Make sure you register to our monthly newsletter, it's going out soon! Stay up do date about the latest energy news and our current activities.
Click here to register!

Difference between revisions of "PicoPV Test"

From energypedia
***** (***** | *****)
***** (***** | *****)
m
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Pico PV Systems  ==
+
[[Portal:Solar|►Back to Solar Portal]]
 +
= Overview =
  
Currently engagement concerning Pico PV Systems increases. In order to advance the framework for project development in this field EnDev has effected various activities. One of these is a test series for Pico PV Systems. It is divided into three phases:
+
Pico PV Systems have emerged as a strong contender in the solar market of developing countries. Thus,[[Energising_Development_(EnDev)|EnDev]] has developed a test series to test their effectiveness.<br/>
  
<br>  
+
== Technical Test I<br/> ==
  
1. Technical Test I
+
The technical tests are performed by '''Fraunhofer Gesellschaft ([http://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en?set_language=en FhG/ISE])''' in Freiburg, Germany. In the first test phase (2007/ 10 - 2008/ 01) twelve systems were tested on road capability with special focus on mechanical stability, lighting characteristics and operability.
  
2. Technical Test II
+
<u>These systems were in detail:</u>
  
3. Field Tests<br>  
+
*GL9000SW, Global Marketing Technologies Inc. (US) --> overall picture bad
 +
*MS01, Macro-Solar Technology Co,. Ltd (China) --> overall picture very bad
 +
*Solar 2007-1, Solarprojekt-Freilassing e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture good
 +
*Mightylight, Cosmos Ignite Innovations (India) --> overall picture good
 +
*AISHWARYA, Noble energy Solar Technologies Ltd. (?) --> overall picture middle
 +
*Solar Home System, "Afghanistan" --> overall picture very bad
 +
*2212SL Wuara, SolEnergy Africa (PTY) Ltd (South Africa) --> overall picture very bad
 +
*SOLUX-LED-100, SOLUX e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture middle
 +
*Sun x-set mobile, Würth Solergy (Germany) --> overall picture middle - bad
 +
*Glowstar GS7, Sollatek Ltd. (UK) --> overall picture middle
 +
*AS018, Astral Solar technology Co. (China) --> overall picture bad
 +
*SOLUX-LED-50, SOLUX e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture middle
  
=== Technical Test I  ===
+
<br/>
  
The technical tests are performed by Fraunhofer Gesellschaft FhG/ISE in Freiburg, Germany. In the first test phase (2007/ 10 - 2008/ 01) eleven systems were tested on road capability with special focus on mechanical stability, lighting characteristics and operability. These systems were in detail:
+
== Technical Test II<br/> ==
  
*GL9000SW, Global Marketing Technologies Inc. (US) --&gt; overall picture bad
+
Seven solar lanterns reached the second testing stage, of which four are German-made: the Solux LED 100 and Solux LED 50 of the Solux e.V. development assistance project, the Solar 2007-1 by the Freilassing solar promotion project, and the sun x-set mobile produced by Würth. Other lamps of the main test were the Glowstar GS7 of the British company Sollatek, the A­ishwarya NEST-6543 of the Indian manufacturer Noble Energy and the Mightylight 3040, also Indian made.
*MS01, Macro-Solar Technology Co,. Ltd (China) --&gt; overall picture very bad
 
*Solar 2007-1, Solarprojekt-Freilassing e.v. (Germany) --&gt; overall picture good
 
*Mightylight, Cosmos Ignite Innovations (India) --&gt; overall picture good
 
*AISHWARYA, Noble energy Solar Technologies Ltd. (?) --&gt; overall picture middle
 
*Solar Home System, "Afghanistan" --&gt; overall picture very bad
 
*2212SL Wuara, SolEnergy Africa (PTY) Ltd (South Africa) --&gt; overall picture very bad
 
*SOLUX-LED-100, SOLUX e.v. (Germany) --&gt; overall picture middle
 
*Sun x-set mobile, Würth Solergy (Germany) --&gt; overall picture middle - bad
 
*Glowstar GS7, Sollatek Ltd. (UK) --&gt; overall picture middle
 
*AS018, Astral Solar technology Co. (China) --&gt; overall picture bad
 
  
<br>  
+
<u>In the following table you find a selection of the most important criteria:</u>
  
Detailed test description can be inspected here:<br>Technical Test I (in german)<br>
+
'''Testcriteria Level 2'''
  
=== Technical Test II ===
+
{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" border="1" style="width: 70%; width: 100%"
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
Solar module
  
Testkriterien Level 2
+
|
 +
Does the system deliver the nominal rated values of power output, open- circuit voltage and shortcircuit current?
  
