Stove Colloquium Nairobi 07.06.2011 - Revision history

Wiki Gardener at 15:54, 7 October 2014

2014-10-07T15:54:27Z

Wiki Gardener at 15:51, 7 October 2014

2014-10-07T15:51:14Z

Wiki Gardener at 15:49, 7 October 2014

2014-10-07T15:49:37Z

Wiki Gardener at 08:57, 4 June 2014

2014-06-04T08:57:44Z

Show changes

Kasivwie at 11:55, 22 September 2011

2011-09-22T11:55:41Z

Kasivwie at 11:54, 22 September 2011

2011-09-22T11:54:12Z

Kasivwie at 11:53, 22 September 2011

2011-09-22T11:53:39Z

Tai Becker at 12:45, 20 September 2011

2011-09-20T12:45:26Z

Show changes

Tai Becker at 12:38, 20 September 2011

2011-09-20T12:38:25Z

Tai Becker at 12:37, 20 September 2011

2011-09-20T12:37:58Z

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 <br/>
-==== Developments in the global improved stove arena ====
+= Developments in the Global Improved Stove Arena =
-Presentations were made on the Global Alliance on Clean Cookstoves (GACC) and Africa Alliance on Clean Cookstoves (AACC). This highlighted the justification of formation of the alliance and progress to date elaborating opportunities for partnership.
+Presentations were made on the [http://www.cleancookstoves.org/ Global Alliance on Clean Cookstoves (GACC)] and Africa Alliance on Clean Cookstoves (AACC). This highlighted the justification of formation of the alliance and progress to date elaborating opportunities for partnership.
 Participants stated that it is still not clear on membership and benefits that come with the membership. It appears that only big players can benefit since small agencies cannot afford large financial contributions to get substantial recognition. Will the GACC be flexible to publish information on their website and will this be accessible to non members? There needs to be more information about GACC/AACC and how members can benefit.
-== <br/>Stove Testing and Research<br/> ==
+= <br/>Stove Testing and Research<br/> =
 Presentations were made by three research and testing institutions namely the Kenya Industrial Research Development Institute, Centre for Research in Energy and Energy Conservation Uganda and University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. The presenters elaborated on various aspects of their work such as general information on the institutions, stove prototype development, stove testing methods, partners involved and challenges faced in research and testing. Participants were divided into three groups to brainstorm on important (priority) testing needs. During focused group discussions, the following were the requests made by various<br/>sector players:
-=== Carbon finance sector testing requirements<br/> ===
 The carbon finance sector players emphasized that they need
@@ Line 61: / Line 63: @@
 *Information on consumers and buyer interest
-=== <br/>Stove project implementers (NGOs, CBOs and semi industrial stove production) testing requirements<br/> ===
+= <br/>Stove Project Implementers (NGOs, CBOs and semi industrial stove production) Testing Requirements<br/> =
 Individuals involved in implementing improved stove projects by disseminating semi industrial stove production cited their needs as:
@@ Line 73: / Line 75: @@
 *Determining added value of inclusion of stove skirt
-=== <br/>Industrial/pre-fab stove producers testing requirements<br/> ===
+= <br/>Industrial/pre-fab Stove Producers Testing Requirements<br/> =
 Individuals involved in implementing improved stove projects by training trainers and semi industrial stove production cited their needs as:
@@ Line 195: / Line 197: @@
 <references />
 [[Category:Kenya]]

