Difference between revisions of "Senegal Energy Situation"
***** (***** | *****) |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
| (17 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {| | + | {{CES Country|CES Country Name=Senegal |
| − | | | + | |CES Country Capital=Dakar |
| − | + | |CES Country Region Africa = Sub-Saharan Africa | |
| − | + | |CES Country Coordinates=14.6667° N, 17.4167° W | |
| − | | | + | }}<br/> |
| − | | | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | = Introduction = | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
The Senegalese energy sector is relatively small. Total fossil fuel provision stands at 27 TWh/year, thereby making up nearly 40% of Senegal's primary energy provision of which the remainder is nearly entirely biomass (well over 50%) - most of which non-renewable - complemented by some coal and some hydro and solar for renewably generated electricity. | The Senegalese energy sector is relatively small. Total fossil fuel provision stands at 27 TWh/year, thereby making up nearly 40% of Senegal's primary energy provision of which the remainder is nearly entirely biomass (well over 50%) - most of which non-renewable - complemented by some coal and some hydro and solar for renewably generated electricity. | ||
| − | In terms of consumption, the large biomass share in energy provision is for the by far biggest part used for cooking in households, either as firewood (58% of households) or after carbonisation as charcoal (26 % of households). In addition 11% of households use LPG for cooking (mainly in bigger towns), 4% use electricity and 1% uses lampoil. The LPG share thereby is smaller than one would expect based on prevalence of LPG stoves (e.g. in Dakar, where 20% of Senegal's population lives, over 90% of households have LPG stoves) - as LPG supply is not always reliable, in which case (urban) households fall back on charcoal.<br/> | + | In terms of consumption, the large biomass share in energy provision is for the by far biggest part used for cooking in households, either as firewood (58% of households) or after carbonisation as charcoal (26 % of households). In addition 11% of households use LPG for cooking (mainly in bigger towns), 4% use electricity and 1% uses lampoil. The LPG share thereby is smaller than one would expect based on prevalence of LPG stoves (e.g. in Dakar, where 20% of Senegal's population lives, over 90% of households have LPG stoves) - as LPG supply is not always reliable, in which case (urban) households fall back on charcoal.<br/> |
Cooking overall also easily accounts for the largest share of household energy consumption; while the electrification rate at 45% is not even very low, electricity consumption in households is still limited. | Cooking overall also easily accounts for the largest share of household energy consumption; while the electrification rate at 45% is not even very low, electricity consumption in households is still limited. | ||
| − | In total only some 10% of final energy consumed concerns electricity, largely generated by fossil fuels (diesel-gensets) and for a small part renewably (hydro, wind and solar). The renewable potential however is large, and little by little is getting recognised : along the coast there's good potential for windpower; irradiation throughout the country at 5-7 kWh/m2/day is favourable for PV, in addition to which there's hydropotential along major rivers - though with rainfall predicted to decline by some 20% over the next decades, hydro’s role in Senegal’s energy mix should be carefully tailored. | + | In total only some 10% of final energy consumed concerns electricity, largely generated by fossil fuels (diesel-gensets) and for a small part renewably (hydro, wind and solar). The renewable potential however is large, and little by little is getting recognised : along the coast there's good potential for windpower; irradiation throughout the country at 5-7 kWh/m2/day is favourable for PV, in addition to which there's hydropotential along major rivers - though with rainfall predicted to decline by some 20% over the next decades, hydro’s role in Senegal’s energy mix should be carefully tailored. |
The below diagram shows the development over time of the energy consumption of households, transport and industry. | The below diagram shows the development over time of the energy consumption of households, transport and industry. | ||
| Line 82: | Line 22: | ||
As a whole, the energy-sector has to deal with inefficient technologies, a low density distribution grid, a lack of regulatory framework and weak financial structures. | As a whole, the energy-sector has to deal with inefficient technologies, a low density distribution grid, a lack of regulatory framework and weak financial structures. | ||
| − | + | [[Senegal Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] | |
== Biomass<br/> == | == Biomass<br/> == | ||
| Line 94: | Line 34: | ||
Due to the high demand, the price of charcoal increased by 42 percent between 2005 and 2008, which is, however, still less than the increase in the ceiling price for LPG that increased by 48 and 63 percent for the two main bottle sizes (3.5 and 6 kg) respectively. Thereby, cooking energy increased disproportionately compoared to the 14% increase in general consumer prices in the same period. . | Due to the high demand, the price of charcoal increased by 42 percent between 2005 and 2008, which is, however, still less than the increase in the ceiling price for LPG that increased by 48 and 63 percent for the two main bottle sizes (3.5 and 6 kg) respectively. Thereby, cooking energy increased disproportionately compoared to the 14% increase in general consumer prices in the same period. . | ||
| − | + | Some key figures: | |
| + | |||
*40,000 ha of forest are lost every year (to chopping for firewood, forest fires, desertification) | *40,000 ha of forest are lost every year (to chopping for firewood, forest fires, desertification) | ||
*the price of traditional fuels (firewood, charcoal) has more than doubled in the last 10 years | *the price of traditional fuels (firewood, charcoal) has more than doubled in the last 10 years | ||
*between 5,400 and 6,300 people annually die from diseases caused by indoor air pollution | *between 5,400 and 6,300 people annually die from diseases caused by indoor air pollution | ||
