Operation and Maintenance of Battery Charging Systems (BCS) - Revision history

Lisafeldmann at 11:39, 11 June 2015

2015-06-11T11:39:13Z

Wiki Gardener at 11:01, 11 February 2015

2015-02-11T11:01:48Z

Ranisha at 13:22, 17 July 2014

2014-07-17T13:22:41Z

Wiki Gardener at 13:05, 9 August 2012

2012-08-09T13:05:24Z

Wiki Gardener: moved Operation and maintenance of Battery Charging Systems (BCS) to Operation and Maintenance of Battery Charging Systems (BCS)

2012-08-09T12:57:26Z

moved Operation and maintenance of Battery Charging Systems (BCS) to Operation and Maintenance of Battery Charging Systems (BCS)

Jewgeni Bader: moved Operation and maintenance of BCS to Operation and maintenance of Battery Charging Systems (BCS)

2011-08-26T13:27:39Z

moved Operation and maintenance of BCS to Operation and maintenance of Battery Charging Systems (BCS)

Rupert Wronski at 14:18, 29 September 2010

2010-09-29T14:18:45Z

Rupert Wronski at 14:39, 28 September 2010

2010-09-28T14:39:37Z

Rupert Wronski at 20:32, 27 September 2010

2010-09-27T20:32:37Z

Rupert Wronski at 11:17, 27 September 2010

2010-09-27T11:17:29Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 = Overview<br/> =
 Not considering generation issues here, one of the most crucial points concerning the operation of professional '''[[Battery Charging Systems (BCS)|Battery Charging Systems (BCS)]]''' is the need for trained personnel. Another important point is how transport of the batteries from the BCS to the consumer is organized (in the case of central BCS in neighbouring villages, for example). This can either be the responsibility of the resident or a service provided by the station. This question is of particular relevance mainly because of possible human injuries related to spilling of acids during transport. Also the weight of the batteries should be considered (because of a given energy-density, batteries of a useful stored capacity often weigh around 20 kgs).
-Besides that, it is an interesting question whether batteries should be privately owned or lent/leased by a firm.
+Not considering generation issues here, one of the most crucial points concerning the operation of professional '''[[Battery Charging Systems (BCS)|Battery Charging Systems (BCS)]]''' is the need for trained personnel. Another important point is how transport of the batteries from the BCS to the consumer is organized (in the case of central BCS in neighbouring villages, for example). This can either be the responsibility of the resident or a service provided by the station. This question is of particular relevance mainly because of possible human injuries related to spilling of acids during transport. Also the weight of the batteries should be considered (because of a given energy-density, batteries of a useful stored capacity often weigh around 20 kgs). Besides that, it is an interesting question whether batteries should be privately owned or lent/leased by a firm.<br/>
 <br/>
 = Lease System<br/> =
 There are several advantages of operating a BCS as a lease system.
-<u>These advantages include possible:</u>
+There are several advantages of operating a BCS as a lease system. <u>These advantages include possible:</u>
 *standardization of batteries (allowing for better handling and therefore cost savings)
 *cost leverage from bulk purchase (allowing for cheaper recharge rates)
 *maintenance services according to a set schedule
 <br/>
 = Ownership Model<br/> =
 The greatest technical risk of BCS, namely over discharge of batteries, is most probably effectively solved by an ownership model. In this case the individual would be responsible for his/her own battery maintenance and, therefore, less likely to over discharge the battery. Therefore, the sound introduction of standardized batteries in the market through a lease model seems to be a feasible option. This way, costumers with very low incomes would be enabled to benefit from the system while developing a certain sense of care for their system.
-<br/>
+The greatest technical risk of BCS, namely over discharge of batteries, is most probably effectively solved by an ownership model. In this case the individual would be responsible for his/her own battery maintenance and, therefore, less likely to over discharge the battery. Therefore, the sound introduction of standardized batteries in the market through a lease model seems to be a feasible option. This way, costumers with very low incomes would be enabled to benefit from the system while developing a certain sense of care for their system.<br/>
 = Further Information<br/> =
-*For a general discription of operation and maintenance issues please go [[Micro_Hydro_-_Operation_and_Maintenance|here]].
+*For a general discription of operation and maintenance issues please go [[Micro Hydro - Operation and Maintenance|here]].
 <br/>
 = References<br/> =
 <references />
 [[Category:Battery_Charging_Systems]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 = Overview<br/> =
