Difference between revisions of "Risks in Energy Access Projects"
***** (***** | *****) |
***** (***** | *****) |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:121px; height:9px" | | | style="width:121px; height:9px" | | ||
− | Power quality<ref name="Hazelton (2013)" /> | + | Power quality<ref name="Hazelton (2013)">_</ref> |
| style="width:306px; height:9px" | | | style="width:306px; height:9px" | | ||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:121px; height:9px" | | | style="width:121px; height:9px" | | ||
− | Equipment failure/ Downtime<ref name="Hazelton (2013)" /> | + | Equipment failure/ Downtime<ref name="Hazelton (2013)">_</ref> |
| style="width:306px; height:9px" | | | style="width:306px; height:9px" | | ||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:121px; height:9px" | | | style="width:121px; height:9px" | | ||
− | Hardware compatibility issues<ref name="Hazelton (2013)" /> | + | Hardware compatibility issues<ref name="Hazelton (2013)">_</ref> |
| style="width:306px; height:9px" | | | style="width:306px; height:9px" | | ||
Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:121px; height:9px" | | | style="width:121px; height:9px" | | ||
− | Limitation for continuous supply/storage<ref name="Hazelton (2013)" /> | + | Limitation for continuous supply/storage<ref name="Hazelton (2013)">_</ref> |
| style="width:306px; height:9px" | | | style="width:306px; height:9px" | | ||
Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:121px; height:9px" | | | style="width:121px; height:9px" | | ||
− | Familiarity with the technology<ref name="Hazelton (2013)" /> | + | Familiarity with the technology<ref name="Hazelton (2013)">_</ref> |
| style="width:306px; height:9px" | | | style="width:306px; height:9px" | | ||
Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:121px; height:9px" | | | style="width:121px; height:9px" | | ||
− | Future connectivity<ref name="Hazelton (2013)" /> | + | Future connectivity<ref name="Hazelton (2013)">_</ref> |
| style="width:306px; height:9px" | | | style="width:306px; height:9px" | | ||
Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:121px; height:9px" | | | style="width:121px; height:9px" | | ||
− | Supply and installation issues<ref name="Hazelton (2013)" /><ref name="Manetsgruber (2015)" /> | + | Supply and installation issues<ref name="Hazelton (2013)">_</ref><ref name="Manetsgruber (2015)">_</ref> |
| style="width:306px; height:9px" | | | style="width:306px; height:9px" | | ||
Line 161: | Line 161: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:121px; height:9px" | | | style="width:121px; height:9px" | | ||
− | Building and testing | + | Building and testing<ref name="The Economist (2011)">The Economist, ‘Managing the risk in renewable energy’, 2011 https://www.altran.de/fileadmin/medias/DE.altran.de/documents/Fachartikel/Managing-The-Risk-In-Renewable-Energy.pdf</ref> |
| style="width:306px; height:9px" | | | style="width:306px; height:9px" | | ||
Line 180: | Line 180: | ||
| style="width:121px; height:9px" | | | style="width:121px; height:9px" | | ||
− | Stakeholder management | + | Stakeholder management<ref name="Hazelton (2013)" /> |
| style="width:306px; height:9px" | | | style="width:306px; height:9px" | | ||
Line 194: | Line 194: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:121px; height:9px" | | | style="width:121px; height:9px" | | ||
− | Operational | + | Operational<ref name="Manetsgruber (2015)" /> |
| style="width:306px; height:9px" | | | style="width:306px; height:9px" | | ||
Line 209: | Line 209: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:121px; height:9px" | | | style="width:121px; height:9px" | | ||
− | Geographical isolation | + | Geographical isolation<ref name="Hazelton (2013)" /> |
| style="width:306px; height:9px" | | | style="width:306px; height:9px" | | ||
Line 227: | Line 227: | ||
| style="width:121px; height:9px" | | | style="width:121px; height:9px" | | ||
− | Change in public policy | + | Change in public policy<ref name="Manetsgruber (2015)" /> |
| style="width:306px; height:9px" | | | style="width:306px; height:9px" | | ||
Line 284: | Line 284: | ||
| style="width:121px; height:9px" | | | style="width:121px; height:9px" | | ||
− | Commitment, competence and credit worthiness of investors | + | Commitment, competence and credit worthiness of investors<ref name="Green (2013)">Green Rhino Energy, ‘Project Risk Matrix’, 2013, http://www.greenrhinoenergy.com/finance/renewable/risks.php</ref> |
| style="width:306px; height:9px" | | | style="width:306px; height:9px" | | ||