| − | *45 % of Senegal’s primary energy demand are covered by firewood (31 % directly as firewood and 14 % as charcoal) | + | *45 % of Senegal’s primary energy demand are covered by firewood (31 % directly as firewood and 14 % as charcoal) |
The Senegalese government has recently published several policy orientations, thus beginning to address these extremely urgent issues. Nevertheless the Senegalese forest sector lacks institutional capacities and efficiency in order to launch basic reform processes and to implement sustainable changes on a large scale and to face deforestation. | The Senegalese government has recently published several policy orientations, thus beginning to address these extremely urgent issues. Nevertheless the Senegalese forest sector lacks institutional capacities and efficiency in order to launch basic reform processes and to implement sustainable changes on a large scale and to face deforestation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Senegal Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] </div> | ||
== LPG<br/> == | == LPG<br/> == | ||
| − | In the 1970’s the government launched the national butanisation programme in order to re-place charcoal consumption by '''Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)''' through subsidies and promotion campaigns, resulting in around 70 percent of urban households in Senegal and nearly 90% of households in Dakar using LPG as primary cooking fuel. The Senegal Ministry of Energy estimated the annual saving of firewood and charcoal to be 70,000 tons and 90,000 tons, respectively. To learn more about the project, click [[Senegal: | + | In the 1970’s the government launched the national butanisation programme in order to re-place charcoal consumption by '''Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)''' through subsidies and promotion campaigns, resulting in around 70 percent of urban households in Senegal and nearly 90% of households in Dakar using LPG as primary cooking fuel. The Senegal Ministry of Energy estimated the annual saving of firewood and charcoal to be 70,000 tons and 90,000 tons, respectively. To learn more about the project, click [[Senegal: Best Practice Case Studies#Senegal Liquid Petroleum Gas .28LPG.29 Programme|here]].<br/>Nevertheless, biomass resources and wood in particular continue to be unsustainably ex-ploited. |
| − | + | [[Senegal Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] | |
== Electricity<br/> == | == Electricity<br/> == | ||
| Line 116: | Line 59: | ||
[[File:Electricity Prod Cap of Senegal.JPG|thumb|left|470px|Installed Capacity and Electricity Production in Senegal]]<br/> | [[File:Electricity Prod Cap of Senegal.JPG|thumb|left|470px|Installed Capacity and Electricity Production in Senegal]]<br/> | ||
| − | Nevertheless and in comparison to neighbouring countries, the electrification rate is relatively high: at 75% in urban areas and 17% rural, the national average is 45 %, up from approximately 30% a decade ago. In comparison, in neighbouring Mali national coverage is just 25%. However, this (rural) coverage also implies the governments' ambitious target to achieve 50% rural electrification by 2012 has not nearly been achieved. | + | Nevertheless and in comparison to neighbouring countries, the electrification rate is relatively high: at 75% in urban areas and 17% rural, the national average is 45 %, up from approximately 30% a decade ago. In comparison, in neighbouring Mali national coverage is just 25%. However, this (rural) coverage also implies the governments' ambitious target to achieve 50% rural electrification by 2012 has not nearly been achieved. |
| − | + | [[Senegal Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] | |
= Electricity Generation, Transmission and Distribution<br/> = | = Electricity Generation, Transmission and Distribution<br/> = | ||
| Line 124: | Line 67: | ||
== Electricty Generation == | == Electricty Generation == | ||
| − | Senegal’s total installed capacity is 638 MW (2010 est) of which 80% is connected to the national grid. SENELEC owns power stations with nearly 60 % of the total production capacity while the remainder is private, either GTI-Dakar or ESKOM-Manantali. | + | Senegal’s total installed capacity is 638 MW (2010 est) of which 80% is connected to the national grid. SENELEC owns power stations with nearly 60 % of the total production capacity while the remainder is private, either GTI-Dakar or ESKOM-Manantali. |
As indicated above, over 80% is generated by diesel plants, while there are also gas-, steam- and gas-steam power plants. As a result electricity production costs strongly depend on the world market oil-price and the local Diesel price, both for the national grid as well as mini-grids. However, due to subsidies the consumer price is kept artificially low. | As indicated above, over 80% is generated by diesel plants, while there are also gas-, steam- and gas-steam power plants. As a result electricity production costs strongly depend on the world market oil-price and the local Diesel price, both for the national grid as well as mini-grids. However, due to subsidies the consumer price is kept artificially low. | ||
| Line 130: | Line 73: | ||
Some 10% of the total instyalled capacity comes from the 60 MW that Senegal uses of the 200 MW Manantali hydroelectric power plant at the border with Mali. | Some 10% of the total instyalled capacity comes from the 60 MW that Senegal uses of the 200 MW Manantali hydroelectric power plant at the border with Mali. | ||
| − | + | [[Senegal Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] | |
== Transmission == | == Transmission == | ||
| Line 142: | Line 85: | ||
== Distribution == | == Distribution == | ||
| − | All distribution is carried out by SENELEC. | + | All distribution is carried out by SENELEC. </div> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
= Rural Electrification = | = Rural Electrification = | ||
| Line 151: | Line 91: | ||
While rural electrification stands at 17%, for the larger part this again concerns larger villages and relatively densely populated rural areas. However, nearly half the rural population lives in small villages (< 500 inhabitants) that are of little interest to private investors due to relatively high investment costs and low revenues. | While rural electrification stands at 17%, for the larger part this again concerns larger villages and relatively densely populated rural areas. However, nearly half the rural population lives in small villages (< 500 inhabitants) that are of little interest to private investors due to relatively high investment costs and low revenues. | ||
