Energy for Rural Health Centers

From energypedia
Revision as of 09:46, 11 November 2014 by ***** (***** | *****) (→‎Food Preparation)

Overview

Health professionals in rural clinics must address unexpected challenges on a daily basis. Poor infrastructure can delay the delivery of critical medical supplies, and inclement weather can make it difficult for patients to access the clinic. An unreliable energy source adds to these challenges. If the cold chain is inoperable when supplies arrive, vaccines, blood, and other medicines may go to waste. If a clinic is without lights, patients arriving at night must wait until morning to receive care. Selecting an appropriate source of reliable and sustainable energy as well as introducing measures for efficient energy consumption can help mitigate some of the challenges inherent in operating a health facility in the developing world.This article will provide an overview on options for the improvement of the energy situation in rural health facilities.

Most of the information related to electricity supply for health centers is based on the excellent USAID publication "Powering Health"[1].


Electricity Supply

Stepwise Approach to Electrifying a Health Center

  1. Identify the Health Center's Current Energy Demands
    Identify current energy needs and applications, e.g. for lighting, refrigeration, communication, etc.
  2. Account for Near-Term Change
    Determine whether energy demands will change in the near-term.
  3. Establish Target Energy Consumption in kWh/day
    Use tools such as the USAID Health Clinic Power System Design Tool (4 - Electric Load Inputs) or the Energy Audit Spreadsheet (Worksheet 7 - Future Electric Applications) to calculate the future electric energy consumption in kWh/day.
  4. Determine Technologies Needed to Meet Target
    Evaluate energy technologies.
  5. Procure, Design System, and Install Technology
    Select the most appropriate energy technology.
  6. Maintain and Financing Your Energy Technology
    Institute financing mechanism(s) accounting for operation and maintenance needs and costs.

Remember to contact an expert for assessment, system design, procurement, installation, and maintenance of energy technologies!


Defining Energy Needs

When considering the type of electrification needed to sustain daily operations, a facility must first understand its basic needs. The needs assessment will include an inventory of the types of equipment used in the facility and the power required to operate each device. Understanding the average “daily load”, or the amount of power required to operate equipment under normal working conditions, will influence the choice of power supply. Once the daily energy requirement is established, a range of electrification options can be considered. Understanding the need will also provide managers with a realistic budget for procuring, installing, and maintaining the new system.


Calculating Energy Needs of a Health Facility

The USAID Health Clinic Power System Design Tool (4 - Electric Load Inputs) and/or the Energy Audit Spreadsheet (Worksheet 7 - Future Electric Applications) as well as the examples of energy demands of typical rural health centers in developing countries can help identifying the overall energy demands of health facilities. The amount of expected energy consumption in kWh/day, in addition to expert consultation, will assists in the selection of appropriate electrification technology.

Once a facility has comprehensively analyzed the energy requirements of its day-to-day operations, it must be determined whether those demands are likely to change. Facility managers must think strategically about the possibility that energy demands may increase due to the addition of patients, extended operating hours, or new services. Once this process has been completed and an adequate accounting of needs has been made, the manager can determine the various energy options to meet those demands. These options must be considered in light of all facility-specific variables.


Categorization of Health Clinics

Please note: these descriptions are provided as general comparative guidelines and are not precise descriptions of any one facility.


Health Posts:

Health posts are the smallest, most basic health facility. These locations typically will not have a permanent doctor or nurse on staff. The health post may have a full- or part-time primary healthcare provider. Services available at health posts include the treatment of minor illnesses, the tending of minor injuries and, where possible, the provision of basic immunization services. Due to the limited medical equipment used, the overall energy demand of health posts is relatively low. The energy demands of a health post will be satisfied through Category I Health Clinic (see below) electrification options, while taking into account the reduced daily demand for energy.


Health Clinics:

Health clinics are generally larger than health posts and employ one or more full-time nurses. Clinics may also employ a part-time physician, depending on the size and location. A health clinic offers a wider array of services than a health post and will possess equipment allowing for more sophisticated diagnoses. Rural health clinics generally fall into one of three categories (Categories I, II and III - see table below) based on the type and number of medical devices used in the facility and the frequency with which they are used on a daily basis. Local resources may make specific energy options more or less advantageous in each location. The categories are listed on page five. Other types of health facilities that require reliable and sustainable electrification include blood banks, stand-alone laboratories and pharmacies, and anti-retroviral treatment (ARV) clinics. Blood banks, stand-alone labs, and pharmacies will, depending on their size, utilize equipment similar to that found in Category I or II Health Clinics and will have similar energy needs. ARV clinics will have significant energy demands similar to those found in a Category III Health Clinic or higher. Energy requirements could be intensive for some ARV clinics due to the computer technology and additional equipment required to perform rapid blood analyses.


