Difference between revisions of "Impact Monitoring Guidelines"
From energypedia
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*use a [[Theory Based Approach|'''theory based approach''']] by applying the result chain for developing the study design | *use a [[Theory Based Approach|'''theory based approach''']] by applying the result chain for developing the study design | ||
*use a [[Mixed Methods|'''mixed methods approach''']]: the logic of the comparative advantages of [[Methoden|methods]]: that means the mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions) | *use a [[Mixed Methods|'''mixed methods approach''']]: the logic of the comparative advantages of [[Methoden|methods]]: that means the mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions) | ||
− | * | + | *include [[Control Groups|'''control groups''']] if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study |
+ | *consider [[Research ethics|'''research ethics''']] | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | The following tables shows typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we would recommend and support. | + | The following tables shows typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we would recommend and support. |
= Preparation = | = Preparation = |
Revision as of 11:06, 28 March 2012
Introduction
The Impacts Monitoring Group of Energising Development has developed recommendations for a "proper" impact assessments.
We recommend to:
- use the recommended list of indicators
- conduct baseline studies before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy
- use a theory based approach by applying the result chain for developing the study design
- use a mixed methods approach: the logic of the comparative advantages of methods: that means the mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions)
- include control groups if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study
- consider research ethics
The following tables shows typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we would recommend and support.
Preparation
Tasks | Materials/ Support | Library |
Terms for Consultants/ Enumerators |
|
ToR Consultants: |
Selection Consultant/ Enumerators |
|
|
Study of available documents and statistics on national development goals and policies, national sector goals and policies, BMZ goals and concept for the partner country |
|
|
Developing of Results Chains/ Indicators |
Rural Electrifciation: Cooking:
| |
Developing of Questionnaires, interview guidelines, PRA tools (MAPP), observation criteria and other tools (catalogue of methods) |
PRA tools, Interview Guidelines, Observation criteria etc.
| |
Sampling/ Selection target Group |
|
|
Training of Supervisors and Enumerators/ Pretesting |
|
|
Implementation
Task | Materials/ Support | Library |
Logistics | Checklist on how to implement HH Interviews |
|
Conducting Interviews |
| |
Data entry |
Data Analysis/ Reporting
Task | Materials/ Support | Library |
Data analysis |
| |
Data interpretation – in exchange with the project team (in a workshop) |
|
|
Report writing (+ summary writing) |
|
|
Handover of raw data |
|