Difference between revisions of "Energy Access and Climate Mitigation and Adaptation"

From energypedia
***** (***** | *****)
m
***** (***** | *****)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
  
−
= Effect of Black Carbon on Climate<br/> =
+
= Biomass Burning =
 +
 
 +
Burning of biomass generates carbon compounds such as carbon dioxide, methane, tiny bits of soot called black carbon and motes of associated substances called brown carbon.
  
 
Black Carbon is generated by the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels, biofuels and biomass. It is a strongly light-absorbing particulate matter that absorbs solar radiation at all wavelength.<ref name="http://www3.epa.gov/blackcarbon/2012report/Chapter2.pdf">http://www3.epa.gov/blackcarbon/2012report/Chapter2.pdf</ref>​&nbsp;
 
Black Carbon is generated by the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels, biofuels and biomass. It is a strongly light-absorbing particulate matter that absorbs solar radiation at all wavelength.<ref name="http://www3.epa.gov/blackcarbon/2012report/Chapter2.pdf">http://www3.epa.gov/blackcarbon/2012report/Chapter2.pdf</ref>​&nbsp;
Line 16: Line 18:
 
Brown carbon (BrC) is also a carbon based particulate matter that absorbs solar radiation within the visible and ultraviolet wavelength.&nbsp;<ref name="http://www3.epa.gov/blackcarbon/2012report/Chapter2.pdf">http://www3.epa.gov/blackcarbon/2012report/Chapter2.pdf</ref>
 
Brown carbon (BrC) is also a carbon based particulate matter that absorbs solar radiation within the visible and ultraviolet wavelength.&nbsp;<ref name="http://www3.epa.gov/blackcarbon/2012report/Chapter2.pdf">http://www3.epa.gov/blackcarbon/2012report/Chapter2.pdf</ref>
  
−
Black and brown carbon particles causes atmostpheric warming in three ways:
+
Exposure to these pollutants during biomass burning is one of the major cause of premature deaths. Every year, more than 4 million people die from illness caused by indoor air pollution. The pollutants also causes cardiovascular disease, respiratory illness, lung cancer, asthma and low birth weights.<ref>http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs292/en/</ref>
  
−
*Direct effect
+
For more information about indoor air pollution , see the article on [[Indoor Air Pollution (IAP)|Indoor Air Pollution (IAP)]] and[[Indoor Air Pollution (IAP) Measurement|Indoor Air Pollution (IAP) Measurement]]<br/>
 +
 
 +
<br/>
  
−
Black and brown carbon, in the atmosphere enter the miniscule water droplets that form clouds. The sunlight penetrates the water droplet and is absorbed by the carbon particles, creating heat and acceleratign the evaportation of the water droplets. Similarly, the carbon particles floating inbetween the water droplets spaces also absorb the sunlight resulteing in additional heating and evaportion of the cloud. Cloud acts as a buffer between the earth and the sun, reflecting the sunlight back to the atmosphere. with increased evaporation of the cloud, less sunlight will be refelcted and more will be absorbed, resulting in warming of the earth.<ref name=" https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216"> https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216</ref>
+
= Effect of Black Carbon on Climate =
  
−
*Snow/albedo Effect
+
'''Black and brown carbon particles causes atmospheric warming in three ways:'''
  
−
Black and brown carbon particles increase atmospheric warming in three ways. First, they enter the minuscule water droplets that form clouds. Sunlight scatters around the clouds, bathing them in luminescence. According to Jacobson, when sunlight penetrates a water droplet containing black or brown carbon particles, the carbon absorbs the light energy creating heat and accelerating the evaporation of the droplet. Carbon particles floating around in the spaces between the droplets also absorb scattered sunlight, converting it to heat.<ref name="https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216"> https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216</ref>
+
== Direct effects ==
  
−
''“Heating the cloud reduces the relative humidity in the cloud,”'' - Jacobson<ref name="https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216"> ''Italic text''https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216</ref>
+
Black carbon absorbs both the incoming and outgoing solar radiation at all wavelength and thus lead to the atmosphere warming. The green house gases (GHG) only trap the outgoing infrared radiation from the earth's surface.<ref name="http://www3.epa.gov/blackcarbon/2012report/Chapter2.pdf">http://www3.epa.gov/blackcarbon/2012report/Chapter2.pdf</ref>
  
