Difference between revisions of "Solar Cooling"
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) |
||
Line 131: | Line 131: | ||
often coincide of loads and solar gains | often coincide of loads and solar gains | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Experiences<br/> === | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Ministry of New and Renewable Energe (MNRE) proposed an [http://www.aprekh.org/files/A_K_Singhal.pdf Action Plan on Solar Cooling ]in 2009, together with the establishment of a working group on solar cooling. However, the plan has not been followed. There are no updates and the working group is not active anymore. | ||
− | + | Comapnies have been using VAM systems – available locally | |
+ | |||
+ | Gas, wood or exhaust heat – b/c of unreliable power supply and costs | ||
+ | |||
+ | Established VAM market (around 5 Mio USD) | ||
+ | |||
+ | 10 projects - R&D and some private (non commercial/green) initiatives è concentrated solar collectors + VAM | ||
+ | |||
+ | SEC, TERI, IITs,… | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thermax (pipeline program 3-effect VAM with MNRE), Baskara Solar, Gadhia Solar,.. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mamata - only project with evacuated tube collectors, since 2006, little maintenance | ||
+ | |||
+ | still early pilot phase | ||
+ | |||
+ | So far no coherent strategic approach, lacking knowledge sharing | ||
+ | |||
+ | R&D for solid and liquid dessicant systems | ||
+ | |||
+ | Still early phase | ||
+ | |||
+ | Could become simpler, cheaper and suitable for smaller systems | ||
+ | |||
+ | Local manufacturers (desiccant wheels) available | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Economics | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~1 lakh Rs/kW cooling capacity (at 100kW), around 100 Lahks Rs higher investment costs (Thermax) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Investment costs 3x higher (other statements) | ||
+ | |||
+ | High capital investment and long payback periods (> 7 years) highest drawback | ||
+ | |||
+ | investors very hesitant regarding investments with payback >3years | ||
+ | |||
+ | With Government subsidy of up to 50%, payback of 5 years (Thermax Projects) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Most feasible for larger systems >100 kW | ||
+ | |||
+ | Awareness raising needed | ||
+ | |||
+ | Costs for chillers and solar components are decreasing | ||
+ | |||
+ | Energy demand for control system and backup not to be underestaimated | ||
+ | |||
+ | Reliability of system and back-up storage | ||
+ | |||
+ | Improving quality of chillers and solar components, but still an issue | ||
+ | |||
+ | Increasing reliability – storage/back-up necessary | ||
+ | |||
+ | Solar as add on, not total replacement, otherwise very expensive | ||
+ | |||
+ | Variation in irradiation and diffiulty of prediction - dynamic system needed | ||
+ | |||
+ | Standardization of storage (cold and heat) necessary | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | System design, integration and optimization prove difficult | ||
+ | |||
+ | Smaller VAMs under development, expensive | ||
+ | |||
+ | Space availability for solar collectors and cooling towers is a challenge | ||
+ | |||
+ | Concentrating collectors (for higher temperature applications) face difficulties at the moment because of high fraction of diffuce radiation (dust, cloud coverage) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Used as locally produced but also more expensive than flat plate/evacuated tube | ||
+ | |||
+ | Achieve higher temperature lift, remove the need for wet cooling towers | ||
+ | |||
+ | Maintenance issue | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thermax might be working on this with German solar Company Ritter | ||
+ | |||
+ | Expensive, performance and tracking issues | ||
+ | |||
+ | non-concentrating collectors more suitable? - architectural integration possible, but lower temperatures, lower COPs | ||
+ | |||
+ | Evacuated heat pipes not produced in India | ||
+ | |||
+ | Efficiency of solar equipment needs to be improved | ||
+ | |||
+ | High humidity and water scarcity – find suitable technologies | ||
= Actors<br/> = | = Actors<br/> = |
Revision as of 05:10, 28 February 2012
Background
Why solar cooling?
In many countries, especially in developing countries in the South, with increasing economic development and population growth, demand for cooling is increasing rapidly (e.g. ric Arab Countries - 75% of installed poer is used for sooling). Often, this additional electricity load puts further stress on the mostly already shaky grids in these countries, leading to further power cuts.
The main arguments for solar assisted cooling (SAC) originate from an energy saving perspective:
- Application of SAC saves electricity and thus conventional primary energy sources
- SAC also leads to a reduction of peak electricity demand this can benefit the electricity network and lead to additional cost savings of the most expensive peak electricity (if applied on a broad scale)
- environmentally sound materials without ozone depletion and no (or very small) global warming potential are used with SAC
- Coincide of solar energy supply and demand in many cases - when it is the hottest, usually the most sun is shining as well.
