Difference between revisions of "Solar Home System (SHS) Costs"
From energypedia
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
For an evaluation of these economic data, information on the quallity and sustainability of the SHS, as well as on O&M and services has to be collected. In addition, it has to be checked to what extent the target group of the poorer rural population could be reached within the different projects. | For an evaluation of these economic data, information on the quallity and sustainability of the SHS, as well as on O&M and services has to be collected. In addition, it has to be checked to what extent the target group of the poorer rural population could be reached within the different projects. | ||
− | Source: Translated from the [http://www.endev.info/wiki/index.php/Subsidies_for_Solar_Home_Systems study conducted by SiNERGi] for EnDev (in German). | + | Source: Translated from the [http://www.endev.info/wiki/index.php/Subsidies_for_Solar_Home_Systems study on subsidies conducted by SiNERGi] for EnDev (in German). |
<br> | <br> |
Revision as of 16:35, 2 September 2009
Compariosn of Costs and Subsidies
Country Example | Model | Market Costs in € per SHS | Costumer Price in € | Share of direkt Subsidies1 |
EnDev Nicaragua | Cash Sales | 600 (75-85 Wp) | 220-280 | 54-63% |
EnDev Honduras | Two hand | 576 (54 Wp) | 231-301 | 60% |
EnDev Bangladesh | One hand | 341 (50 Wp) | 290 | 15% |
EnDev Bangladesh II | One hand | 142-149 (21 Wp) | 98-115 | 19-34% |
EnDev Uganda | Cash Sales | 420 (50 Wp) | 420 | 0%2 |
EnDev Senegal | Concession | 498 (50 Wp) | 30 connection, 6 per month | 70% |
GTZ Tansania | Cash Sales | 200 (14 Wp) | 200 | 0% |
Roshan Pakistan | Concession | ?? (40 Wp) | 4,10 connection, 1,76 per month | 100% |
Solarstiftung Äthiopien | Service NGO | 200 (10 Wp) | connection free, 0,17 per month | 100% |
Sunlabob Laos | Service RESCO | ?? (20 Wp) | ?? connection, 2,5 per month | 0%3 |
Sri Lanka RERED | Two hand | 372-437 (?30? Wp) | 310-375 | 14-17% |
1: of direct costs for the system and for installation, without O&M.
2: for private costumers, social infrastracture is subsidised with up to 85 % of costs.
3: but refinancing loans at discounted rates
For an evaluation of these economic data, information on the quallity and sustainability of the SHS, as well as on O&M and services has to be collected. In addition, it has to be checked to what extent the target group of the poorer rural population could be reached within the different projects.
Source: Translated from the study on subsidies conducted by SiNERGi for EnDev (in German).
⇒ Back to Solar Section