Difference between revisions of "Nepal Energy Situation"

From energypedia
***** (***** | *****)
m
***** (***** | *****)
 
(258 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
- WORK IN PROGRESS -  
+
{{CES Country|CES Country Name=Nepal
 +
|CES Country Capital=Kathmandu
 +
|CES Country Region South Asia=South Asia
 +
|CES Country Coordinates=27.7000° N, 85.3333° E
 +
}}
 +
= Introduction<br/> =
 +
Nepal has no known major oil, gas, or coal reserves, and its position in the Himalayas makes it hard to reach remote and extremely remote communities. Consequently, most Nepali citizens have historically met their energy needs with biomass, human labor, imported kerosene, and/or traditional water-powered vertical axis mills, yet per capita energy consumption is thus “startlingly low” at one-third the average for Asia as a whole and less than one-fifth the worldwide average. In 2010, Nepal’s electrification rate was only 53 percent (leaving 12.5 million people without electricity) and 76 percent depended on fuelwood for cooking (meaning 20.22 million people placed stress on Nepali forests for their fuel needs). This situation has led some experts to call the country’s energy portfolio “medieval” in the fuels it uses and “precarious” in the load shedding that occurs throughout Kathmandu, due to an imbalance between electricity supply and demand. Nepal, however, has all it needs to escape these problems. Large markets for improved cookstoves, biogas digesters, and solar lanterns exist throughout the country. Independent scientific studies have calculated that the country could meet all if its own energy needs—indeed, even the potential needs of Nepal plus many of its neighbors—if it tapped its solar resources or its hydroelectric resources (and potentially its wind resources). These efforts could be complemented with attempts to strengthen energy efficiency planning, with significant potential for transmission upgrades and retrofits and more efficient lighting practices.<ref name="UNDP Country brief">_</ref>
  
= Situation Analysis and Framework Conditions  =
+
[[#toc|►Go To Top]]
  
== Energy Situation  ==
 
  
According to the "WECS" Nepal's primary energy consumption was approximately 367 million GJ in 2005. The International Energy Agency (IEA) indicates a value of about 394 million GJ for 2006.
+
= Energy Situation =
  
The use of primary energy sources is distributed as follows:
+
== Energy Consumption ==
 +
Nepal's total energy consumption in 2010 was about 428 PJ (10,220 ktoe). New renewable energy sources (excluding large hydropower) such as biogas, micro-hydro and solar energy contributed about 0.7% to the national balance in 2008/09 altogether. Although the share is still small, it has increased by 40 % since 2005.
  
{| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" width="200" border="1"
+
<ref name="UNDP Country brief">UNDP Sustainable Energy for All Country Brief Nepal, February 2013</ref>The use of primary energy sources is distributed as follows: <ref>Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership (REEEP) Clean Energy Information Portal, Energy Profile Nepal (Vienna: REEEP Secretariat, 2012)</ref>
 +
 
 +
<br/>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="1" style="width: 238px" class="prettytable"
 +
|-
 +
| style="width: 184px" | Biomass
 +
| style="width: 48px;  text-align: right" | 85 %
 
|-
 
|-
| Biomass
+
| style="width: 184px" | Petroleum products
| 86&nbsp;%
+
| style="width: 48px; text-align: right" | 9 %
 
|-
 
|-
| Petroleum products
+
| style="width: 184px" | Coal
| 9&nbsp;%
+
| style="width: 48px; text-align: right" | 3 %
 
|-
 
|-
| Hydro Power
+
| style="width: 184px" | Hydro Electricity
| 2.5&nbsp;%
+
| style="width: 48px;  text-align: right" | 2 %
 
|-
 
|-
| Coal
+
| style="width: 184px" | Renewables
| 2.5&nbsp;%
+
| style="width: 48px;  text-align: right" | 1 %
 +
|}
 +
<div style="clear:both"></div><br/>
 +
 
 +
Between 2001 and 2009, the total energy consumption was growing at a rate of 2.4 % per year on average. Although there is a considerable lack of efficiency in energy use, Nepal accounts for relatively low CO2 emissions compared to other countries in the region. The reason is the high proportion of renewable energy sources (biomass and hydropower) in primary energy consumption. 43.6 % (2009) of Nepalese population has access to electricity; 81.0 % (2012) depend on traditional fuels (wholly or partially).<ref name="UNDP Asia Pacific">_</ref>
 +
 
 +
Energy consumption in economic sectors (2010)<ref name="UNDP Country brief">_</ref>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
{| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="5" border="1" style="width: 211px"
 +
|-
 +
| style="width: 162px" | Residential
 +
| style="width: 45px; text-align: right" | 87%
 +
|-
 +
| style="width: 162px" | Transport
 +
| style="width: 45px;  text-align: right" | 6%
 +
|-
 +
| style="width: 162px" | Industry
 +
| style="width: 45px;  text-align: right" | 5%
 +
|-
 +
| style="width: 162px" | Commercial (services)
 +
| style="width: 45px;  text-align: right" | 1%
 +
|-
 +
| style="width: 162px" | Agriculture
 +
| style="width: 45px;  text-align: right" | 1%
 +
 
 
|}
 
|}
 +
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
 +
 +
<br/>
 +
 +
 +
== Energy Consumption on Household Level ==
 +
Percentage of energy types used for cooking in rural<ref name="WHO 2010">WHO 2010: WHO Household Energy Database</ref> and urban<ref name="WHO 2010">fckLRWHO 2010: WHO Household Energy Database</ref> areas
 +
 +
[[File:Nepal Urban Share.jpg|300px|Nepal Urban Share.jpg|alt=Nepal Urban Share.jpg]][[File:Nepal Rural Share.jpg|left|372px|Nepal Rural Share.jpg|alt=Nepal Rural Share.jpg]]
 +
 +
<br/>
 +
 +
<div style="clear:both"></div>82% of population use solid fuels (charcoal, coal, cropwaste, dung and wood) as cooking energy. In rural areas this percentage goes up to 90%, whereas only 33% of the urban dwellers use solid fuels for cooking. <ref>According to WHO 2010 http://apps.who.int/gho/data/?theme=country&vid=14500</ref><ref name="WHO 2007">WHO 2007</ref>
 +
 +
There are several activities ongoing to improve the cooking situation in Nepal.<br/>
 +
 +
<div>----
 +
 +
<div><div id="_com_1"></div></div></div><u>'''Impact of Solid Fuel on Health'''</u>
 +
 +
Total annual deaths attributable to solid fuel use: 7500 persons;<br/>
 +
 +
Percentage of national burden of diseases attributable to solid fuel use: 2,7%<ref name="WHO 2006">WHO (2006): Fuel for Life - Household Energy and Health</ref>
 +
 +
According to the Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves, 85 % of the Nepali population use solid fuels for cooking (mostly wood).<ref name="UNDP Country brief">_</ref><br/>[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]<br/>
 +
 +
 +
== Energy Efficiency<br/> ==
 +
With about 1 TOE for every $1,000 of GDP, Nepal has the poorest energy intensity among all South Asian countries (IEA, 2012). It thus has very large energy efficiency potential, though the United Nations warns that “energy efficiency efforts in the country are still at its infancy.” The NEA currently pursues a “loss reduction” strategy of rehabilitating 27 feeders and distribution lines, and plans for solar-powered street lamps and replacing incandescent light bulbs with compact fluorescent ones have been discussed, but not fully implemented. Nepal thus has a number of barriers to energy efficiency that it must overcome, including “absence of a legal framework,” “low levels of public awareness,” and “lack of capable human resources.” In this regard, Nepal is in the process of formulating an Energy Efficiency Strategy and establishing an agency to institutionalize energy efficiency.<br/>
 +
 +
<div>----
 +
 +
<div><div id="_com_1"></div></div></div>[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
 +
 +
 +
== Renewable Energy ==
 +
 +
=== Biomass ===
 +
Biomass is by far the most important primary energy source in Nepal. Biomass comprises wood, agricultural residues and dung. 95 % of the biomass is predominantly and traditionally used for cooking and heating purposes in households.
 +
 +
According to estimates by WECS the national biomass balance is in deficit: From 2000 to 2005 the deforestation rate was 2.1 % which was the highest rate in the region followed by Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The estimated wood consumption in 2005 was about 17 million tons. Over-exploitation of wood resources is declared to be approximately 10 million tons. This indicates that only about 40 % of the firewood comes from the sustainable supply. However, there are clear regional differences. In the Terai region, only 19 % of consumption can re-grow sustainably, while this value reaches between 60 % and 80 % in the mountain regions. According to WECS, these figures are not certain and therefore only indicative.
 +
 +
Land Area Covered by Forest: 25.4%<br/>
 +
 +
Forest Annual Rate of Change: -1.23% (1990-2005); 0% (2005-2010) <ref name="UN FAO">http://rainforests.mongabay.com/deforestation/</ref><br/>
 +
 +
To manage and improve the biomass situation in Nepal, it is designated to include a Biomass Energy Strategy (BEST) in the National Energy Strategy Framework (NES). <br/>
 +
 +
<div>----
 +
 +
<div><div id="_com_1"></div></div></div>[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
 +
 +
 +
=== Biogas ===
 +
The Nepali farming system is heavily dependent on livestock, with at least 1.2 million households owning cattle and buffalo, with technical biogas potential for at least one million household-size plants, 57 percent located in the Terai plains, 37 percent in the hills and 6 percent in remote hills.
 +
 +
According to the Alternative Energy Promotion Center, as of July 2011, 241,920 biogas plants were installed in more than 2,800 Village Development Committees and in all 75 Districts under their Biogas Support Program. In addition, 2,907 biogas plants were installed under the Gold Standard Biogas Project (GSP).
 +
 +
Still, other estimates of Nepali biogas utilization have calculated that potential for family-sized biogas plants, operating on agricultural residues could fuel at least another 200,000 units.<ref name="UNDP Country brief">_</ref>
 +
 +
[[Biogas Technology in Nepal|Biogas Technology in Nepal]]
  
New renewable energy sources (biogas, micro hydro, solar and wind energy) contributed about 0.5% to the national balance in 2005 altogether.
+
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
  
The primary energy consumption is growing at rate of around 6&nbsp;% per year, electricity consumption, even at a rate of about 9&nbsp;%. In the last years energy consumption has been rising much faster than GDP.
 
  
A regional comparison shows that Nepal has the highest specific energy consumption based on GDP. This already suggests that energy is used inefficiently. Because of the high proportion of renewable energy sources (biomass and hydro power) in primary energy consumption Nepal accounts for relatively low CO2 emissions compared to other countries in the region.  
+
=== Solar ===
 +
Nepal has great potential for at least four types of solar energy technology: grid-connected PV, solar water heaters, solar lanterns and solar home systems. Nepal receives 3.6 to 6.2 kWh of solar radiation per square meter per day, with roughly 300 days of sun a year, making it ideal for solar energy.
  
In the past years, according to the NEA, the number of consumers as well as power consumption increased by approximately 10&nbsp;% per year. The evening peak demand has been risen by far higher values because of increasing household consumption.  
+
The country also has a large market for solar water heaters, with 185,000 units installed and operating as of 2009.<ref name="UNDP Country brief">_</ref>
  
The continuously rising demand and stagnation in power generation capacity growth has increasingly led to a noticeable shortage of power supply since 2007, which forced the NEA in early 2009 to cut power for up to 20 hours per day in some regions.
+
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
  
Due to a long lead time for the completion of new power generation capacity or new import capacities a rapid improvement in the supply crises cannot be expected. An emergency supply through diesel power plants is unrealistic because of the high power generation costs associated as the resultant rise of electricity tariffs couldn't be easily implemented politically and the deficit of the NEA would increase significantly.
 
  
The power supply crisis has hits all sectors of the population, public life and the economy.
+
== Fossil Fuels ==
  
It must be expected that more industrial enterprises and service providers make themselves independent from the unreliable public power supply by using diesel generators. This development is economically burdensome because of additional fuel imports, but allows at least the profitable companies to maintain their business.  
+
=== Petroleum Products ===
 +
Petroleum is the second largest energy fuel in Nepal after firewood and accounts for 8% of primary energy consumption in Nepal. All petroleum products are imported from India. The government has signed an agreement with the British company Cairns Energy PLC for petroleum exploitations but the exploitation works have not been initiated up to now.
  
'''Biomass'''
+
At the moment, the import of petroleum products is transacted exclusively between the “Nepal Oil Corporation” and the “Indian Oil Corporation”. 75 % of the imports are diesel, kerosene and gasoline. Due to the high energy demand in the country the dependence on petroleum imports is increasing. In 2006, Nepal had to spend 53 % of its foreign currency for importing petroleum products which is almost double than 2001. More than 62 % of the petroleum products are used in the transportation sector. Besides that, petroleum products constitute important energy sources for cooking purposes in households. The price rises during the last years made the import dependency more and more precarious for the economy of the country. The price instability also increased the vulnerability of households, especially of the urban poor, for which kerosene has become the principal source of cooking energy. The amount these households have to spend on kerosene has more than doubled from 2003 to 2009.
  
Biomass is by far the most important primary energy source in Nepal. Biomass comprises wood, agricultural residues and dung, with wood dominating with about 80&nbsp;%.  
+
In recent years, subsidized fuels for cooking such as Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) have been utilized widely not only in urban but also in rural areas. But due to price rises in international oil markets, fossil fuels have become too costly. In 2010, the Nepal Oil Corporation reports that almost 40% of high-speed diesel is used for electricity generation in captive gensets. As a result, diesel imports have therefore doubled from 2008 to 2010, creating opportunity costs of around NR 41 billion (US$ 490 million) annually.<ref name="UNDP Country brief">_</ref>
  
95&nbsp;% of the biomass is predominantly and traditionally used for cooking and heating purposes in households. Approx. 2% of the biomass (especially agricultural residues) are used for energy in the economy.
+
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
  
According to estimates by WECS the national biomass balance is in deficit: The wood consumption in 2005 is estimated to be 17 million tonnes, over-exploitation of resources is declared to be approximately 10 million tonnes. This means that only about 40&nbsp;% of the firewood comes from sustainable supply. <br>However, there are clear regional differences. In the Terai region, only 19&nbsp;% of consumption can regrow sustainably, while this value reaches between 60&nbsp;% and 80&nbsp;% in the mountain regions . These figures are not certain according to WECS and therefore only indicative.
 
  
'''Petroleum Products'''
+
=== Coal ===
 +
Coal accounts for 2 % of the total energy consumption and is almost exclusively consumed by the industrial sector, primarily for heating and boiling processes in brick, lime and cement production as well as in steel processing. Apart from some minor coal reserves, coal for industrial needs is imported from India. In the year 2008/09, Nepal imported about 293,000 tons of coal.
  
Nepal consumes about 800,000 tons of fuel and other petroleum products per year. The amount equates to about 9&nbsp;% of primary energy consumption in Nepal. The import of petroleum products is transacted exclusively between the “Nepal Oil Corporation” and the “Indian Oil Corporation”. 75&nbsp;% of the imports are made up of diesel, kerosene and gasoline. Almost 50&nbsp;% of petroleum products are used in the transportation sector and another 25&nbsp;% are consumed in industry, agriculture and in the service sector.
+
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
  
'''Coal'''
 
  
Apart from some minor coal reserves, coal for the industrial needs is imported from India. With 2.5&nbsp;% of primary energy consumption, coal is primarily used for brick and cement production as well as in steel processing.  
+
= Electricity =
 +
<br/>The state owned '''Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA) '''is responsible for the electricity supply through the national grid. Electricity supply is limited to 43.6 % of the population (2009) <ref name="UNDP Asia Pacific">_</ref> which lives mainly in urban areas. Only 8 % of people in rural areas have access to electricity. The low level of electrification hampers both economic development and access to information and education in rural areas.
  