| − | For electrification of rural areas the Senegalese government developed a two-pronged concessionaire-model: <br/>- Large scale concessions through the Rural Electrification Priority Programme (PPER); this concerns sizeable concessions given out to national or international utilities;<br/>- Small scale concessions named ERIL (Local Initiative for Rural Electrification), through which local initiatives for electrification can get their initial investmenrt subsidised. | + | For electrification of rural areas the Senegalese government developed a two-pronged concessionaire-model:<br/>- Large scale concessions through the Rural Electrification Priority Programme (PPER); this concerns sizeable concessions given out to national or international utilities;<br/>- Small scale concessions named ERIL (Local Initiative for Rural Electrification), through which local initiatives for electrification can get their initial investmenrt subsidised. |
| − | The Senegalese Agency for Rural Electrification (ASER) is responsible for the implementation of the model (see Public Institutions and Actors). | + | The Senegalese Agency for Rural Electrification (ASER) is responsible for the implementation of the model (see Public Institutions and Actors). |
| − | For the PPER all of Senegal is divided into concession zones (9 concessions remain after a consolidation). International donors and the Senegalese government provide subsidies to concessionaires for their rural electrification activities. Donors involved entail the World Bank, the German development bank KfW and the African Development Bank. Subsidies amount to 70 % of funds required for investment and engineering. The concessionaire contributes 20 % and the users 10 %. End users are charged cost covering tariffs. All donors have dedicated a share of their funds (ca. 15 %) for the installation of renewable energy systems. | + | For the PPER all of Senegal is divided into concession zones (9 concessions remain after a consolidation). International donors and the Senegalese government provide subsidies to concessionaires for their rural electrification activities. Donors involved entail the World Bank, the German development bank KfW and the African Development Bank. Subsidies amount to 70 % of funds required for investment and engineering. The concessionaire contributes 20 % and the users 10 %. End users are charged cost covering tariffs. All donors have dedicated a share of their funds (ca. 15 %) for the installation of renewable energy systems. |
The first concession was awarded in 2008. Within the large concession areas municipalities can apply for ERIL loans (Electrification Rurale d’Initiative Locale – rural electrification through local initiatives) to implement electrification projects themselves. For ERILs, the same 70/20/10% funding distribution applies as for the PPER concessions. For all ERILs a seperate application has to be prepared and submitted, which should subsequently be approved by ASER and the PPER concessionaire for the region concerned. | The first concession was awarded in 2008. Within the large concession areas municipalities can apply for ERIL loans (Electrification Rurale d’Initiative Locale – rural electrification through local initiatives) to implement electrification projects themselves. For ERILs, the same 70/20/10% funding distribution applies as for the PPER concessions. For all ERILs a seperate application has to be prepared and submitted, which should subsequently be approved by ASER and the PPER concessionaire for the region concerned. | ||
| Line 161: | Line 101: | ||
The concessionaires eventually will only reach a part of the rural population. In line with ASER's current strategy, in the coming 10 to 15 years only villages in the relative vicinity of medium tension power lines will be supplied with electricity. In the concession zones of KfW in the Peanut Basin and the Casamance, for example, about 1 million people in 2,600 villages will not be connected to the grid in the foreseeable future. | The concessionaires eventually will only reach a part of the rural population. In line with ASER's current strategy, in the coming 10 to 15 years only villages in the relative vicinity of medium tension power lines will be supplied with electricity. In the concession zones of KfW in the Peanut Basin and the Casamance, for example, about 1 million people in 2,600 villages will not be connected to the grid in the foreseeable future. | ||
| − | Although in principle the two concession models of ASER (large-scale concessions (PPER), and concessions based on local initiative (ERIL)), in conjunction with the tariffs set by the regulatory authority, ensure profitability for the operators and thus continued maintenance (and hence sustainability), in practice operation of ERILs proves more expensive than anticipated - rendering their operation unsustainable. Moreover it lasted years until th elegal framework for ERILs was ecventually fully finalised. Only very recently (late 2013) the first ERIL got fully and completely legal. | + | Although in principle the two concession models of ASER (large-scale concessions (PPER), and concessions based on local initiative (ERIL)), in conjunction with the tariffs set by the regulatory authority, ensure profitability for the operators and thus continued maintenance (and hence sustainability), in practice operation of ERILs proves more expensive than anticipated - rendering their operation unsustainable. Moreover it lasted years until th elegal framework for ERILs was ecventually fully finalised. Only very recently (late 2013) the first ERIL got fully and completely legal. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | [[Senegal Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] </div> | ||
= Institutional Set Up and Actors in the Energy Sector = | = Institutional Set Up and Actors in the Energy Sector = | ||
| Line 182: | Line 115: | ||
