Difference between revisions of "Impact Monitoring Guidelines"
From energypedia
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) m (→Overview) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | |||
= Overview = | = Overview = | ||
− | The | + | The Impact Monitoring Group of [[Energising_Development_(EnDev)|Energising Development]] has developed recommendations for sound impact assessments. |
<u>We recommend to:</u> | <u>We recommend to:</u> | ||
*use the recommended [[Indicator rural electrification and stoves|list of indicators]] | *use the recommended [[Indicator rural electrification and stoves|list of indicators]] | ||
− | *conduct '''baseline studies '''before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs | + | *conduct '''baseline studies '''before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs received access to a form of modern energy |
*use a [[Theory Based Approach|theory based approach]] by applying the result chain for developing the study design | *use a [[Theory Based Approach|theory based approach]] by applying the result chain for developing the study design | ||
− | *use a [[Mixed Methods|mixed methods approach]]: the logic of the comparative advantages of [[Methoden|methods]]: | + | *use a [[Mixed Methods|mixed methods approach]]: the logic of the comparative advantages of [[Methoden|methods]]: i.e. the mix of quantitative (standardised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open / semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions) |
− | *include [[Control Groups|control groups]] | + | *include, whereever possible, [[Control Groups|control groups]] (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study |
*consider [[Research Ethics|research ethics]] | *consider [[Research Ethics|research ethics]] | ||
− | The following tables show typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we | + | The following tables show typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we furthermore recommend and support. |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
+ | |||
= Preparation = | = Preparation = |
Revision as of 08:29, 7 August 2013
Overview
The Impact Monitoring Group of Energising Development has developed recommendations for sound impact assessments.
We recommend to:
- use the recommended list of indicators
- conduct baseline studies before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs received access to a form of modern energy
- use a theory based approach by applying the result chain for developing the study design
- use a mixed methods approach: the logic of the comparative advantages of methods: i.e. the mix of quantitative (standardised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open / semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions)
- include, whereever possible, control groups (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study
- consider research ethics
The following tables show typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we furthermore recommend and support.
Preparation
Tasks | Materials/ Support | Library |
Terms for Consultants/ Enumerators |
|
ToR Consultants: |
Selection Consultant/ Enumerators |
|
|
Study of available documents and statistics on national development goals and policies, national sector goals and policies, BMZ goals and concept for the partner country |
|
|
Developing of Results Chains/ Indicators (consider
undesired side effects being positive or negative) |
Cooking:
| |
Developing of Questionnaires, interview guidelines, PRA tools (MAPP), observation criteria and other tools (catalogue of methods) | ||
Sampling/ Selection target Group |
|
|
Training of Supervisors and Enumerators/ Pretesting |
|
|
Implementation
Task | Materials/ Support | Library |
Logistics | Checklist on how to implement HH Interviews |
|
Conducting Interviews |
| |
Data entry |
Data Analysis/ Reporting
Task | Materials/ Support | Library |
Data analysis |
| |
Data interpretation – in exchange with the project team (in a workshop) |
|
|
Report writing (+ summary writing) |
|
|
Handover of raw data |
|