{| width="70%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" border="1"
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| <div class="draft"></div>Battery<br/>
 
|  
 
|  
Solarmodul
+
Measure of capacity (NiMH+ Pb), persistence against overcharging (NiMH), simple durability test (NiMH)<span style="font-size: 11pt;  font-family: arial"></span>
  
 +
|-
 
|  
 
|  
Werden die Nennwerte von Leistung, Leerlaufspannung und Kurzschlussstrom eingehalten? <br>  
+
Luminous fux<span style="font-size: 11pt;  font-family: arial"></span>
 +
 
 +
|
 +
average of 210 minutes
  
 
|-
 
|-
| <div class="draft"></div> Batterie<br>
 
 
|  
 
|  
Messung der Kapazität (NiMH+ Pb), Beständigkeit gegen Überladung (NiMH), einfacher Haltbarkeitstest (NiMH) <span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: arial;">
+
Brennzeit/autonome Zeit
</span>
+
 
 +
|
 +
The duration is measured until luminous flux falls to 70&nbsp;% of the initial value. (beginning from a fully-charged battery)
  
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| Luminous efficacy<br/>
 
|  
 
|  
Lichtstrom<span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: arial;">
+
average is obtained from a period of 210 minutes, beginning from a fully-charged battery.
</span>
 
  
| <div class="draft">Mittelwert über 210 Minuten <br></div>
 
 
|-
 
|-
| <div class="draft">Brennzeit/autonome Zeit <br></div>
+
| Charge Controller<br/>
| <div class="draft">Leuchtdauer bis der Lichtstrom 70% des nach 15 min gemessenen Wertes erreicht hat (Start mit voll geladener Batterie) <br></div>
+
|  
 +
Spannungslevel Ladeschluss-/ Lastabwurfspannung, Eigenverbrauch, Signalisierungen, Schutz vor Entladung durch Modul, Wirkungsgrad
 +
 
 
|-
 
|-
| <div class="draft"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: arial;">Lichtausbeute
+
| Ballast device<br/>
</span></div>  
+
|  
| <div class="draft">Mittelwert über 210 min., Start mit voll geladener Batterie <br></div>
+
How good is the efficiency of the ballast?
 +
 
 
|-
 
|-
| <div class="draft"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: arial;">Laderegler
+
|  
</span></div>
+
Cycle test / degradation of CFL-lamps
| <div class="draft">Spannungslevel Ladeschluss-/ Lastabwurfspannung, Eigenverbrauch, Signalisierungen, Schutz vor Entladung durch Modul, Wirkungsgrad <br></div>
+
 
 +
|  
 +
How long do CFL lamps last when subjected to a switching cycle of ‘on’ for 60 seconds, ‘off’ for 150 seconds?
 +
 
 
|-
 
|-
| <div class="draft"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: arial;">Vorschaltgerät<span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: arial;">
+
|  
</span></span></div>
+
Simulation
| <div class="draft">Elektrischer Wirkungsgrad <br></div>
+
 
|-
+
|  
| <div class="draft">Zyklentest bei CFL-Leuchten <br></div>
+
Ermittlung der solaren Deckungsrate für 5 Standorte bei einer Brenndauer von täglich 3,5 Stunden
| <div class="draft">Test der Schaltfestigkeit der Leuchte mit dem Zyklus 60s an 150s aus <br></div>
+
 
|-
 
| <div class="draft">Simulation <br></div>
 
| <div class="draft">Ermittlung der solaren Deckungsrate für 5 Standorte bei einer Brenndauer von täglich 3,5 Stunden <br></div>
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
<br>
+
<br/>
 +
 
 +
== Field Test<br/> ==
 +
 
 +
<u><span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-size: 10pt;  font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">The publication is available in English and German:</span></span></u>
 +
 
 +
*[[:File:Solar Lanterns Test - Shades of Light.pdf|English version]]
 +
*[[:File:Solarleuchtentest - Licht und Schatten.pdf|German version]]<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-size: 10pt;  font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'"></span></span>
  