−
This causes the cloud to dissipate. And because clouds reflect sunlight, cloud dissipation causes more sunlight to transfer to the ground and seas, ultimately resulting in warmer ground and air temperature. Finally, carbon particles released from burning biomass settle on snow and ice, contributing to further warming.<ref name="https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216"> https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216</ref>
+
== Warming of clouds ==
  
−
''“Ice and snow are white, and reflect sunlight very effectively,”'' - Jacobson. “But because carbon is dark it absorbs sunlight, causing snow and ice to melt at accelerated rates. That exposes dark soil and dark seas. And again, because those surfaces are dark, they absorb even more thermal energy from the sunlight, establishing an ongoing amplification process.”<ref name="https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216"> https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216</ref>
+
Black and brown carbon, in the atmospheric surface enter the minuscule water droplets that form clouds. During day time, the sunlight penetrates the water droplet and is absorbed by the carbon particles, creating heat and accelerating the evaporation of the water droplets. Similarly, the carbon particles floating in between the water droplets spaces also absorb the sunlight resulting in additional heating. Heating the cloud reduces its relative humidity and causes the clouds to dissipate. Cloud acts as a buffer between the earth and the sun, reflecting the sunlight back to the atmosphere. with increased dissipation of the cloud, less sunlight will be reflected and more will be absorbed, resulting in the warming of the earth.<ref name="https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216"> https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216</ref>
  
−
Jacobson also noted that in some carbon particles – specifically white and gray carbon, the variants associated with some types of ash – can exert a cooling effect because they reflect sunlight. That must be weighed against the warming qualities of the black and brown carbon particles and CO2 emissions generated by biomass combustion to derive a net effect.<ref name="https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216"> https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216</ref>
+
== Snow/albedo Effect ==
  
−
Jacobson further states that the sum of warming caused by all anthropogenic greenhouse gases – CO2, methane, nitrous oxide, chlorofluorocarbons and some others – plus the warming caused by black and brown carbon will yield a planetary warming effect of 2 degrees Celsius over the 20-year period simulated by the computer. But light-colored particles – white and gray particles primarily – reflect sunlight and enhance cloudiness, causing more light to reflect.<ref name="https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216"> https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216</ref>
+
White surface result more light as compared to darker surfaces. Therefore, snow and ice effectively reflect sunlight and are vital in balancing the atmospheric temperature. Black carbon deposited on snow and ice darkens the surface and decrease the reflectivity of the surface (albedo effect). Black carbon can also absorb solar radiation in all wavelength and thus, the BC deposited on the snow accelerates the melting of the snow,exposing the dark soil and the dark seas underneath. Since these surfaces are dark, they contribute to further warming.<ref name="https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216"> https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216</ref>
  
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
  
−
“The cooling effect of these light-colored particles amounts to slightly more than 1 C,” Jacobson said, “so you end up with a total net warming gain of 0.9 C or so. Of that net gain, we’ve calculated that biomass burning accounts for about 0.4 C.”<ref name="https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216"> https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216</ref>
+
== Net Effect of Black Carbon ==
  
−
Jacobson’s model also tracks the impact of the direct heat produced by combusting biomass.“The direct heat generated by burning biomass is significant and contributes to cloud evaporation by decreasing relative humidity,” Jacobson said. “We’ve determined that 7 percent of the total net warming caused by biomass burning – that is, 7 percent of the 0.4 C net warming gain – can be attributed to the direct heat caused by the fires.”<ref name="https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216"> https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216</ref>
+
To understand the net effect of black carbon on atmospheric warming, it is important to take into account the following points:
  
−
[[Energy Access and Climate Mitigation and Adaptation#toc|►Go to Top]]
+
*Black carbon is not emitted alone but rather with other particles such as sulfur dioxide (SO2) , nitrogen oxides (NOx) and organic carbon. Some of these particles have a cooling effect on the climate. Therefore to calculate the net effect of black carbon, the cooling effect of co-emitted pollutants has to be offset.<ref name="http://www3.epa.gov/blackcarbon/2012report/Chapter2.pdf">http://www3.epa.gov/blackcarbon/2012report/Chapter2.pdf</ref>
 +
*The atmospheric processes such as&nbsp;&nbsp;mixing, aging, and coating occur after the BC is emitted and can influence its effect on climate<ref name="http://www3.epa.gov/blackcarbon/2012report/Chapter2.pdf">http://www3.epa.gov/blackcarbon/2012report/Chapter2.pdf</ref>
  