+Not considering generation issues here, one of the most crucial points concerning the operation of professional '''[[Battery Charging Systems (BCS)|Battery Charging Systems (BCS)]]''' is the need for trained personnel. Another important point is how transport of the batteries from the BCS to the consumer is organized (in the case of central BCS in neighbouring villages, for example). This can either be the responsibility of the resident or a service provided by the station. This question is of particular relevance mainly because of possible human injuries related to spilling of acids during transport. Also the weight of the batteries should be considered (because of a given energy-density, batteries of a useful stored capacity often weigh around 20 kgs).
 Besides that, it is an interesting question whether batteries should be privately owned or lent/leased by a firm.
 <br/>
 = Lease System<br/> =
 There are several advantages of operating a BCS as a lease system.
-There are several advantages of operating a BCS as a lease system. <u>These include possible:</u>
+<u>These advantages include possible:</u>
 *standardization of batteries (allowing for better handling and therefore cost savings)
 *cost leverage from bulk purchase (allowing for cheaper recharge rates)
 *maintenance services according to a set schedule
 <br/>
 = Ownership Model<br/> =
 The greatest technical risk of BCS, namely over discharge of batteries, is most probably effectively solved by an ownership model. In this case the individual would be responsible for his/her own battery maintenance and, therefore, less likely to over discharge the battery. Therefore, the sound introduction of standardized batteries in the market through a lease model seems to be a feasible option. This way, costumers with very low incomes would be enabled to benefit from the system while developing a certain sense of care for their system.
 <br/>
 = Further Information<br/> =
-*For a general discription of operation and maintenance issues please go [[Operation_and_Maintenance|here]].
+*For a general discription of operation and maintenance issues please go [[Micro_Hydro_-_Operation_and_Maintenance|here]].
 <br/>
 = References<br/> =
 <references />
 [[Category:Battery_Charging_Systems]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 = Overview<br/> =
-Not considering generation issues here, one of the most crucial points concerning the operation of professional '''Battery Charging Systems (BCS)''' is the need for trained personnel. Another important point is how transport of the batteries from the BCS to the consumer is organized (in the case of central BCS in neighbouring villages, for example). This can either be the responsibility of the resident or a service provided by the station. This question is of particular relevance mainly because of possible human injuries related to spilling of acids during transport. Also the weight of the batteries should be considered (because of a given energy-density, batteries of a useful stored capacity often weigh around 20 kgs).
+Not considering generation issues here, one of the most crucial points concerning the operation of professional '''[[Battery_Charging_Systems_(BCS)|Battery Charging Systems (BCS)]]''' is the need for trained personnel. Another important point is how transport of the batteries from the BCS to the consumer is organized (in the case of central BCS in neighbouring villages, for example). This can either be the responsibility of the resident or a service provided by the station. This question is of particular relevance mainly because of possible human injuries related to spilling of acids during transport. Also the weight of the batteries should be considered (because of a given energy-density, batteries of a useful stored capacity often weigh around 20 kgs).
 Besides that, it is an interesting question whether batteries should be privately owned or lent/leased by a firm.
+<br/>
 = Lease System<br/> =
 There are several advantages of operating a BCS as a lease system. <u>These include possible:</u>
 *standardization of batteries (allowing for better handling and therefore cost savings)
 *cost leverage from bulk purchase (allowing for cheaper recharge rates)
 *maintenance services according to a set schedule
+<br/>
 = Ownership Model<br/> =
@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 The greatest technical risk of BCS, namely over discharge of batteries, is most probably effectively solved by an ownership model. In this case the individual would be responsible for his/her own battery maintenance and, therefore, less likely to over discharge the battery. Therefore, the sound introduction of standardized batteries in the market through a lease model seems to be a feasible option. This way, costumers with very low incomes would be enabled to benefit from the system while developing a certain sense of care for their system.
+<br/>
 = Further Information<br/> =
-*For a general discription of operation and maintenance issues please go [http://energypedia.info/index.php/Operation_and_maintenance here].
+*For a general discription of operation and maintenance issues please go [[Operation_and_Maintenance|here]].
 = References<br/> =