Applications
Solar assistes cooling can be broadly split up in two main applications, depending on the targeted temperature range:
- air conditioning – temperature range of 5-20°C
- refrigeration – temperature range of -20°C to +5°C
Air-Conditioning
Cold Storage - own page?
State of the Art world wide Solar Air Conditioning
Despite intensive research over the past decade,SAC has still reached only a very small market penetration. Yet, a well established SAC research society and scientific field are working on further market development.[1]
- Close to 1.000 SAC systems installed worldwide
- Huge variety in sizes and technologies
- Upcoming larger >400kW and very large > 1MW projects
- More and more chiller products in smaller range <25kW
- With around 60% vapor absorption systems (VAM) dominate the market
- Improving system performance
- Early market development
- Small but increasing number of projects by private investors
- Most systems in USA, Germany, Southern Europe and MENA
- Few companies offering complete SAC solutions
- Custom made systems è lacking experience and expertise, very expensive
- Cost reduction expected with increasing standardization, economies of scale and upcoming specialized incentive schemes (e.g. France)
- Could take off in the coming years with increasing energy prices and further experiences in hotter climates (higher irradiation, higher cooling loads)
Mayor Challenges
A range of challenges exist why solar cooling has not taken off so far. In many cases, it is a combination of different issues.
Technology
Still, most of the issues are related to the technology. One of the main problems beeing that there is not one single solution and experiences with new applications are collected constantly
- Small capacity VAM units under development, expensive
- Few suppliers for adsorption and desiccant systems
- No packaged solutions for residential and small commercial users available
- Lacking standardization of applications, mostly still tailor-made
- No great variety of medium temperature collectors
- Thermal efficiencies often still low
- Heat rejection systems: often wet cooling tower needed
- Lacking professional skills – high skilled labour needed, also for maintenance
- Still electricity for control systems, pumps etc needed – can be significant
- Over-dimensioning should be avoided – otherwise low efficiency
- Heat rejection systems need a lot of electricity and maintenance
- Auxiliary components not energy efficient
- Maximizing usage (hot water, heating and cooling) important
- System integration and energy management inadequate – combination of subsystems and skills
- Experience in design, control and system operation lacking
Cost
- High capital investment costs (2-5 times) compared to conventional systems
- Price range: EUR 2.000-5.000/kWcold
- Payback periods of <10 years under promising conditions possible (< 7 years have already been reached by some systems)
- Often high maintenance costs - depending on technology
- Unfavorable finance environment
- Financial incentive scheme not explicitly designed to fulfill special SAC needs, often same as solar thermal for heating, if any
Policy
- Cooling not yet part of policy target and strategies
- Regulatory measures needed
Awareness
- Lacking knowledge and practical experience of architects, planners and builders
- Lacking (large-scale) experiences and showcases for replication
Solar Thermal vs PV?
New discussion due to decreasing PV prices. Could it be more economical to run vapour compression chiller with a PV module than operating solar thermally powered chillers? The discussion is still going on, there is no clear answer yet available to this question as the answer depends o a range of different thinkable boundary:
- First examples of competitive installations – e.g. Cyprus
- Maybe suitable alternative
- Different results depending on perspective and goal
- Depending on boundary conditions and objective of cooling – very site specific
- Availability and reliability of grid as storage - if needed
- Storage/ back-up issue
- alternative Energy costs (esp. Electricity)
- Subsidies and incentives available for conventional power/systems/energy switch, etc.
- Different effect on grids - what do I want to achieve with solar cooling?
- Demand for other energy services – demand for hot water and heating
- Still discussion and research going on in solar cooling community
- Solar thermal and chiller costs expected to decrease with market growth
- Upcoming support schemes for solar thermal cooling
- lower efficiency of PV modules in hot climates but lower maintenance (e.g.)
- Energetically PV less ideal than thermal
Country Experiences
Solar Cooling in India
he In India, boundary conditions for solar cooling are very favourable: there is more irradiation and at the same time more cooling degree days than in areas where most systems so far have been installed (e.g. USA, MENA, South Europa) - but partly in some regions the climate is also more humid which asks for adapted systems[2]
Ideal boundary conditions (high solar radioation, long cooling season). The only drawback are not prohibitive high energy price, yet this is neutralized trough extensive electricity shortages. Many institutions, companies etc. have their own back up systems for electrcity supply, often also for cooling.