'''ASER''' was founded in 2000 and is the governmental agency which is charged with the task of rural electrification. It is financed by the Senegalese government and international donores (such as Worldbank, DGIS, GIZ, KfW, AfDB, IsDB). ASER tends the concessions for rural areas for private investors and finances 70% of the projects (see '''Rural Electrification section'''). Urban electricity supply remained within the responsibility of SENELEC/CRSE. | '''ASER''' was founded in 2000 and is the governmental agency which is charged with the task of rural electrification. It is financed by the Senegalese government and international donores (such as Worldbank, DGIS, GIZ, KfW, AfDB, IsDB). ASER tends the concessions for rural areas for private investors and finances 70% of the projects (see '''Rural Electrification section'''). Urban electricity supply remained within the responsibility of SENELEC/CRSE. | ||
| − | + | [[Senegal Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] | |
| − | + | == Non Governmental Service Providers == | |
| − | |||
| − | == Non Governmental Service Providers | ||
=== Commercial Service Providers === | === Commercial Service Providers === | ||
During the 1990s, Senegalese companies sold about 2,000 PV systems per year, but the reorganisation of the electricity sector had a negative impact of the nascent Senegalese market for solar energy systems. Only few solar companies survived the reform. However, with increasing poopularity of PV systems many new entrants have entered the market and at present there's some tens of PV companies, though there's only of handfull of some meaningfull size. Such companies are mainly involved in installation and service for donor-funded systems while the market for unsubsidised systems is small. | During the 1990s, Senegalese companies sold about 2,000 PV systems per year, but the reorganisation of the electricity sector had a negative impact of the nascent Senegalese market for solar energy systems. Only few solar companies survived the reform. However, with increasing poopularity of PV systems many new entrants have entered the market and at present there's some tens of PV companies, though there's only of handfull of some meaningfull size. Such companies are mainly involved in installation and service for donor-funded systems while the market for unsubsidised systems is small. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Senegal Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
=== Micro Finance Institutions === | === Micro Finance Institutions === | ||
| − | Micro finance institutions, providing loans to private operators, eventually should play an important role in the further spread of rural electrification. | + | Micro finance institutions, providing loans to private operators, eventually should play an important role in the further spread of rural electrification. |
The ministry in charge of micro-finance ist the "[http://www.famille.gouv.sn/ Ministére de la Famille,de la Solidarité Nationale, de la Sécurité Alimentaire, de l'Entreprenariat Féminin, de la Micro Finance et de la Petite Enfance]". | The ministry in charge of micro-finance ist the "[http://www.famille.gouv.sn/ Ministére de la Famille,de la Solidarité Nationale, de la Sécurité Alimentaire, de l'Entreprenariat Féminin, de la Micro Finance et de la Petite Enfance]". | ||
| Line 200: | Line 135: | ||
The SEM Fund, or the [http://www.sem-fund.org/ Senegal Ecovillage Microfinance Fund], is a nonprofit organisation dedicated to poverty alleviation by providing affordable business loans aimed at strengthening the business skills and livelihoods of highly motivated microentrepreneurs that lack access to the commercial banking system. | The SEM Fund, or the [http://www.sem-fund.org/ Senegal Ecovillage Microfinance Fund], is a nonprofit organisation dedicated to poverty alleviation by providing affordable business loans aimed at strengthening the business skills and livelihoods of highly motivated microentrepreneurs that lack access to the commercial banking system. | ||
| − | + | [[Senegal Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
= Policy Framework = | = Policy Framework = | ||
| Line 209: | Line 142: | ||
A renewable energy law came into effect late 2010. The law is kept rather general. All details will be determined in by-laws which are currently being elaborated. The text of the law can be found [[:file:Loi des ENR-senegal.pdf|here]]. | A renewable energy law came into effect late 2010. The law is kept rather general. All details will be determined in by-laws which are currently being elaborated. The text of the law can be found [[:file:Loi des ENR-senegal.pdf|here]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Senegal Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] | ||
== Poverty Reduction Strategy and Energy Policy == | == Poverty Reduction Strategy and Energy Policy == | ||
| Line 215: | Line 150: | ||
The PRSP names ten overall objectives for the development of the energy sector: | The PRSP names ten overall objectives for the development of the energy sector: | ||
| + | |||
#develop the institutional framework and production capacity for energy | #develop the institutional framework and production capacity for energy | ||
#promote the engine of productive activities | #promote the engine of productive activities | ||
| Line 225: | Line 161: | ||
#enhance access to energy services in rural and suburban areas so as to facilitate the working of basic infrastructures (schools, healthcare facilities, conservation infrastructures, etc.) | #enhance access to energy services in rural and suburban areas so as to facilitate the working of basic infrastructures (schools, healthcare facilities, conservation infrastructures, etc.) | ||
#improve access to oil and gas. | #improve access to oil and gas. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Senegal Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] | ||
== National Energy Sector Development Strategy == | == National Energy Sector Development Strategy == | ||
The ''Lettre de Politique de Développement du Secteur de l’énergie'' (LPDSE) was approved in 2008 to cope with the fundamental problems of the energy sector. There are six main objetives: | The ''Lettre de Politique de Développement du Secteur de l’énergie'' (LPDSE) was approved in 2008 to cope with the fundamental problems of the energy sector. There are six main objetives: | ||
| + | |||
#Development and usage of domestic energy resources, particularly biofuels and renewable energies. | #Development and usage of domestic energy resources, particularly biofuels and renewable energies. | ||
