Difference between revisions of "Impact Monitoring Guidelines"
From energypedia
***** (***** | *****) |
***** (***** | *****) |
||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| | | | ||
*[[MDGs and Result Chains|<font size="2">Sample Results Chain</font>]] | *[[MDGs and Result Chains|<font size="2">Sample Results Chain</font>]] | ||
− | *[[Recommendation|<font size="2">Impact Criteria and indicators</font>]] | + | *[[Recommendation|<font size="2">Impact Criteria and indicators</font>]] |
− | |||
| | | | ||
*EnDev [http://www.endev.info/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=175&&Itemid=13 Guide Impact Assessment (IA) ] | *EnDev [http://www.endev.info/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=175&&Itemid=13 Guide Impact Assessment (IA) ] | ||
− | *[http://www.endev.info/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=176&&Itemid=13 Proposed Concept] IA ProBEC Malawi | + | *[http://www.endev.info/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=176&&Itemid=13 Proposed Concept] IA ProBEC Malawi |
*Cooking [http://www.endev.info/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=381 Energy Impacts, Observation Fields and Indicators] | *Cooking [http://www.endev.info/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=381 Energy Impacts, Observation Fields and Indicators] | ||
*IA Kenya [http://www.endev.info/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=183&&Itemid=13 Result Chain] | *IA Kenya [http://www.endev.info/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=183&&Itemid=13 Result Chain] | ||
Line 83: | Line 82: | ||
| | | | ||
− | *Kenya [http://www.endev.info/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=185&&Itemid=13 Selection Criteria for HH, SI, PU and Producers IA] | + | *Kenya [http://www.endev.info/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=185&&Itemid=13 Selection Criteria for HH, SI, PU and Producers IA] |
+ | *Malawi IA ProBec [http://www.endev.info/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=184&&Itemid=13 Final Scope] | ||
| | | |
Revision as of 13:34, 26 October 2009
The focus of the EnDev 2 M&E Sytem has shifted from Outcome Monitoring (EnDev 1) to Outcome and Impact Monitoring (EnDev 2). Therefore the Monitoring Group are developing recommendations for a "proper" impact M&E System.
We recommend to:
- conduct baseline studies before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy
- use a mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions)
- a theory based approach by applying the result chain for developing the study design
- to include control groups if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study
The following table shows typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we would recommend and support.
Steps | Tasks | Materials/ Support | Library | |
Step 1: Preperation | Terms for Consultants/ Enumerators |
|
||
Selection Consultant/ Enumerators |
|
|||
Study of available documents and statistics on national development goals and policies, national sector goals and policies, BMZ goals and concept for the partner country |
|
|||
Developing of Results Chains/ Indicators |
|
|||
Developing of Questionnaires, interview guidelines, PRA tools (MAPP), observation criteria and other tools |
|
|
||
Sampling/ Selection target Group |
|
|
||
Training of Supervisors and Enumerators/ Pretesting |
|
|||
Step 2: Implementation | Logistics |
|
||
Conducting Interviews | ||||
Data entry | ||||
Step 3: Data Analysis/ Reporting | Data analysis |
|
|
|
Data interpretation – in exchange with the project team (in a workshop) |
|
|||
Report writing |
|