Indian customers are looking for reliable cooling options - this is a chance for solar applications.
Moreover, the cooling demand is growing further which is endangering grid stability even more [3]
The total installed cooling load is 35.000MWe (28.7% of installed capacity) [4] and e.g. yearly +60MW cooling capacity for newly built retail sector only are coming up. (Benchmark: cooling demand in richer Arab countries: 75% of electricity).
- Residential sector – great future challenge
Penetration level for A/C < 1% only and switch from air evaporation systems expected [5]
Lacking affordabel, small scale renewable technologies
Highest load in non-sunshine hours -> no coincide of supply and demand, challenge of storage
- Industrial and commercial sector – short and medium term market
Larger central systems in place already – solar technologies available for these sizes
often coincide of loads and solar gains
Experiences
The Ministry of New and Renewable Energe (MNRE) proposed an Action Plan on Solar Cooling in 2009, together with the establishment of a working group on solar cooling. However, the plan has not been followed. There are no updates and the working group is not active anymore.
Comapnies have been using VAM systems – available locally
Gas, wood or exhaust heat – b/c of unreliable power supply and costs
Established VAM market (around 5 Mio USD)
10 projects - R&D and some private (non commercial/green) initiatives è concentrated solar collectors + VAM
SEC, TERI, IITs,…
Thermax (pipeline program 3-effect VAM with MNRE), Baskara Solar, Gadhia Solar,..
Mamata - only project with evacuated tube collectors, since 2006, little maintenance
still early pilot phase
So far no coherent strategic approach, lacking knowledge sharing
R&D for solid and liquid dessicant systems
Still early phase
Could become simpler, cheaper and suitable for smaller systems
Local manufacturers (desiccant wheels) available
Economics
~1 lakh Rs/kW cooling capacity (at 100kW), around 100 Lahks Rs higher investment costs (Thermax)
Investment costs 3x higher (other statements)
High capital investment and long payback periods (> 7 years) highest drawback
investors very hesitant regarding investments with payback >3years
With Government subsidy of up to 50%, payback of 5 years (Thermax Projects)
Most feasible for larger systems >100 kW
Awareness raising needed
Costs for chillers and solar components are decreasing
Energy demand for control system and backup not to be underestaimated
Reliability of system and back-up storage
Improving quality of chillers and solar components, but still an issue
Increasing reliability – storage/back-up necessary
Solar as add on, not total replacement, otherwise very expensive
Variation in irradiation and diffiulty of prediction - dynamic system needed
Standardization of storage (cold and heat) necessary
System design, integration and optimization prove difficult
Smaller VAMs under development, expensive
Space availability for solar collectors and cooling towers is a challenge
Concentrating collectors (for higher temperature applications) face difficulties at the moment because of high fraction of diffuce radiation (dust, cloud coverage)
Used as locally produced but also more expensive than flat plate/evacuated tube
Achieve higher temperature lift, remove the need for wet cooling towers
Maintenance issue
Thermax might be working on this with German solar Company Ritter
Expensive, performance and tracking issues
non-concentrating collectors more suitable? - architectural integration possible, but lower temperatures, lower COPs
Evacuated heat pipes not produced in India
Efficiency of solar equipment needs to be improved
High humidity and water scarcity – find suitable technologies
Actors
Research Institutes
Companies
Further Information
IEA Task 38 - Solar Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration -IEA Solar Cooling Position Paper
- ↑ https://www.iea-shc.org/publications/downloads/IEA-SHC-Solar-Cooling-Position-Paper.pdf
- ↑ Sivak, M. (2009): Potential demand for cooling in the 50 largest metropolitan areas of the world. Implications for developing countries. Energy Policy 37 (2009) 1382-1384
- ↑ Singh, S.K. (2011): Solar Refrigeration and Air-conditioning. Solar Energy Center. MNRE. Ppt.
- ↑ Sivak, M. (2009): Potential demand for cooling in the 50 largest metropolitan areas of the world. Implications for developing countries. Energy Policy 37 (2009) 1382-1384
- ↑ DSCL Energy Services Company Ltd. (2010): Trigeneration in India Market Assessment Study .Trigeneration Technology within the Indian Building Sector . Berliner Energieagentur GmbH (editor). Commissioned by GTZ.