Difference between revisions of "PicoPV Test"

From energypedia
***** (***** | *****)
***** (***** | *****)
m
 
(33 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Pico PV Systems  ==
+
[[Portal:Solar|►Back to Solar Portal]]
 +
= Overview =
  
Currently engagement concerning Pico PV Systems increases. In order to advance the framework for project development in this field EnDev has effected various activities. One of these is a test series for Pico PV Systems. It is divided into three phases:
+
Pico PV Systems have emerged as a strong contender in the solar market of developing countries. Thus,[[Energising_Development_(EnDev)|EnDev]] has developed a test series to test their effectiveness.<br/>
  
<br>
+
== Technical Test I<br/> ==
  
1. Technical Test I
+
The technical tests are performed by '''Fraunhofer Gesellschaft ([http://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en?set_language=en FhG/ISE])''' in Freiburg, Germany. In the first test phase (2007/ 10 - 2008/ 01) twelve systems were tested on road capability with special focus on mechanical stability, lighting characteristics and operability.
  
2. Technical Test II
+
<u>These systems were in detail:</u>
  
3. Field Tests
+
*GL9000SW, Global Marketing Technologies Inc. (US) --> overall picture bad
 +
*MS01, Macro-Solar Technology Co,. Ltd (China) --> overall picture very bad
 +
*Solar 2007-1, Solarprojekt-Freilassing e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture good
 +
*Mightylight, Cosmos Ignite Innovations (India) --> overall picture good
 +
*AISHWARYA, Noble energy Solar Technologies Ltd. (?) --> overall picture middle
 +
*Solar Home System, "Afghanistan" --> overall picture very bad
 +
*2212SL Wuara, SolEnergy Africa (PTY) Ltd (South Africa) --> overall picture very bad
 +
*SOLUX-LED-100, SOLUX e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture middle
 +
*Sun x-set mobile, Würth Solergy (Germany) --> overall picture middle - bad
 +
*Glowstar GS7, Sollatek Ltd. (UK) --> overall picture middle
 +
*AS018, Astral Solar technology Co. (China) --> overall picture bad
 +
*SOLUX-LED-50, SOLUX e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture middle
  
<br>
+
<br/>
  
=== Technical Test I  ===
+
== Technical Test II<br/> ==
  
The technical tests are performed by Fraunhofer Gesellschaft FhG/ISE in Freiburg, Germany. In the first test phase (2007/ 10 - 2008/ 01) eleven systems were tested on road capability with special focus on mechanical stability, lighting characteristics and operability. These systems were in detail:
+
Seven solar lanterns reached the second testing stage, of which four are German-made: the Solux LED 100 and Solux LED 50 of the Solux e.V. development assistance project, the Solar 2007-1 by the Freilassing solar promotion project, and the sun x-set mobile produced by Würth. Other lamps of the main test were the Glowstar GS7 of the British company Sollatek, the A­ishwarya NEST-6543 of the Indian manufacturer Noble Energy and the Mightylight 3040, also Indian made.
  
*GL9000SW, Global Marketing Technologies Inc. (US) --&gt; overall picture bad
+
<u>In the following table you find a selection of the most important criteria:</u>
*MS01, Macro-Solar Technology Co,. Ltd (China) --&gt; overall picture very bad
 
*Solar 2007-1, Solarprojekt-Freilassing e.v. (Germany) --&gt; overall picture good
 
*Mightylight, Cosmos Ignite Innovations (India) --&gt; overall picture good
 
*AISHWARYA, Noble energy Solar Technologies Ltd. (?) --&gt; overall picture middle
 
*Solar Home System, "Afghanistan" --&gt; overall picture very bad
 
*2212SL Wuara, SolEnergy Africa (PTY) Ltd (South Africa) --&gt; overall picture very bad
 
*SOLUX-LED-100, SOLUX e.v. (Germany) --&gt; overall picture middle
 
*Sun x-set mobile, Würth Solergy (Germany) --&gt; overall picture middle - bad
 
*Glowstar GS7, Sollatek Ltd. (UK) --&gt; overall picture middle
 
*AS018, Astral Solar technology Co. (China) --&gt; overall picture bad
 
  
Detailed test description can be inspected here:<br>[http://www.endev.info/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=4&Itemid=13 Technical Test I (in german)]<br>
+
'''Testcriteria Level 2'''
  
=== Technical Test II ===
+
{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" border="1" style="width: 70%; width: 100%"
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
Solar module
  
not yet started<br>
+
|
 +
Does the system deliver the nominal rated values of power output, open- circuit voltage and shortcircuit current?
  
