Difference between revisions of "Drivers of Adoption: Innovation and Behavioural Theory"
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| − | = TAM and UTAUT<br/> = | + | = TAM (1,2 and 3) and UTAUT<br/> = |
Although focussed on information systems, the Technology Acceptance Models (1,2 and 3) by Venkatesh and Davis offer some insights on factors that influence individual decision making when it comes to accepting (and using) a new technology. The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_acceptance_model TAM 1] is the most basic model, and got elaborated further in the TAM 2 and TAM 3 and changed a bit in UTAUT. An overview of all these models can be found on [http://www.vvenkatesh.com/it/organizations/Theoretical_Models.asp#Con=structdefs http://www.vvenkatesh.com/it/organizations/Theoretical_Models.asp#Con=structdefs] | Although focussed on information systems, the Technology Acceptance Models (1,2 and 3) by Venkatesh and Davis offer some insights on factors that influence individual decision making when it comes to accepting (and using) a new technology. The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_acceptance_model TAM 1] is the most basic model, and got elaborated further in the TAM 2 and TAM 3 and changed a bit in UTAUT. An overview of all these models can be found on [http://www.vvenkatesh.com/it/organizations/Theoretical_Models.asp#Con=structdefs http://www.vvenkatesh.com/it/organizations/Theoretical_Models.asp#Con=structdefs] | ||
The strength of influence of these determinants on a behaviour or decision can vary from region to region or user to user and of course might be very different in the context of different technologies. It might be interesting to consider this before the next awareness, marketing or training intervention and make sure that all (or most) of these factors and the right carriers for your message have been adressed. | The strength of influence of these determinants on a behaviour or decision can vary from region to region or user to user and of course might be very different in the context of different technologies. It might be interesting to consider this before the next awareness, marketing or training intervention and make sure that all (or most) of these factors and the right carriers for your message have been adressed. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 05:26, 15 November 2012
 |
This article needs to be revised. Please rewrite the article according to the specifications below. Only remove this maintenance box after a thorough revision of this article. See the discussion page for more details or start a discussion there. In particular the following aspects and passages have been specified to be in need for a revision: |
TAM (1,2 and 3) and UTAUT
Although focussed on information systems, the Technology Acceptance Models (1,2 and 3) by Venkatesh and Davis offer some insights on factors that influence individual decision making when it comes to accepting (and using) a new technology. The TAM 1 is the most basic model, and got elaborated further in the TAM 2 and TAM 3 and changed a bit in UTAUT. An overview of all these models can be found on http://www.vvenkatesh.com/it/organizations/Theoretical_Models.asp#Con=structdefs
The strength of influence of these determinants on a behaviour or decision can vary from region to region or user to user and of course might be very different in the context of different technologies. It might be interesting to consider this before the next awareness, marketing or training intervention and make sure that all (or most) of these factors and the right carriers for your message have been adressed.