#Diversification of energy sources for power generation: increase use of coal, biofuels, biomass (especially biomass produced in sustainable, participative forest management systems) | #Diversification of energy sources for power generation: increase use of coal, biofuels, biomass (especially biomass produced in sustainable, participative forest management systems) | ||
| Line 236: | Line 175: | ||
#Reducing the energy demand and increasing the energy efficiency | #Reducing the energy demand and increasing the energy efficiency | ||
| − | + | [[Senegal Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] | |
== National Household Fuels Subsector Development Strategy == | == National Household Fuels Subsector Development Strategy == | ||
The ''Lettre de Politique de développement du sous-secteur des combustibles domestiques'' (LPDSCD) was also approved in 2008 and aims at | The ''Lettre de Politique de développement du sous-secteur des combustibles domestiques'' (LPDSCD) was also approved in 2008 and aims at | ||
| + | |||
#the management of the supply side through participative forest management systems | #the management of the supply side through participative forest management systems | ||
#the management of the demand side through the dissemination of improved stoves, gas-stoves and alternative energy sources such as kerosene, biomass-briquettes and gelfuel among others. | #the management of the demand side through the dissemination of improved stoves, gas-stoves and alternative energy sources such as kerosene, biomass-briquettes and gelfuel among others. | ||
| Line 246: | Line 186: | ||
#the dissemination of modern energy sources in rural areas (particularly for rural electrification issues). | #the dissemination of modern energy sources in rural areas (particularly for rural electrification issues). | ||
| − | + | [[Senegal Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] | |
== Climate Change == | == Climate Change == | ||
| Line 253: | Line 193: | ||
Flooding of thermal plants in some cases is a realistic threat that will need to be addressed. Already one plant has suffered severe damage from heavy rains. | Flooding of thermal plants in some cases is a realistic threat that will need to be addressed. Already one plant has suffered severe damage from heavy rains. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Senegal Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| + | = Obstacles for Rural Electrification = | ||
| − | = | + | == Grid Based == |
| − | + | *Even though concessionaires have started their activities, eventually they will only reach a small part of the rural population, leaving over half the rural area unelectrified for the foreseeable future. | |
| + | *ASERs' administrative processes are lengthy and intransparent to potential operators (necessity for capacity building of ASER staff). | ||
| + | *Although in principle the two concession models of ASER (large-scale concessions (PPER) and concessions based on local initiative (ERIL)), in conjunction with the tariffs set by the regulatory authority, ensure profitability for operators and thus continued maintenance (and hence sustainability), profitability hence atractiveness for concessionnaires still has to be proven. | ||
| − | + | [[Senegal Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | == Off Grid == | |
| − | + | *low purchasing power of the consumers (implying a need for subsidies if a broad range of people is to be targeted, although the willingness to pay may be higher for truly good service); | |
| − | + | *the small number of qualified enterprises intervening on the rural market; with expanding rural electrification little by little tghis barrier is being overcome | |
| − | *low purchasing power of the consumers (implying a need for subsidies if a broad range of people is to be targeted) | + | *legal environment; as is indicated above this issue was recently tackled |
| − | *small number of qualified enterprises intervening on the rural market | + | *lengthy administrative procedures implying retarded income generation. |
*incongruity of rural electrification funds and demand | *incongruity of rural electrification funds and demand | ||
| − | * | + | *high investment costs; while particulalrly the prices of solar panels have come down a lot, those of batteries and power electronics are still high; apart from donors stepping in operators thus require loans in order to expand their business, however there's not a lot of financing institutions to turn to; with expanding activities this issue will need more attention. |
| − | + | [[Senegal Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] | |
= Further Information = | = Further Information = | ||
| − | * | + | *[https://www.get-invest.eu/market-information/senegal/useful-links/ Get.invest's Market Insights Package for Senegal] |
| − | |||
| − | [https:// | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| Line 288: | Line 229: | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[Senegal Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] |
| − | |||
Revision as of 09:40, 24 July 2019
Capital:
Dakar
Region:
Coordinates:
14.6667° N, 17.4167° W
Total Area (km²): It includes a country's total area, including areas under inland bodies of water and some coastal waterways.
196,710
Population: It is based on the de facto definition of population, which counts all residents regardless of legal status or citizenship--except for refugees not permanently settled in the country of asylum, who are generally considered part of the population of their country of origin.
17,316,449 (2022)
Rural Population (% of total population): It refers to people living in rural areas as defined by national statistical offices. It is calculated as the difference between total population and urban population.
51 (2022)
GDP (current US$): It is the sum of gross value added by all resident producers in the economy plus any product taxes and minus any subsidies not included in the value of the products. It is calculated without making deductions for depreciation of fabricated assets or for depletion and degradation of natural resources.
27,684,264,748 (2022)
GDP Per Capita (current US$): It is gross domestic product divided by midyear population
1,598.73 (2022)
Access to Electricity (% of population): It is the percentage of population with access to electricity.
