Difference between revisions of "How to Scale Up Green Microfinance? A Comparative Study of Energy Lending in Peru"
From energypedia
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| <span style="line-height: 20.400001525878906px;">Among the green microfinance initiatives, energy lending still appears to lack long-term sustainability, and therefore remain difficult to up-scale. In the rollout of these programs, implementing a two-hand model approach – where microfinance institutions (MFIs) partner with energy suppliers – becomes a challenge for both parties. Obstacles entail the access to technical assistance, and the development of efficient supply chains and profitable business models. In this paper, a comparison of the energy diversification process – from a pilot phase towards a large commercialization – of the Peruvian MFIs Fondesurco and CMAC Huancayo is presented, highlighting their experiences, challenges and discusses opportunities to build from their lessons learned in order to innovate green microfinance.</span><ref>How to Scale Up Green Microfinance? A Comparative Study of Energy Lending in Peru. Natalia Realpe Carrillo</ref><span style="line-height: 20.400001525878906px;">.</span> | | <span style="line-height: 20.400001525878906px;">Among the green microfinance initiatives, energy lending still appears to lack long-term sustainability, and therefore remain difficult to up-scale. In the rollout of these programs, implementing a two-hand model approach – where microfinance institutions (MFIs) partner with energy suppliers – becomes a challenge for both parties. Obstacles entail the access to technical assistance, and the development of efficient supply chains and profitable business models. In this paper, a comparison of the energy diversification process – from a pilot phase towards a large commercialization – of the Peruvian MFIs Fondesurco and CMAC Huancayo is presented, highlighting their experiences, challenges and discusses opportunities to build from their lessons learned in order to innovate green microfinance.</span><ref>How to Scale Up Green Microfinance? A Comparative Study of Energy Lending in Peru. Natalia Realpe Carrillo</ref><span style="line-height: 20.400001525878906px;">.</span> | ||
| − | | [[File:File|border|right|180px|File: | + | | [[File:File|border|right|180px|File:File|alt=File:File]] |
|} | |} | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | __NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
| + | [[Category:Conference_Documentation]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Peru]] | ||
[[Category:Microfinance]] | [[Category:Microfinance]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 13:51, 29 April 2014
 |
 |
 |
 |
How to Scale Up Green Microfinance? A Comparative Study of Energy Lending in Peru
Presenter: Natalia Realpe Carrillo, (MicroEnergy International,Germany)
Overview
| Among the green microfinance initiatives, energy lending still appears to lack long-term sustainability, and therefore remain difficult to up-scale. In the rollout of these programs, implementing a two-hand model approach – where microfinance institutions (MFIs) partner with energy suppliers – becomes a challenge for both parties. Obstacles entail the access to technical assistance, and the development of efficient supply chains and profitable business models. In this paper, a comparison of the energy diversification process – from a pilot phase towards a large commercialization – of the Peruvian MFIs Fondesurco and CMAC Huancayo is presented, highlighting their experiences, challenges and discusses opportunities to build from their lessons learned in order to innovate green microfinance.[1]. |
References
- ↑ How to Scale Up Green Microfinance? A Comparative Study of Energy Lending in Peru. Natalia Realpe Carrillo
