Difference between revisions of "Impact Monitoring Guidelines"

From energypedia
***** (***** | *****)
m
***** (***** | *****)
Line 73: Line 73:
 
| <font size="2">Developing of Questionnaires, interview guidelines, PRA tools (MAPP), observation criteria and other tools [[Methoden|(catalogue of methods)]]</font>
 
| <font size="2">Developing of Questionnaires, interview guidelines, PRA tools (MAPP), observation criteria and other tools [[Methoden|(catalogue of methods)]]</font>
 
|  
 
|  
*[[Quantitative Methods|<font size="2">Questionnaire</font>s for&nbsp;HH (stoves), stove producers, social institutions and restaurants using ICS]]
+
*[[Interviews_/_Discussions_-_Qualitative_Methods|<font size="2">Questionnaire</font>s for&nbsp;HH (stoves), stove producers, social institutions and restaurants using ICS]]
*[[Qualitative Methods|PRA tools for focus group discussions (MAPP)]]
+
*[[Interviews_/_Discussions_-_Qualitative_Methods|PRA tools for focus group discussions (MAPP)]]
*[[Qualitative Methods|Interview&nbsp;guidelines for village authorities]]
+
*[[Interviews_/_Discussions_-_Qualitative_Methods|Interview&nbsp;guidelines for village authorities]]
*[[Qualitative Methods|Observation criteria for stoves in use (example lists of good cooking practices and of stove conditions)&nbsp;]]
+
*[[Interviews_/_Discussions_-_Qualitative_Methods|Observation criteria for stoves in use (example lists of good cooking practices and of stove conditions)&nbsp;]]
  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 110: Line 110:
  
 
&nbsp;
 
&nbsp;
 +
  
 
= Implementation =
 
= Implementation =

Revision as of 14:44, 17 May 2012

Introduction

The Impacts Monitoring Group of Energising Development has developed recommendations for a "proper" impact assessments.

We recommend to:

  • use the recommended list of indicators
  • conduct baseline studies before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy
  • use a theory based approach by applying the result chain for developing the study design
  • use a mixed methods approach: the logic of the comparative advantages of methods: that means the mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions)
  • include control groups if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study 
  • consider research ethics


The following tables shows typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we would recommend and support.

Preparation

Tasks Materials/ Support Library
Terms for Consultants/ Enumerators
  • Sample Terms for national / international consultants
  • Sample Terms for enumerators 
ToR Consultants:
Selection Consultant/ Enumerators
  • Consultants
 
Study of available documents and statistics on national development goals and policies, national sector goals and policies, BMZ goals and concept for the partner country
  • Checklist on relevant development goals
Developing of Results Chains/ Indicators

Rural Electrifciation:

Cooking:

Developing of Questionnaires, interview guidelines, PRA tools (MAPP), observation criteria and other tools (catalogue of methods)

Example Questionnaires

PRA tools, Interview Guidelines, Observation criteria etc.


(Impact Studies Material)

Sampling/ Selection target Group
Training of Supervisors and Enumerators/ Pretesting
  • Training Material
  • Training Agenda

 


Implementation

Task Materials/ Support Library
Logistics Checklist on how to implement HH Interviews


 

Conducting Interviews  
Data entry    

 

Data Analysis/ Reporting

Task Materials/ Support Library
Data analysis
Data interpretation – in exchange with the project team (in a workshop)
  • Checklist for data interpretation
 
Report writing (+ summary writing)
  • Example for report summary
  • Example for ICS description (Annex)
Handover of raw data