Line 298: | Line 298: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:121px; height:9px" | | | style="width:121px; height:9px" | | ||
− | Inadequate business models | + | Inadequate business models<ref name="Hazelton (2013)" /> |
| style="width:306px; height:9px" | | | style="width:306px; height:9px" | | ||
Line 313: | Line 313: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:121px; height:68px" | | | style="width:121px; height:68px" | | ||
− | Diesel and cost supply | + | Diesel and cost supply<ref name="Hazelton (2013)" /> |
| style="width:306px; height:68px" | | | style="width:306px; height:68px" | | ||
Line 327: | Line 327: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:121px; height:88px" | | | style="width:121px; height:88px" | | ||
− | Exchange rates/ Inflation | + | Exchange rates/ Inflation<ref name="Green (2013)" /> |
| style="width:306px; height:88px" | | | style="width:306px; height:88px" | | ||
Line 343: | Line 343: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:121px; height:35px" | | | style="width:121px; height:35px" | | ||
− | Credit | + | Credit<ref name="Green (2013)" /> |
| style="width:306px; height:35px" | | | style="width:306px; height:35px" | | ||
Line 508: | Line 508: | ||
<references /><references /><references /><references /><references /><references /><references /><references /><references /><references /> | <references /><references /><references /><references /><references /><references /><references /><references /><references /><references /> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 13:34, 20 February 2017
Overview
Mini-grids and stand-alone systems play an important role when facilitating energy access in developing countries with improved technology. However there are potential risks to be considered in spite of the financing scheme applied and the type of technology. Painuly (2001)[1] in Hazelton et al. (2015)[2] states that unawareness and misinterpretation of risks (and benefits) are a major barrier for technology adoption.
The following table summarizes some of the risks identified based on existing projects and lessons learned from the literature review. Though this article is open for further contributions.
Some of the risks listed may be context specific, some are looked at from the ‘owner’ point of view, while others from the investor perspective. Moreover, the listed risks may correspond to more than one of the categories, though the information has been arranged this order within six categories to facilitate an overview.
Category |
Risk |
Risk description |
Risk mitigation/ control mechanism |
Reference |
Category: Technical | ||||
|
Poor estimation of load size, growth and schedule, could derive in under- or oversized systems. This can lead to increased investment/running cost, lower efficiency, and unreliable supply. Overestimated efficiency |
|
2, 5 | |
Power quality[2] |
Integrating PV and batteries, in retrofits on existing systems, may affect the stability of the grid due to incompatibilities and an ineffective control system. |
|
2 | |
Equipment failure/ Downtime[2] |
Premature failure of hardware can not only cause service interruption but damage the entire system. In addition, despite existing warranties, these can be hard to fulfil due to the remoteness where they system is located. |
|
2 | |
Hardware compatibility issues[2] |
Proprietary protocols could provoke incompatibility between components. |
|
2 | |
Limitation for continuous supply/storage[2] |
Batteries have a limited life-span and are vulnerable to be misused, this impacts on the energy balance and supply affecting the operation of generators (specific for hybrid systems). |
|
2 | |
Familiarity with the technology[2] |
Difficulty to operate and maintain, complexity of maintenance, limited knowledge on maintenance issues. |
|
2 | |
Future connectivity[2] |
Interim solutions, such as mini-grids, would ideally be connected to the main grid if it becomes available, otherwise it becomes obsolete. |
|
2 | |
Incorrect installation and operation of hardware, combined with the remoteness where the technology is installed. |
|
2, 5 | ||
Building and testing[4] |
Property damage or third-party liability arising from mishaps during building or testing. |
|
4 | |
Institutional/ Organizational | ||||
|
Stakeholder management[2] |
Multiple parties involved whose activities, incentives, will not align between parties, causing negative outcomes. |
|
2 |
Operational[3] |
Administration errors or fraud. |
|
5 | |
Geographical isolation[2] |
