Difference between revisions of "Good Practices In City Energy Efficiency - Tianjin, China – Enforcement of Residential Building Energy Efficiency Codes"

From energypedia
***** (***** | *****)
(Created page with "{{Energy Efficiency Project Resource Center |EEPRC title=GOOD PRACTICES IN CITY ENERGY EFFICIENCY - Tianjin, China – Enforcement of Residential Building Energy Efficiency Co...")
 
***** (***** | *****)
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Energy Efficiency Project Resource Center
 
{{Energy Efficiency Project Resource Center
|EEPRC title=GOOD PRACTICES IN CITY ENERGY EFFICIENCY - Tianjin, China – Enforcement of Residential Building Energy Efficiency Codes
+
|EEPRC title=Good Practices In City Energy Efficiency - Tianjin, China – Enforcement of Residential Building Energy Efficiency Codes
 
|EEPRC organization=ESMAP
 
|EEPRC organization=ESMAP
 
|EEPRC year=2011
 
|EEPRC year=2011
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|EEPRC file cn=
 
|EEPRC file cn=
 
|EEPRC URL cn=
 
|EEPRC URL cn=
|EEPRC file en=ESMAP EECI Tianjin BEEC Enforcement.pdf
+
|EEPRC file en=Enforcement of Residential Building Energy Efficiency Codes in China.pdf
 
|EEPRC file fr=
 
|EEPRC file fr=
 
|EEPRC URL fr=
 
|EEPRC URL fr=

Latest revision as of 14:19, 11 September 2015




Good Practices In City Energy Efficiency - Tianjin, China – Enforcement of Residential Building Energy Efficiency Codes

Title of Document Good Practices In City Energy Efficiency - Tianjin, China – Enforcement of Residential Building Energy Efficiency Codes
Abstract Tianjin is one of the most successful Chinese cities in compliance enforcement of building energy efficiency codes (BEECs). Results of recent annual national inspections organized by the Ministry of Housing and Urban and Rural Development (MoHURD) indicate that compliance of BEECs in new residential and commercial buildings in Tianjin is close to 100 percent, compared to the 80 percent average across nearly three dozen large cities inspected by MoHURD in 2008. More remarkable is the fact that, in terms of building envelope thermal integrity, the currently enforced residential BEEC in Tianjin (identified as DB29-1-2007) is 30 percent more stringent than what is required by the pertinent national BEEC (identified as JGJ 26-95).

In 1997, Tianjin introduced its first mandatory residential BEEC (identified as DB29-1-97), which is equivalent to the requirements of the JGJ 26-95, the national model BEEC for cold climate regions enacted in 1995. DB29-1-97 was enforced from 1998 to 2004. Enforcement actually began on January 1, 2005; it was based on an earlier version which was updated and reenacted on June 1, 2007. This case study covered five years of enforcement of DB29-1-2007, from 2005 to 2009. From 2005 to 2009, about 70 million m2 of new residential buildings were completed in the urban areas of Tianjin. Many were subject to compliance of DB29-1-97 because their construction permits were issued before January 1, 2005. About 50 million m2 of them were designed according to Tianjin’s DB29-1-2007. This puts the upper range (assuming full construction compliance) of the calculated space heating energy savings of these new buildings at about 870 GWh/year, compared with the baseline of complying with DB29-1-97 (or the national JGJ 26-95). Heat energy saved would be sufficient to provide winter space heating for about 200,000 apartments (at 100 m2 each) built to comply with DB29-1-2007. Compared with the baseline, the estimated simple payback period for compliance with DB29-1-2007 based on avoided cost of heating service is less than seven years, attractive even if the energy efficiency (EE) measures have a lifespan of 15 years.

File Download

English: Enforcement of Residential Building Energy Efficiency Codes in China.pdf

Original Source ESMAP
Year 2011
Region/Country East Asia & The Pacific - China
Language(s) English
Document Type Case Studies - Institutional and Regulatory Frameworks

Sector Buildings


Property "EEPRC abstractsearch" (as page type) with input value "ßerror: string exceeds 1,000 character limit." contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.