Difference between revisions of "Assessing the Economic Viability of Business Ideas for Productive Use"

From energypedia
***** (***** | *****)
m
***** (***** | *****)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''<span lang="EN-GB">Good practice from the INSABA programme in Sub-Saharan Africa</span>'' <span data-cke-bookmark="1" style="display: none">&nbsp;</span>
 
Introduction<br/> =
 
  
The'''Integrated Southern Africa Business Advisory (INSABA)''' project was implemented in pilot regions in Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and Zambia over the period from 2005 to 2008 with funding from the German Federa'''l Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) '''and the European Commission. The programme developed and delivered adapted tools for identifying marketable goods and services that can be produced and performed using various locally available renewable energy sources (mainly'''photovoltaic (PV) '''solar power systems and small wind generators). The 30-month project included training, business advisory services and policy dialogue intervention.
+
= Overview<br/> =
 
 
 
 
 
 
= Economic Viability<br/> =
 
 
 
For advance assessment of the economic viability of any business idea, experience from INSABA has shown that seasoned business consultants may be capable of qualitatively evaluating the viability of specific business ideas based on their in-depth understanding of local economic structures. Proper appraisal of a business idea’s viability requires extensive data collection and in-depth technological study to assess the idea’s feasibility under given socioeconomic conditions. If similar business ideas have already been implemented elsewhere in the region or country, those real cases can and should be analysed and possibly transferred and adapted to the location under study.
 
  
 +
For advance assessment of the economic viability of any business idea, experience from [http://www.technosol.de/Consult/Consult.htm Integrated South Africa Business Advisory (INSABA)] has shown that seasoned business consultants may be capable of qualitatively evaluating the viability of specific business ideas based on their in-depth understanding of local economic structures. Proper appraisal of a business idea’s viability requires extensive data collection and in-depth technological study to assess the idea’s feasibility under given socioeconomic conditions. If similar business ideas have already been implemented elsewhere in the region or country, those real cases can and should be analysed and possibly transferred and adapted to the location under study.
  
 +
<br/>
  
 
== Feasibility<br/> ==
 
== Feasibility<br/> ==
  
INSABA developed a sophisticated set of tools for assessing the feasibility of small businesses powered by electricity generated from renewable sources (see example below). These tools guide future entrepreneurs through a simple equation calculating the '''return on investment (ROI)''', a sensitivity analysis measuring changes in key business parameters as a function of changes in ROI, a competitiveness analysis, and a cash flow analysis.  
+
INSABA developed a sophisticated [[:File:Insaba_tools_(excel_sheets).xls|set of tools]] for assessing the feasibility of small businesses powered by electricity generated from renewable sources (see example below). These tools guide future entrepreneurs through a simple equation calculating the '''return on investment (ROI)''', a sensitivity analysis measuring changes in key business parameters as a function of changes in ROI, a competitiveness analysis, and a cash flow analysis.
  
 
<u>The following data are required for these calculations:</u>
 
<u>The following data are required for these calculations:</u>
 
 
*investment capital and lifespan
 
*investment capital and lifespan
 
*production price per unit
 
*production price per unit
Line 27: Line 20:
 
*fixed cost per unit
 
*fixed cost per unit
  
 +
<br/>
  
 +
Since most micro and small businesses in rural environments might not be able to calculate or even estimate all these data, the INSABA approach provided the facilitating services of an '''interdisciplinary advisory team (IAT)'''. These experienced business advisors were trained in the methodology in a five-day INSABA toolkit seminar. They, in turn, trained local potential producers and suppliers of goods and services in how to obtain the necessary data and use the various tools. The methodology tends to be rather costly when considering small investment opportunities valued at less than USD 5,000.
  
Since most micro and small businesses in rural environments might not be able to calculate or even estimate all these data, the INSABA approach provided the facilitating services of an'''interdisciplinary advisory team (IAT)'''. These experienced business advisors were trained in the methodology in a five-day INSABA toolkit seminar. They, in turn, trained local potential producers and suppliers of goods and services in how to obtain the necessary data and use the various tools. The methodology tends to be rather costly when considering small investment opportunities valued at less than USD 5,000.
+
The table below presents an INSABA business pre-assessment tool for calculating the ROI for a particular economic activity undertaken by a micro, '''small or medium-size enterprise (MSME)'''. The example chosen here is a fruit drying business that utilises a solar dryer. The same computational tool can be applied for calculating ROI in electrical equipment.
 