=== Field Test ===
+
|-
 +
| <div class="draft"></div>Battery<br/>
 +
|
 +
Measure of capacity (NiMH+ Pb), persistence against overcharging (NiMH), simple durability test (NiMH)<span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: arial"></span>
  
not yet started
+
|-
 +
|
 +
Luminous fux<span style="font-size: 11pt;  font-family: arial"></span>
 +
 
 +
|
 +
average of 210 minutes
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
Brennzeit/autonome Zeit
 +
 
 +
|
 +
The duration is measured until luminous flux falls to 70&nbsp;% of the initial value. (beginning from a fully-charged battery)
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| Luminous efficacy<br/>
 +
|
 +
average is obtained from a period of 210 minutes, beginning from a fully-charged battery.
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| Charge Controller<br/>
 +
|
 +
Spannungslevel Ladeschluss-/ Lastabwurfspannung, Eigenverbrauch, Signalisierungen, Schutz vor Entladung durch Modul, Wirkungsgrad
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| Ballast device<br/>
 +
|
 +
How good is the efficiency of the ballast?
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
Cycle test / degradation of CFL-lamps
 +
 
 +
|
 +
How long do CFL lamps last when subjected to a switching cycle of ‘on’ for 60 seconds, ‘off’ for 150 seconds?
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
Simulation
 +
 
 +
|
 +
Ermittlung der solaren Deckungsrate für 5 Standorte bei einer Brenndauer von täglich 3,5 Stunden
 +
 
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
<br/>
 +
 
 +
== Field Test<br/> ==
 +
 
 +
<u><span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-size: 10pt;  font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">The publication is available in English and German:</span></span></u>
 +
 
 +
*[[:File:Solar Lanterns Test - Shades of Light.pdf|English version]]
 +
*[[:File:Solarleuchtentest - Licht und Schatten.pdf|German version]]<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-size: 10pt;  font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'"></span></span>
 +
 
 +
<br/>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
= Further Information =
 +
 
 +
*[[PicoPV Field Tests|PicoPV Field Tests (of GTZ EnDev)]]
 +
*The SOLAR 2007-1 Lantern (Solarprojekt Freilassing e.V.)has been upgraded with new LEDs of 80 lm/W.
 +
 
 +
<br/>
 +
 
 +
[[Category:PicoPV]]
 +
[[Category:Solar]]

Latest revision as of 09:38, 1 August 2018

►Back to Solar Portal

Overview

Pico PV Systems have emerged as a strong contender in the solar market of developing countries. Thus,EnDev has developed a test series to test their effectiveness.

Technical Test I

The technical tests are performed by Fraunhofer Gesellschaft (FhG/ISE) in Freiburg, Germany. In the first test phase (2007/ 10 - 2008/ 01) twelve systems were tested on road capability with special focus on mechanical stability, lighting characteristics and operability.

These systems were in detail:

  • GL9000SW, Global Marketing Technologies Inc. (US) --> overall picture bad
  • MS01, Macro-Solar Technology Co,. Ltd (China) --> overall picture very bad
  • Solar 2007-1, Solarprojekt-Freilassing e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture good
  • Mightylight, Cosmos Ignite Innovations (India) --> overall picture good
  • AISHWARYA, Noble energy Solar Technologies Ltd. (?) --> overall picture middle
  • Solar Home System, "Afghanistan" --> overall picture very bad
  • 2212SL Wuara, SolEnergy Africa (PTY) Ltd (South Africa) --> overall picture very bad
  • SOLUX-LED-100, SOLUX e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture middle
  • Sun x-set mobile, Würth Solergy (Germany) --> overall picture middle - bad
  • Glowstar GS7, Sollatek Ltd. (UK) --> overall picture middle
  • AS018, Astral Solar technology Co. (China) --> overall picture bad
  • SOLUX-LED-50, SOLUX e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture middle


Technical Test II

Seven solar lanterns reached the second testing stage, of which four are German-made: the Solux LED 100 and Solux LED 50 of the Solux e.V. development assistance project, the Solar 2007-1 by the Freilassing solar promotion project, and the sun x-set mobile produced by Würth. Other lamps of the main test were the Glowstar GS7 of the British company Sollatek, the A­ishwarya NEST-6543 of the Indian manufacturer Noble Energy and the Mightylight 3040, also Indian made.

In the following table you find a selection of the most important criteria:

Testcriteria Level 2

Solar module

Does the system deliver the nominal rated values of power output, open- circuit voltage and shortcircuit current?

Battery

Measure of capacity (NiMH+ Pb), persistence against overcharging (NiMH), simple durability test (NiMH)

Luminous fux

average of 210 minutes

Brennzeit/autonome Zeit

The duration is measured until luminous flux falls to 70 % of the initial value. (beginning from a fully-charged battery)

Luminous efficacy

average is obtained from a period of 210 minutes, beginning from a fully-charged battery.

Charge Controller

Spannungslevel Ladeschluss-/ Lastabwurfspannung, Eigenverbrauch, Signalisierungen, Schutz vor Entladung durch Modul, Wirkungsgrad

Ballast device

How good is the efficiency of the ballast?

Cycle test / degradation of CFL-lamps

How long do CFL lamps last when subjected to a switching cycle of ‘on’ for 60 seconds, ‘off’ for 150 seconds?

Simulation

Ermittlung der solaren Deckungsrate für 5 Standorte bei einer Brenndauer von täglich 3,5 Stunden


Field Test

The publication is available in English and German:



Further Information