<br>
+
Beside the national grid, thousands of small installations (diesel gensets, solar home systems, small island mini grids etc.) are installed in Nepal. Therefore, the NEA serves only 15 % of the total population of Nepal. For this small number of customers, average electricity supply is less than eight hours per day, with load shedding accounting for up to 16 hours during winter. In December 2008 the Nepal Government declared a “national energy crisis” and approved an Energy Crisis Management Action Plan. In January 2009, things got even worse as drought in one part of the country reduced water available for hydroelectricity generation, and floods in another part breached the embankments of the Koshi River, toppling a crucial transmission line importing power from India. Such events provoked the World Bank to declare that “Nepal is<br/>experiencing an energy crisis of unprecedented severity, caused by years of underinvestment and sharp growth in electricity demand.”90 Other recent studies have concluded that “Nepal has strikingly low levels of access and electricity consumption compared to many other developing countries.”<ref name="UNDP Asia Pacific">_</ref>
  
<br>
+
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
  
Nepal’s energy resources are limited to hydro power, biomass and other renewable energy sources. 557 MW out of potential of 44,000 MW are currently harnessed in Nepal. Despite 25 to 40&nbsp;% higher per unit installed cost of hydro power due to topography and unfavourable hydrology and geology, it is still an important energy resource of Nepal. Lack of seasonal storage capacity and inadequate transmission and distribution system compared to demand has resulted in frequent load-shedding. Electricity supply is limited to 40&nbsp;% of the population (CBS, 2001) most of which is in urban areas. The low level of electrification hampers both economic development and access to information and education in rural areas.
 
  
Other primary energy supplies are biomass (87.2&nbsp;%) used by 95&nbsp;% of population and commercial energies oil, coal and electricity (13.5&nbsp;%). Nepal spends about 57&nbsp;% of its export revenues in importing petroleum products.  
+
== Electricity Demand ==
 +
The electricity consumption and the number of consumers increase at a rate of approximately 9 % per year, according to the Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA). Because of increasing household consumption, the evening peak demand has risen dramatically. Due to the continuously rising demand and stagnation in creating additional power generation capacities, a noticeable shortage of power supply since 2007 has been the consequence, which forced the NEA in early 2009 to cut power for up to 20 hours per day in some regions including urban centres.
  
The Asian Development Bank, Danida and the World Bank are supporting rural electrification in about 35 districts. Government of Nepal (GoN) and Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA) are also funding rural electrification expansion in a limited scale.  
+
The NEA as the major electricity utility faces an immense increase in electricity demand, whereas at the same time production and transmission capacities are limited. Though, ambitious development targets are announced by politics, the development of plants and transmission lines cannot keep up with economic development and its induced demand increase.<br/>
  
<br>
+
[[File:Peak demand Nepal 2014.png|left|500px|thumb|Peak energy demand in Nepal(2014)<ref>NEA Annual Report 2014</ref>]]<br clear=all>
  
=== Energy Demand and Supply in the Household Sector  ===
+
Between 2005 and 2014 (estimated figures) peak demand has more than doubled from 557 to 1200 MW. In the same period of time annual electricity production increased from 2642 GWh to 4631 GWh. Out of these, 3558 GWh have been produced domestically, while 1072 GWh have been imported from India.
  
Electricity Sector
+
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
  
The state owned NEA is responsible for the electricity supply through the national grid. In addition to the NEA's own power plant capacity which amounts to 458 MW, power plants from independent power producers with a capacity of 153 MW fed into the national grid in 2007. Nepal electricity generation is dominated by hydro power, only 55 MW are available to the NEA as thermal power plant capacity.
 
  
The technically and economically exploitable hydro power potential of Nepal is estimated to be about 42 GW. By the end of 2007 only 561 MW (about 1.5&nbsp;%) was developed. All in all approximately 2700 GWh of electricity were produced in 2007, about 330 GWh were imported from India. Due to technical and non-technical losses of 28&nbsp;% the amount of electricity sold by the NEA in 2007 equaled 2,200 GWh. The revenue from electricity tariffs remain below cost. The level of cost coverage is approximately 90&nbsp;%.  
+
== Generation & Installed Capacity ==
 +
Production is heavily dependent on hydropower, as nearly 93% of the total electricity will be generated by either NEA-owned or private hydropower plants in 2013 (despite high costs per unit installed due to topography and unfavorable hydrology and geology). In order to meet the growing hunger for more electricity, imports from India have become more important during the last decade. In 2011 they accounted for 18.42 % of total energy production. Whereas private and state-owned hydropower generation has doubled in the last ten years, power imports from India are 4 times higher now (from 266 GWh in 2001 to 1072 GWh in 2013). <ref name="NEA 2011">National National Electricity Authority (NEA), 2011. [http://www.nea.org.np//reports/annualReports/BvTeH9hxFHAnnualReport2010.pdf A Year in Review, Fiscal 2009/ 2010]. Kathmandu, Nepal.</ref><br/>
  
With about 40&nbsp;% each, households and industry are the largest consumers of electricity in Nepal.  
+
A similar picture can be drawn in terms of installed generation capacity. Currently, 733 MW out of 782 MW installed capacity is hydropower. Around 478 MW of hydropower capacity is NEA-owned, while 255 MW is privately owned and operated. Due to rising fuel prices two diesel power plants with a total installed capacity of 53.4 MW were almost abandoned within the last years. Following figure gives a comprehensive overview on the installed capacity by fuel type.<ref name="NEA 2011">National National Electricity Authority (NEA), 2011. A Year in Review, Fiscal 2009/ 2010. Kathmandu, Nepal.</ref><br/>
  
<br>
+
<br/>
  
Grid electricity in private households
+
[[File:Total installed capacity in Nepal 2013.png|none|389px]]<br/>
  
The NEA provides approximately 1.5 million households with electricity. The subscriber growth rate was about 10% per year in recent years. Private households account for 40&nbsp;% of national electricity consumption. Detailed statistics on the end use of electricity are not available, but the average daily household consumption of 2 kWh suggests that the electricity is mainly used for lighting purposes.
+
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
  
The electricity tariffs for households with 4 to 10 NRs / kWh (approx. 0.04 - 0.10 EUR / kWh) are low to moderate in international comparison. However, because of the high fixed monthly minimum rate households are not motivated to save electricity.
 
  
The electricity supply crises leads to cut offs that affect particularly large numbers of consumers, especially during evening peak load. The households are disadvantaged in two ways. They have to pay a high monthly minimum rate for a supply that is not given and have additional expenses on lighting alternatives such as kerosene lamps, candles or battery lighting.  
+
=== Hydro ===
 +
One major technical barrier to fully harnessing Nepal’s hydroelectric potential is the country’s hydrology. The rugged and mountain alpine terrain endows Nepal with plentiful moving water, but the South-West monsoon delivering it is inconsistent. About 80 percent of the country’s rain occurs from June to September, the remaining 20 percent falls as snow during the dry season. This mismatch between when water is available and when it is needed year-round to generate hydroelectricity creates a complicated engineering challenge, leading severe load shedding particularly in winter, of up to 18 hours at times.
  
<br>
+
A [http://www.fncci.org/text/pp-eup.pdf list of installed and planned hydro power plants] has been published by Federation of Nepalese Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FNCCI):
  
Due to the lack of minimum standards for energy efficient appliances and a lack of labelling of the devices regarding their electricity consumption, private households can make no conscious purchase decisions with regard to operation costs of the appliances. Inefficient domestic appliances are usually cheaper than those with a higher energy-efficiency. Therefore, costumers that have no access to information about the operating costs buy the cheaper but inefficient appliances.
 
  
As a consequence households have to bear high operation costs and the energy service companies have to make a higher power generation capacities available.  
+
{| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="5" border="1" style="width: 347px"
 +
|-
 +
| style="width: 250px" | Total Major Hydro Grid Connected
 +
| style="width: 93px;  text-align: right" | 472,994 kW
 +
|-
 +
| style="width: 250px" | Total Small Hydro Isolated (NEA)
 +
| style="width: 93px;  text-align: right" | 4,536 kW
 +
|-
 +
| style="width: 250px" | Total hydro IPP
 +
| style="width: 93px;  text-align: right" | 158,315 kW
 +
|-
 +
| style="width: 250px" | Total Hydro -Nepal
 +
| style="width: 93px;  text-align: right" | 635,845 kW
 +
|}
 +
A prevalence of water with high rates of silt and lack of sufficient crews to conduct maintenance lead to an average capacity factor of hydro plant - the amount of time a dam is actually producing electricity - is around 59 %.<ref name="UNDP Asia Pacific">_</ref>
  
Durch die Nutzung energieeffizienter Haushaltsgeräte könnten also sowohl die privaten Haushalte durch niedrigere monatliche Stromverbräuche als auch die NEA durch vermiedene Investitionen in Kraftwerke profitieren. Allerdings wäre ein Tarifsystem, welches Stromeinsparungen bei Verbrauchern durch sinkende Betriebsausgaben belohnt, die Voraussetzung dafür, dass dieses win-win Potenzial realisiert werden kann.
+
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
  
Die Einführung von verbindlichen Mindeststandards und Kennzeichnung energieeffizienter Haushaltsgeräte sind international etablierte Instrumente, die zur Verbraucherinformation, Bewusstseinsbildung, Ressourcenschonung und zur Umsetzung eines ’demand side management‘ in Stromversorgungssystemen beitragen.
 
  
Eine Übertragung dieses Instruments auf nepalesische Bedingungen hat wegen der Versorgungskrise eine hohe Relevanz und Aktualität.  
+
=== Solar<br/> ===
 +
943 medium-size solar PV units provide 1.2 MWp of electricity for the communications sector. Solar lanterns, popularly known as solar tuki, with 155,000 units in use as of 2010 constituting 737 kWp of capacity. 225,000 of solar home systems are used throughout Nepal across 2600 villages with an output of 5.36 MWp.<ref name="UNDP Country brief">_</ref>
  
Der tägliche Leidensdruck, der durch die Stromabschaltungen auf alle Beteiligten wirkt, lässt eine relativ hohe Akzeptanz für die notwendigen Maßnahmen erwarten.
+
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
  
Die Breitenwirkung (Signifikanz) der Maßnahmen wird sich nicht unmittelbar einstellen, sondern durch die hohe Stückzahlen energieeffizienter Haushaltsgeräte erreicht.
 
  
<br>
+
=== Wind ===
 +
The first wind turbine generator of 20 kW capacity (10 kW each) installed Kagbeni of Mustang Distrcit in 1989 (Within the three months of operation, blade and tower of the wind generator were broken). Other, wind turbines were installed in Chisapani of Shivapuri National Park and the Club Himalaya in Nagarkot, both of which are not functional anymore.Within the Asian Development Bank Renewable Village Program, two 5KW wind turbines in Dhaubadi village of Nawalparasi District were installed.<ref>Saroj Dhakal, WindPower Nepal Pvt. Ltd., http://www.renewable-world.org/sites/default/files/Session%201%20Saroj%20Dhakal%20WindPower%20Nepal%20-%20Wind%20Energy%20in%20Nepal_0.pdf</ref>
  
=== Rural Electrification  ===
+
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]<br/>
  
Rural electrification in Nepal is naturally very expensive and at the same time the purchasing power of the consumers very low. This unfortunate combination of obstacles is documented in the hard fact that 60&nbsp;% of the Nepalese households have no access to electricity. State funds are insufficient to cope with the problem at hand, therefore in 2003/04 GoN adopted a policy to involve communities in accelerating the electrification process by:
 
  
<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; a) </span>community contribution of 20&nbsp;% of the cost
 
  
<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; b)<span> </span></span>buying bulk power from NEA and manage/operate Community Rural Electrification Entities (CREE)  
+
=== Opportunities of Cogeneration<br/> ===
 +
There are eleven sugar mills in Nepal crushing approximately three million tons of cane annually. All the mills are equipped with bagasse cogeneration plants for captive electricity and steam needs. Through updates of their captive plants. Nepal’s sugar mills could generate significant surplus power during dry season when power generation from hydropower projects is running low. Even the quickly available potential from the ‘incidental’ option at 20,750 MWh/year is more than double NEA’s current thermal generation and would require only little additional investment. The ‘high efficiency’ option could contribute as much as 18 % of hydropower generation during the dry season (up to 257,886 MWh/year ).<br/>
  
Over 200 communities have positively responded to this initiative and deposited 5&nbsp;% (as a pre-condition to be part of the program) of the anticipated costs to the Community Rural Electrification Department of NEA. More than 50 communities have already got access to electricity under this arrangement (20&nbsp;% local contribution, 80&nbsp;% grants from GoN). Among the remaining communities having paid 5&nbsp;% already a large number will not be in a position to comply with their obligation to come up with the remaining 15&nbsp;%. &nbsp;In addition, many communities are lacking the necessary management and technical skills to properly operate and manage the system.
+
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]<br/>
  
<br>
 
  
== Institutional Set Up and Actors in the Energy Sector  ==
 
  
=== Public Institutions  ===
+
== Potential of Renewable Energy ==
  
Mehrere Ministerien haben Mandate, die energiepolitische Fragen und die Nutzung von Energie berühren. Diese sind das Ministry of Water Ressources (MoWR), das Ministry of Environment, Science &amp; Technology (MoEST) und das Ministry of Industry. Im Biomassebereich spielt auch das Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation (MoFSC) eine Rolle, im Gebäudebereich das Ministry of Housing (MoH). Für Fragen im Hinblick auf die Verwendung von fossilen Kraftstoffen ist zusätzlich auch noch das Ministry of Commerce and Supplies zuständig.
+
The potential is as follows (UNDP, 2012)<ref name="UNDP Asia Pacific">_</ref>:
  
Aufgrund dieser Zersplitterung von Zuständigkeiten kommt der Auswahl des politischen Trägers eine besondere Bedeutung zu. Es ist nicht möglich, die Art der Zusammenarbeit zwischen den Ministerien und die Kooperationsbereitschaft untereinander hinreichend genau zu beurteilen. Zudem kann sich die Zusammenarbeit durch die häufig stattfindenden Wechsel auf Führungsebene jederzeit positiv oder negativ verändern. Da verhindert werden sollte, dass es aufgrund von Konkurrenzsituationen zwischen staatlichen Institutionen zu einer Beeinträchtigung oder gar Behinderung der Umsetzung des Vorhabens kommt, sollte bei der Auswahl des politischen Trägers auf eine relative Unabhängigkeit der Institution sowie eine breite politische Akzeptanz besonders geachtet werden.
+
Total Installed Capacity 710 MW (mostly hydro)<br/>Technical Renewable Energy Potential 77,949 MW<br/>Annual Total Electricity Generation 3,851 GWh<br/>Annual Renewable Energy Potential 226,460 GWh
  
In Ermangelung eines politischen Trägers, der ‚Mandat und Kompetenz‘ vereint, wurden als ‚second best options‘ für die politische Trägerschaft zwei Institutionen näher betrachtet: Das Ministry of Finance (MoF) sowie das Water and Energy Commission Secretariat (WECS).  
+
Notes: 2,100 MW of solar PV, 716 MW of wind, 42,133 MW of hydro. At a capacity factor of 17 percent, those solar facilities would generate 3,127 GWh. At a capacity factor of 30 percent, those wind farms would generate 1,882 GWh. At a capacity factor of 60 percent, those dams would generate 221,451 GWh.
  