−
== Biomass Burning ==
+
<br/>
  
−
Biomass burning also includes the combustion of agricultural and lumber waste for energy production. Such power generation often is promoted as a “sustainable” alternative to burning fossil fuels. And that’s partly true as far as it goes. It is sustainable, in the sense that the fuel can be grown, processed and converted to energy on a cyclic basis. But the thermal and pollution effects of its combustion – in any form – can’t be discounted, Jacobson said.<ref name="https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216"> https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216</ref>
+
[[Energy Access and Climate Mitigation and Adaptation#toc|►Go to Top]]
  
−
“The bottom line is that biomass burning is neither clean nor climate-neutral,” he said. “If you’re serious about addressing global warming, you have to deal with biomass burning as well.”<ref name="https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216"> https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216</ref>
+
= Carbon Debt =
  
−
Exposure to biomass burning particles is strongly associated with cardiovascular disease, respiratory illness, lung cancer, asthma and low birth weights. As the rate of biomass burning increases, so do the impacts to human health.<br/>
+
The extraction, transportation and combustion of biomass releases a significant amount of carbon into the atmosphere. This carbon is added to the atmosphere and it takes time before it is balanced by the ecosystem. According to a report by IPCC on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation (2011), ''it can take decades, even centuries, before ecosystems; in particular forests can recapture the carbon that has been released during biomass combustion'' . This creates a "'''carbon debt'''" in the atmosphere. Therefore, burning of solid biomas might not be "carbon neutral".<ref name="http://www.birdlife.org/sites/default/files/attachments/EU-Joint-NGO-briefing-biomass-sustainability-energy-March2012.pdf">http://www.birdlife.org/sites/default/files/attachments/EU-Joint-NGO-briefing-biomass-sustainability-energy-March2012.pdf</ref><ref name="https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/cooking.pdf">https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/cooking.pdf</ref>
  
−
The global middle and upper class which are largely responsible for GHG emissions currently are the major beneficiaries in the climate mitigation approach whereas the poor and disadvantaged are left out! The poor are only served by climate financing through climate adaptation measures (risk mitigation, disaster management, etc.). This approach however might lead to sharpen inequalities as the funds are rather beneficial to the better-off and not to the poor and hence distort many development approaches.
+
<br/>
−
 
 
−
For Black Carbon there is no internationally standardized methodology available. The Golden Standard Quantification Methodology&nbsp;has not been approved by UNFCCC by now. WB however applies it in a few pilot projects and has come out with first figures. Hence the question still remains which methodology to apply to monitor Black Carbon.
 
−
 
 
−
Non-Kyoto particles such as black carbon and short-lived climate pollutants are not mentioned in the current draft of the climate treaty&nbsp; but are important for INDC under UNFCCC. In developing countries, more than 1 billion tons of CO₂ are emitted into the atmosphere from burning biomass for cooking.<br/>
 
−
 
 
−
Other products of incomplete combustion and climate forcers (non-Kyoto particles) such as black carbon further exacerbate the problem. 21% of black carbon emissions is thought to be from residential solid fuel use for cooking and heating in the developing world (US EPA, 2012).
 
−
 
 
−
In terms of climate change, woody resources are generally regarded as “renewable” and “carbon neutral” if sustainably produced; however, while CO₂ to a degree could be sequestered if biomass regrows, the level of regrowth is likely to vary geographically. There is evidence that biomass used for household cooking is thus a net contributor to global warming since not all biomass harvested is renewable. When short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs) such as black carbon are taken into consideration, the burning of solid fuels is decidedly not “climate neutral”.
 
−
 
 
−
[[Energy Access and Climate Mitigation and Adaptation#toc|►Go to Top]]
 
  
 
= Potential Measures =
 
= Potential Measures =
Line 80: Line 75:
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
  
−
= Further Information<br/> =
 
  
−
*Household Cookstoves, Environment, Health and Climate Change – A New Look at an Old Problem (WB 2010)
 
  
−
[http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2010/03/14600224/household-cook-stoves-environment-health-climate-change-new-look-old-problem http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2010/03/14600224/household-cook-stoves-environment-health-climate-change-new-look-old-problem]
+
= Further Information<br/> =
−
 
 
−
*On thin Ice: How Cutting Pollution Can Slow Warming and Save Lives (WB 2013)
 
−
 
 
−
[http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2013/11/03/protecting-snow-ice-critical-for-development-climate http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2013/11/03/protecting-snow-ice-critical-for-development-climate]
 