Health Clinic Categories:
Category Description

Category I

low energy requirements, 5 - 10 kWh/day

  • Typically located in a remote setting with limited services and a small staff
  • Approximately 0 - 60 beds
  • Electric power is required for:
  1. lighting the facility during evening hours and to support limited surgical procedures (e.g. suturing)
  2. maintain the cold chain for vaccines, blood, and other medical supplies - one or two refrigerators may be used
  3. utilizing basic lab equipment - a centrifuge, hematology mixer, microscope, incubator, and hand-powered aspirator

Category II

moderate energy requirements, 10 - 20 kWh/day

  • Approximately 60 - 120 beds
  • Medical equipment similar to Category I Health Clinic; frequency of use and number of devices are key factors of differentiation between Category I and II health clinics
  • Separate refrigerators may be used for food storage and cold chain
  • Communication device, such as a radio, may be utilized
  • May accommodate more sophisticated diagnostic medical equipment and perform more complex surgical procedures

Category III

high energy requirements, 20 - 30 kWh/day

  • Approximately 120 beds or more
  • May serve as a regional referral center and coordinate communication between several smaller facilities and hospitals in large cities
  • May need to communicate with remote health centers and hospitals by way of telephone, fax, computer, and Internet
  • May contain sophisticated diagnostic devices (x-ray machine, CD4 counters, blood typing equipment, etc.) requiring additional power


Power Generation Options

After determining the facility’s typical daily energy usage, it is time to evaluate the energy technologies available to electrify your facility. Rural health clinics have a number of options available to supply reliable electricity. The best option for a given application depends on a number of factors, and in some cases a combination of measures may be the best solution.

Some factors to consider include:

  • Reliability of local grid
  • Local renewable energy resources (wind, solar, biomass)
  • Local cost and availability of conventional energy sources (diesel, propane, gasoline)
  • Local availability of systems, parts, service companies, and technicians
  • Governmental policies and incentives
  • System reliability requirements
  • Technical capacity and funds for system maintenance and replacement
  • Special considerations or desired operational characteristics - i.e. noise, emissions, etc.


Technological options to consider:


The table below illustrates the key characteristics of energy generation technologies. Capital cost, operating cost, reliability, emissions, resource availability, and other factors should be considered when selecting an energy technology.


Energy Technology Characteristics:
Energy Technologies Capital Cost O&M Cost Reliability Durability Special Considerations Emissions Optimal Use
Solar PV System with Batteries Very high Low High (if maintained properly) or low (if not) 20-30 years (PV), 5 years (batteries) Theft (batteries or panels); Vandalism (panels); Availability of trained technicians None Small Loads; Areas where fuel is costly or difficult to obtain
Wind Turbine with Batteries High Low-moderate High (if maintained properly) or low (if not) 20 years (turbine), 10 years (blades), 5 years (batteries) Theft (batteries); Lack of data on wind resources None Many moderate loads where resource is sufficient
Diesel Generator Moderate-high High High 25,000 operating hours Fuel spills; emissions Very High Larger loads
Gasoline Generator Low Very High Moderate 1,000 - 2,000 operating hours Fuel spills; emissions; flammability High Emergency Generator
Gas Generator Moderate High Moderate 3,000 operating hours Propane is of limited availability, but can use biogas Low Component in hybrid system or stand-alone
Hybrid System Very high Low-moderate Very High Varies; optimization greatly extends generator and battery life Complexity for servicing Low Medium and large loads
Grid extension Varies None Varies High Theft; extending grid allows connection of nearby homes to grid Not local Where grid is reliable and not too distant


The table Costs of Power Sources for different Health Clinic Categories below illustrates the estimated cost of various energy technologies for a range of clinic sizes. In general, renewable energy options (e.g., photovoltaic (PV) system) will have higher capital costs than diesel or other fuel-based electricity generating options. However, over the long-term, renewable systems will have lower operating costs and produce fewer or no emissions. In renewable energy systems, battery maintenance, occasional cleaning, and theft-prevention will be the major recurring costs. A hybrid system using an alternative energy source (e.g., PV system) and a traditional generator (e.g., diesel) will have a higher up-front capital cost than a renewable-only system; however, hybrid systems provide greater flexibility, including the ability for one system to support the other. For illustrative purposes, a PV/diesel hybrid is represented in the table Costs of Power Sources for different Health Clinic Categories. Actual prices in a given location may vary considerably from those used in the table.