<br>Ministry of Finance
+
<br/>
  
Das MoF ist ein Ministerium mit großem politischem Einfluss. Es hat Finanzhoheit über alle ministeriellen Budgets und kann hier Prioritäten setzen. Dies kann die Bereitstellung finanzieller Partnerbeiträge erheblich vereinfachen. Das MoF ist an den Verhandlungen zu allen Vorhaben der internationalen Kooperation beteiligt und muss diesen zustimmen. Damit kann es auch eine treibende Kraft für eine Geberabstimmung darstellen. Es hat daher einen guten Überblick über das aktuelle Projektportfolio. Das MoF hat direkten Zugang zu allen Ministerien und kann im Problemfall direkt Einfluss ausüben. Darüber hinaus erleichtert eine Einbindung des MoF auch eine mögliche Verlängerung oder Ausweitung des Vorhabens bei den nächsten Regierungsverhandlungen.  
+
<u>'''Nepalese hydropower potential in detail'''</u><ref>Surendra, K.C. et al. (2011). Current Status of Renewable Energy in Nepal: Opportunities and Challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15, pp. 4107-4117.</ref>: This potential was not calculated by the cited paper. In fact it was done by Dr. Shrestha, as cited in that paper itself. This number is used bymany research papers. Could you please clarifiy why only this paper was cited and is it okay to do that?
  
Das MoF hat kein fachliches Know-how im Energiebereich, ist aber aus wirtschaftlichen Überlegungen daran interessiert, mögliche Kosteneinsparpotenziale durch Effizienzmaß-nahmen im öffentlichen Sektor zu erkennen und durch geeignete Maßnahmen auch zu realisieren. Das MoF kann sich notfalls eine Rolle als „politisches Dach“ des Vorhabens vorstellen (und hat eine solche Rolle bereits bei komplexen, sektorübergreifenden Projekten hilfsweise übernommen). Die Umsetzung des Vorhabens erfolgt jedoch durch Fach-institutionen; das MoF kann dazu entsprechende Aufträge erteilen, die im Rahmen des Durchführungsvertrages festgelegt werden.
+
<br/>
  
Aus Kreisen der Botschaft sowie den vor Ort tätigen GTZ-Vertretern wurde jedoch eine gewisse Skepsis geäußert, ob das MoF seine Aufgaben als politischer Träger gewissenhaft wahrnehmen wird. Einerseits wird dem MoF unterstellt, mehr an Budgethilfe und finanzieller als an technischer Zusammenarbeit interessiert zu sein. Zweitens – und dem Argument verschließt sich die Mission nicht – gibt es die Befürchtung, dass sich das fehlende Fachwissen negativ auf Diskussions- und Entscheidungsprozesse auswirken kann. Weiterhin wird befürchtet, dass das MoF aufgrund des fehlenden fachlichen Bezugs auch projektferne Aufgaben auf das Vorhaben abwälzen könnte.
+
<br/>
  
<br>Water and Energy Commission Secretariat (WECS)
+
{| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="5" border="1" style="width: 500px"
 +
|-
 +
| River Basin
 +
| Nomber of project sites
 +
| Economic potential [MW]
 +
|-
 +
| Sapta Koshi
 +
| 40
 +
| 10,260
 +
|-
 +
| Sapta Gandaki
 +
| 12
 +
| 5,270
 +
|-
 +
| Karnali and Mahakali
 +
| 9
 +
| 25,125
 +
|-
 +
| Southern River
 +
| 5
 +
| 878
 +
|-
 +
| Total
 +
| 66
 +
| 42,133
 +
|}
  
Die Water and Energy Commission (WEC) wurde 1975 mit dem Ziel gegründet, die Entwicklung der Energie- und Wasserressourcen in Nepal in integraler Form voranzutreiben. Sechs Jahre später wurde ein permanentes Sekretariat (WECS) eingerichtet, welches die Aufgabe hat, die Wasser- und Energiestrategie und -politik des Landes zu formulieren und Planungsprozesse im Wasser- und Energiesektor durchzuführen. WECS ist organisatorisch dem Ministry of Water Ressources (MoWR) angegliedert. Die Kommission besteht aus Staatssekretären nahezu aller Ministerien sowie Vertretern der Planning Commission, der Federation of Nepalese Chamber of Commerce (FNCCI), der Nepal Engineering Association, einer technischen Universität sowie zwei Experten aus Nichtregierungs-organisationen. Vorsitzender ist der Minister des MoWR.  
+
The theoretical overall potential is 83,290 MW and the technical feasible potential is 45,610 MW from which 42,133 MW is economically to realise.<br/>
  
WECS hat folgende Mandate:
+
<br/>
  
• Formulierung von Politiken und Strategien in den Sektoren Wasser und Energie • Vorbereitung von Gesetzesvorlagen in diesen Sektoren • Koordination des Politikdialogs in diesen Sektoren • Identifizierung von Energieprojekten • Analyse des Portfolios an bi- und multilateralen Entwicklungsprojekten in den Sektoren Energie und Wasser • Energieplanung und Erstellung von Energiebedarfsstudien
+
<u>'''Nepalese Wind potential:'''</u>
  
WECS hatte sich in den letzten Jahren auf den Wassersektor konzentriert. Nach Abschluss der Arbeiten zum ‚Water Resources Strategy of Nepal‘ erarbeitet WECS nun mit Unterstützung lokaler Consultants eine nationale Energiestrategie bis zum Jahre 2030, die bis Ende 2009 verabschiedet sein soll. In der zweiten Jahreshälfte will WECS auch mit der Erarbeitung einer Energiepolitik beginnen. Weiterhin hat WECS mit der Erstellung von Guidelines für Auditoren im Bereich „Energieeffizienz“ begonnen, erstellt Machbarkeits-studien für Strom-Übertragungsleitungen und Wasserkraftwerke. Alle zwei Jahre veröffentlich WECS den umfangreichen „Energy Synopsis Report“, in dem energierelevante Zahlen und Fakten dargestellt sind. Aufgrund der hohen Priorität des Themas DSM will WECS dieses Thema ebenfalls in Kürze in sein Arbeitsprogramm aufnehmen. Es ist geplant, innerhalb von WECS ein “DSM-Center“ zu etablieren.  
+
The Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership published in 2012 Nepal has substantial wind potential in one study wth at least 200 to 300 MW of capacity possible and extreme wind speeds of 46 meters per second in some areas recorded, with the best sites in the Mustang district (though many of these sites are remote from existing roads and transmission networks). A second, more thorough assessment looked at wind resources in the Annapurna Conservation Area and estimated at least 716 MW of capacity within 10 kilometers of the NEA grid. A third study done jointly by the Department of Geology at Tribhuvan Universityand the Ministry of Physical Planning and Works found at least, 3,000 MW of technical wind potential and 448 MW of potential that could be quickly and commercially exploited.<ref name="UNDP Country brief">_</ref><br/>
  
WECS wird von einem Leiter im Range eines Staatssekretärs geführt und ist in vier Abteilungen gegliedert. Der Abteilung „Energie“ sind insgesamt 8 technische Stellen zugeordnet, von denen jedoch 4 Stellen – nach Organigramm - nicht besetzt sind. Nach eigenen Angaben hat die Abteilung derzeit insgesamt 10 Mitarbeiter.
+
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
  
In den Gesprächen fiel – im Gegensatz zu anderen staatlichen Stellen – der offene und partizipative Kommunikationsstil zwischen der Leitung und Mitarbeitern positiv auf.
 
  
Für WECS als politischen Partner spricht vor allem sein Mandat für die Entwicklung von Energiestrategie und -politik sowie die breit und hochrangig besetzte Kommission, die als Steuerungsgremium in alle wichtigen Entscheidungen einbezogen werden muss. Damit wird ein guter Informationsfluss zwischen den wichtigsten politischen und den im WECS vertretenen Verbänden der Zivilgesellschaft sichergestellt. Formal besteht auch die Möglichkeit, die Kommission um weitere Akteure zu erweitern, falls dies sinnvoll erscheint. Die Kommission ist auch „Eingangstor“ für alle Änderungswünsche und sonstigen Vorschläge zu gesetzlichen Vorgaben im Energiebereich. Für das Vorhaben ergibt sich dadurch ein direkter Zugang zu allen politischen Entscheidungsträgern. Über WECS gelangt das Vorhaben auf direktem Wege auch zu wichtigen energierelevanten Nepal betreffenden Informationen.  
+
== Regional Disparities ==
 +
<br/>In 2008/09 consumption of electricity was almost balanced between industrial (manufacturing) sector (37.37 %) and households (45.52 %), while the commercial sector consumed only 6.6 %.<ref name="MoF 2010">Ministry of Finance (MoF), 2010. [http://www.mof.gov.np/publication/budget/2010/pdf/english_full.pdf Economic Survey Fiscal Year 2009 - 2010]. Kathmandu. Nepal.</ref> However, the industrialized and urban areas account for the majority of electricity demand.
  
Nachteilig wird die derzeit geringe Personaldecke gesehen. Auch hat WECS keine Erfahrung in der Durchführung von Vorhaben der internationalen Zusammenarbeit. WECS hat sich aber bereit erklärt, die Durchführung einzelner Komponenten an dafür geeignete Institutionen zu übertragen. Auch ist nicht ganz auszuschließen, dass das MoWR seinen Einfluss in der Kommission ausnutzt, um einzelne Entscheidungen zu beeinflussen.  
+
Around 28 % of electricity produced in Nepal in the year 2005 was consumed in the Kathmandu Valley alone.<ref name="Shrestha 2010">Shrestha, Ram M. and Salony Rajbhandari, 2010. [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421509009483 Energy and environmental implications of carbon emission reduction targets: Case of Kathmandu Valley], Nepal. in Energy Policy, Volume 38, Issue 9. September 2010, Pages 4818-4827.</ref> The vast majority of electricity is currently consumed in the central and eastern region. Therefore an elaborated system of transmission lines is required as few hydropower plants are situated close to areas of high demand. Middle- (70 MW), Lower-Marshyangdi (69 MW) as well as Kali-Gandaki A (144 MW) as the biggest hydropower projects are all situated in the western part of the country. At the same time, this power cannot be transmitted to the central and eastern part due to bottlenecks in the transmission network between Bharatpur – Hetauda – Dhalkebar. Especially the eastern region has become totally dependent on power imported from India.<ref name="Kathmandu Post 2011b">The Kathmandu Post, 2011(b). [http://www.ekantipur.com/the-kathmandu-post/2011/04/07/nation/power-crisis-lack-of-political-will-behind-outage/220337.html Lack of political will behind outage]. published 7/4/2011. Kathmandu, Nepal.</ref> Besides low generation capacity, the poor transmission network seems to be the major bottleneck in the Nepalese electricity sector.
  
Unter Abwägung aller Vor- und Nachteile hat die Mission WECS als politischen Partner für die erste Phase des Vorhabens vorgeschlagen. Im Rahmen des Abschlussworkshops wurde dem Vorschlag nach eingehenden Diskussionen von allen Beteiligten zugestimmt.
+
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
  
Alternative Energy Promotion Center (AEPC)
 
  
Das Alternative Energy Promotion Center (AEPC) hat die Aufgabe, die Entwicklung und den Einsatz erneuerbarer Energien und alternativer Energietechnologien in Nepal zu fördern. Die 1996 gegründete Institution hat einen autonomen Status und ist formal dem Ministry of Environment, Science and Technology (MoEST) angegliedert. Oberstes Gremium ist ein aus sieben Regierungsvertretern und zwei Vertretern der Privatwirtschaft zusammengesetzter Rat, dem der jeweilige Minister des MoEST vorsitzt. Die operativen Geschäfte leitet ein Geschäftsführer. AEPC hat sich mit seinen Aktivitäten bisher überwiegend auf den ländlichen Raum konzentriert. Es betreibt dazu sogenannte „District Energy and Environment Units“ in derzeit 32 Distrikten Nepals. Das Mandat, auch für Fragen der Energieeffizienz zuständig zu sein, wurde erst vor wenigen Monaten per Kabinettsbeschluss auf AEPC übertragen. Dies geschah auf Drängen des vorherigen Executive Directors Govind Pokharel, der sowohl in der Fachwelt als auch in der internationalen Gebergemeinschaft ein hohes Ansehen genießt und dessen Ablösung durch die neue nepalesische Regierung in der Gebergemeinschaft mit Unverständnis aufgenommen wurde.  
+
== Power Shortage & Load-Shedding ==
 +
<br/>The general shortage of electricity is manifesting itself in scheduled power cuts (so-called load-shedding), which became an incremental part of power supply in Nepal within the last years. Especially during dry-season Nepal’s dependence on hydropower becomes obvious, forcing the NEA to cut power in Kathmandu up to 16 hours per day (as in April 2011). The situation has even worsened as only two hydropower plants with an installed capacity of 92 MW are storage types, while the rest are run-off river plants.<ref name="WECS 2010">Water and Energy Commission Secretariat (WECS), 2010. [http://www.wec.gov.np/hkk/noticefile/test_1309074425.pdf Energy Synopsis Report]. Kathmandu, Nepal.</ref>
  
AEPC erhält eine Grundlagenfinanzierung durch die nepalesische Regierung, finanziert sich aber ansonsten weitgehend aus Projekten der internationalen Kooperation. Das vermutlich bedeutendste Vorhaben ist die Umsetzung des vor allem von Dänemark und Norwegen finanzierten Energy Sector Assistance Programme (ESAP), mit dessen Hilfe insbesondere die ländliche Energieversorgung (Solar Home Systems, Kleinwasserkraftanlagen, Biogas-anlagen, effiziente Herde) verbessert werden soll. AEPC verwaltet im Rahmen von ESAP auch den Rural Energy Fund, der die Teilfinanzierung von Investitionen in ländliche Elektrifizierungsmaßnahmen ermöglicht. Auch die KfW wird sich mit einem finanziellen Beitrag zur Förderung von SHS an ESAP beteiligen.  
+
Follwoing figure illustrates the growing gap between electricity demand and supply and corresponds with the appearance of load-shedding. Since 2006/07 the supply gap increased from 105 GWh to 678 GWh in 2009/10, with the temporary peak in 2008/09 with 745 GWh. Furthermore, the figure shows the seasonal fluctuations due to irregular run-off rivers. Due to glacier melt and intensive rainfall during the monsoon season, electricity supply almost matches the demand between June and October. However, during the winter (where precipitation is far less) generation capacity decreases along with diminishing run-off rivers.
  