67.98 (2021)
Energy Imports Net (% of energy use): It is estimated as energy use less production, both measured in oil equivalents. A negative value indicates that the country is a net exporter. Energy use refers to use of primary energy before transformation to other end-use fuels, which is equal to indigenous production plus imports and stock changes, minus exports and fuels supplied to ships and aircraft engaged in international transport.
52.69 (2014)
Fossil Fuel Energy Consumption (% of total): It comprises coal, oil, petroleum, and natural gas products.
53.91 (2014)
Introduction
The Senegalese energy sector is relatively small. Total fossil fuel provision stands at 27 TWh/year, thereby making up nearly 40% of Senegal's primary energy provision of which the remainder is nearly entirely biomass (well over 50%) - most of which non-renewable - complemented by some coal and some hydro and solar for renewably generated electricity.
In terms of consumption, the large biomass share in energy provision is for the by far biggest part used for cooking in households, either as firewood (58% of households) or after carbonisation as charcoal (26 % of households). In addition 11% of households use LPG for cooking (mainly in bigger towns), 4% use electricity and 1% uses lampoil. The LPG share thereby is smaller than one would expect based on prevalence of LPG stoves (e.g. in Dakar, where 20% of Senegal's population lives, over 90% of households have LPG stoves) - as LPG supply is not always reliable, in which case (urban) households fall back on charcoal.
Cooking overall also easily accounts for the largest share of household energy consumption; while the electrification rate at 45% is not even very low, electricity consumption in households is still limited.
In total only some 10% of final energy consumed concerns electricity, largely generated by fossil fuels (diesel-gensets) and for a small part renewably (hydro, wind and solar). The renewable potential however is large, and little by little is getting recognised : along the coast there's good potential for windpower; irradiation throughout the country at 5-7 kWh/m2/day is favourable for PV, in addition to which there's hydropotential along major rivers - though with rainfall predicted to decline by some 20% over the next decades, hydro’s role in Senegal’s energy mix should be carefully tailored.
The below diagram shows the development over time of the energy consumption of households, transport and industry.
As a whole, the energy-sector has to deal with inefficient technologies, a low density distribution grid, a lack of regulatory framework and weak financial structures.
Biomass
As biomass accounts for more than half of Senegal's energy consumption, the pressure on Senegalese forests is high, and the use of biomass for cooking is responsible for a large part of the depletion of the country's forest stocks. In the medium term deforestation will create bottle-necks in the supply of cooking energy, particularly for the poorest households.
Demand for charcoal from Senegalese forests also may well increase if and when subsidies for LPG would be phased out in reaction to pressure from the West African Monetary Union, prompting poorer households to return to their traditional fuel usage patterns. Thereby the effect might be aggravetd as particulalrly such poorer households might not be able to afford efficient (charcoal) cookstoves - implying they'd subsequently use low efficiency charcoal stoves.
In the urban and peri-urban Dakar region, the high demand for traditional fuels nowadays can only be exploiting wood sources up to 500 km away from the capital. While Senegal still counts a relatively high share of primary forests, deforestation leads to annual forest-losses of 0.5 percent, which comes close to the average of Western African countries. Anyway, figures from FAO on Africa and Senegal in particular indicate that agricultural land clearance eventually will become, or already is the predominant cause of deforestation.
Due to the high demand, the price of charcoal increased by 42 percent between 2005 and 2008, which is, however, still less than the increase in the ceiling price for LPG that increased by 48 and 63 percent for the two main bottle sizes (3.5 and 6 kg) respectively. Thereby, cooking energy increased disproportionately compoared to the 14% increase in general consumer prices in the same period. .
Some key figures:
- 40,000 ha of forest are lost every year (to chopping for firewood, forest fires, desertification)
- the price of traditional fuels (firewood, charcoal) has more than doubled in the last 10 years
- between 5,400 and 6,300 people annually die from diseases caused by indoor air pollution
- 45 % of Senegal’s primary energy demand are covered by firewood (31 % directly as firewood and 14 % as charcoal)
The Senegalese government has recently published several policy orientations, thus beginning to address these extremely urgent issues. Nevertheless the Senegalese forest sector lacks institutional capacities and efficiency in order to launch basic reform processes and to implement sustainable changes on a large scale and to face deforestation.
►Go to Top </div>
LPG
In the 1970’s the government launched the national butanisation programme in order to re-place charcoal consumption by Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) through subsidies and promotion campaigns, resulting in around 70 percent of urban households in Senegal and nearly 90% of households in Dakar using LPG as primary cooking fuel. The Senegal Ministry of Energy estimated the annual saving of firewood and charcoal to be 70,000 tons and 90,000 tons, respectively. To learn more about the project, click here.
Nevertheless, biomass resources and wood in particular continue to be unsustainably ex-ploited.
Electricity
Since the year 2000 electricity production increases by approximately 7% annually and stood at 2,8 TWh in 2012. Over 80% of its generation results from fossil fuel powered plants / gen-sets, 2% from gas power plants, 2% from co-generation, 10% from hydropower plants, and 2% from other renewable sources (PV, wind, some renewable biomass). At present approximately 5 GWh/year is produced decentralized with PV application.