Costs of Power Sources for Different Health Clinic Categories:
Technology System Size Capital ($) Operating ($/year) O&M Assumptions
Category I -
5 kWh/day
PV System with Batteries 1,200 W panels
20 kWh batteries
$12,000 system
$2,000 batteries
$500
1% of system cost per year (includes maintenance and
component replacement, does not include security); Amortized cost of replacing the batteries every five years (20% of battery cost).
Wind Turbines with Batteries 1,750 W turbine
20 kWh batteries
$10,000 system
$2,000 batteries
$600
2% of system cost per year; Amortized cost of replacing the batteries every five years.
Diesel Engine Generator 2.5 kW $2,000 $1,400
$0.0075/kWh maintenance, $0.67/kWh fuel ($1/liter for fuel is used), operating at 4kWh per day at 50% capacity, and replacement of engine every 10 years.
Hybrid Systems 1,200 W panels
10 kWh batteries
500 W engine
$12,000 PV system
$1,000 batteries
$500 generator
$450
1% of PV system cost per year; battery replacement every five years; 200 hours of engine operation per year; replacement of engine every ten years.
Grid Extension n/a $10,000+ per mile $200 $0.10/kWh power
Category II -
15 kWh/day
PV System with Batteries 3,600 W panels
60 kWh batteries
$36,000 system
$6,000 batteries
$1,150 Same as above.
Wind Turbines with Batteries 5,250 W turbine
60 kWh batteries
$28,000 system
$6,000 batteries
$1,750 Same as above.
Diesel Engine Generator 2.5 kW $2,000 $3,900 Same as above, operating at 15 kWh at 50% capacity.
Hybrid Systems 3,500 W panels
30 kWh batteries
1.5 kW engine
$35,000 PV system
$3,000 batteries
$1,000 generator
$1,350 Same as above, with 200 hours of engine operation per year.
Grid Extension n/a $10,000+ per mile $550 Same as above.
Category III -
25 kWh/day
PV System with Batteries 6,000 W panels
100 kWh batteries
$55,000 system
$10,000 batteries
$2,550 Same as above.
Wind Turbines with Batteries 8,750 W turbine
100 kWh batteries
$44,000 system
$10,000 batteries
$2,900 Same as above.
Diesel Engine Generator 2.5 kW $2,000 $6,400 Same as above, operating at 25 kWh per day at 67% capacity.
Hybrid Systems 6,000 W panels
50 kWh batteries
2.5 kW engine
$55,000 PV system
$5,000 batteries
$2,000 generator
$2,200 Same as above, with 200 hours of engine operation per year.
Grid Extension n/a $10,000+ per mile $900 Same as above.


System Sustainability

In December 2010, ESMAP published the very resourceful handbook "Photovoltaics for Community Service Facilities" [2]. It covers the most relevant issues regarding sustainability and long-term operation of community PV systems.


Importance of Maintenance

Regular and timely maintenance of all electrification equipment is essential to proper functioning of the equipment.

  • Routine maintenance, as well as major overhauls and capital replacement, need to be planned and budgeted for in advance.
  • Lack of maintenance ultimately will have a negative impact on reliability of power supply.
  • Maintenance problems often are easily preventable, yet frequently overlooked.
  • Emergency back-up generators should be checked periodically even if rarely used.
  • Improper or insufficient maintenance can lead to substantial costs in the future.

Regular maintenance is well worth the cost, and programs installing energy systems at health clinics or other facilities should ensure there will be a commitment to servicing the system. Experts recommend training local personnel in the servicing of these systems or obtaining a long-term maintenance contract.


Financing of Operation and Maintenance

Clinic managers must develop a sustainable way to pay for the maintenance and operation of the system to ensure continuity of facility operations. Facilities should consider incorporating aspects of the innovative finance structures described below into their financial and operating practices.


User Fees

A “user fee” system involves building the cost of energy into the overall cost of medical services – passing the cost to the patient. Most rural medical clinics struggle to secure sufficient operating funds due to the inability to pass along true costs of medical service to users who lack the resources to pay actual costs. The inability of patients to pay, coupled with the challenge of managing the collection and disbursement of funds, makes this approach difficult to implement.


Sale of Excess Electricity

The sale of excess electricity offers a promising approach to finance operations. By installing a system with excess capacity, income from the sale of additional power can offset a portion, if not all, of the system’s operating costs.

  • Bulk (Wholesale): By operating the power system as a small enterprise, excess electricity can be sold to nearby villages, factories, schools or facilities. The system must be sized to accommodate both the clinic and the potential customer base. Customers must be in close proximity to the system or transmission costs quickly make this approach prohibitively expensive. Maintenance requirements are also more complex.