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 = Overview =
 The East Africa Stove colloquium was held on 7th June 2011 in Nairobi Kenya. It was a meeting organized under the auspices of the [http://www.giz.de/en/ GIZ (formerly German Technical Cooperation- GTZ)] sector network for energy in sub Saharan Africa with support from the GIZ headquarters sector initiative for Poverty Oriented Basic Energy (HERA).
 <u>The main aim of this event was to provide a forum for practitioners in improved stove projects in the East Africa region to exchange information on various aspects of the current status of stove project implementation such as:</u>
@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 A variety of methods were used to facilitate interactions between participants. For instance rather than have typical plenary question and answer sessions, time was provided for participants to walk up to presenters in corner discussions where they could get their questions answered at length. This was used during the carbon finance and stove activities in the region sessions. In the case of improved stove testing, research and commercialization, focused group discussions were held and the feedback from the groups is elaborated in these proceedings. The brief comments on the GACC/AACC session are also provided here.
+<br/>
 = Pictures =
@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 Participants stated that it is still not clear on membership and benefits that come with the membership. It appears that only big players can benefit since small agencies cannot afford large financial contributions to get substantial recognition. Will the GACC be flexible to publish information on their website and will this be accessible to non members? There needs to be more information about GACC/AACC and how members can benefit.
-= <br/>Stove Testing and Research<br/> =
+== <br/>Stove Testing and Research<br/> ==
 Presentations were made by three research and testing institutions namely the Kenya Industrial Research Development Institute, Centre for Research in Energy and Energy Conservation Uganda and University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. The presenters elaborated on various aspects of their work such as general information on the institutions, stove prototype development, stove testing methods, partners involved and challenges faced in research and testing. Participants were divided into three groups to brainstorm on important (priority) testing needs. During focused group discussions, the following were the requests made by various<br/>sector players:
@@ Line 156: / Line 156: @@
 *Promote a comprehensive approach to the biomass energy to take into account the fuel/forest management and the introduction of improved stoves. Fuel supply chain issues also need to be addressed
-=== <br/>Stoves and carbon Finance<br/> ===
+= <br/>Stoves and Carbon Finance<br/> =
-<br/>The Paradigm project, Co2 balance and Uganda carbon bureau presented their experience in implementing improved stove carbon finance projects in East Africa. Highlights of the presentations included explanation of the type of carbon finance project, elaboration of the projects stage, partners involved, technologies are included, method of establishing the baseline, dissemination approach, monitoring, use of the revenue by the projects and opportunities for partnership. Thereafter participants were allowed to meet the presenters individually for clarifications.
+The Paradigm project, Co2 balance and Uganda carbon bureau presented their experience in implementing improved stove carbon finance projects in East Africa. Highlights of the presentations included explanation of the type of carbon finance project, elaboration of the projects stage, partners involved, technologies are included, method of establishing the baseline, dissemination approach, monitoring, use of the revenue by the projects and opportunities for partnership. Thereafter participants were allowed to meet the presenters individually for clarifications.
 = <br/>Feedback from the Participants<br/> =
@@ Line 183: / Line 183: @@
 The closing remarks were made by Ms Anna Ingwe-Musungu of GIZ PSDA. There is a lot of technologies and different tools we have something to show for our about 30 years of work. We can say we are moving forward. This sector has now even attracted private sector interest to invest. We now need to work to bring stove closer to consumer need good approach. Let us now invest in a good strategy to make a difference so that we can meet in 60 years with even more celebration of what we have moved forward in stoves sector. We appreciate the Ministry of Agriculture, all presenters and organizers and participants for patience in attending the whole<br/>day. Let us keep fire burning to address the problem of clean energy for cooking.
+<br/>
 = Further Information =
-*[[GIZ_HERA_Cooking_Energy_Compendium|GIZ HERA Cooking Energy Compendium]]
+*[[GIZ HERA Cooking Energy Compendium|GIZ HERA Cooking Energy Compendium]]
 = References =
@@ Line 195: / Line 195: @@
 <references />
 [[Category:Conference_Documentation]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-[[File:Stove colloquium.JPG|center|750px|alt=Stove colloquium.JPG]]
+= Overview =
-== Introduction<br/> ==
+The East Africa Stove colloquium was held on 7th June 2011 in Nairobi Kenya. It was a meeting organized under the auspices of the [http://www.giz.de/en/ GIZ (formerly German Technical Cooperation- GTZ)] sector network for energy in sub Saharan Africa with support from the GIZ headquarters sector initiative for Poverty Oriented Basic Energy (HERA).
-The East Africa Stove colloquium was held on 7th June 2011 in Nairobi Kenya. It was a meeting organized under the auspices of the GIZ (formerly German Technical Cooperation- GTZ) sector network for energy in sub Saharan Africa with support from the GIZ headquarters sector initiative for Poverty Oriented Basic Energy (HERA). The main aim of this event was to provide a forum for practitioners in improved stove projects in the East Africa region to exchange information on various aspects of the current status of stove project implementation such as:
+<u>The main aim of this event was to provide a forum for practitioners in improved stove projects in the East Africa region to exchange information on various aspects of the current status of stove project implementation such as:</u>
 *Stove activities in the region
 *Developments in the global improved cook stove arena
@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 A variety of methods were used to facilitate interactions between participants. For instance rather than have typical plenary question and answer sessions, time was provided for participants to walk up to presenters in corner discussions where they could get their questions answered at length. This was used during the carbon finance and stove activities in the region sessions. In the case of improved stove testing, research and commercialization, focused group discussions were held and the feedback from the groups is elaborated in these proceedings. The brief comments on the GACC/AACC session are also provided here.
-== Stove activities in the region<br/> ==
 This session gave select participants an opportunity to present their work on improved cook stoves in East Africa. Presentations were made by Millennium Villages, Practical Action, Solar Cookers International, GIZ stove programmes with support of Energising Development funds in East Africa, Envirofit, Tea Vac Machinery Limited, SNV, GIZ Programme supporting refugees in partnership with the United Nations High Commision for Refugees and Tanzania Traditional Energy Development and Environment Organisation.
-The emphasis of these presentations was:
+<u>The emphasis of these presentations was:</u>
 *Brief information on the organization
 *Activities being implemented – stove dissemination, stove research, training among others
@@ Line 31: / Line 37: @@
 Participants were then given an opportunity to have individual discussions with the presenters for clarifications.
+<br/>
 ==== Developments in the global improved stove arena ====
@@ Line 39: / Line 45: @@
