View source for A Participatory Gaming Approach To Community Energy Planning in Southeast Asia: Spreading Best-Practices on Community Engagement

<div class="WISIONS">

== Introduction ==
{| class="wikitable"
|+Basic Project Information
|Location:
|Kampung Buayan, Kampung Terian and Kampung Timpayasa, East Malaysia
|-
|Technology:
|Minigrids Minigrid planning tool
|-
|Costs:
|Total: 20,500 € 
|-
|
|WISIONS financial support: 20,500 € 
|-
|Partners Involved:
|[https://www.enactpartners.org/ Energy Action Partners] (ENACT) [https://www.hpnet.org/ Hydro Empowerment Network] (HPNET)
|-
|Duration:
|April 2017 – November 2017
|}
The project, “A Participatory Gaming Approach to Community Energy Planning in Southeast Asia: Spreading Best Practices on Community Engagement”, applied a novel gaming approach to building community energy systems. It emphasised participation, collaboration and capacity-building within communities.

== Exchange Need and Objective(s) ==
Conventional minigrid planning tends to limit the participation of households and communities and excludes social and organisational success factors. A lack of community engagement often leads to poor system design, and absence of local maintenance, system abandonment and limited community benefit. Thus, planning methods and tools need to be improved and expanded by including communal knowledge resources in the overall process. The project’s objectives were: 
* to increase communities’ understanding of minigrid design, management and operation and to incorporate users’ input and knowledge into system design and management, 
* to demonstrate The Minigrid Game as a participatory planning tool and to foster knowledge exchange on community engagement among the practitioners. 

The Minigrid Game consists of a role-playing game where community members come together to simulate household energy consumption and make energy-related individual and collective decisions. These may include, for example, buying appliances, managing finances to pay electricity bills, setting energy tariffs or developing community infrastructure and services. 
A facilitator plays the role of the minigrid operator and manages system-wide operations while facilitating discussions and collective decision making. The cooperative game can only be won if the community chooses a minigrid system of an appropriate size and sets a tariff that prioritises the recovery of system costs, taking into account the ability to pay. The community must also limit its energy consumption within the capacity of the system. This gaming approach helps to ensure the system that is ultimately designed reflects actual energy needs as well as future expectations of populations.

[[File:Malaysia_.png|alt=|551x551px]]

== Participants & Target Group(s)  ==
Three workshops were held with participants from three rural minigrid communities in East Malaysia. A fourth workshop was held online with remote participation from energy practitioners from the Southeast Asian member organisations of the Hydro Empowerment Network (HPNET). The project also reached out to the wider energy access community. The workshops were organised and facilitated by ENACT. 

[[File:Participants_&_Target_Group(s).png|alt=|550x550px]]

== Activities ==
The knowledge exchange consisted of three main activities.
First, a series of three community minigrid planning workshops were held in the Ulu Papar region of Sabah, Malaysia. Through these workshops, local residents played and used The Minigrid Game tools and processes. Prior to the community workshops, the project team visited households in all three villages to conduct social mapping activities in the form of informal discussions. The information gained was used to calibrate the game parameters and to guide the gameplay process during the village workshops.

Second, an online workshop and knowledge exchange session was held for South and Southeast Asian practitioners from the Hydro Empowerment Network (HPNET). The online workshop included a presentation on the gaming process, video recordings from the village workshops, a practitioner knowledge sharing session and an online gameplay of The Minigrid Game.

Third, an active online campaign was implemented to reach the wider energy access community. This included a dedicated website on The Minigrid Game process, as well as videos and social media posts highlighting the community minigrid planning workshops. The aim was to generate interest in future knowledge exchange activities.

== Lessons Learned ==
Through social mapping and game facilitation, the project team was able to observe how community members interacted and made individual and collective decisions that were consistent with their community’s protocols or codes of conduct, value systems and existing governance structures and institutions.
The social mapping activity was a key success factor in equipping the project team with sufficient knowledge of the local context, including issues and challenges to address via the game. While the three communities found the gaming tool easy to use, they suggested improvements for a more interesting and user-friendly interface and exciting experience. The participants’ feedback and suggestions have been documented and incorporated into ongoing and future development of The Minigrid Game tool. 
To fully realise the potential of The Minigrid Game approach, the workshop activity should be followed by continued community engagement. Hence, game facilitators should have good working relationships with communities and be able to offer continuous support and monitoring of the changes initiated by the Games Workshop. An implementation plan for improved minigrid management and operations must be put into place by the community. Where there is no energy committee or committed energy system manager, steps must be taken to fill these roles.

[[File:LESSONS_LEARNED.png|alt=|550x550px]]

[[Category:WISIONS of Sustainability]]
[[Category:WISIONS Case Study]]
[[Category:Tools]]
[[Category:Mini-grid]]
[[Category:Malaysia]]
</div>