  • Point of Use Sale (Retail): When potential purchasers of power are too remote to obtain the electricity over transmission lines, the clinic can sell it at or near their facility. A small powering station can be established with fees charged based on the amount of power used, if metering is available, or according to time. For customers with transportable devices such as power tools, a small work area with outlets can be set aside adjacent to the power station where users can plug in equipment. Villagers can use these areas for income-generating activities. It may be feasible to establish a “mini industrial zone” near the clinic’s power system, providing an area with permanent workshops (sewing, weaving or repair services) or stores. The clinic could realize income from rent on the workshop/store space, the sale of electricity, and the pumping of water.


Institutional Management
Establishing an entity that has a stake in the continued successful operation of the system is crucial to cultivating a sense of ownership for on-going system operation. Innovative financing systems must be properly managed by organizations and individuals who use and pay for the power. Management structures include existing clinic management, nearby villages or facilities, or a new organization dedicated to providing oversight of the energy system such as a cooperative between villages. The cooperative can include an agreement with the clinic to manage any of the financing arrangements previously described. The level of responsibility of the cooperative can range from total operation and management of the system to simply keeping track of usage and payments.


Thermal Energy

Food Preparation

Cooking needs in rural health centers can be divided into two categories, depending on the target group, for whom the food is prepared:

  • Food for staff: It depends mainly on the number of staff, the health center management and/or the degree of self-organization of the staff if the meals for staff members are prepared communally. In this case an institutional size stoves might make sense Examples: Both Mission and the Government hospitals in Mulanje District (Southern Malawi) have institutional size wood-fired rocket stoves to cater for the staff and the students of the nursing college. Cooking is done by a paid cook, who got trained on the proper use of the stoves. The firewood is provided by the hospital. Savings as compared to the open fire are between 70-80 percent.


  • Food for patients: Most rural health centers do not provide meals for the patients, even if they have in-patient facilities. The meals for patients are prepared individually by the guardians who accompany the patient often with the main purpose to cater or prepare warm bath water for the patient. Thus individual cooking facilities are needed for the guardians. Usually food ingredients, fuel and cooking utensils have to be organised by the guardians and are not provided by the health center. Thus the most prevalent cooking facility is the makeshift 3-stone fire fuelled with firewood or any other biomass that the guardians are able to organise in the immediate surroundings of the health center. A good practice is when health centers provide a sheltered cooking place and define the area where cooking is allowed. To minimise the adverse effects of air pollution and prevent that smoke is adding to the ailments of the patients, this location should preferably be at a distance from the wards and care units. Mulanje Mission Hospital in Southern Malawi went even further: they had already a roofed kitchen for the guardians with 20 simple fireplaces. As hospital facilities were expanding and the number of in-patients increasing, the kitchen became small. With advice from GTZ-project staff on stove technology and kitchen design, they added another roofed kitchen with improved fixed ‘Epseranza’ -type stoves and good ventilation. In the first weeks the kitchen was not yet well accepted and rather empty, because people were not familiar with the stoves and were unsure how to use them. Upon realizing this, a permanent security staff of the hospital got trained on the correct stove use and was able to show the ever-changing users, who normally don’t use the kitchen longer than a few days. From then onward the kitchen became more and more popular as people became aware of he advantages: the new stoves were more economic, cooked faster, created less smoke, and the building had a better ventilation. Young mothers felt more comfortable bringing their babies in the new kitchen. The challenge is to organise the maintenance of the stoves, as some of the ceramic pot-supports of the ‘Esperanza stoves’ had gone missing and the stoves performed poorly without them.



Sterilization / Pasteurization

For the sterilization of instruments or the pasteurization of drinking water thermo-solar energy might be an option, if used with a (reusable) temperature indicator to ensure that the water has at some stage reached the required temperature. Solar energy is also a good option to heat bath water for the patients, if storage of hot water is provided. Solar energy is less suitable for guardian’s kitchens, as the requirement for food is often during hours, when sunshine is not available.


Project Experience

Experience and lessons learned, including project approaches, technical details and evidence for impacts of projects in Uganda and Ethiopia are discussed in the article "Photovoltaic (PV) for Health Centers - Project Experience". It aims at compiling experience from past and ongoing PV programmes for rural health centers.

For each project the following issues are covered:

  1. Project Approach,
  2. Project Outputs & Technical System Details,
  3. Evidence for Impacts, and
  4. Lessons Learned.


Further Information


References

  1. USAID: Powering Health. Internet: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADJ557.pdf
  2. ESMAP: Photovoltaics for Community Service Facilities - Guidance for Sustainability. Internet: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTAFRREGTOPENERGY/Resources/717305-1266613906108/PV_Toolkit_FINAL_12-14-10.pdf