Difference between revisions of "Metering and Billing Systems"

From energypedia
***** (***** | *****)
m
***** (***** | *****)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
= Standard kWh meter  =
 
= Standard kWh meter  =
  
[[Image:Standard kWh meter.jpg|thumb|Standard kWh meter. Its price is about 40-50 USD]] [[Image:Digital meter.jpg|thumb|Digital meter. Its price is about 120-150 USD]]  
+
[[Image:Standard kWh meter.jpg|thumb|Standard kWh meter. Its price is about 40-50 USD]]&nbsp;<u>Advantages</u>[[Image:Digital meter.jpg|thumb|right|Digital  
 +
meter. Its price is about 120-150 USD]]  
  
<u>Advantages</u>  
+
*technique is "state of the art"<br>
 
+
*billing is fair and transparent&nbsp;
*fair and transparent  
+
*reading can be uncoupled from tariff collection
*reading less frequent than collection; if customers go to office, there is cost reduction
+
*allows amount and time related tariffs&nbsp; (demand steering)&nbsp;
*amount and time related tariffs possible (demand steering)
 
  
 
<u>Disadvantages</u>  
 
<u>Disadvantages</u>  
  
*high costs (metering device &amp; reading)  
+
*high costs (metering device)
*dis- and re-connection in case of late payment  
+
*especially at rural areas in dev. countries the investment cost for a meter unit are way out of range<br>
*complicated reading and billing
+
*dis- and re-connection in case of late payment<br>
 
 
<br>
 
 
 
<br>
 
 
 
<br>
 
  
<br>
+
<br>  
  
<br>
+
<br>  
  
<br>
+
<br>  
  
<br>
+
<br>  
  
<br>
+
<br>  
  
<br>
+
<br>  
  
 
= Pre-paid system with coins or cards  =
 
= Pre-paid system with coins or cards  =
Line 52: Line 46:
 
*costs for re-collection of coins and selling system for coins/cards
 
*costs for re-collection of coins and selling system for coins/cards
  
<br>
+
<br>  
  
 
= Current limiter  =
 
= Current limiter  =
Line 70: Line 64:
 
*time of usage not considered; less fair
 
*time of usage not considered; less fair
  
<br>
+
<br>  
 
 
<br>
 
 
 
<br>
 
 
 
<br>
 
 
 
<br>
 
  
<br>
+
<br>  
  
<br>
+
<br>  
  
 
= Flat rate  =
 
= Flat rate  =
Line 98: Line 84:
 
*less fair
 
*less fair
  
<br>
+
<br>  
  
 
= Experience form Nepal&nbsp;: [http://www.endev.info/wiki/index.php/Nepal#Innovative_metering_.2F_load_management Innovative Metering]  =
 
= Experience form Nepal&nbsp;: [http://www.endev.info/wiki/index.php/Nepal#Innovative_metering_.2F_load_management Innovative Metering]  =
  
<br>
+
<br>  
  
 
  [[Solar Main Page|⇒ Back to Solar Section]]
 
  [[Solar Main Page|⇒ Back to Solar Section]]
Line 109: Line 95:
 
[[Category:Hydro]]
 
[[Category:Hydro]]
 
[[Category:Solar]]
 
[[Category:Solar]]
 +
[[Category:metering]]

Revision as of 10:37, 2 June 2010

Standard kWh meter

Standard kWh meter. Its price is about 40-50 USD

 Advantages

Digital meter. Its price is about 120-150 USD
  • technique is "state of the art"
  • billing is fair and transparent 
  • reading can be uncoupled from tariff collection
  • allows amount and time related tariffs  (demand steering) 

Disadvantages

  • high costs (metering device)
  • especially at rural areas in dev. countries the investment cost for a meter unit are way out of range
  • dis- and re-connection in case of late payment







Pre-paid system with coins or cards

Pre-paid system with coins or cards. Its price is about 40-80 USD

Advantages

  • fair and transparent
  • no meter reading
  • no overdue costs
  • no costs for dis- and re-connection
  • close to “ability to pay”-variations
  • coins less expensive than cards

Disadvantages

  • relatively high cost for metering device
  • less forgery proof
  • costs for re-collection of coins and selling system for coins/cards


Current limiter

Current limiter. The price may be less than 5 USD
Current limiter

Advantages

  • simultaneously protecting against overcurrent (actual purpose)
  • delimiting peak demand
  • no meter reading required; flat rates according to max. amperage

Disadvantages

  • danger of fraud and theft of switch fuses
  • additional costs for replacement of cut out fuses
  • time of usage not considered; less fair




Flat rate

Advantages

  • very cheap (no metering or delimiting device)
  • especially in rural areas of Indonesia quite common and accepted
  • can be combined with number of appliances or installed wattage (social control)

Disadvantages

  • provokes waste of electricity, no incentive for saving
  • no load control / demand steering possible (peaks)
  • less fair


Experience form Nepal : Innovative Metering


⇒ Back to Solar Section
⇒ Back to Hydro Section