 Participants stated that it is still not clear on membership and benefits that come with the membership. It appears that only big players can benefit since small agencies cannot afford large financial contributions to get substantial recognition. Will the GACC be flexible to publish information on their website and will this be accessible to non members? There needs to be more information about GACC/AACC and how members can benefit.
-== <br/>Stove testing and research<br/> ==
+= <br/>Stove Testing and Research<br/> =
 Presentations were made by three research and testing institutions namely the Kenya Industrial Research Development Institute, Centre for Research in Energy and Energy Conservation Uganda and University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. The presenters elaborated on various aspects of their work such as general information on the institutions, stove prototype development, stove testing methods, partners involved and challenges faced in research and testing. Participants were divided into three groups to brainstorm on important (priority) testing needs. During focused group discussions, the following were the requests made by various<br/>sector players:
@@ Line 77: / Line 83: @@
 *A general concern was raised that the type of wood should also be taken into consideration in testing. For instance soft wood burns differently from hard wood.
-== <br/>Stove commercialization<br/> ==
+= <br/>Stove Commercialization<br/> =
-<br/>This session provided an opportunity for projects to showcase their methods for stove commercialization as well as their challenges and successes. Presentations were made by the GIZ Burkina Faso stove programme, the stove associations in Kenya and Uganda (ISAK and BEETA) and the Paradigm project.
+This session provided an opportunity for projects to showcase their methods for stove commercialization as well as their challenges and successes. Presentations were made by the GIZ Burkina Faso stove programme, the stove associations in Kenya and Uganda (ISAK and BEETA) and the Paradigm project.
 <br/>Participants were then provided with an opportunity to debate the approaches of the various organizations at their respective tables. Below is a summary of their comments and some recommendations.
@@ Line 154: / Line 160: @@
 <br/>The Paradigm project, Co2 balance and Uganda carbon bureau presented their experience in implementing improved stove carbon finance projects in East Africa. Highlights of the presentations included explanation of the type of carbon finance project, elaboration of the projects stage, partners involved, technologies are included, method of establishing the baseline, dissemination approach, monitoring, use of the revenue by the projects and opportunities for partnership. Thereafter participants were allowed to meet the presenters individually for clarifications.
-== <br/>Feedback from the participants<br/> ==
+= <br/>Feedback from the Participants<br/> =
 The participants abounded in positive comments about the event. Some of their comments include:
@@ Line 173: / Line 179: @@
 *The general consensus was that this is a meeting that provided a very important forum for improved stove sector stakeholders to meet and get opportunities for collaboration. It should be held regularly perhaps once every year.
-== <br/>Closing remarks<br/> ==
+= <br/>Closing Remarks<br/> =
 [[Category:Kenya]]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 Over 70 participants attended the event with representatives of private sector, research institutes, government and NGOs from Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania Ethiopia, Burundi, Congo, Senegal, Burkina Faso, Germany, the UK and USA among others.
-Opening remarks were made by Ms Felicia Ndungu, Ministry of Agriculture Kenya who emphasized the importance of improved stoves in Kenya’s national development and clear alignment with national goals such as vision 2030. After this, presentations were made by participants on the 5 themes. Detailed presentations are available [http://energypedia.info/index.php/Stove_Colloquium_Nairobi_07.06.2011 here][https://energypedia.info/index.php/Special:Contributions/Maxwell_Musoka .] A copy of the programme is provided as an annex to these proceedings.
+Opening remarks were made by Ms Felicia Ndungu, Ministry of Agriculture Kenya who emphasized the importance of improved stoves in Kenya’s national development and clear alignment with national goals such as vision 2030. After this, presentations were made by participants on the 5 themes. Detailed presentations are available [https://energypedia.info/index.php/Special:Contributions/Maxwell_Musoka here][https://energypedia.info/index.php/Special:Contributions/Maxwell_Musoka .] A copy of the programme is provided as an annex to these proceedings.
 A variety of methods were used to facilitate interactions between participants. For instance rather than have typical plenary question and answer sessions, time was provided for participants to walk up to presenters in corner discussions where they could get their questions answered at length. This was used during the carbon finance and stove activities in the region sessions. In the case of improved stove testing, research and commercialization, focused group discussions were held and the feedback from the groups is elaborated in these proceedings. The brief comments on the GACC/AACC session are also provided here.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Image:Stove_colloquium.JPG|center|750px]]
-== Introduction<br> ==
+== Introduction<br/> ==
 The East Africa Stove colloquium was held on 7th June 2011 in Nairobi Kenya. It was a meeting organized under the auspices of the GIZ (formerly German Technical Cooperation- GTZ) sector network for energy in sub Saharan Africa with support from the GIZ headquarters sector initiative for Poverty Oriented Basic Energy (HERA). The main aim of this event was to provide a forum for practitioners in improved stove projects in the East Africa region to exchange information on various aspects of the current status of stove project implementation such as:
 *Stove activities in the region
 *Developments in the global improved cook stove arena
 *Stove testing and Research
 *Stove commercialization
 *Stoves and Carbon Finance
 Over 70 participants attended the event with representatives of private sector, research institutes, government and NGOs from Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania Ethiopia, Burundi, Congo, Senegal, Burkina Faso, Germany, the UK and USA among others.
-Opening remarks were made by Ms Felicia Ndungu, Ministry of Agriculture Kenya who emphasized the importance of improved stoves in Kenya’s national development and clear alignment with national goals such as vision 2030. After this, presentations were made by participants on the 5 themes. Detailed presentations are available [http://energypedia.info/index.php/Stove_Colloquium_Nairobi_07.06.2011 here]. A copy of the programme is provided as an annex to these proceedings.
+Opening remarks were made by Ms Felicia Ndungu, Ministry of Agriculture Kenya who emphasized the importance of improved stoves in Kenya’s national development and clear alignment with national goals such as vision 2030. After this, presentations were made by participants on the 5 themes. Detailed presentations are available [http://energypedia.info/index.php/Stove_Colloquium_Nairobi_07.06.2011 here][https://energypedia.info/index.php/Special:Contributions/Maxwell_Musoka .] A copy of the programme is provided as an annex to these proceedings.
 A variety of methods were used to facilitate interactions between participants. For instance rather than have typical plenary question and answer sessions, time was provided for participants to walk up to presenters in corner discussions where they could get their questions answered at length. This was used during the carbon finance and stove activities in the region sessions. In the case of improved stove testing, research and commercialization, focused group discussions were held and the feedback from the groups is elaborated in these proceedings. The brief comments on the GACC/AACC session are also provided here.
 == Stove activities in the region<br/> ==