As demand for electricity grows a lot faster than its supply, Senegal is facing serious problems. The national utility SENELEC lacks an efficient organisational structure and lacks (access to funds for) investments in powerplants and transmission-lines in order to cope with the increasing demand. Reserve capacity presently is insufficient, causing frequent (scheduled or unscheduled) outages of whole districts, while transmission losses, old thermal power plants and increasing oil prices result in high average production costs. The below graph shows consumption and capacity over time, underpinning the above.
Nevertheless and in comparison to neighbouring countries, the electrification rate is relatively high: at 75% in urban areas and 17% rural, the national average is 45 %, up from approximately 30% a decade ago. In comparison, in neighbouring Mali national coverage is just 25%. However, this (rural) coverage also implies the governments' ambitious target to achieve 50% rural electrification by 2012 has not nearly been achieved.
Electricity Generation, Transmission and Distribution
Electricty Generation
Senegal’s total installed capacity is 638 MW (2010 est) of which 80% is connected to the national grid. SENELEC owns power stations with nearly 60 % of the total production capacity while the remainder is private, either GTI-Dakar or ESKOM-Manantali.
As indicated above, over 80% is generated by diesel plants, while there are also gas-, steam- and gas-steam power plants. As a result electricity production costs strongly depend on the world market oil-price and the local Diesel price, both for the national grid as well as mini-grids. However, due to subsidies the consumer price is kept artificially low.
Some 10% of the total instyalled capacity comes from the 60 MW that Senegal uses of the 200 MW Manantali hydroelectric power plant at the border with Mali.
Transmission
There are two grid-systems: the 90 kV national grid and the 225 kV supranational grid, together totalling some 13,000 km. Both are managed by SENELEC. The grid mainly supplies urban areas around Dakar, Thies, St. Louis and Kaolack/Fatick with electricity. But there are several isolated networks in order to power some remote areas.
The following map shows the current electricity transport lines as well as main power plants.
Distribution
All distribution is carried out by SENELEC. </div>
Rural Electrification
While rural electrification stands at 17%, for the larger part this again concerns larger villages and relatively densely populated rural areas. However, nearly half the rural population lives in small villages (< 500 inhabitants) that are of little interest to private investors due to relatively high investment costs and low revenues.
For electrification of rural areas the Senegalese government developed a two-pronged concessionaire-model:
- Large scale concessions through the Rural Electrification Priority Programme (PPER); this concerns sizeable concessions given out to national or international utilities;
- Small scale concessions named ERIL (Local Initiative for Rural Electrification), through which local initiatives for electrification can get their initial investmenrt subsidised.
The Senegalese Agency for Rural Electrification (ASER) is responsible for the implementation of the model (see Public Institutions and Actors).
For the PPER all of Senegal is divided into concession zones (9 concessions remain after a consolidation). International donors and the Senegalese government provide subsidies to concessionaires for their rural electrification activities. Donors involved entail the World Bank, the German development bank KfW and the African Development Bank. Subsidies amount to 70 % of funds required for investment and engineering. The concessionaire contributes 20 % and the users 10 %. End users are charged cost covering tariffs. All donors have dedicated a share of their funds (ca. 15 %) for the installation of renewable energy systems.
The first concession was awarded in 2008. Within the large concession areas municipalities can apply for ERIL loans (Electrification Rurale d’Initiative Locale – rural electrification through local initiatives) to implement electrification projects themselves. For ERILs, the same 70/20/10% funding distribution applies as for the PPER concessions. For all ERILs a seperate application has to be prepared and submitted, which should subsequently be approved by ASER and the PPER concessionaire for the region concerned.
The concessionaires eventually will only reach a part of the rural population. In line with ASER's current strategy, in the coming 10 to 15 years only villages in the relative vicinity of medium tension power lines will be supplied with electricity. In the concession zones of KfW in the Peanut Basin and the Casamance, for example, about 1 million people in 2,600 villages will not be connected to the grid in the foreseeable future.
Although in principle the two concession models of ASER (large-scale concessions (PPER), and concessions based on local initiative (ERIL)), in conjunction with the tariffs set by the regulatory authority, ensure profitability for the operators and thus continued maintenance (and hence sustainability), in practice operation of ERILs proves more expensive than anticipated - rendering their operation unsustainable. Moreover it lasted years until th elegal framework for ERILs was ecventually fully finalised. Only very recently (late 2013) the first ERIL got fully and completely legal.
►Go to Top </div>
Institutional Set Up and Actors in the Energy Sector
Public Institutions and Actors
In 1997 Senegal began a reorganisation of its electricity sector following recommendations by the World Bank. It was decided to privatise the public utility SENELEC, to found the "Agence Sénégalaise d’Electrification Rurale" (ASER – Senegalese Agency for Rural Electrification) and to put in place the "Commission de Régulation du Secteur de l’Electricité" (CRSE – Regulatory Commission for the Electricity Sector).
The Ministry of Energy (Ministère de l’Energie) as the lead agency is in charge of formulating, coordinating, and setting overall objectives, policies, strategies, and general directives for the entire energy sector. Furthermore it is authorized to issue directives to SENELEC.
The CRSE
ASER was founded in 2000 and is the governmental agency which is charged with the task of rural electrification. It is financed by the Senegalese government and international donores (such as Worldbank, DGIS, GIZ, KfW, AfDB, IsDB). ASER tends the concessions for rural areas for private investors and finances 70% of the projects (see Rural Electrification section). Urban electricity supply remained within the responsibility of SENELEC/CRSE.
