Knowledge fuels change - Support energypedia!
For over 10 years, energypedia has been connecting energy experts around the world — helping them share knowledge, learn from each other, and accelerate the global energy transition.
Today, we ask for your support to keep this platform free and accessible to all.
Even a small contribution makes a big difference! If just 10–20% of our 60,000+ monthly visitors donated the equivalent of a cup of coffee — €5 — Energypedia would be fully funded for a whole year.
Is the knowledge you’ve gained through Energypedia this year worth €5 or more?
Your donation keeps the platform running, helps us create new knowledge products, and contributes directly to achieving SDG 7.
Thank you for your support, your donation, big or small, truly matters!
Difference between revisions of "Impact Monitoring Guidelines"
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) m (→Overview) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | |||
= Overview = | = Overview = | ||
| − | The | + | The Impact Monitoring Group of [[Energising_Development_(EnDev)|Energising Development]] has developed recommendations for sound impact assessments. |
<u>We recommend to:</u> | <u>We recommend to:</u> | ||
*use the recommended [[Indicator rural electrification and stoves|list of indicators]] | *use the recommended [[Indicator rural electrification and stoves|list of indicators]] | ||
| − | *conduct '''baseline studies '''before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs | + | *conduct '''baseline studies '''before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs received access to a form of modern energy |
*use a [[Theory Based Approach|theory based approach]] by applying the result chain for developing the study design | *use a [[Theory Based Approach|theory based approach]] by applying the result chain for developing the study design | ||
| − | *use a [[Mixed Methods|mixed methods approach]]: the logic of the comparative advantages of [[Methoden|methods]]: | + | *use a [[Mixed Methods|mixed methods approach]]: the logic of the comparative advantages of [[Methoden|methods]]: i.e. the mix of quantitative (standardised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open / semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions) |
| − | *include [[Control Groups|control groups]] | + | *include, whereever possible, [[Control Groups|control groups]] (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study |
*consider [[Research Ethics|research ethics]] | *consider [[Research Ethics|research ethics]] | ||
| − | The following tables show typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we | + | The following tables show typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we furthermore recommend and support. |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| + | |||
= Preparation = | = Preparation = | ||
Revision as of 08:29, 7 August 2013
Overview
The Impact Monitoring Group of Energising Development has developed recommendations for sound impact assessments.
We recommend to:
- use the recommended list of indicators
- conduct baseline studies before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs received access to a form of modern energy
- use a theory based approach by applying the result chain for developing the study design
- use a mixed methods approach: the logic of the comparative advantages of methods: i.e. the mix of quantitative (standardised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open / semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions)
- include, whereever possible, control groups (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study
- consider research ethics
The following tables show typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we furthermore recommend and support.
Preparation
| Tasks | Materials/ Support | Library |
| Terms for Consultants/ Enumerators |
|
ToR Consultants: |
| Selection Consultant/ Enumerators |
|
|
| Study of available documents and statistics on national development goals and policies, national sector goals and policies, BMZ goals and concept for the partner country |
|
|
| Developing of Results Chains/ Indicators (consider
undesired side effects being positive or negative) |
Cooking:
| |
| Developing of Questionnaires, interview guidelines, PRA tools (MAPP), observation criteria and other tools (catalogue of methods) | ||
| Sampling/ Selection target Group |
|
|
| Training of Supervisors and Enumerators/ Pretesting |
|
|
Implementation
| Task | Materials/ Support | Library |
| Logistics | Checklist on how to implement HH Interviews |
|
| Conducting Interviews |
| |
| Data entry |
Data Analysis/ Reporting
| Task | Materials/ Support | Library |
| Data analysis |
| |
| Data interpretation – in exchange with the project team (in a workshop) |
|
|
| Report writing (+ summary writing) |
|
|
|
Handover of raw data |
|



