@@ Line 195: / Line 195: @@
 *The general consensus was that this is a meeting that provided a very important forum for improved stove sector stakeholders to meet and get opportunities for collaboration. It should be held regularly perhaps once every year.
-== <br/>Closing remarks<br/> ==
+== <br>Closing remarks<br> ==
-<br/>The closing remarks were made by Ms Anna Ingwe-Musungu of GIZ PSDA. There is a lot of<br/>technologies and different tools we have something to show for our about 30 years of work. We<br/>can say we are moving forward. This sector has now even attracted private sector interest to<br/>invest. We now need to work to bring stove closer to consumer need good approach. Let us<br/>now invest in a good strategy to make a difference so that we can meet in 60 years with even<br/>more celebration of what we have moved forward in stoves sector. We appreciate the Ministry<br/>of Agriculture, all presenters and organizers and participants for patience in attending the whole<br/>day. Let us keep fire burning to address the problem of clean energy for cooking.
+<br>The closing remarks were made by Ms Anna Ingwe-Musungu of GIZ PSDA. There is a lot of technologies and different tools we have something to show for our about 30 years of work. We can say we are moving forward. This sector has now even attracted private sector interest to invest. We now need to work to bring stove closer to consumer need good approach. Let us now invest in a good strategy to make a difference so that we can meet in 60 years with even more celebration of what we have moved forward in stoves sector. We appreciate the Ministry of Agriculture, all presenters and organizers and participants for patience in attending the whole<br>day. Let us keep fire burning to address the problem of clean energy for cooking.
 [[Category:GIZ_HERA]]

