Knowledge fuels change - Support energypedia!
For over 10 years, energypedia has been connecting energy experts around the world — helping them share knowledge, learn from each other, and accelerate the global energy transition.
Today, we ask for your support to keep this platform free and accessible to all.
Even a small contribution makes a big difference! If just 10–20% of our 60,000+ monthly visitors donated the equivalent of a cup of coffee — €5 — Energypedia would be fully funded for a whole year.
Is the knowledge you’ve gained through Energypedia this year worth €5 or more?
Your donation keeps the platform running, helps us create new knowledge products, and contributes directly to achieving SDG 7.
Thank you for your support, your donation, big or small, truly matters!
Difference between revisions of "Publication - Understanding Multi-Level Drivers of Behaviour Change - A Cross-Impact Balance Analysis of What Influences the Adoption of Improved Cookstoves in Kenya"
From energypedia
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
{{Pub Database | {{Pub Database | ||
|Pub Title=Understanding Multi-Level Drivers of Behaviour Change - A Cross-Impact Balance Analysis of What Influences the Adoption of Improved Cookstoves in Kenya | |Pub Title=Understanding Multi-Level Drivers of Behaviour Change - A Cross-Impact Balance Analysis of What Influences the Adoption of Improved Cookstoves in Kenya | ||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
|Pub Abstract=The research described in this paper is part of the Behaviour and Choice Initiative, a multi-year research initiative by the Stockholm Environment Institute, funded by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). The initiative explores the factors that influence household choice and decision-making, with a specific focus on the uptake of technologies, services or changes of practice that lead to sustainable outcomes. It does so using case studies of drivers of behaviour and a range of analytical approaches. This paper relies on empirical data on the drivers of adoption of improved cookstoves in Kenya. | |Pub Abstract=The research described in this paper is part of the Behaviour and Choice Initiative, a multi-year research initiative by the Stockholm Environment Institute, funded by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). The initiative explores the factors that influence household choice and decision-making, with a specific focus on the uptake of technologies, services or changes of practice that lead to sustainable outcomes. It does so using case studies of drivers of behaviour and a range of analytical approaches. This paper relies on empirical data on the drivers of adoption of improved cookstoves in Kenya. | ||
| − | The paper outlines an approach for synthesizing empirical data from different analytical levels using the Cross-impact Balance (CIB) method in a way that is epistemologically consistent and documents its application. In so doing, | + | The paper outlines an approach for synthesizing empirical data from different analytical levels using the Cross-impact Balance (CIB) method in a way that is epistemologically consistent and documents its application. In so doing, the authors contribute a systemic view of how behaviour change with regard to the adoption of an improved cooking technology may – or may not – come about. |
| − | Furthermore, in order to explore consistent stories of behaviour change, the authors combine CIB with Scenario Diversity Analysis (SDA) as suggested by Kemp-Benedict (2012). Combining CIB with SDA allows | + | Furthermore, in order to explore consistent stories of behaviour change, the authors combine CIB with Scenario Diversity Analysis (SDA) as suggested by Kemp-Benedict (2012). Combining CIB with SDA allows the authors to reduce what might potentially be half a million combinations of scenarios – what referred to in the paper as scenario kernels – to just four scenarios, which represents quite an efficient reduction. |
|Pub Topics=Cooking, Impacts, Other | |Pub Topics=Cooking, Impacts, Other | ||
|Pub Download=https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/181221a-gill-lambe-kenya-cookstove-analysis-1811h.pdf | |Pub Download=https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/181221a-gill-lambe-kenya-cookstove-analysis-1811h.pdf | ||
|Pub Newsletter=No | |Pub Newsletter=No | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |||
[[Category:Cooking]] | [[Category:Cooking]] | ||
[[Category:Improved_Cooking]] | [[Category:Improved_Cooking]] | ||
[[Category:Impacts]] | [[Category:Impacts]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:00, 8 January 2019
►Add a New Publication
►See All Latest Publications
Title
Understanding Multi-Level Drivers of Behaviour Change - A Cross-Impact Balance Analysis of What Influences the Adoption of Improved Cookstoves in Kenya
Publisher
Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI)
Author
Fiona Lambe, Henrik Carlsen, Marie Jürisoo, Nina Weitz, Aaron Atteridge, Hannah Wanjiru & Gregor Vulturius
Published in
December 2018
Abstract
The research described in this paper is part of the Behaviour and Choice Initiative, a multi-year research initiative by the Stockholm Environment Institute, funded by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). The initiative explores the factors that influence household choice and decision-making, with a specific focus on the uptake of technologies, services or changes of practice that lead to sustainable outcomes. It does so using case studies of drivers of behaviour and a range of analytical approaches. This paper relies on empirical data on the drivers of adoption of improved cookstoves in Kenya.
The paper outlines an approach for synthesizing empirical data from different analytical levels using the Cross-impact Balance (CIB) method in a way that is epistemologically consistent and documents its application. In so doing, the authors contribute a systemic view of how behaviour change with regard to the adoption of an improved cooking technology may – or may not – come about.
Furthermore, in order to explore consistent stories of behaviour change, the authors combine CIB with Scenario Diversity Analysis (SDA) as suggested by Kemp-Benedict (2012). Combining CIB with SDA allows the authors to reduce what might potentially be half a million combinations of scenarios – what referred to in the paper as scenario kernels – to just four scenarios, which represents quite an efficient reduction.URL
Admin:
No
PIE Grant (Grid Portal)?