 
The table below presents an INSABA business pre-assessment tool for calculating the ROI for a particular economic activity undertaken by a micro, '''small or medium-size enterprise (MSME)'''. The example chosen here is a fruit drying business that utilises a solar dryer. The same computational tool can be applied for calculating ROI in electrical equipment.&nbsp;
 
 
 
  
 +
<br/>
  
 
== Calculation of Return on Investment (ROI)<br/> ==
 
== Calculation of Return on Investment (ROI)<br/> ==
  
{| style="width:100.0%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"
+
{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="1" style="width: 100%; width:100.0%"
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="5" style="width:100.0%; height:17px" nowrap="nowrap" |  
+
| style="white-space: nowrap; width: 100%; height: 17px; background-color: rgb(204, 204, 204)" colspan="5" |  
'''Calculation of ROI for a solar dryer&nbsp;used for drying fruit'''
+
'''Calculation of ROI for a solar dryer used for drying fruit'''
  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| style="width:21.22%; height:14px" |  
 
| style="width:21.22%; height:14px" |  
&nbsp;
+
<br/>
  
| colspan="2" style="width:15.72%; height:14px" nowrap="nowrap" |  
+
| style="white-space: nowrap; width:15.72%; height:14px" colspan="2" |  
 
'''Apple dryer'''
 
'''Apple dryer'''
  
Line 57: Line 50:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| style="width:21.22%; height:27px" |  
 
| style="width:21.22%; height:27px" |  
'''Investment capital&nbsp;'''
+
'''Investment capital'''
  
| colspan="2" style="width:15.72%; height:27px" nowrap="nowrap" |  
+
| style="white-space: nowrap; width:15.72%; height:27px" colspan="2" |  
 
9,957
 
9,957
  
Line 72: Line 65:
 
'''Investment lifespan'''
 
'''Investment lifespan'''
  
| colspan="2" style="width:15.72%; height:27px" nowrap="nowrap" |  
+
| style="white-space: nowrap; width:15.72%; height:27px" colspan="2" |  
5&nbsp;
+
5
  
 
| style="width:26.28%; height:27px" |  
 
| style="width:26.28%; height:27px" |  
Line 85: Line 78:
 
'''Production'''
 
'''Production'''
  
| colspan="2" style="width:15.72%; height:24px" nowrap="nowrap" |  
+
| style="white-space: nowrap; width:15.72%; height:24px" colspan="2" |  
520&nbsp;
+
520
  
 
| style="width:26.28%; height:24px" |  
 
| style="width:26.28%; height:24px" |  
Line 92: Line 85:
  
 
| style="width:36.78%; height:24px" |  
 
| style="width:36.78%; height:24px" |  
Units produced per year&nbsp;
+
Units produced per year
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 98: Line 91:
 
'''Price/unit'''
 
'''Price/unit'''
  
| colspan="2" style="width:15.72%; height:17px" nowrap="nowrap" |  
+
| style="white-space: nowrap; width:15.72%; height:17px" colspan="2" |  
19.50&nbsp;
+
19.50
  
 
| style="width:26.28%; height:17px" |  
 
| style="width:26.28%; height:17px" |  
Line 111: Line 104:
 
'''Revenue'''
 
'''Revenue'''
  
| colspan="2" style="width:15.72%; height:17px" nowrap="nowrap" |  
+
| style="white-space: nowrap; width:15.72%; height:17px" colspan="2" |  
 
10,140
 
10,140
  
Line 124: Line 117:
 
'''Variable cost/unit'''
 
'''Variable cost/unit'''
  
| colspan="2" style="width:15.72%; height:83px" nowrap="nowrap" |  
+
| style="white-space: nowrap; width:15.72%; height:83px" colspan="2" |  
8.00&nbsp;
+
8.00
  
 
| style="width:26.28%; height:83px" |  
 
| style="width:26.28%; height:83px" |  
Line 137: Line 130:
 
'''Cost of energy/unit'''
 