Eine weitere Einnahmequelle ist die „Renewable Energy Test Station“, in der energie-relevante Importgüter im Hinblick auf die Einhaltung vorgegebener Standards oder selbstdeklarierter Leistungsmerkmale getestet werden.  
+
[[File:Supply-Demand-Gap-Nepal.jpg|center|577px|Supply-Demand-Gap-Nepal.jpg|alt=Supply-Demand-Gap-Nepal.jpg]]
  
Im Bereich Energieeffizienz hat AEPC bisher keine Maßnahmen durchgeführt. Ein fester Mitarbeiter von AEPC befindet sich derzeit in Norwegen, um an einer mehrmonatigen Schulungsmaßnahme zu EE teilzunehmen.  
+
Coping with load-shedding is challenging both the industrial and commercial sector. Despite preferential treatment of the industrial sector (which is partly spared from load-shedding), manufacturing suffers hard from the power crisis. Newspapers report, that manufacturing industries have to cut their production between 25 and 80 % in peak times. Small commercial businesses are similarly affected by load-shedding, as many are dependent on power and are thus forced to use generators or backup systems.<ref name="Kathmandu Post 2010">The Kathmandu Post, 2010. [http://www.ekantipur.com/the-kathmandu-post/2010/12/30/money/parsa-bara-industrial-area-crippled-by-power-crisis/216681/ Parsa-Bara industrial area crippled by Power Crisis], Sshankar Acharya. published 31/12/2010. Kathmandu, Nepal.</ref> The long-term impact of poor power supply is observable as the share of manufacturing sector among GDP declined from 9 to 6 % since 2000/01.<ref name="Himalayan Times 2011">The Himalayan Times, 2011. [http://www.thehimalayantimes.com/fullNews.php?headline=Power+crisis+breaks+backbone+of+economy&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;NewsID=279138 Power crisis breaks backbone of economy], Kuvera Chalise. published 8/3/2011. Kathmandu, Nepal.</ref>
  
Zum Zeitpunkt des Besuchs der Mission war der neue Exekutivdirektor, Dr. Chaulagain, erst wenige Tage im Amt und hatte noch keinen umfassenden Überblick über die Aktivitäten seiner Institution. Er betont, dass AEPC seinen Fokus auf Haushalte und Industriebetriebe in ländlichen, nicht netzangebundenen Gebieten sieht. Hier beabsichtigt AEPC, in naher Zukunft eine an Haushalte und kleine und mittlere Betriebe gerichtete Kampagne für Energieeffizienz durchzuführen. Für den städtischen Bereich sieht der eher die NEA als zuständige Institution.  
+
As the construction period for new power generation projects and new import transmission capacities is very long, a rapid improvement of energy supply cannot be expected. An emergency supply through diesel power plants is unrealistic, because of the high power generation costs associated. Therefore, the power supply crisis affects public life and especially economic development negatively. Electricity provides nearly one fourth of the total industrial energy consumption. It has to be expected that more industrial enterprises and service providers make themselves independent from the unreliable public power supply by using diesel generators. Although this costly practice allows at least profitable companies to maintain their business, it places a huge burden on the national economy as additional fuel imports will be necessary.<br/>
  
Unterstützungsbedarf für AEPC sieht er vor allem im Bereich effiziente Kochherde (Effizienzverbesserung), EE-Sensibilisierungsprogramme für Haushalte, EE in Gebäuden, Beleuchtung und Warmwasseraufbereitung.
+
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
  
Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA) Der staatliche Energieversorger NEA wurde 1985 gegründet. Seine Aufgabe ist die Erzeugung, Übertragung und Verteilung von elektrischem Strom sowie der Ausbau und Betrieb des Stromnetzes. NEA ist weiterhin mitverantwortlich für die Erstellung der Energieplanung sowie für die Aus- und Weiterbildung von Fachleuten im Bereich Energieerzeugung, Übertragung und Verteilung.
+
<br/>
  
Die NEA hat jedoch keine Tarifautonomie, sondern hängt von den Entscheidungen der „Electricity Tariff Fixation Commission“ (EFTC) ab. Die Einnahmen durch Stromtarife sind nicht kostendeckend, die letzte Tarifanpassung wurde 2001 genehmigt; nach eigenen Angaben betrug die Gesamtverschuldung der NEA am Endes das Bilanzjahres 2007/2008 7,1 Mrd. NRs (ca. 700 Mio. EUR).
 
  
Die NEA ist organisatorisch dem MoWR angegliedert. Der NEA steht ein Board of Directors vor, dessen Chairman der Minister des MoWR ist. Weitere Mitglieder sind der Staatssekretär des Finanzministeriums, der Managing Director der NEA, zwei Vertreter aus dem Bereich Industrie/Banken/Handel und Verbraucherschutz sowie zwei Energieexperten.
+
== Demand Forecast & Outlook ==
 +
According to estimations of the NEA energy demand will grow in the next 17 years with an average annual rate of 8.34 %. The current demand of 4430 GWh annually is expected to double until 2018 and exceed 17,400 GWh by 2027. Along with the growing demand it is projected that system peak load will increase with similar annual growth rates, reaching 3679 MW in 2027.<ref name="NEA 2011">_</ref>
  
Aufgrund der täglichen Stromausfälle steht die NEA in der öffentlichen Kritik. Durch Importe versucht die NEA, die Lücke zwischen Stromnachfrage und -angebot zu reduzieren. Mit Indien wurde ein Vertrag über die Bereitstellung von 150 MW geschlossen. Allerdings kann diese Leistung aufgrund von technischen Problemen bei der Übertragung gegenwärtig nicht abgerufen werden.  
+
These estimations require an immense increase in the exploitation of the vast hydropower resources in Nepal. Of the 42,000 MW of economically feasible hydropower resources only the relatively small share of 1.7 % is tapped.<ref name="WECS 2010">_</ref> Despite long term development plans targeting to reach 10,000 MW of installed capacity by 2020 (according to the 10-years hydropower development plan), current development of the sector draw a rather different picture.
  
Gemeinsam mit der Weltbank führt NEA derzeit Studien durch, inwieweit durch ein DSM-Programm Lastspitzen abgesenkt und der Energieverbrauch insgesamt reduziert werden kann. Die Studie soll bis Oktober 2009 vorliegen. NEA plant seit Monaten die Durchführung eines CFL-Pilotprogramms. Die Details der Umsetzung des Programms sind noch nicht geklärt, jedoch findet derzeit eine Ausschreibung hinsichtlich des Einkaufs der CFL statt.  
+
Currently, projects with a total capacity of 547 MW are under construction. NEA projects account for the major share (500 MW) of it. Planned and proposed projects would furthermore increase the capacity by 1422 MW. But considering the relatively slow deployment of new projects in Nepal, it seems unlikely that until 2020 more than 7000 MW of capacity will be contributed by projects that even have not been proposed until now.
  
Bisher ist DSM von NEA praktisch nicht als Steuerungsinstrument der Verbrauchsseite genutzt worden. Mit zunehmendem Druck durch die Versorgungskrise entwickelt NEA ein zunehmendes Interesse, eine eigene ‚DSM-Abteilung‘ einzurichten (vgl. Anlage 8.1.c Besprechungsbericht mit NEA vom 4.3.2009)
+
Though, actions to upgrade generation capacity within the next ten years were taken, the current situation of load-shedding is likely to persist and may even get worse in the near future. Chamelia and Kulekhani-III with a capacity of 30 and 14 MW respectively are expected to be completed in 2011. However, the first one is situated in the Far-Western region and is thus unable to contribute to the major demand in the central and eastern part of the country. If at all, relief can be expected when the Upper Tamakoshi project is connected to the national grid. With a total capacity of 456 MW it is expected to contribute 2281.2 GWh annually. Developed as a PPP it is scheduled to start production in 2013/14.<ref name="NEA 2011">_</ref> Considering the estimated growth of energy demand, capacity will hardly meet peak demand even after completion of the three above mentioned projects. Especially, in the dry seasons plants will operate far below their maximum capacity, resulting in load-shedding or an immense increase of power imports from India.
  
=== Commercial Service Providers  ===
+
As all projects that are currently under construction are run-off-river types, the Nepalese power sector will be even more dependent on seasonal fluctuations of river flows. Furthermore, it is unclear how climate change will affect water security in Nepal. Linked to many uncertainties, climate change affects run-off rivers by (a) glacier retreat and (b) changes in rainfall intensity and patterns. Projections estimate that run-off could be reduced by 14 % due to climate change, reducing both generation capacity and economically feasible hydropower potential.<ref name="Pathak 2010">Pathak, Mahesh, 2010. Climate Change: [http://www.nepjol.info/index.php/HN/article/download/4190/3564 Uncertainty for Hydropower Development in Nepal]. in Hydro Nepal, Issue No. 6, p. 31 – 34, Kathmandu, Nepal.</ref>
  
=== Non Governmental Service Providers for Rural Areas in the Field of Energy  ===
+
Limited financing: Inabilities to procure financing and foreign investment are major barriers. One assessment calculated that if you take all of the available capital in Nepali markets - this for everything, not just energy - and directed it solely at building hydropower projects, you would not even have enough for 200 MW. UNDP surveyed key lenders in the sector and noted that commercial banks and financial institutions are “generally not interested” in investing in energy. A separate evaluation commented that Nepal lacked “long-term debt financing” for energy projects and that the major lenders, the Agricultural Development Bank and National Commercial Bank, have already “maxed out” their lending for microhydro, solar PV, and biogas. A third study remarked that in Nepal, “financial institutions are not readily motivated to invest in renewable energy technologies because of the immature business models, market insecurity and implementation and usage risks.”<ref name="UNDP Asia Pacific">_</ref>
  
=== Micro Finance Institutions  ===
+
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
  
== Policy Framework, Laws and Regulations  ==
+
<br/>
  
=== Poverty Reduction Strategy  ===
 
  
Die Entwicklungspolitik der nepalesischen Regierung wurde bisher in Fünfjahresplänen festgeschrieben. Der letzte Plan 2002/03 – 2006/07, der gleichzeitig ein PRSP war, nannte folgende Hauptziele: Armutsbekämpfung als übergeordnetes Ziel, Wirtschaftswachstum, Verbesserung der sozialen Indikatoren, marktwirtschaftliche Ordnungspolitik, sowie good governance als grundlegende Orientierung. Die Realisierung dieser in ihrer Ausrichtung grundsätzlich richtigen Entwicklungspläne litt allerdings an Durchführungsschwächen, finanziellen Engpässen und im Detail zu ambitionierten Zielen.  
+
== Electricity Demand and Supply in the Household Sector ==
 +
NEA provides approximately 1.5 million households with electricity. The subscriber growth rate was about 10% per year in recent years. Private households account for 43.4 % of national electricity consumption. The average daily household consumption is about 2 kWh which is used mainly for lighting. The other uses being running radios, TVs and to some extent cooking and water heating.
  
Ganz wesentliches Hemmnis bei der Umsetzung der Entwicklungsstrategie war und ist die Tatsache, dass die politische Lage wie auch die Sicherheitssituation noch immer fragil ist.  
+
The electricity tariffs for households with 4 to 10 NRs / kWh (approx. 0.04 - 0.10 EUR / kWh) are low to moderate in international comparison. However, because of the high fixed monthly minimum rate households are not motivated to save electricity.
  
=== Energy Policy  ===
+
The electricity supply crises leads to cut offs that affect particularly large numbers of consumers, especially during evening peak load hours. The households are disadvantaged in two ways. They have to pay a high monthly minimum rate for an unreliable supply and moreover, they have additional expenses on lighting alternatives such as kerosene lamps, candles or battery lighting. The increasing use of electrical appliances such as refrigerators, water pumps, rice cookers and water heaters lead to power supply overload. Due to the lack of minimum standards for energy efficient appliances and a lack of labeling of the devices regarding their electricity consumption, private households can make no conscious purchase decisions with regard to operation costs of the appliances. Inefficient domestic appliances are usually cheaper than those with a higher energy-efficiency. Therefore, costumers who have no access to information about the operating costs usually buy the cheaper but inefficient appliances. As a consequence, households have to bear high operation costs, and the energy service companies have to make higher power generation capacities available.
  
Bis dato gibt es keine ‚Nationale Energiestrategie‘ für Nepal. Die energiepolitischen Zielsetzungen werden durch jeweils gültige 5-Jahrespläne festgelegt und fortgeschrieben.  
+
A social norm against collecting revenue for electricity further inhibits the profitability of hydro schemes. Many believe hydroelectric facilities should serve the community for free, and that poor families should not have to pay for electricity. The problem with this view is that it creates social opposition to charging rural households for hydroelectricity.<ref name="UNDP Asia Pacific">_</ref>
  
Sowohl der 10. Fünf-Jahresplan (2002/03 – 2006/07) als auch der aktuellen 3-Jahres-Interimsplan (2007/2008 – 2009/2010) befassen sich ausschließlich mit dem Elektrizitätssektor. Die Zielsetzungen des letzten und des aktuellen Plans sind:
+
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
  
*Bau neuer Wasserkraftwerke
 
*Erweiterung des nationalen Netzes und des Verteilungsnetzes und dadurch
 
*Erschließung nicht versorgter Gebiete mit Elektrizität
 
  
Die Realisierung dieser Ziele ist aber weit hinter den Planungen zurück geblieben.  
+
== Rural Electrification ==
 +
<br/>Rural electrification in Nepal is very expensive due to the topographical conditions and at the same time the purchasing power of the consumers very low. This unfortunate combination of obstacles is documented in the hard fact that 56.7 % of the Nepalese population has no access to electricity. In rural arears of Nepal, 17 million peole are without electricity. <ref name="UNDP Asia Pacific">_</ref>
  
Entwicklungsbudgets werden ausschließlich dem Ausbau des Elektrizitätssektors zuge-ordnet. Ziele zur nachhaltigen Nutzung der Energie aus Biomasse (als wichtigstem Primär-energieträger) oder der effizienten Nutzung kommerzieller Energieträger werden nicht thematisiert. Ebenso wenig werden Möglichkeiten in Erwägung gezogen, die Verbraucher-seite als Adressat einer Energiepolitik zu begreifen.  
+
State funds are insufficient to cope with the problem at hand, therefore in 2003/04 GoN adopted a policy and created the Community Electrification Program to accelerate the electrification process. The model is that communities buy power in bulk from NEA and manage/operate the local system through village organizations called '''Community Rural Electrification Entities (CREE)'''.The price the CREEs pay for the bulk power is lower than the lowest consumer tariff. The revenue can be spend for operation and maintenance of the system.
  
Die Tarife und Preise für Strom und Erdölprodukte werden politisch bestimmt. Sie sind nicht kostendeckend oder orientieren sich an der unteren Grenze der Beschaffungskosten.  
+
230 communities positively responded to this initiative and have deposited 5 % (as a pre-condition to be part of the program) of the anticipated costs to the Community Rural Electrification Department of NEA. Another 188 agreements have already been signed, and additional 444 community applications have been registered. 116 communities have already got access to electricity under this arrangement (20 % local contribution, 80 % grants from GoN). Among the 230 communities having paid 5 % already, a large number will not be able to comply with their obligation to come up with the remaining 15 %. In addition, the communities usually lack the necessary management and technical skills to operate and manage the system properly.
  
So wurden der ‚Nepal Electricity Authority‘ (NEA) seit 2001 Tariferhöhungen verwehrt; der Stromverkauf ist defizitär und muss durch den Staatshaushalt ausgeglichen werden. Das Tarif- und Preisregime als wichtigstes sektorpolitisches Steuerungsinstrument zur effizienten Energienutzung setzt in Nepal keine Anreize für eine sparsame und effiziente Nutzung von Energieressourcen.
+
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
  
Seit 2008 arbeitet das ‚Water and Energy Commission Secretariat‘ (WECS) an einer ‚Nationalen Energiestrategie‘, zu der derzeit ein breiter Konsultationsprozess durchgeführt wird. Nach Aussagen von WECS soll im Juli 2009 der Entwurf fertig gestellt sein. Das durch die Regierung dafür bereitgestellte Budget beträgt ca. 150.000 EUR. Weiterhin soll nach Aussagen von WECS im Anschluss an die Verabschiedung der ‚Nationalen Energiestrategie‘ die Formulierung einer ‚Nationalen Energiepolitik‘ erfolgen.
 
  
Der 10. Fünf-Jahresplan (2002/03 – 2006/07) zielte stark auf Armutsminderung ab. Die für den Energiesektor abgeleiteten Entwicklungsziele beschränkten sich auf den Elektrizitäts-sektor und sahen sowohl die Ausweitung der Stromnetze in den ländlichen Raum vor als auch den Ausbau der Wasserkraftkapazität. Eine Gegenüberstellung quantitativer Schlüsselziele mit den realisierten Ergebnissen ist ernüchternd:
+
= Institutional Set-up and Actors in the Energy Sector =
  
<br>
+
== Public Institutions ==
 +
<br/>Several ministries have mandates affecting energy policy issues and the use of energy. These are the '''Ministry of Energy (MoE)''', the Ministry of Environment, Science & Technology (MoEST) and the Ministry of Industry. The '''Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation (MoFSC)''' plays a role in the biomass sector and the Ministry of Housing (MoH) in the building sector. The Ministry of Commerce and Supplies is responsible for questions regarding the use of fossil fuels.
  