=== Field Test  ===
+
<br/>
  
<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'arial','sans-serif';">The publication is available in English and German.</span></span>
 
  
*[http://energypedia.info/img_auth.php/e/ed/Gtz_solar_lanterns_test.pdf <span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'arial','sans-serif';">English version</span></span>]
+
= Further Information =
*<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'arial','sans-serif';">German version</span></span><span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'arial','sans-serif';">&nbsp;</span></span>
 
  
==== Additional Info  ====
+
*[[PicoPV Field Tests|PicoPV Field Tests (of GTZ EnDev)]]
 +
*The SOLAR 2007-1 Lantern (Solarprojekt Freilassing e.V.)has been upgraded with new LEDs of 80 lm/W.
  
The SOLAR 2007-1 Lantern (Solarprojekt Freilassing e.V.)has been upgraded with new LEDs of 80 lm/W.
+
<br/>
  
[[Category:PicoPV]] [[Category:Solar]]
+
[[Category:PicoPV]]
 +
[[Category:Solar]]

Latest revision as of 09:38, 1 August 2018

►Back to Solar Portal

Overview

Pico PV Systems have emerged as a strong contender in the solar market of developing countries. Thus,EnDev has developed a test series to test their effectiveness.

Technical Test I

The technical tests are performed by Fraunhofer Gesellschaft (FhG/ISE) in Freiburg, Germany. In the first test phase (2007/ 10 - 2008/ 01) twelve systems were tested on road capability with special focus on mechanical stability, lighting characteristics and operability.

These systems were in detail:

  • GL9000SW, Global Marketing Technologies Inc. (US) --> overall picture bad
  • MS01, Macro-Solar Technology Co,. Ltd (China) --> overall picture very bad
  • Solar 2007-1, Solarprojekt-Freilassing e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture good
  • Mightylight, Cosmos Ignite Innovations (India) --> overall picture good
  • AISHWARYA, Noble energy Solar Technologies Ltd. (?) --> overall picture middle
  • Solar Home System, "Afghanistan" --> overall picture very bad
  • 2212SL Wuara, SolEnergy Africa (PTY) Ltd (South Africa) --> overall picture very bad
  • SOLUX-LED-100, SOLUX e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture middle
  • Sun x-set mobile, Würth Solergy (Germany) --> overall picture middle - bad
  • Glowstar GS7, Sollatek Ltd. (UK) --> overall picture middle
  • AS018, Astral Solar technology Co. (China) --> overall picture bad
  • SOLUX-LED-50, SOLUX e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture middle


Technical Test II

Seven solar lanterns reached the second testing stage, of which four are German-made: the Solux LED 100 and Solux LED 50 of the Solux e.V. development assistance project, the Solar 2007-1 by the Freilassing solar promotion project, and the sun x-set mobile produced by Würth. Other lamps of the main test were the Glowstar GS7 of the British company Sollatek, the A­ishwarya NEST-6543 of the Indian manufacturer Noble Energy and the Mightylight 3040, also Indian made.

In the following table you find a selection of the most important criteria:

Testcriteria Level 2

Solar module

Does the system deliver the nominal rated values of power output, open- circuit voltage and shortcircuit current?

Battery

Measure of capacity (NiMH+ Pb), persistence against overcharging (NiMH), simple durability test (NiMH)

Luminous fux

average of 210 minutes

Brennzeit/autonome Zeit

The duration is measured until luminous flux falls to 70 % of the initial value. (beginning from a fully-charged battery)

Luminous efficacy

average is obtained from a period of 210 minutes, beginning from a fully-charged battery.

Charge Controller

Spannungslevel Ladeschluss-/ Lastabwurfspannung, Eigenverbrauch, Signalisierungen, Schutz vor Entladung durch Modul, Wirkungsgrad

Ballast device

How good is the efficiency of the ballast?

Cycle test / degradation of CFL-lamps

How long do CFL lamps last when subjected to a switching cycle of ‘on’ for 60 seconds, ‘off’ for 150 seconds?

Simulation

Ermittlung der solaren Deckungsrate für 5 Standorte bei einer Brenndauer von täglich 3,5 Stunden


Field Test

The publication is available in English and German:



Further Information