Difficulties to acquire spare parts and/or repair due to long distances, transportation challenges and lack of skilled personnel in the area. |
|
2 | |
Geo-political |
Change in public policy[3] |
Increase in taxes levied on technology or import and export duties. Subsidies affecting operation and/or profitability. |
|
5 |
Political instability |
Unrest, social conflicts, war. |
|
| |
Delays in approvals |
Arbitrary actions of public authorities can affect the development of any energy access project. |
|
| |
Arrival of the national grid |
Investment’s payback and further cash flows could be in danger or threatened. |
|
| |
Finance and Economics |
Commitment, competence and credit worthiness of investors[5] |
Large level of investment/ long tenor of return, may require additional equity later after project has begun. |
|
3 |
Inadequate business models[2] |
Effective business models are key for deployment and may need to be continuously revised to scale up. |
|
2 | |
Diesel and cost supply[2] |
Although the use is reduced (hybrid systems), prices and availability impact the operation of the system. |
|
2 | |
Exchange rates/ Inflation[5] |
Foreign exchange rate changes due to devaluation, convertibility or transfer restrictions. |
|
3 | |
Credit[5] |
Risk of default of counterparties or default on specific payments. |
|
3 | |
Liquidity |
|
|
| |
Social |
Public resistance |
Resistance of interest groups because statics, water supply, smell (biogas), etc. |
|
5 |
Community/social integration |
Over-consumption from one or few users can cause a black-out. Theft or users connecting loads beyond their quota. |
|
2 | |
Appropriate pricing and payments |
Rural customers usually have low incomes which is challenging when setting a price that is both sufficiently high to give returns and low enough to make it affordable. |
|
2, 5 | |
Operators and end users’ safety |
Risks of harm due to higher voltages and extensive wiring. |
|
2 | |
Theft and vandalism |
Components or other valuable materials for which there is a secondary market, are in danger of being stolen |
|
5 | |
Environment |
Environmental |
Harm to the environment caused by operating the technology may affect planning & permitting. |
|
|
Weather-related /availability |
Risk of fall in volume of electricity produced owing to lack of wind, sunshine, water flow/low rainfall, biomass availability.
|
|
5 | |
Force majeure |
Environmental disaster like severe storms, typhoons, sandstorms, volcanic eruption, earth quakes, mud slides, etc. |
|
5 |
References
- ↑ Painuly, Jyoti Prasad, ‘Barriers to renewable energy penetration; a framework for analysis’, Renewable Energy 24, 2001. http://www1.upme.gov.co/SGIC/sites/default/files/Barriers%20to%20renewable%20energy%20penetration.pdf
- ↑ 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 Hazelton, James; Bruce, Anna; MacGill Iain, ‘A review of the potential benefits and risks of photovoltaic hybrid mini-grid systems’, Renewable Energy 67, 2013. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259298363_A_review_of_the_potential_benefits_and_risks_of_photovoltaic_hybrid_mini-grid_systems Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "Hazelton (2013)" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>
tag; name "Hazelton (2013)" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>
tag; name "Hazelton (2013)" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>
tag; name "Hazelton (2013)" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>
tag; name "Hazelton (2013)" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>
tag; name "Hazelton (2013)" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>
tag; name "Hazelton (2013)" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>
tag; name "Hazelton (2013)" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Manetsgruber, David; Wagemann, Bernanrd; Kondev, Bozhil; Dziergwa, Katrin. Risk Management for Mini-Grids: A new approach to guide mini-grid development. 2015. https://www.ruralelec.org/sites/default/files/risk_management_for_mini-grids_2015_final_web_0.pdf Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "Manetsgruber (2015)" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ The Economist, ‘Managing the risk in renewable energy’, 2011 https://www.altran.de/fileadmin/medias/DE.altran.de/documents/Fachartikel/Managing-The-Risk-In-Renewable-Energy.pdf
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Green Rhino Energy, ‘Project Risk Matrix’, 2013, http://www.greenrhinoenergy.com/finance/renewable/risks.php