{| class="MsoNormalTable" style="border-right: medium none; border-top: medium none; margin: auto auto auto 5.4pt; border-left: medium none; border-bottom: medium none; border-collapse: collapse" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="1"
+
The Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA), the state-owned utility, dominates the electricity sector and is responsible for all planning, construction, and operation of electricity supply. The NEA also acts as the sole buyer of electricity from all IPPs, and it acts as the agent for all power purchase agreements for energy exchanges with India. The Ministry of Water Resources has the responsibility for all public and private activities related to hydroelectricity supply. The Nepal Oil Corporation has a monopoly to sell and distribute all petroleum products throughout the country. Apart from these three main actors, the Ministry of Energy was recently created in 2009 to “manage Nepal’s energy sector” and “develop energy resources to accelerate development,” including activities such as policy design, planning, regulation, and research. It has within it a Department of Energy Development which is supposed to ensure transparent energy regulations and facilitate private sector involvement. The Ministry of Environment enforces all environmental impact assessments, and coordinates climate change adaptation and mitigation programs. The National Development Council issues macroeconomic policy directives to the National Planning Commission for the development of annual and five-year plans. A Water and Energy Commission, Water Resources Development Council, and Environmental Protection Council all enforce regulations relating to either water resources and permitting or environmental permitting. The Department of Industry, lastly, plays a minor role and has been tasked with overseeing energy efficiency audits and efforts in the industrial sector. Though not an independent, high-level ministry, the Alternative Energy Promotion Center (AEPC), established under the Ministry of Environment, Science, and Technology, gets special mention as it is the “nodal” agency for the promotion and dissemination of all renewable energy in the country, as well as all major off-grid electrification programs.<ref name="UNDP Country brief">_</ref>
|-
+
 
| style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0cm; border-left: windowtext 1pt solid; width: 248.1pt; padding-top: 0cm; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent" valign="top" width="331" |
+
Civil unrest lasted 11 years and stopped with the formal end of the monarchy in Nepal and the establishment of the “People’s Republic of Nepal” in 2006. as of November 2011, the government was still in “crisis” without an elected Prime Minister. As a result, experts have noted that “for the past three months, the economy has come to a grinding halt, nothing is happening, no funds have been allocated to Nepal Electricity Authority or to energy.” Although the new budget published in November 2010 allocated 16.69 billion Nepalese Rupees to power generation and transmission systems, the Independent Power Producers of Nepal already stated that it is insufficient to bring any projects online.<ref name="UNDP Asia Pacific">_</ref>
<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">Maßnahme</span></span>
+
 
 +
UNDP has noted that “no single institution” could “provide the horizontal alignment and necessary focus on linkages between energy poverty” and give “overall direction to a collective pro-poor energy strategy”. UNDP also documented a lack of<br/>centralized energy planning, duplication of efforts resulting from lack of coordination, and disputes between local and national institutions over energy planning.<ref name="UNDP Asia Pacific">_</ref><br/>
 +
 
 +
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=== Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA) ===
 +
The state-owned utility NEA was founded in 1985. Its task is the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity and the development and operation of the electricity grid. Furthermore, the NEA is co-responsible in the preparation of energy planning and in education and training of professionals in the field of power generation, transmission and distribution.
 +
 
 +
The NEA cannot decide on electricity tariffs, but depends on the decisions of the '''“Electricity Tariff Fixation Commission” (EFTC)'''. The revenues from electricity tariffs are not cost covering. The last tariff adjustment was approved in 2001. According to its own data, the total indebtedness of the NEA amounted to 7.1 billion NRs (about 700 million EUR) at the end of the financial year 2007/2008.
 +
 
 +
The NEA is affiliated with the MoE. It is headed by a Board of Directors, whose Chairman is the Minister of Energy. Further members include the Secretary of Finance, the Managing Director of the NEA, two representatives from the industrial / banking / trade and consumer protection sector as well as two energy experts.
 +
 
 +
Due to the daily power cuts, the NEA is publically criticized. It tries to bridge the gap between electricity demand and supply by importing electricity from India. Therefore, a contract for the provision of 150 MW was stipulated. However, due to technical problems during transmission this capacity currently cannot be retrieved.
 +
 
 +
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
 +
 
 +
<br/>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=== Alternative Energy Promotion Center (AEPC) ===
 +
[http://www.aepc.gov.np/ The Alternative Energy Promotion Center (AEPC)] was founded in 1996 to promote the development and deployment of renewable energies and alternative energy technologies in Nepal. It is a semi-autonomous institution formally attached to the Ministry of Environment. AEPC acts as an intermediary institution between the operational level NGOs / private promoters of renewable energy and the policy decision levels in relevant ministries. It`s activities include renewable energy policy formulation, planning and facilitating the implementation of the policies/plans. It also responsible for the delivery of subsidies and financial assistance for off-grid Rural Electrification and also monitoring, evaluation and quality control during the process of electrification projects. Beyond that, AEPC is responsible for the standardization, quality assurance and monitoring of RE programs
 +
 
 +
The highest body is a board with representatives from government sector, industry sector and non-governmental organizations. . An executive director leads the operational business. AEPC mainly focuses its activities on rural areas. For that purpose it operates so-called “District Energy and Environment Units” in currently 32 districts of Nepal.
 +
 
 +
AEPC receives basic funding from the Nepalese government. Moreover, it is financed to a large extend by international cooperation projects. Perhaps the most important project was the implementation of the Energy Sector Assistance Program (ESAP), mainly financed by DANIDA and NORAD. This program aimed at improving the rural energy supply (solar home systems, small hydro power plants, biogas plants, efficient stoves). ESAP managed the Rural Energy Fund, which makes the partial financing of investments in rural electrification measures possible. The German KfW participated in the promotion of SHS with a financial contribution to ESAP. Another important program is the Rural Electrification Development Programme (REDP) by UNDP and World Bank which was supporting the government in implementing the Rural Energy Policy in all districts. The Renewable Energy Project (REP), a joint effort by the European Union and the government of Nepal focused on the provision of solar energy systems in rural areas.<br/>
 +
 
 +
Currently, under the NRREP (National Rural and Renewable Energy Programme, 2012-2017) ESAP, REDP and REP were combined with the aim of having a single programme modality. AEPC is the executing agency for NRREP. The programme has three components: Central Renewable Energy Fund, Technical Support, Business Development for Renewable Energy and Productive Energy Use. <br/>
 +
 
 +
Furthermore, there are additional smaller projects focusing on improved watermills, biogas and climate change adaption strategies.<br/>
 +
 
 +
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
 +
 
 +
<br/>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=== Water and Energy Commission Secretariat (WECS) ===
 +
The Water and Energy Commission (WEC) was founded in 1975 with the aim of advancing the development of energy and water resources in Nepal in an integral way. Six years later, a permanent secretariat (WECS) was established, which is responsible for the formulation of the water and energy strategy and policy of the country as well as for the implementation of planning processes in the water and energy sectors. Originally, WECS was organizationally affiliated with the Ministry of Water Resources (MoWR), which is by now merged into the new established Ministry of Energy (MoE). The Commission consists of state secretaries of almost all ministries and representatives of the Planning Commission, the Federation of Nepalese Chamber of Commerce (FNCCI), the Nepal Engineering Association, a technical university and two experts from NGOs. Chairman is the Minister of the MoE.
 +
 
 +
<br/>
 +
 
 +
<u>The WECS has the following mandates:</u>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
*Formulation of policies and strategies in the sectors of water and energy
 +
*Preparation of legislative proposals in these sectors
 +
*Coordination of policy dialogue in these sectors
 +
*Identification of energy projects
 +
*Analysis of the portfolio of bilateral and multilateral development projects in the sectors of energy and water
 +
*Energy planning and preparation of energy demand studies
 +
<br/>[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]&lt;/div&gt;
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== Activities of Donors ==
 +
<u>'''Energising Development (EnDev)'''</u>
 +
 
 +
Please see the regularly updated web activities of [http://endev.info/content/Nepal EnDev in Nepal].
 +
 
 +
[[Micro Hydropower Debt Fund Component - EnDev Nepal|Micro Hydropower Debt Fund Component - EnDev Nepal]]
 +
 
 +
<u>'''German Government'''</u><br/>
 +
 
 +
implemented by GIZ:<br/>
 +
 
 +
[http://www.giz.de/en/worldwide/17864.html Nepal Energy Efficiency Programme ((NEEP), 2009 - 2017), Advisory towards energy efficiency] <br/>
 +
 
 +
with three components: energy efficiency in markets (industries and public infrastructure), clean cooking (with a focus on improved cooking stoves) and policy advise on energy efficiency.<br/>
 +
 
 +
<u>'''Global Sustainable Electricity Partnership (GSEP)'''</u> <ref>www.globalelectricity.org</ref><br/>
 +
 
 +
<u>'''Energy for Education Project'''</u> <ref>http://www.globalelectricity.org/en/index.jsp?p=121&f=373</ref>
 +
 
 +
Project activities:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
*Installation of two PV systems and construction of a computer room (including computer) at the local schools in the Matela VDC of Surkhet District in western Nepal and in addition distribution of small solar home systems (clean portable lamps) to students and residents of Matela displace the use of kerosene lamps. Fees for the use of these lanterns and the computers, according to the beneficiary aibility to pay, contribute to the financing of the project.
 +
*Beautiful Nepal Association (BNA), a local NGO, and the Malika U Ma Vi School’s Management Committee are responsible to ensure maintenance and provide supervision to quality and sustainability.
 +
Timeline:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
*10-14th December, 2012, 29 technical training workshop on stand-alone photovoltaic (PV) systems, participants from all over Nepal
 +
*16 December 2012, groundbreaking ceremony
 +
*16 April 2013, inauguration ceremony, project completed.
 +
<br/>Key objectives:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
*To demonstrate the potential of solar energy as a viable power source for improving education in the region.
 +
*To use the energy from photovoltaic system for lighting and to launch a computer program in two rural schools.
 +
*To provide clean portable small solar home systems for students and residents of rural Matela, significantly reducing the emission of toxic gases from the current use of kerosene lamps.
 +
<br/>
 +
 
 +
<span lang="en"><u>'''Distribution of Solar Home Systems within SE4ALL initiative'''</u><ref>http://www.globalelectricity.org/upload/File/news_release_2014_nepal_solar_lantern_distribution.pdf</ref></span>
 +
 
 +
GSEP, in partnership with the Global BrightLight Foundation (GBLF), distributes already (status 03 February 2014) 5000 solar home systems across Nepal within the SE4ALL initiative.
 +
 
 +
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
= Policy Framework, Laws and Regulations =
 +
<br/>
 +
== Energy Policy<br/> ==
 +
 
 +
=== National Energy Strategy (NES)<br/> ===
 +
To date, there is no “National Energy Strategy” for Nepal. A draft forwarded to the parliament is not approved, yet. Up to now, the energy policy objectives are set up as a part of the general 5-Year Plans by the National Planning Commission. The energy policy of the current 3-Year Interim Plan (2007/08 – 2009/10) deals exclusively with electricity, and therefore development budgets are allocated exclusively to the development of the electricity sector. Targets for the sustainable use of energy from biomass (as the most important primary energy source) or the efficient use of commercial energy sources are not discussed. Likewise, no opportunities to understand the consumer side as the addressee of an energy policy are considered.
 +
 
 +
<br/>
 +
 
 +
<u>The objectives regarding electricity and energy in the Interim Plan are:</u>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
*creation of an environment conductive to investment in the development of hydropower
 +
*ensure reliable and easily accessible electricity services for the majority of the people in rural areas
 +
*completion of ongoing hydropower projects adding 105 MW generation capacity (85 MW by public sector, 20 MW by private sector)
 +
*initiation of construction of new hydropower projects with an additional capacity of 2,115 MW with the objective to abandon the practice of load-shedding in 2013/14
 +
*provision of electricity to additional 10 % of the population (in total, 58.5 %) in 500 additional VDCs through extension of the national grid
 +
*expansion of per capita consumption to 100 KWh<br/>
 +
<br/>
 +
 
 +
The realization of these objectives is delayed.
 +
 
 +
The tariffs and prices for electricity and petroleum products are politically determined. They are geared to the lower limit of acquisition costs or not cost covering at all. Tariff increase has been denied to the Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA) since 2001. Therefore, the electricity sale is in deficit and has to be balanced by the state budget. In December 2011 the Nepalese Government finally decided to hike electricity prices and from 15th of January 2012 a 20% increase in power tariffs will be in effect. However, the minimum tariff of 80 NPR per 20 kWh per month will be left unchanged.
 +
 
 +
From 2008 to 2010, the “Water and Energy Commission Secretariat” (WECS) worked on a “National Energy Strategy”, in whose regard a broad consultation process was undergoing. The budget provided for this by the government was approximately 150,000 EUR. Furthermore, according to statements by the WECS, the formulation of a “National Energy Policy” shall follow after the adoption of the “National Energy Strategy”.<br/>
 +
 
 +
<br/>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=== Biomass Energy Strategy (BEST)<br/> ===
 +
In 2013 it was decided that the Alternative Energy Promotion Centre (AEPC) and the Nepal Energy Efficiency Program (NEEP) will prepare a Biomass Energy Strategy (BEST). The Strategy was ready for implementation in 2014. The baseline study therefore tried to cover a wide range of situations in both the supply and demand side of all relevant sectors.
  
| style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0cm; border-left: rgb(236,233,216); width: 63.75pt; padding-top: 0cm; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent" valign="top" width="85" |
+
The specific objectives of the baseline study assignment were:
<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">Zielgröße</span></span>
 
  
| style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0cm; border-left: rgb(236,233,216); width: 63.8pt; padding-top: 0cm; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent" valign="top" width="85" |
 
<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">realisiert</span></span>
 
  
| style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0cm; border-left: rgb(236,233,216); width: 49.6pt; padding-top: 0cm; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent" valign="top" width="66" |
+
*To provide a comprehensive overview on the baseline situation of the BE related sectors with respect to its diversity of supply sources and end users;
<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">Quote</span></span>
+
*To analyze major trends over time from earlier studies and their implications in the BE sector of Nepal;
 +
*To analyze institutional responsibilities and challenges in the management of the BE sector;
 +
*To estimate the potential of savings and conservation of biomass resource through the adoption of more efficient technologies;
 +
*To identify possible strategic interventions to improve the productivity and labour efficient access to sustainable biomass energy sources and to improve the adoption and usage of efficient BE technologies
 +
*To provide information on cross cutting issues like governance, poverty reduction, gender and social inclusion, health and climate change and suggest intervention options accordingly.<br/>
  
|-
 
| style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: rgb(236,233,216); padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0cm; border-left: windowtext 1pt solid; width: 248.1pt; padding-top: 0cm; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent" valign="top" width="331" |
 
<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">Ausbau der Wasserkraftwerke</span></span>
 
  
| style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: rgb(236,233,216); padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0cm; border-left: rgb(236,233,216); width: 63.75pt; padding-top: 0cm; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent" valign="top" width="85" |
 
<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">315 MW</span></span>
 
  
| style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: rgb(236,233,216); padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0cm; border-left: rgb(236,233,216); width: 63.8pt; padding-top: 0cm; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent" valign="top" width="85" |
 
<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">40 MW</span></span>
 
  
| style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: rgb(236,233,216); padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0cm; border-left: rgb(236,233,216); width: 49.6pt; padding-top: 0cm; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent" valign="top" width="66" |
+
<br/>
<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">13&nbsp;%</span></span>
 
  
|-
+
----
| style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: rgb(236,233,216); padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0cm; border-left: windowtext 1pt solid; width: 248.1pt; padding-top: 0cm; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent" valign="top" width="331" |
 
<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">Erweiterung der Hochspannungsleitungen</span></span>
 
  
| style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: rgb(236,233,216); padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0cm; border-left: rgb(236,233,216); width: 63.75pt; padding-top: 0cm; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent" valign="top" width="85" |
+
<div><div id="_com_1">
<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">420 km</span></span>
+
=== Energy Efficiency Strategy (EEST)<br/> ===
 +
Since 2011 WECS is drafting an Energy Efficiency Strategy (EEST) supported by NEEP. The ''“efficient use of energy is a constituent of the national energy strategy of Nepal”'' is one of the objectives of this programme. Within this backdrop and the defined objective, WECS as an implementing agency for the component is to draft National Energy Efficiency Strategy of Nepal as a part of the “National Energy Strategy".
  