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Not considering generation issues here, one of the most crucial points concerning the operation of professional BCS is the need for trained personnel. Another important point is how transport of the batteries from the BCS to the consumer is organized (in the case of central BCS in neighbouring villages, for example). This can either be the responsibility of the resident or a service provided by the station. This question is of particular relevance mainly because of possible human injuries related to spilling of acids during transport. Also the weight of the batteries should be considered (because of a given energy-density, batteries of a useful stored capacity often weigh around 20 kgs). Besides that, it is an interesting question whether batteries should be privately owned or lent/leased by a firm.
+= Overview<br/> =
-There are several advantages of operating a BCS as a lease system. These include possible standardization of batteries (allowing for better handling and therefore cost savings), cost leverage from bulk purchase (allowing for cheaper recharge rates) and maintenance services according to a set schedule.
+Not considering generation issues here, one of the most crucial points concerning the operation of professional '''Battery Charging Systems (BCS)''' is the need for trained personnel. Another important point is how transport of the batteries from the BCS to the consumer is organized (in the case of central BCS in neighbouring villages, for example). This can either be the responsibility of the resident or a service provided by the station. This question is of particular relevance mainly because of possible human injuries related to spilling of acids during transport. Also the weight of the batteries should be considered (because of a given energy-density, batteries of a useful stored capacity often weigh around 20 kgs).
-The greatest technical risk of BCS, namely over discharge of batteries, is most probably effectively solved by an ownership model. In this case the individual would be responsible for his/her own battery maintenance and, therefore, less likely to over discharge the battery. Therefore, the sound introduction of standardized batteries in the market through a lease model seems to be a feasible option. This way, costumers with very low incomes would be enabled to benefit from the system while developing a certain sense of care for their system.
+Besides that, it is an interesting question whether batteries should be privately owned or lent/leased by a firm.
 For a general discription of operation and maintenance issues please go [http://energypedia.info/index.php/Operation_and_maintenance here].
 [[Category:Battery_Charging_Systems]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Professional battery chargers require trained personnel.
+Not considering generation issues here, one of the most crucial points concerning the operation of professional BCS is the need for trained personnel. Another important point is how transport of the batteries from the BCS to the consumer is organized (in the case of central BCS in neighbouring villages, for example). This can either be the responsibility of the resident or a service provided by the station. This question is of particular relevance mainly because of possible human injuries related to spilling of acids during transport. Also the weight of the batteries should be considered (because of a given energy-density, batteries of a useful stored capacity often weigh around 20 kgs). Besides that, it is an interesting question whether batteries should be privately owned or lent/leased by a firm.
 There are several advantages of operating a BCS as a lease system. These include possible standardization of batteries (allowing for better handling and therefore cost savings), cost leverage from bulk purchase (allowing for cheaper recharge rates) and maintenance services according to a set schedule.
-The greatest technical risk of a BCS, namely over discharge of batteries, is most probably effectively solved by an ownership model. In this case the individual would be responsible for his/her own battery maintenance and, therefore, less likely to over discharge the battery. Therefore, the sound introduction of standardized batteries in the market through a lease model seems to be a feasible option. This way, costumers with very low incomes would be enabled to benefit from the system while developing a certain sense of care for their system due to ownership.
+The greatest technical risk of BCS, namely over discharge of batteries, is most probably effectively solved by an ownership model. In this case the individual would be responsible for his/her own battery maintenance and, therefore, less likely to over discharge the battery. Therefore, the sound introduction of standardized batteries in the market through a lease model seems to be a feasible option. This way, costumers with very low incomes would be enabled to benefit from the system while developing a certain sense of care for their system.
 For a general discription of operation and maintenance issues please go [http://energypedia.info/index.php/Operation_and_maintenance here].
 [[Category:Battery_Charging_Systems]]

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:27, 26 August 2011
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 28 September 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	Professional battery chargers require trained personnel.
		+
	Not considering generation issues here, one of the most crucial points concerning the operation of BCS is the transport of the batteries from the BCS to the consumer. This can either be the responsibility of the resident or a service provided by the station. This question is of particular relevance mainly because of possible human injuries related to spilling of acids during transport. Also the weight of the batteries should be considered. Besides that, it is an interesting question whether batteries should be privately owned or lent/leased by a firm.		Not considering generation issues here, one of the most crucial points concerning the operation of BCS is the transport of the batteries from the BCS to the consumer. This can either be the responsibility of the resident or a service provided by the station. This question is of particular relevance mainly because of possible human injuries related to spilling of acids during transport. Also the weight of the batteries should be considered. Besides that, it is an interesting question whether batteries should be privately owned or lent/leased by a firm.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:32, 27 September 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Not considering generation issues here, one of the most crucial points concerning the operation of BCS is the transport of the batteries from the BCS to the consumer. This can either be the responsibility of the resident or a service provided by the station. Besides that, it is an interesting question whether batteries should be privately owned or lent/leased by a firm.	+	Not considering generation issues here, one of the most crucial points concerning the operation of BCS is the transport of the batteries from the BCS to the consumer. This can either be the responsibility of the resident or a service provided by the station. This question is of particular relevance mainly because of possible human injuries related to spilling of acids during transport. Also the weight of the batteries should be considered. Besides that, it is an interesting question whether batteries should be privately owned or lent/leased by a firm.

	There are several advantages of operating a BCS as a lease system. These include possible standardization of batteries (allowing for better handling and therefore cost savings), cost leverage from bulk purchase (allowing for cheaper recharge rates) and maintenance services according to a set schedule.		There are several advantages of operating a BCS as a lease system. These include possible standardization of batteries (allowing for better handling and therefore cost savings), cost leverage from bulk purchase (allowing for cheaper recharge rates) and maintenance services according to a set schedule.