@@ Line 175: / Line 175: @@
 <br>The Paradigm project, Co2 balance and Uganda carbon bureau presented their experience in implementing improved stove carbon finance projects in East Africa. Highlights of the presentations included explanation of the type of carbon finance project, elaboration of the projects stage, partners involved, technologies are included, method of establishing the baseline, dissemination approach, monitoring, use of the revenue by the projects and opportunities for partnership. Thereafter participants were allowed to meet the presenters individually for clarifications.
-== <br/>Feedback from the participants<br/> ==
+== <br>Feedback from the participants<br> ==
-<br/>The participants abounded in positive comments about the event. Some of their comments<br/>include:<br/>Best workshop attended – good time management<br/>Quality presentations were made and they were inspiring<br/>It was good to see improved stoves as a business<br/>Good opportunity to interact and get feedback from presenters<br/>Very interactive we got a chance to showcase our work especially in research and testing<br/>Market of opportunities should be used for further follow up of co-operation<br/>Time was very limited to discuss the topics. We need more time for such a meeting perhaps an<br/>extra day?<br/>We need more of such meetings<br/>A wealth of expertise all in one place was awesome. We learnt a lot and networked alot<br/>We got insights on current developments and food for thought some new technology was<br/>presented – this needs testing<br/>This should be done more regularly perhaps once every 1-2 years<br/>It was good to meet other actors in our sector to complement our work. We shared experience<br/>with people who can provide solutions to problems we encounter<br/>It was great to have CDs of everything at the end for future reference<br/>Very good organization – special thanks to organization committee it was not boring!<br/>The general consensus was that this is a meeting that provided a very important forum for<br/>improved stove sector stakeholders to meet and get opportunities for collaboration. It should be<br/>held regularly perhaps once every year.
+The participants abounded in positive comments about the event. Some of their comments include:
 == <br/>Closing remarks<br/> ==