| style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: rgb(236,233,216); padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0cm; border-left: rgb(236,233,216); width: 63.8pt; padding-top: 0cm; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent" valign="top" width="85" |
+
The approach is including the following points:
<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">47 km</span></span>
 
  
| style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: rgb(236,233,216); padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0cm; border-left: rgb(236,233,216); width: 49.6pt; padding-top: 0cm; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent" valign="top" width="66" |
 
<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">11&nbsp;%</span></span>
 
  
|-
+
*Identify the gaps in strategy, institutions and legal/regulatory measures to develop and adopt energy efficiency measures, and technologies in Nepal;
| style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: rgb(236,233,216); padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0cm; border-left: windowtext 1pt solid; width: 248.1pt; padding-top: 0cm; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent" valign="top" width="331" |
+
*Bring in good practices in strategy, institutions and legal/regulatory measures from more advanced countries in the South Asian regions as well as from other regions and analyze their suitability for Nepal;
<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">Erweiterung der Verteilungsleitungen</span></span>
+
*Assessment of Energy Efficiency Potential of Nepal;
 +
*Liaise with the relevant government agencies and undertake consultation at relevant stages to develop ownership for the outputs of this assignment.
 +
*Review all relevant documents related to public and private expenditure for energy infrastructure, demand side management and energy efficiency for consistency. The documents may include, but not limited to :<br/>
  
| style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: rgb(236,233,216); padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0cm; border-left: rgb(236,233,216); width: 63.75pt; padding-top: 0cm; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent" valign="top" width="85" |
 
<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">8672 km</span></span>
 
  
| style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: rgb(236,233,216); padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0cm; border-left: rgb(236,233,216); width: 63.8pt; padding-top: 0cm; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent" valign="top" width="85" |
 
<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">2100 km</span></span>
 
  
| style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: rgb(236,233,216); padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0cm; border-left: rgb(236,233,216); width: 49.6pt; padding-top: 0cm; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent" valign="top" width="66" |
 
<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">24&nbsp;%</span></span>
 
  
|}
+
=== Institutionalizing Energy Efficiency ===
  
Die in Kap 3.1 erwähnte Diskrepanz zwischen Entwicklungsplanung und -realisierung des 10. Fünf-Jahresplans trifft also auch für die gesteckten Ausbauziele des Elektrizitätssektors zu. Die angestrebten Reformziele im Elektrizitätssektor wurden ebenfalls praktisch nicht realisiert.
+
Nepal has been implementing energy efficiency measures for about two decades in different scales and at different levels, but as of today, does not have any nodal agency for addressing the issues of energy efficiency and leading the process of promoting and improving energy efficiency. The Ministry of Energy is currently working on the drafting of such a nodal government agency for energy efficiency that shall lead the initiation of a regulatory framework and facilitate the setting of energy efficiency promoting policies.
 +
<div>
 +
----
 +
</div>
 +
<br/>
  
Auch im aktuellen Drei-Jahres-Interimsplan (2007/2008 – 2009/2010) werden die Ausbauziele voraussichtlich nicht erreicht werden können.
+
== Tariffs ==
  
Neben dem Ausbau der Stromerzeugungskapazität sahen und sehen die Entwicklungs-planungen sowohl eine breitere Versorgung der ländlichen Gebiete mit Elektrizität vor, als auch eine Steigerung des pro-Kopf-Verbrauchs an Strom. Allein im aktuellen Drei-Jahres-Interimsplan wird eine Steigerung des jährlichen Stromverbrauchs pro-Kopf von 76 kWh auf 100 kWh als Zielmarke angegeben.  
+
To promote electricity based cooking, the government has waived the custom duty on induction stoves in Nepal such that 700,000 induction stoves have been imported till April 2020 in Nepal but they are mostly concentrated in urban areas. The government is also planning to remove subsidies on LPG and is subsidizign electricity i.e it offers 25% discount on the electricity bills of domestic consumers who consume up to 150 Units of electricity every month<ref name="https://theannapurnaexpress.com/news/can-induction-stoves-offset-nepals-lpg-shortage-2391">https://theannapurnaexpress.com/news/can-induction-stoves-offset-nepals-lpg-shortage-2391</ref>.&nbsp;
  
The power sector objectives of the country include “increasing rural electrification to promote economic growth and improve living standards and to develop hydro power as an important export item”.&nbsp;
 
  
== Key Problems Hampering Access to Modern Energy Services in Rural Areas  ==
+
= References<br/> =
 +
<references />
  
=== Obstacles for Grid Based Rural Electrification  ===
 
  
=== Obstacles for Off Grid Energy Technologies and Services  ===
 
  
[[Category:Nepal]]
+
[[Nepal Energy Situation#toc|►Go To Top]]
[[Category:Country Situation]]
 

Latest revision as of 07:20, 14 April 2020

Nepal
Flag of Nepal.png
Location _______.png

Capital:

Kathmandu

Region:

Coordinates:

27.7000° N, 85.3333° E

Total Area (km²): It includes a country's total area, including areas under inland bodies of water and some coastal waterways.

147,180

Population: It is based on the de facto definition of population, which counts all residents regardless of legal status or citizenship--except for refugees not permanently settled in the country of asylum, who are generally considered part of the population of their country of origin.

29,694,614 (2023)

Rural Population (% of total population): It refers to people living in rural areas as defined by national statistical offices. It is calculated as the difference between total population and urban population.

78 (2023)

GDP (current US$): It is the sum of gross value added by all resident producers in the economy plus any product taxes and minus any subsidies not included in the value of the products. It is calculated without making deductions for depreciation of fabricated assets or for depletion and degradation of natural resources.

40,908,073,367 (2023)

GDP Per Capita (current US$): It is gross domestic product divided by midyear population

1,377.63 (2023)

Access to Electricity (% of population): It is the percentage of population with access to electricity.

91.30 (2022)

Energy Imports Net (% of energy use): It is estimated as energy use less production, both measured in oil equivalents. A negative value indicates that the country is a net exporter. Energy use refers to use of primary energy before transformation to other end-use fuels, which is equal to indigenous production plus imports and stock changes, minus exports and fuels supplied to ships and aircraft engaged in international transport.

16.68 (2014)

Fossil Fuel Energy Consumption (% of total): It comprises coal, oil, petroleum, and natural gas products.

15.48 (2014)

Source: World Bank



Introduction

Nepal has no known major oil, gas, or coal reserves, and its position in the Himalayas makes it hard to reach remote and extremely remote communities. Consequently, most Nepali citizens have historically met their energy needs with biomass, human labor, imported kerosene, and/or traditional water-powered vertical axis mills, yet per capita energy consumption is thus “startlingly low” at one-third the average for Asia as a whole and less than one-fifth the worldwide average. In 2010, Nepal’s electrification rate was only 53 percent (leaving 12.5 million people without electricity) and 76 percent depended on fuelwood for cooking (meaning 20.22 million people placed stress on Nepali forests for their fuel needs). This situation has led some experts to call the country’s energy portfolio “medieval” in the fuels it uses and “precarious” in the load shedding that occurs throughout Kathmandu, due to an imbalance between electricity supply and demand. Nepal, however, has all it needs to escape these problems. Large markets for improved cookstoves, biogas digesters, and solar lanterns exist throughout the country. Independent scientific studies have calculated that the country could meet all if its own energy needs—indeed, even the potential needs of Nepal plus many of its neighbors—if it tapped its solar resources or its hydroelectric resources (and potentially its wind resources). These efforts could be complemented with attempts to strengthen energy efficiency planning, with significant potential for transmission upgrades and retrofits and more efficient lighting practices.[1]

►Go To Top


Energy Situation

Energy Consumption

Nepal's total energy consumption in 2010 was about 428 PJ (10,220 ktoe). New renewable energy sources (excluding large hydropower) such as biogas, micro-hydro and solar energy contributed about 0.7% to the national balance in 2008/09 altogether. Although the share is still small, it has increased by 40 % since 2005.

[1]The use of primary energy sources is distributed as follows: [2]



Biomass 85 %
Petroleum products 9 %
Coal 3 %
Hydro Electricity 2 %
Renewables 1 %


Between 2001 and 2009, the total energy consumption was growing at a rate of 2.4 % per year on average. Although there is a considerable lack of efficiency in energy use, Nepal accounts for relatively low CO2 emissions compared to other countries in the region. The reason is the high proportion of renewable energy sources (biomass and hydropower) in primary energy consumption. 43.6 % (2009) of Nepalese population has access to electricity; 81.0 % (2012) depend on traditional fuels (wholly or partially).[3]

Energy consumption in economic sectors (2010)[1]


Residential 87%
Transport 6%
Industry 5%
Commercial (services) 1%
Agriculture 1%

►Go To Top



Energy Consumption on Household Level

Percentage of energy types used for cooking in rural[4] and urban[4] areas

Nepal Urban Share.jpg

Nepal Rural Share.jpg


82% of population use solid fuels (charcoal, coal, cropwaste, dung and wood) as cooking energy. In rural areas this percentage goes up to 90%, whereas only 33% of the urban dwellers use solid fuels for cooking. [5][6]

There are several activities ongoing to improve the cooking situation in Nepal.

----

Impact of Solid Fuel on Health

Total annual deaths attributable to solid fuel use: 7500 persons;

Percentage of national burden of diseases attributable to solid fuel use: 2,7%[7]

According to the Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves, 85 % of the Nepali population use solid fuels for cooking (mostly wood).[1]
►Go To Top


Energy Efficiency

With about 1 TOE for every $1,000 of GDP, Nepal has the poorest energy intensity among all South Asian countries (IEA, 2012). It thus has very large energy efficiency potential, though the United Nations warns that “energy efficiency efforts in the country are still at its infancy.” The NEA currently pursues a “loss reduction” strategy of rehabilitating 27 feeders and distribution lines, and plans for solar-powered street lamps and replacing incandescent light bulbs with compact fluorescent ones have been discussed, but not fully implemented. Nepal thus has a number of barriers to energy efficiency that it must overcome, including “absence of a legal framework,” “low levels of public awareness,” and “lack of capable human resources.” In this regard, Nepal is in the process of formulating an Energy Efficiency Strategy and establishing an agency to institutionalize energy efficiency.

----

►Go To Top


Renewable Energy

Biomass

Biomass is by far the most important primary energy source in Nepal. Biomass comprises wood, agricultural residues and dung. 95 % of the biomass is predominantly and traditionally used for cooking and heating purposes in households.

According to estimates by WECS the national biomass balance is in deficit: From 2000 to 2005 the deforestation rate was 2.1 % which was the highest rate in the region followed by Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The estimated wood consumption in 2005 was about 17 million tons. Over-exploitation of wood resources is declared to be approximately 10 million tons. This indicates that only about 40 % of the firewood comes from the sustainable supply. However, there are clear regional differences. In the Terai region, only 19 % of consumption can re-grow sustainably, while this value reaches between 60 % and 80 % in the mountain regions. According to WECS, these figures are not certain and therefore only indicative.

Land Area Covered by Forest: 25.4%

Forest Annual Rate of Change: -1.23% (1990-2005); 0% (2005-2010) [8]

To manage and improve the biomass situation in Nepal, it is designated to include a Biomass Energy Strategy (BEST) in the National Energy Strategy Framework (NES).

----

►Go To Top


Biogas

The Nepali farming system is heavily dependent on livestock, with at least 1.2 million households owning cattle and buffalo, with technical biogas potential for at least one million household-size plants, 57 percent located in the Terai plains, 37 percent in the hills and 6 percent in remote hills.

According to the Alternative Energy Promotion Center, as of July 2011, 241,920 biogas plants were installed in more than 2,800 Village Development Committees and in all 75 Districts under their Biogas Support Program. In addition, 2,907 biogas plants were installed under the Gold Standard Biogas Project (GSP).

Still, other estimates of Nepali biogas utilization have calculated that potential for family-sized biogas plants, operating on agricultural residues could fuel at least another 200,000 units.[1]

Biogas Technology in Nepal

►Go To Top


Solar

Nepal has great potential for at least four types of solar energy technology: grid-connected PV, solar water heaters, solar lanterns and solar home systems. Nepal receives 3.6 to 6.2 kWh of solar radiation per square meter per day, with roughly 300 days of sun a year, making it ideal for solar energy.

The country also has a large market for solar water heaters, with 185,000 units installed and operating as of 2009.[1]

►Go To Top


Fossil Fuels

Petroleum Products

Petroleum is the second largest energy fuel in Nepal after firewood and accounts for 8% of primary energy consumption in Nepal. All petroleum products are imported from India. The government has signed an agreement with the British company Cairns Energy PLC for petroleum exploitations but the exploitation works have not been initiated up to now.

At the moment, the import of petroleum products is transacted exclusively between the “Nepal Oil Corporation” and the “Indian Oil Corporation”. 75 % of the imports are diesel, kerosene and gasoline. Due to the high energy demand in the country the dependence on petroleum imports is increasing. In 2006, Nepal had to spend 53 % of its foreign currency for importing petroleum products which is almost double than 2001. More than 62 % of the petroleum products are used in the transportation sector. Besides that, petroleum products constitute important energy sources for cooking purposes in households. The price rises during the last years made the import dependency more and more precarious for the economy of the country. The price instability also increased the vulnerability of households, especially of the urban poor, for which kerosene has become the principal source of cooking energy. The amount these households have to spend on kerosene has more than doubled from 2003 to 2009.

In recent years, subsidized fuels for cooking such as Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) have been utilized widely not only in urban but also in rural areas. But due to price rises in international oil markets, fossil fuels have become too costly. In 2010, the Nepal Oil Corporation reports that almost 40% of high-speed diesel is used for electricity generation in captive gensets. As a result, diesel imports have therefore doubled from 2008 to 2010, creating opportunity costs of around NR 41 billion (US$ 490 million) annually.[1]

►Go To Top


Coal

Coal accounts for 2 % of the total energy consumption and is almost exclusively consumed by the industrial sector, primarily for heating and boiling processes in brick, lime and cement production as well as in steel processing. Apart from some minor coal reserves, coal for industrial needs is imported from India. In the year 2008/09, Nepal imported about 293,000 tons of coal.

►Go To Top


Electricity


The state owned Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA) is responsible for the electricity supply through the national grid. Electricity supply is limited to 43.6 % of the population (2009) [3] which lives mainly in urban areas. Only 8 % of people in rural areas have access to electricity. The low level of electrification hampers both economic development and access to information and education in rural areas.

Beside the national grid, thousands of small installations (diesel gensets, solar home systems, small island mini grids etc.) are installed in Nepal. Therefore, the NEA serves only 15 % of the total population of Nepal. For this small number of customers, average electricity supply is less than eight hours per day, with load shedding accounting for up to 16 hours during winter. In December 2008 the Nepal Government declared a “national energy crisis” and approved an Energy Crisis Management Action Plan. In January 2009, things got even worse as drought in one part of the country reduced water available for hydroelectricity generation, and floods in another part breached the embankments of the Koshi River, toppling a crucial transmission line importing power from India. Such events provoked the World Bank to declare that “Nepal is
experiencing an energy crisis of unprecedented severity, caused by years of underinvestment and sharp growth in electricity demand.”90 Other recent studies have concluded that “Nepal has strikingly low levels of access and electricity consumption compared to many other developing countries.”[3]

►Go To Top


Electricity Demand

The electricity consumption and the number of consumers increase at a rate of approximately 9 % per year, according to the Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA). Because of increasing household consumption, the evening peak demand has risen dramatically. Due to the continuously rising demand and stagnation in creating additional power generation capacities, a noticeable shortage of power supply since 2007 has been the consequence, which forced the NEA in early 2009 to cut power for up to 20 hours per day in some regions including urban centres.

