Make sure you register to our monthly newsletter, it's going out soon! Stay up do date about the latest energy news and our current activities.
Click here to register!

Difference between revisions of "Solar Energy and Rural Development - Exploration into End-users' Impact Evaluation"

From energypedia
***** (***** | *****)
***** (***** | *****)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Results_bunt.jpg|center]]The current thesis addresses the question, in which way solar energy use impacts on rural development in off-grid areas. For this a field study was conducted in the village Rema in Amhara region, Ethiopia, which utilizes solar home systems (SHSs) for lighting, phone charging, radio, TV and fridges.<br>An answering approach towards the question was developed with the special focus on obtaining end-user defined impacts from solar use. According to the Indian economist Amartya Kumar Sen, development can be defined as increasing people’s choices in life, referred to as capabilities (2001). The capabilities have to be defined by the people themselves, in order to make them agents of their own lifes. Therefore, a survey using qualitative methods was conducted in Rema, asking for the impacts experienced by the end users. <br>The impacts found were the capabilities made available by solar home systems. Those were economical improvements, health, education, self-determined time use, changes in gender relations, social interaction, information, communication, entertainment, security, well-being and changes in the people’s state-of-mind.<br>The obtained categories were allocated towards the most basic or critical choices defined in the Human Development Reports (UNDP, 2003) and choices exceeding those related to basic needs (see figure). <br>
+
The current thesis addresses the question, in which way solar energy use impacts on rural development in off-grid areas. For this a field study was conducted in the village Rema in Amhara region, Ethiopia, which utilizes solar home systems (SHSs) for lighting, phone charging, radio, TV and fridges.<br>An answering approach towards the question was developed with the special focus on obtaining end-user defined impacts from solar use. According to the Indian economist Amartya Kumar Sen, development can be defined as increasing people’s choices in life, referred to as capabilities (2001). The capabilities have to be defined by the people themselves, in order to make them agents of their own lifes. Therefore, a survey using qualitative methods was conducted in Rema, asking for the impacts experienced by the end users. <br>The impacts found were the capabilities made available by solar home systems. Those were economical improvements, health, education, self-determined time use, changes in gender relations, social interaction, information, communication, entertainment, security, well-being and changes in the people’s state-of-mind.<br>The obtained categories were allocated towards the most basic or critical choices defined in the Human Development Reports (UNDP, 2003) and choices exceeding those related to basic needs (see figure). <br>[[Image:Results bunt.jpg|center|680x489px|Results bunt.jpg]]

Revision as of 18:23, 3 October 2012

The current thesis addresses the question, in which way solar energy use impacts on rural development in off-grid areas. For this a field study was conducted in the village Rema in Amhara region, Ethiopia, which utilizes solar home systems (SHSs) for lighting, phone charging, radio, TV and fridges.
An answering approach towards the question was developed with the special focus on obtaining end-user defined impacts from solar use. According to the Indian economist Amartya Kumar Sen, development can be defined as increasing people’s choices in life, referred to as capabilities (2001). The capabilities have to be defined by the people themselves, in order to make them agents of their own lifes. Therefore, a survey using qualitative methods was conducted in Rema, asking for the impacts experienced by the end users.
The impacts found were the capabilities made available by solar home systems. Those were economical improvements, health, education, self-determined time use, changes in gender relations, social interaction, information, communication, entertainment, security, well-being and changes in the people’s state-of-mind.
The obtained categories were allocated towards the most basic or critical choices defined in the Human Development Reports (UNDP, 2003) and choices exceeding those related to basic needs (see figure).

Results bunt.jpg