Mini-grid Operation Models

From energypedia
Revision as of 15:40, 16 March 2017 by ***** (***** | *****) (Created page with " = Overview = Mini-grids in different settings are owned and managed by differnt actors for covering the upfront cost and the on-going operation and mai...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Mini-grids in different settings are owned and managed by differnt actors for covering the upfront cost and the on-going operation and maintenance costs of the system. In general, the mini-grids models can be distinguished into four types: utility model, private model, community model and public-private model. This article briefly explains each model.[1]

Utility Model

Under the model, a large or medium-sized state-owned or private utility company is responsible for the installation and operation of the mini-grids. The involved utility operates the mini-grid in the same way as the main grid. The private utilities companies are mostly subsidized by the government and it is the most common model for rural electrification in developing countries.

Example: Tsumkwe mini-grid in Namibia, a PV-hybrid mini-grid with a capacity of 202 kW and supplies power to 3000 residents as well as 35 commercial and public-service customers.[2]

Private Model

Under this model, a private company is responsible for installation, operation and maintenance of the mini-grids. They generate electricity and sell it directly to the connected customers. These private companies are mostly small or medium in size and unlike the utility model, do not operate the main grid.

The private companies generate their investment capital from various sources like grants, commercial or concessional loans and equity to run the mini-grids. 

Example: Powerhive in Kisii and Nyamira, Kenya operates four PV mini-grids and supply electricity to over 1500 [3]customers in Kenya. 

Community Model

In this model, the community owns as well as operates the mini-grid, however the design as well as installation is often done by a third party, contracted by the community or on its behalf by a non-governmental organization (NGO) or development agency.  The investment capital generally comes from grants, supplemented by a cash or in-kind contribution from the community.  

Example: Four hydropower mini-grids in Kenya at Thima,Kathamba, Tungu Kabiri and Kipin[4]

Public-private Model

This approach combines different aspects of the models described above, in order to maximise effectiveness and efficiency. Hybrid business models are very diverse and may involve different entities owning and operating different parts of the system.

Example: In Senegal, the government owns the mini-grid and a private company is awarded a 15-year concession to operate and maintain it.  this approach has been followed by 18 mini-grids powered by solar PV and diesel generators in Senegal. These mini-grids supply electricity to over 38,000 households,  88 schools and 88 clinics as well as business and public buildings. [5]

Comparison Between Different Models

Each model have their own advantages and disadvantages[1]:[6]

Model Advantages Disadvantages
  • Improves operation and maintenance by increasing sense of ownership in the community
  • the system is most likely to fit in with the community's requirement
  • this model empowers the local people
  • Reduces bureaucratic levels hence is more efficient.
  • Communities may lack the technical and business skills required for running mini-grids which might lead to higher costs from outsourcing these services.
  • The governance of the mini-grids need to be clear and well managed.
  • There can be delay in community decision making due to conflicting social interests
  • There is great efficiency.
  • Companies may have the capacity to offer better operation and management services.
  • companies have an incentive to promote financial sustainability of the mini-grids  when they are driven by market dynamics rather than government subsidies
  • May be able to deal better with political interference.
  • In most cases there is lack of support for covering upfront financial cost
  • There is often a difficulty in finding an experienced company to run the scheme leaving smaller companies with less capacity to run them.
  • Utilities have experience in electricity generation, distribution as well as carrying out administrative processes.
  • There is a better legal system.
  • Their capacity gives them the advantage of having better access to spare parts and maintenance.
  • They are usually market driven so they may not prioritize decentralized systems in rural areas.
  • Quite often they are inefficient and bankrupt.
  • Political agenda governs them.

  • This combines the advantages of all the above systems such as the technical capacity of a utility with the financial capability of a private entity.
  • The difference in management for each entity can increase the transaction costs for the scheme.
  • Strong framework is required to balance the interest of each involved parties and establish the interface between them. 

Further Information


  1. 1.0 1.1 The history of mini-grid development in developing countries:
  2. Lights, Power, Action: Electrifying Africa (2017). pg 47fckLR
  3. Lights, Power, Action: Electrifying Africa (2017). pg 48fckLR
  4. Lights, Power, Action: Electrifying Africa (2017). pg 48fckLR
  5. Lights, Power, Action: Electrifying Africa (2017). pg 49fckLR
  6. Lights, Power, Action: Electrifying Africa (2017). pg 50fckLR