Non Governmental Service Providers
Commercial Service Providers
During the 1990s, Senegalese companies sold about 2,000 PV systems per year, but the reorganisation of the electricity sector had a negative impact of the nascent Senegalese market for solar energy systems. Only few solar companies survived the reform. However, with increasing poopularity of PV systems many new entrants have entered the market and at present there's some tens of PV companies, though there's only of handfull of some meaningfull size. Such companies are mainly involved in installation and service for donor-funded systems while the market for unsubsidised systems is small.
Micro Finance Institutions
Micro finance institutions, providing loans to private operators, eventually should play an important role in the further spread of rural electrification.
The ministry in charge of micro-finance ist the "Ministére de la Famille,de la Solidarité Nationale, de la Sécurité Alimentaire, de l'Entreprenariat Féminin, de la Micro Finance et de la Petite Enfance".
The SEM Fund, or the Senegal Ecovillage Microfinance Fund, is a nonprofit organisation dedicated to poverty alleviation by providing affordable business loans aimed at strengthening the business skills and livelihoods of highly motivated microentrepreneurs that lack access to the commercial banking system.
Policy Framework
Renewable Energy Law
A renewable energy law came into effect late 2010. The law is kept rather general. All details will be determined in by-laws which are currently being elaborated. The text of the law can be found here.
Poverty Reduction Strategy and Energy Policy
Senegegal´s Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) pushes the poverty reduction agenda forward so as to meet the objective of raising economic growth to about 7 percent per year necessary to halve poverty by 2015, in line with the targets set out in the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) and the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).
The PRSP names ten overall objectives for the development of the energy sector:
- develop the institutional framework and production capacity for energy
- promote the engine of productive activities
- involve private operators, village associations and local authorities in the development of energy infrastructures and services;
- ensure the financing of activities aimed at developing the energy sector
- diversify energy sources and technologies
- promote the control of energy and renewable energy sources
- create an investment programme for access to energy services aimed at economic and human development
- provide better and safer public access to domestic fuels
- enhance access to energy services in rural and suburban areas so as to facilitate the working of basic infrastructures (schools, healthcare facilities, conservation infrastructures, etc.)
- improve access to oil and gas.
National Energy Sector Development Strategy
The Lettre de Politique de Développement du Secteur de l’énergie (LPDSE) was approved in 2008 to cope with the fundamental problems of the energy sector. There are six main objetives:
- Development and usage of domestic energy resources, particularly biofuels and renewable energies.
- Diversification of energy sources for power generation: increase use of coal, biofuels, biomass (especially biomass produced in sustainable, participative forest management systems)
- Increase share of hydropower through the participation in regional cooperation projects such as OMVG, OMVS and WAPP
- Security in supply of oil products by building own refineries and close cooperation with oil producing countries.
- Increasing the electricity supply in rural areas especially pro social and productive uses
- Reducing the energy demand and increasing the energy efficiency
National Household Fuels Subsector Development Strategy
The Lettre de Politique de développement du sous-secteur des combustibles domestiques (LPDSCD) was also approved in 2008 and aims at
- the management of the supply side through participative forest management systems
- the management of the demand side through the dissemination of improved stoves, gas-stoves and alternative energy sources such as kerosene, biomass-briquettes and gelfuel among others.
- the improvement of the institutional and fiscal framework
- the dissemination of modern energy sources in rural areas (particularly for rural electrification issues).
Climate Change
Senegal already has some key adaptation elements in place. The country has a national contingency plan that includes studies of natural disasters such as flooding, and of the areas where disasters might occur. Maps showing projected cloud cover and wind speeds are available. Biomass consumption is also being tackled with substantial research on biomass issues and promotion of improved woodstoves.
Flooding of thermal plants in some cases is a realistic threat that will need to be addressed. Already one plant has suffered severe damage from heavy rains.
Obstacles for Rural Electrification
Grid Based
- Even though concessionaires have started their activities, eventually they will only reach a small part of the rural population, leaving over half the rural area unelectrified for the foreseeable future.
- ASERs' administrative processes are lengthy and intransparent to potential operators (necessity for capacity building of ASER staff).
- Although in principle the two concession models of ASER (large-scale concessions (PPER) and concessions based on local initiative (ERIL)), in conjunction with the tariffs set by the regulatory authority, ensure profitability for operators and thus continued maintenance (and hence sustainability), profitability hence atractiveness for concessionnaires still has to be proven.
Off Grid
- low purchasing power of the consumers (implying a need for subsidies if a broad range of people is to be targeted, although the willingness to pay may be higher for truly good service);
- the small number of qualified enterprises intervening on the rural market; with expanding rural electrification little by little tghis barrier is being overcome
- legal environment; as is indicated above this issue was recently tackled
- lengthy administrative procedures implying retarded income generation.
- incongruity of rural electrification funds and demand
- high investment costs; while particulalrly the prices of solar panels have come down a lot, those of batteries and power electronics are still high; apart from donors stepping in operators thus require loans in order to expand their business, however there's not a lot of financing institutions to turn to; with expanding activities this issue will need more attention.
Further Information