'''Cost of energy/unit'''
  
| colspan="2" style="width:15.72%; height:27px" nowrap="nowrap" |  
+
| style="white-space: nowrap; width:15.72%; height:27px" colspan="2" |  
&nbsp;
+
<br/>
  
 
| style="width:26.28%; height:27px" |  
 
| style="width:26.28%; height:27px" |  
no other additional cost&lt;/span&gt;
+
no other additional cost
  
 
| style="width:36.78%; height:27px" |  
 
| style="width:36.78%; height:27px" |  
Line 150: Line 143:
 
'''Total fixed costs'''
 
'''Total fixed costs'''
  
| colspan="2" style="width:15.72%; height:24px" nowrap="nowrap" |  
+
| style="white-space: nowrap; width:15.72%; height:24px" colspan="2" |  
 
1,000
 
1,000
  
Line 167: Line 160:
  
 
| style="width:7.86%; height:24px" |  
 
| style="width:7.86%; height:24px" |  
1,991 &nbsp;
+
1,991
  
| rowspan="8" style="width:26.28%; height:24px" |  
+
| style="width:26.28%; height:24px" rowspan="8" |  
&nbsp;
+
<br/>
  
 
| style="width:36.78%; height:24px" |  
 
| style="width:36.78%; height:24px" |  
Line 180: Line 173:
  
 
| style="width:7.86%; height:27px" |  
 
| style="width:7.86%; height:27px" |  
11.83&nbsp;
+
11.83
  
 
| style="width:7.86%; height:27px" |  
 
| style="width:7.86%; height:27px" |  
6,151&nbsp;
+
6,151
  
 
| style="width:36.78%; height:27px" |  
 
| style="width:36.78%; height:27px" |  
Line 196: Line 189:
  
 
| style="width:7.86%; height:27px" |  
 
| style="width:7.86%; height:27px" |  
&nbsp;
+
<br/>
  
 
| style="width:36.78%; height:27px" |  
 
| style="width:36.78%; height:27px" |  
Line 209: Line 202:
  
 
| style="width:7.86%; height:24px" |  
 
| style="width:7.86%; height:24px" |  
&nbsp;
+
<br/>
  
 
| style="width:36.78%; height:24px" |  
 
| style="width:36.78%; height:24px" |  
Line 222: Line 215:
  
 
| style="width:7.86%; height:14px" |  
 
| style="width:7.86%; height:14px" |  
7,151&nbsp;
+
7,151
  
 
| style="width:36.78%; height:14px" |  
 
| style="width:36.78%; height:14px" |  
Line 235: Line 228:
  
 
| style="width:7.86%; height:16px" |  
 
| style="width:7.86%; height:16px" |  
'''2,989&nbsp;'''
+
'''2,989'''
  
 
| style="width:36.78%; height:16px" |  
 
| style="width:36.78%; height:16px" |  
Line 244: Line 237:
 
'''ROI'''
 
'''ROI'''
  
| colspan="2" style="width:15.72%; height:24px" |  
+
| style="width:15.72%; height:24px" colspan="2" |  
 
'''30%'''
 
'''30%'''
  
Line 252: Line 245:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| style="width:21.22%; height:36px" |  
 
| style="width:21.22%; height:36px" |  
'''Payback period'''''&nbsp;'''''in years'''
+
'''Payback period in years'''
  
| colspan="2" style="width:15.72%; height:36px" |  
+
| style="width:15.72%; height:36px" colspan="2" |  
 
'''2.00'''
 
'''2.00'''
  
Line 262: Line 255:
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
<br/>
  
 +
<br/>
  
 
= Further Information<br/> =
 
= Further Information<br/> =
  
[http://www.insaba.org/ www.insaba.org]
+
*[[:File:Insaba_tools_(excel_sheets).xls|INSABA tool (excel sheet)]]<br/>
 +
*[[:File:Insaba_business_planning_manual.pdf|Insaba business planning manual.pdf]]<br/>
 +
*[[Portal:Productive Use|Productive Use Portal on energypedia]]
 +
*[[Productive Use of Electricity|Productive Use of Electricity]]
 +
*[http://www.insaba.org/ insaba.org]
 +
*[[Portal:Financing and Funding|Financing and funding portal on energypedia]]<br/>
 +
 