The NEA as the major electricity utility faces an immense increase in electricity demand, whereas at the same time production and transmission capacities are limited. Though, ambitious development targets are announced by politics, the development of plants and transmission lines cannot keep up with economic development and its induced demand increase.

Peak energy demand in Nepal(2014)[9]


Between 2005 and 2014 (estimated figures) peak demand has more than doubled from 557 to 1200 MW. In the same period of time annual electricity production increased from 2642 GWh to 4631 GWh. Out of these, 3558 GWh have been produced domestically, while 1072 GWh have been imported from India.

►Go To Top


Generation & Installed Capacity

Production is heavily dependent on hydropower, as nearly 93% of the total electricity will be generated by either NEA-owned or private hydropower plants in 2013 (despite high costs per unit installed due to topography and unfavorable hydrology and geology). In order to meet the growing hunger for more electricity, imports from India have become more important during the last decade. In 2011 they accounted for 18.42 % of total energy production. Whereas private and state-owned hydropower generation has doubled in the last ten years, power imports from India are 4 times higher now (from 266 GWh in 2001 to 1072 GWh in 2013). [10]

A similar picture can be drawn in terms of installed generation capacity. Currently, 733 MW out of 782 MW installed capacity is hydropower. Around 478 MW of hydropower capacity is NEA-owned, while 255 MW is privately owned and operated. Due to rising fuel prices two diesel power plants with a total installed capacity of 53.4 MW were almost abandoned within the last years. Following figure gives a comprehensive overview on the installed capacity by fuel type.[10]


Total installed capacity in Nepal 2013.png


►Go To Top


Hydro

One major technical barrier to fully harnessing Nepal’s hydroelectric potential is the country’s hydrology. The rugged and mountain alpine terrain endows Nepal with plentiful moving water, but the South-West monsoon delivering it is inconsistent. About 80 percent of the country’s rain occurs from June to September, the remaining 20 percent falls as snow during the dry season. This mismatch between when water is available and when it is needed year-round to generate hydroelectricity creates a complicated engineering challenge, leading severe load shedding particularly in winter, of up to 18 hours at times.

A list of installed and planned hydro power plants has been published by Federation of Nepalese Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FNCCI):


Total Major Hydro Grid Connected 472,994 kW
Total Small Hydro Isolated (NEA) 4,536 kW
Total hydro IPP 158,315 kW
Total Hydro -Nepal 635,845 kW

A prevalence of water with high rates of silt and lack of sufficient crews to conduct maintenance lead to an average capacity factor of hydro plant - the amount of time a dam is actually producing electricity - is around 59 %.[3]

►Go To Top


Solar

943 medium-size solar PV units provide 1.2 MWp of electricity for the communications sector. Solar lanterns, popularly known as solar tuki, with 155,000 units in use as of 2010 constituting 737 kWp of capacity. 225,000 of solar home systems are used throughout Nepal across 2600 villages with an output of 5.36 MWp.[1]

►Go To Top


Wind

The first wind turbine generator of 20 kW capacity (10 kW each) installed Kagbeni of Mustang Distrcit in 1989 (Within the three months of operation, blade and tower of the wind generator were broken). Other, wind turbines were installed in Chisapani of Shivapuri National Park and the Club Himalaya in Nagarkot, both of which are not functional anymore.Within the Asian Development Bank Renewable Village Program, two 5KW wind turbines in Dhaubadi village of Nawalparasi District were installed.[11]

►Go To Top


Opportunities of Cogeneration

There are eleven sugar mills in Nepal crushing approximately three million tons of cane annually. All the mills are equipped with bagasse cogeneration plants for captive electricity and steam needs. Through updates of their captive plants. Nepal’s sugar mills could generate significant surplus power during dry season when power generation from hydropower projects is running low. Even the quickly available potential from the ‘incidental’ option at 20,750 MWh/year is more than double NEA’s current thermal generation and would require only little additional investment. The ‘high efficiency’ option could contribute as much as 18 % of hydropower generation during the dry season (up to 257,886 MWh/year ).

►Go To Top


Potential of Renewable Energy

The potential is as follows (UNDP, 2012)[3]:

Total Installed Capacity 710 MW (mostly hydro)
Technical Renewable Energy Potential 77,949 MW
Annual Total Electricity Generation 3,851 GWh
Annual Renewable Energy Potential 226,460 GWh

Notes: 2,100 MW of solar PV, 716 MW of wind, 42,133 MW of hydro. At a capacity factor of 17 percent, those solar facilities would generate 3,127 GWh. At a capacity factor of 30 percent, those wind farms would generate 1,882 GWh. At a capacity factor of 60 percent, those dams would generate 221,451 GWh.


Nepalese hydropower potential in detail[12]: This potential was not calculated by the cited paper. In fact it was done by Dr. Shrestha, as cited in that paper itself. This number is used bymany research papers. Could you please clarifiy why only this paper was cited and is it okay to do that?



River Basin Nomber of project sites Economic potential [MW]
Sapta Koshi 40 10,260
Sapta Gandaki 12 5,270
Karnali and Mahakali 9 25,125
Southern River 5 878
Total 66 42,133

The theoretical overall potential is 83,290 MW and the technical feasible potential is 45,610 MW from which 42,133 MW is economically to realise.


Nepalese Wind potential:

The Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership published in 2012 Nepal has substantial wind potential in one study wth at least 200 to 300 MW of capacity possible and extreme wind speeds of 46 meters per second in some areas recorded, with the best sites in the Mustang district (though many of these sites are remote from existing roads and transmission networks). A second, more thorough assessment looked at wind resources in the Annapurna Conservation Area and estimated at least 716 MW of capacity within 10 kilometers of the NEA grid. A third study done jointly by the Department of Geology at Tribhuvan Universityand the Ministry of Physical Planning and Works found at least, 3,000 MW of technical wind potential and 448 MW of potential that could be quickly and commercially exploited.[1]

►Go To Top


Regional Disparities


In 2008/09 consumption of electricity was almost balanced between industrial (manufacturing) sector (37.37 %) and households (45.52 %), while the commercial sector consumed only 6.6 %.[13] However, the industrialized and urban areas account for the majority of electricity demand.

Around 28 % of electricity produced in Nepal in the year 2005 was consumed in the Kathmandu Valley alone.[14] The vast majority of electricity is currently consumed in the central and eastern region. Therefore an elaborated system of transmission lines is required as few hydropower plants are situated close to areas of high demand. Middle- (70 MW), Lower-Marshyangdi (69 MW) as well as Kali-Gandaki A (144 MW) as the biggest hydropower projects are all situated in the western part of the country. At the same time, this power cannot be transmitted to the central and eastern part due to bottlenecks in the transmission network between Bharatpur – Hetauda – Dhalkebar. Especially the eastern region has become totally dependent on power imported from India.[15] Besides low generation capacity, the poor transmission network seems to be the major bottleneck in the Nepalese electricity sector.

►Go To Top


Power Shortage & Load-Shedding


The general shortage of electricity is manifesting itself in scheduled power cuts (so-called load-shedding), which became an incremental part of power supply in Nepal within the last years. Especially during dry-season Nepal’s dependence on hydropower becomes obvious, forcing the NEA to cut power in Kathmandu up to 16 hours per day (as in April 2011). The situation has even worsened as only two hydropower plants with an installed capacity of 92 MW are storage types, while the rest are run-off river plants.[16]

Follwoing figure illustrates the growing gap between electricity demand and supply and corresponds with the appearance of load-shedding. Since 2006/07 the supply gap increased from 105 GWh to 678 GWh in 2009/10, with the temporary peak in 2008/09 with 745 GWh. Furthermore, the figure shows the seasonal fluctuations due to irregular run-off rivers. Due to glacier melt and intensive rainfall during the monsoon season, electricity supply almost matches the demand between June and October. However, during the winter (where precipitation is far less) generation capacity decreases along with diminishing run-off rivers.

Supply-Demand-Gap-Nepal.jpg

Coping with load-shedding is challenging both the industrial and commercial sector. Despite preferential treatment of the industrial sector (which is partly spared from load-shedding), manufacturing suffers hard from the power crisis. Newspapers report, that manufacturing industries have to cut their production between 25 and 80 % in peak times. Small commercial businesses are similarly affected by load-shedding, as many are dependent on power and are thus forced to use generators or backup systems.[17] The long-term impact of poor power supply is observable as the share of manufacturing sector among GDP declined from 9 to 6 % since 2000/01.[18]

As the construction period for new power generation projects and new import transmission capacities is very long, a rapid improvement of energy supply cannot be expected. An emergency supply through diesel power plants is unrealistic, because of the high power generation costs associated. Therefore, the power supply crisis affects public life and especially economic development negatively. Electricity provides nearly one fourth of the total industrial energy consumption. It has to be expected that more industrial enterprises and service providers make themselves independent from the unreliable public power supply by using diesel generators. Although this costly practice allows at least profitable companies to maintain their business, it places a huge burden on the national economy as additional fuel imports will be necessary.

►Go To Top



Demand Forecast & Outlook

According to estimations of the NEA energy demand will grow in the next 17 years with an average annual rate of 8.34 %. The current demand of 4430 GWh annually is expected to double until 2018 and exceed 17,400 GWh by 2027. Along with the growing demand it is projected that system peak load will increase with similar annual growth rates, reaching 3679 MW in 2027.[10]

These estimations require an immense increase in the exploitation of the vast hydropower resources in Nepal. Of the 42,000 MW of economically feasible hydropower resources only the relatively small share of 1.7 % is tapped.[16] Despite long term development plans targeting to reach 10,000 MW of installed capacity by 2020 (according to the 10-years hydropower development plan), current development of the sector draw a rather different picture.

Currently, projects with a total capacity of 547 MW are under construction. NEA projects account for the major share (500 MW) of it. Planned and proposed projects would furthermore increase the capacity by 1422 MW. But considering the relatively slow deployment of new projects in Nepal, it seems unlikely that until 2020 more than 7000 MW of capacity will be contributed by projects that even have not been proposed until now.

Though, actions to upgrade generation capacity within the next ten years were taken, the current situation of load-shedding is likely to persist and may even get worse in the near future. Chamelia and Kulekhani-III with a capacity of 30 and 14 MW respectively are expected to be completed in 2011. However, the first one is situated in the Far-Western region and is thus unable to contribute to the major demand in the central and eastern part of the country. If at all, relief can be expected when the Upper Tamakoshi project is connected to the national grid. With a total capacity of 456 MW it is expected to contribute 2281.2 GWh annually. Developed as a PPP it is scheduled to start production in 2013/14.[10] Considering the estimated growth of energy demand, capacity will hardly meet peak demand even after completion of the three above mentioned projects. Especially, in the dry seasons plants will operate far below their maximum capacity, resulting in load-shedding or an immense increase of power imports from India.

As all projects that are currently under construction are run-off-river types, the Nepalese power sector will be even more dependent on seasonal fluctuations of river flows. Furthermore, it is unclear how climate change will affect water security in Nepal. Linked to many uncertainties, climate change affects run-off rivers by (a) glacier retreat and (b) changes in rainfall intensity and patterns. Projections estimate that run-off could be reduced by 14 % due to climate change, reducing both generation capacity and economically feasible hydropower potential.[19]

Limited financing: Inabilities to procure financing and foreign investment are major barriers. One assessment calculated that if you take all of the available capital in Nepali markets - this for everything, not just energy - and directed it solely at building hydropower projects, you would not even have enough for 200 MW. UNDP surveyed key lenders in the sector and noted that commercial banks and financial institutions are “generally not interested” in investing in energy. A separate evaluation commented that Nepal lacked “long-term debt financing” for energy projects and that the major lenders, the Agricultural Development Bank and National Commercial Bank, have already “maxed out” their lending for microhydro, solar PV, and biogas. A third study remarked that in Nepal, “financial institutions are not readily motivated to invest in renewable energy technologies because of the immature business models, market insecurity and implementation and usage risks.”[3]

►Go To Top



Electricity Demand and Supply in the Household Sector

NEA provides approximately 1.5 million households with electricity. The subscriber growth rate was about 10% per year in recent years. Private households account for 43.4 % of national electricity consumption. The average daily household consumption is about 2 kWh which is used mainly for lighting. The other uses being running radios, TVs and to some extent cooking and water heating.

The electricity tariffs for households with 4 to 10 NRs / kWh (approx. 0.04 - 0.10 EUR / kWh) are low to moderate in international comparison. However, because of the high fixed monthly minimum rate households are not motivated to save electricity.

The electricity supply crises leads to cut offs that affect particularly large numbers of consumers, especially during evening peak load hours. The households are disadvantaged in two ways. They have to pay a high monthly minimum rate for an unreliable supply and moreover, they have additional expenses on lighting alternatives such as kerosene lamps, candles or battery lighting. The increasing use of electrical appliances such as refrigerators, water pumps, rice cookers and water heaters lead to power supply overload. Due to the lack of minimum standards for energy efficient appliances and a lack of labeling of the devices regarding their electricity consumption, private households can make no conscious purchase decisions with regard to operation costs of the appliances. Inefficient domestic appliances are usually cheaper than those with a higher energy-efficiency. Therefore, costumers who have no access to information about the operating costs usually buy the cheaper but inefficient appliances. As a consequence, households have to bear high operation costs, and the energy service companies have to make higher power generation capacities available.

A social norm against collecting revenue for electricity further inhibits the profitability of hydro schemes. Many believe hydroelectric facilities should serve the community for free, and that poor families should not have to pay for electricity. The problem with this view is that it creates social opposition to charging rural households for hydroelectricity.[3]

►Go To Top


Rural Electrification


Rural electrification in Nepal is very expensive due to the topographical conditions and at the same time the purchasing power of the consumers very low. This unfortunate combination of obstacles is documented in the hard fact that 56.7 % of the Nepalese population has no access to electricity. In rural arears of Nepal, 17 million peole are without electricity. [3]

State funds are insufficient to cope with the problem at hand, therefore in 2003/04 GoN adopted a policy and created the Community Electrification Program to accelerate the electrification process. The model is that communities buy power in bulk from NEA and manage/operate the local system through village organizations called Community Rural Electrification Entities (CREE).The price the CREEs pay for the bulk power is lower than the lowest consumer tariff. The revenue can be spend for operation and maintenance of the system.

230 communities positively responded to this initiative and have deposited 5 % (as a pre-condition to be part of the program) of the anticipated costs to the Community Rural Electrification Department of NEA. Another 188 agreements have already been signed, and additional 444 community applications have been registered. 116 communities have already got access to electricity under this arrangement (20 % local contribution, 80 % grants from GoN). Among the 230 communities having paid 5 % already, a large number will not be able to comply with their obligation to come up with the remaining 15 %. In addition, the communities usually lack the necessary management and technical skills to operate and manage the system properly.

►Go To Top


Institutional Set-up and Actors in the Energy Sector

Public Institutions


Several ministries have mandates affecting energy policy issues and the use of energy. These are the Ministry of Energy (MoE), the Ministry of Environment, Science & Technology (MoEST) and the Ministry of Industry. The Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation (MoFSC) plays a role in the biomass sector and the Ministry of Housing (MoH) in the building sector. The Ministry of Commerce and Supplies is responsible for questions regarding the use of fossil fuels.

The Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA), the state-owned utility, dominates the electricity sector and is responsible for all planning, construction, and operation of electricity supply. The NEA also acts as the sole buyer of electricity from all IPPs, and it acts as the agent for all power purchase agreements for energy exchanges with India. The Ministry of Water Resources has the responsibility for all public and private activities related to hydroelectricity supply. The Nepal Oil Corporation has a monopoly to sell and distribute all petroleum products throughout the country. Apart from these three main actors, the Ministry of Energy was recently created in 2009 to “manage Nepal’s energy sector” and “develop energy resources to accelerate development,” including activities such as policy design, planning, regulation, and research. It has within it a Department of Energy Development which is supposed to ensure transparent energy regulations and facilitate private sector involvement. The Ministry of Environment enforces all environmental impact assessments, and coordinates climate change adaptation and mitigation programs. The National Development Council issues macroeconomic policy directives to the National Planning Commission for the development of annual and five-year plans. A Water and Energy Commission, Water Resources Development Council, and Environmental Protection Council all enforce regulations relating to either water resources and permitting or environmental permitting. The Department of Industry, lastly, plays a minor role and has been tasked with overseeing energy efficiency audits and efforts in the industrial sector. Though not an independent, high-level ministry, the Alternative Energy Promotion Center (AEPC), established under the Ministry of Environment, Science, and Technology, gets special mention as it is the “nodal” agency for the promotion and dissemination of all renewable energy in the country, as well as all major off-grid electrification programs.[1]

Civil unrest lasted 11 years and stopped with the formal end of the monarchy in Nepal and the establishment of the “People’s Republic of Nepal” in 2006. as of November 2011, the government was still in “crisis” without an elected Prime Minister. As a result, experts have noted that “for the past three months, the economy has come to a grinding halt, nothing is happening, no funds have been allocated to Nepal Electricity Authority or to energy.” Although the new budget published in November 2010 allocated 16.69 billion Nepalese Rupees to power generation and transmission systems, the Independent Power Producers of Nepal already stated that it is insufficient to bring any projects online.[3]

UNDP has noted that “no single institution” could “provide the horizontal alignment and necessary focus on linkages between energy poverty” and give “overall direction to a collective pro-poor energy strategy”. UNDP also documented a lack of
centralized energy planning, duplication of efforts resulting from lack of coordination, and disputes between local and national institutions over energy planning.[3]

►Go To Top


Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA)

The state-owned utility NEA was founded in 1985. Its task is the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity and the development and operation of the electricity grid. Furthermore, the NEA is co-responsible in the preparation of energy planning and in education and training of professionals in the field of power generation, transmission and distribution.

The NEA cannot decide on electricity tariffs, but depends on the decisions of the “Electricity Tariff Fixation Commission” (EFTC). The revenues from electricity tariffs are not cost covering. The last tariff adjustment was approved in 2001. According to its own data, the total indebtedness of the NEA amounted to 7.1 billion NRs (about 700 million EUR) at the end of the financial year 2007/2008.

The NEA is affiliated with the MoE. It is headed by a Board of Directors, whose Chairman is the Minister of Energy. Further members include the Secretary of Finance, the Managing Director of the NEA, two representatives from the industrial / banking / trade and consumer protection sector as well as two energy experts.

Due to the daily power cuts, the NEA is publically criticized. It tries to bridge the gap between electricity demand and supply by importing electricity from India. Therefore, a contract for the provision of 150 MW was stipulated. However, due to technical problems during transmission this capacity currently cannot be retrieved.

►Go To Top



Alternative Energy Promotion Center (AEPC)

The Alternative Energy Promotion Center (AEPC) was founded in 1996 to promote the development and deployment of renewable energies and alternative energy technologies in Nepal. It is a semi-autonomous institution formally attached to the Ministry of Environment. AEPC acts as an intermediary institution between the operational level NGOs / private promoters of renewable energy and the policy decision levels in relevant ministries. It`s activities include renewable energy policy formulation, planning and facilitating the implementation of the policies/plans. It also responsible for the delivery of subsidies and financial assistance for off-grid Rural Electrification and also monitoring, evaluation and quality control during the process of electrification projects. Beyond that, AEPC is responsible for the standardization, quality assurance and monitoring of RE programs

The highest body is a board with representatives from government sector, industry sector and non-governmental organizations. . An executive director leads the operational business. AEPC mainly focuses its activities on rural areas. For that purpose it operates so-called “District Energy and Environment Units” in currently 32 districts of Nepal.

AEPC receives basic funding from the Nepalese government. Moreover, it is financed to a large extend by international cooperation projects. Perhaps the most important project was the implementation of the Energy Sector Assistance Program (ESAP), mainly financed by DANIDA and NORAD. This program aimed at improving the rural energy supply (solar home systems, small hydro power plants, biogas plants, efficient stoves). ESAP managed the Rural Energy Fund, which makes the partial financing of investments in rural electrification measures possible. The German KfW participated in the promotion of SHS with a financial contribution to ESAP. Another important program is the Rural Electrification Development Programme (REDP) by UNDP and World Bank which was supporting the government in implementing the Rural Energy Policy in all districts. The Renewable Energy Project (REP), a joint effort by the European Union and the government of Nepal focused on the provision of solar energy systems in rural areas.

Currently, under the NRREP (National Rural and Renewable Energy Programme, 2012-2017) ESAP, REDP and REP were combined with the aim of having a single programme modality. AEPC is the executing agency for NRREP. The programme has three components: Central Renewable Energy Fund, Technical Support, Business Development for Renewable Energy and Productive Energy Use.

Furthermore, there are additional smaller projects focusing on improved watermills, biogas and climate change adaption strategies.

►Go To Top



Water and Energy Commission Secretariat (WECS)

The Water and Energy Commission (WEC) was founded in 1975 with the aim of advancing the development of energy and water resources in Nepal in an integral way. Six years later, a permanent secretariat (WECS) was established, which is responsible for the formulation of the water and energy strategy and policy of the country as well as for the implementation of planning processes in the water and energy sectors. Originally, WECS was organizationally affiliated with the Ministry of Water Resources (MoWR), which is by now merged into the new established Ministry of Energy (MoE). The Commission consists of state secretaries of almost all ministries and representatives of the Planning Commission, the Federation of Nepalese Chamber of Commerce (FNCCI), the Nepal Engineering Association, a technical university and two experts from NGOs. Chairman is the Minister of the MoE.


The WECS has the following mandates:


  • Formulation of policies and strategies in the sectors of water and energy
  • Preparation of legislative proposals in these sectors
  • Coordination of policy dialogue in these sectors
  • Identification of energy projects
  • Analysis of the portfolio of bilateral and multilateral development projects in the sectors of energy and water
  • Energy planning and preparation of energy demand studies


►Go To Top</div>


Activities of Donors

Energising Development (EnDev)

Please see the regularly updated web activities of EnDev in Nepal.

Micro Hydropower Debt Fund Component - EnDev Nepal

German Government

implemented by GIZ:

Nepal Energy Efficiency Programme ((NEEP), 2009 - 2017), Advisory towards energy efficiency

with three components: energy efficiency in markets (industries and public infrastructure), clean cooking (with a focus on improved cooking stoves) and policy advise on energy efficiency.

Global Sustainable Electricity Partnership (GSEP) [20]

Energy for Education Project [21]

Project activities:


  • Installation of two PV systems and construction of a computer room (including computer) at the local schools in the Matela VDC of Surkhet District in western Nepal and in addition distribution of small solar home systems (clean portable lamps) to students and residents of Matela displace the use of kerosene lamps. Fees for the use of these lanterns and the computers, according to the beneficiary aibility to pay, contribute to the financing of the project.
  • Beautiful Nepal Association (BNA), a local NGO, and the Malika U Ma Vi School’s Management Committee are responsible to ensure maintenance and provide supervision to quality and sustainability.

Timeline:


  • 10-14th December, 2012, 29 technical training workshop on stand-alone photovoltaic (PV) systems, participants from all over Nepal
  • 16 December 2012, groundbreaking ceremony
  • 16 April 2013, inauguration ceremony, project completed.


Key objectives:


  • To demonstrate the potential of solar energy as a viable power source for improving education in the region.
  • To use the energy from photovoltaic system for lighting and to launch a computer program in two rural schools.
  • To provide clean portable small solar home systems for students and residents of rural Matela, significantly reducing the emission of toxic gases from the current use of kerosene lamps.


Distribution of Solar Home Systems within SE4ALL initiative[22]

GSEP, in partnership with the Global BrightLight Foundation (GBLF), distributes already (status 03 February 2014) 5000 solar home systems across Nepal within the SE4ALL initiative.

►Go To Top


Policy Framework, Laws and Regulations


Energy Policy

National Energy Strategy (NES)

To date, there is no “National Energy Strategy” for Nepal. A draft forwarded to the parliament is not approved, yet. Up to now, the energy policy objectives are set up as a part of the general 5-Year Plans by the National Planning Commission. The energy policy of the current 3-Year Interim Plan (2007/08 – 2009/10) deals exclusively with electricity, and therefore development budgets are allocated exclusively to the development of the electricity sector. Targets for the sustainable use of energy from biomass (as the most important primary energy source) or the efficient use of commercial energy sources are not discussed. Likewise, no opportunities to understand the consumer side as the addressee of an energy policy are considered.


The objectives regarding electricity and energy in the Interim Plan are:


  • creation of an environment conductive to investment in the development of hydropower
  • ensure reliable and easily accessible electricity services for the majority of the people in rural areas
  • completion of ongoing hydropower projects adding 105 MW generation capacity (85 MW by public sector, 20 MW by private sector)
  • initiation of construction of new hydropower projects with an additional capacity of 2,115 MW with the objective to abandon the practice of load-shedding in 2013/14
  • provision of electricity to additional 10 % of the population (in total, 58.5 %) in 500 additional VDCs through extension of the national grid
  • expansion of per capita consumption to 100 KWh


The realization of these objectives is delayed.

The tariffs and prices for electricity and petroleum products are politically determined. They are geared to the lower limit of acquisition costs or not cost covering at all. Tariff increase has been denied to the Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA) since 2001. Therefore, the electricity sale is in deficit and has to be balanced by the state budget. In December 2011 the Nepalese Government finally decided to hike electricity prices and from 15th of January 2012 a 20% increase in power tariffs will be in effect. However, the minimum tariff of 80 NPR per 20 kWh per month will be left unchanged.

From 2008 to 2010, the “Water and Energy Commission Secretariat” (WECS) worked on a “National Energy Strategy”, in whose regard a broad consultation process was undergoing. The budget provided for this by the government was approximately 150,000 EUR. Furthermore, according to statements by the WECS, the formulation of a “National Energy Policy” shall follow after the adoption of the “National Energy Strategy”.



Biomass Energy Strategy (BEST)

In 2013 it was decided that the Alternative Energy Promotion Centre (AEPC) and the Nepal Energy Efficiency Program (NEEP) will prepare a Biomass Energy Strategy (BEST). The Strategy was ready for implementation in 2014. The baseline study therefore tried to cover a wide range of situations in both the supply and demand side of all relevant sectors.

The specific objectives of the baseline study assignment were:


  • To provide a comprehensive overview on the baseline situation of the BE related sectors with respect to its diversity of supply sources and end users;
  • To analyze major trends over time from earlier studies and their implications in the BE sector of Nepal;
  • To analyze institutional responsibilities and challenges in the management of the BE sector;
  • To estimate the potential of savings and conservation of biomass resource through the adoption of more efficient technologies;
  • To identify possible strategic interventions to improve the productivity and labour efficient access to sustainable biomass energy sources and to improve the adoption and usage of efficient BE technologies
  • To provide information on cross cutting issues like governance, poverty reduction, gender and social inclusion, health and climate change and suggest intervention options accordingly.





Energy Efficiency Strategy (EEST)

Since 2011 WECS is drafting an Energy Efficiency Strategy (EEST) supported by NEEP. The “efficient use of energy is a constituent of the national energy strategy of Nepal” is one of the objectives of this programme. Within this backdrop and the defined objective, WECS as an implementing agency for the component is to draft National Energy Efficiency Strategy of Nepal as a part of the “National Energy Strategy".

The approach is including the following points:


  • Identify the gaps in strategy, institutions and legal/regulatory measures to develop and adopt energy efficiency measures, and technologies in Nepal;
  • Bring in good practices in strategy, institutions and legal/regulatory measures from more advanced countries in the South Asian regions as well as from other regions and analyze their suitability for Nepal;
  • Assessment of Energy Efficiency Potential of Nepal;
  • Liaise with the relevant government agencies and undertake consultation at relevant stages to develop ownership for the outputs of this assignment.
  • Review all relevant documents related to public and private expenditure for energy infrastructure, demand side management and energy efficiency for consistency. The documents may include, but not limited to :



Institutionalizing Energy Efficiency

Nepal has been implementing energy efficiency measures for about two decades in different scales and at different levels, but as of today, does not have any nodal agency for addressing the issues of energy efficiency and leading the process of promoting and improving energy efficiency. The Ministry of Energy is currently working on the drafting of such a nodal government agency for energy efficiency that shall lead the initiation of a regulatory framework and facilitate the setting of energy efficiency promoting policies.



Tariffs

To promote electricity based cooking, the government has waived the custom duty on induction stoves in Nepal such that 700,000 induction stoves have been imported till April 2020 in Nepal but they are mostly concentrated in urban areas. The government is also planning to remove subsidies on LPG and is subsidizign electricity i.e it offers 25% discount on the electricity bills of domestic consumers who consume up to 150 Units of electricity every month[23]


References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 _ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "UNDP Country brief" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "UNDP Country brief" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "UNDP Country brief" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "UNDP Country brief" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "UNDP Country brief" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "UNDP Country brief" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "UNDP Country brief" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "UNDP Country brief" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "UNDP Country brief" defined multiple times with different content
  2. Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership (REEEP) Clean Energy Information Portal, Energy Profile Nepal (Vienna: REEEP Secretariat, 2012)
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 _
  4. 4.0 4.1 WHO 2010: WHO Household Energy Database Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "WHO 2010" defined multiple times with different content
  5. According to WHO 2010 http://apps.who.int/gho/data/?theme=country&vid=14500
  6. WHO 2007
  7. WHO (2006): Fuel for Life - Household Energy and Health
  8. http://rainforests.mongabay.com/deforestation/
  9. NEA Annual Report 2014
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 National National Electricity Authority (NEA), 2011. A Year in Review, Fiscal 2009/ 2010. Kathmandu, Nepal. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "NEA 2011" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "NEA 2011" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "NEA 2011" defined multiple times with different content
  11. Saroj Dhakal, WindPower Nepal Pvt. Ltd., http://www.renewable-world.org/sites/default/files/Session%201%20Saroj%20Dhakal%20WindPower%20Nepal%20-%20Wind%20Energy%20in%20Nepal_0.pdf
  12. Surendra, K.C. et al. (2011). Current Status of Renewable Energy in Nepal: Opportunities and Challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15, pp. 4107-4117.
  13. Ministry of Finance (MoF), 2010. Economic Survey Fiscal Year 2009 - 2010. Kathmandu. Nepal.
  14. Shrestha, Ram M. and Salony Rajbhandari, 2010. Energy and environmental implications of carbon emission reduction targets: Case of Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. in Energy Policy, Volume 38, Issue 9. September 2010, Pages 4818-4827.
  15. The Kathmandu Post, 2011(b). Lack of political will behind outage. published 7/4/2011. Kathmandu, Nepal.
  16. 16.0 16.1 Water and Energy Commission Secretariat (WECS), 2010. Energy Synopsis Report. Kathmandu, Nepal. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "WECS 2010" defined multiple times with different content
  17. The Kathmandu Post, 2010. Parsa-Bara industrial area crippled by Power Crisis, Sshankar Acharya. published 31/12/2010. Kathmandu, Nepal.
  18. The Himalayan Times, 2011. Power crisis breaks backbone of economy, Kuvera Chalise. published 8/3/2011. Kathmandu, Nepal.
  19. Pathak, Mahesh, 2010. Climate Change: Uncertainty for Hydropower Development in Nepal. in Hydro Nepal, Issue No. 6, p. 31 – 34, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  20. www.globalelectricity.org
  21. http://www.globalelectricity.org/en/index.jsp?p=121&f=373
  22. http://www.globalelectricity.org/upload/File/news_release_2014_nepal_solar_lantern_distribution.pdf
  23. https://theannapurnaexpress.com/news/can-induction-stoves-offset-nepals-lpg-shortage-2391


►Go To Top