 +
<br/>
 +
 
 +
<br/>
 +
 
 +
= References<br/> =
  
 +
<span lang="EN-GB">Good practice from the INSABA programme in Sub-Saharan Africa</span> Introduction
 +
 +
<references />
 +
 +
[[Category:Solar]]
 +
[[Category:Botswana]]
 +
[[Category:Zambia]]
 +
[[Category:Namibia]]
 +
[[Category:South_Africa]]
 +
[[Category:Best_Practices]]
 
[[Category:Productive_Use]]
 
[[Category:Productive_Use]]
[[Category:Best_Practices]]
 

Latest revision as of 13:06, 4 March 2015

Overview

For advance assessment of the economic viability of any business idea, experience from Integrated South Africa Business Advisory (INSABA) has shown that seasoned business consultants may be capable of qualitatively evaluating the viability of specific business ideas based on their in-depth understanding of local economic structures. Proper appraisal of a business idea’s viability requires extensive data collection and in-depth technological study to assess the idea’s feasibility under given socioeconomic conditions. If similar business ideas have already been implemented elsewhere in the region or country, those real cases can and should be analysed and possibly transferred and adapted to the location under study.


Feasibility

INSABA developed a sophisticated set of tools for assessing the feasibility of small businesses powered by electricity generated from renewable sources (see example below). These tools guide future entrepreneurs through a simple equation calculating the return on investment (ROI), a sensitivity analysis measuring changes in key business parameters as a function of changes in ROI, a competitiveness analysis, and a cash flow analysis.

The following data are required for these calculations:

  • investment capital and lifespan
  • production price per unit
  • variable cost per unit
  • cost of energy per unit
  • amortisation per unit
  • direct costs per unit
  • gross margin per unit
  • fixed cost per unit


Since most micro and small businesses in rural environments might not be able to calculate or even estimate all these data, the INSABA approach provided the facilitating services of an interdisciplinary advisory team (IAT). These experienced business advisors were trained in the methodology in a five-day INSABA toolkit seminar. They, in turn, trained local potential producers and suppliers of goods and services in how to obtain the necessary data and use the various tools. The methodology tends to be rather costly when considering small investment opportunities valued at less than USD 5,000.

The table below presents an INSABA business pre-assessment tool for calculating the ROI for a particular economic activity undertaken by a micro, small or medium-size enterprise (MSME). The example chosen here is a fruit drying business that utilises a solar dryer. The same computational tool can be applied for calculating ROI in electrical equipment.


Calculation of Return on Investment (ROI)

Calculation of ROI for a solar dryer used for drying fruit


Apple dryer

Determination of parameters

Definitions

Investment capital

9,957

Estimated, then computed for ROI0,3

Total cost of technology investment

Investment lifespan

5

Estimated for solar dryer

Service life of the technology - i.e. period before it must be replaced

Production

520

2 kg of dried apple chips sold daily 5 days per week for 52 weeks/year = 520 kg per annum

Units produced per year

Price/unit

19.50

Current market price

Sales price per unit produced and sold

Revenue

10,140

Euro

Sales price multiplied by number of units sold

Variable cost/unit

8.00

Costs for fresh apples: 10 x €0.55/kg = €5.5/kg (sales price of €0.55/kg is relevant as this is the opportunity cost of the farmer); costs for packaging: €0.50/kg; costs for preparation: 10 kg fresh apples can be prepared in 15 minutes at an hourly wage of €8.00: 2.00 €/kg

Cost per unit produced e.g. material, processing packaging

Cost of energy/unit


no other additional cost

Costs of power and fuel added to variable cost

Total fixed costs

1,000

Cost for display, handling

Annual indirect costs such as rent, telephones and salaries

Amortisation/unit

3.83

1,991


Amount needed per unit to cover investment in lifetime

Direct costs/unit

11.83

6,151

Variable costs plus amortisation plus cost of energ

Gross margin/unit

7.67


Sales price per unit less the direct costs per unit

Fixed costs/unit

1.92


Total fixed costs divided by the number of units produced

Total costs

13.75

7,151

Direct costs plus fixed costs

Net margin

5.75

2,989

Revenue less total costs

ROI

30%

Return on investment = net margin divided by capital investment

Payback period in years

2.00

Capital investment divided by cash flow until initial expenses are compensated by the net margin



Further Information



References

Good practice from the INSABA programme in Sub-Saharan Africa Introduction