  
−
*Black Carbon Finance Study Group Report (CCAC 2015)<br/>
+
*[[:File:GIZ_(2016)_Climate_Change_Energy_Access.pdf|Climate Change Mitigation and Adoption Potential of Basic Energy Services (GIZ, 2015)]]<br/>
 +
*[http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2010/03/14600224/household-cook-stoves-environment-health-climate-change-new-look-old-problem Household Cookstoves, Environment, Health and Climate Change – A New Look at an Old Problem (WB 2010)]<br/>
 +
*[http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2013/11/03/protecting-snow-ice-critical-for-development-climate On thin Ice: How Cutting Pollution Can Slow Warming and Save Lives (WB 2013)]<br/>
 
*[http://www.unep.org/ccac/Publications/Publications/BlackCarbonFinanceStudyGroupReport2015/tabid/1060194/Default.aspx Black Carbon Finance Study Group Report 2015]<br/>
 
*[http://www.unep.org/ccac/Publications/Publications/BlackCarbonFinanceStudyGroupReport2015/tabid/1060194/Default.aspx Black Carbon Finance Study Group Report 2015]<br/>
−
*<span>M. Jacobsen: Journal of Geophysical research: Atmosphere, July 30, 2014</span><br/>
+
*<span>Effects of biomass burning on climate, accounting for heat and moisture fluxes, black and brown&nbsp;carbon , and could absorption effects (Jacobsen, Journal of Geophysical research: Atmospheres. 2014)</span><br/>
  
−
<br/>[[Energy Access and Climate Mitigation and Adaptation#toc|►Go to Top]]
+
[[Energy Access and Climate Mitigation and Adaptation#toc|►Go to Top]]<br/>
  
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
 +
  
 
= References =
 
= References =
  
 
<references /><br/>
 
<references /><br/>
 +
 +
<br/>
 +
 +
[[Category:Energy_Access]]
 +
[[Category:Biomass]]
 +
[[Category:Cookstoves]]
 +
[[Category:Climate_Change_Adaptation]]
 +
[[Category:Climate_Change]]

Latest revision as of 12:27, 2 August 2016

Facts and Figures

  • The number of people relying on unsustainable cooking energy has increased from 2.6 billion (2013) to 3 billion (2015).[1][2]
  • Cookstoves generate the most black carbon emissions in the developing regions. Black Carbon (BC) is a major constituent of particulate matter (PM) from biomass combustion.[3]
  • Black Carbon is the 2nd largest contributor to global warming after CO2. The warming effect is expected to be about 2/3 of CO2. [3]
  • 60-80% of black carbon emissions in the developing regions are from biomass cookstoves.[3]
  • Almost 8.5 billion tons of atmospheric carbon dioxide – or about 18 percent of all anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions – comes from biomass burning, according to Prof. Mark Jacobson from Stanford university [4]


Biomass Burning

Burning of biomass generates carbon compounds such as carbon dioxide, methane, tiny bits of soot called black carbon and motes of associated substances called brown carbon.

Black Carbon is generated by the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels, biofuels and biomass. It is a strongly light-absorbing particulate matter that absorbs solar radiation at all wavelength.[5]​ 

Brown carbon (BrC) is also a carbon based particulate matter that absorbs solar radiation within the visible and ultraviolet wavelength. [5]

Exposure to these pollutants during biomass burning is one of the major cause of premature deaths. Every year, more than 4 million people die from illness caused by indoor air pollution. The pollutants also causes cardiovascular disease, respiratory illness, lung cancer, asthma and low birth weights.[6]

For more information about indoor air pollution , see the article on Indoor Air Pollution (IAP) andIndoor Air Pollution (IAP) Measurement


Effect of Black Carbon on Climate

Black and brown carbon particles causes atmospheric warming in three ways:

Direct effects

Black carbon absorbs both the incoming and outgoing solar radiation at all wavelength and thus lead to the atmosphere warming. The green house gases (GHG) only trap the outgoing infrared radiation from the earth's surface.[5]

Warming of clouds

Black and brown carbon, in the atmospheric surface enter the minuscule water droplets that form clouds. During day time, the sunlight penetrates the water droplet and is absorbed by the carbon particles, creating heat and accelerating the evaporation of the water droplets. Similarly, the carbon particles floating in between the water droplets spaces also absorb the sunlight resulting in additional heating. Heating the cloud reduces its relative humidity and causes the clouds to dissipate. Cloud acts as a buffer between the earth and the sun, reflecting the sunlight back to the atmosphere. with increased dissipation of the cloud, less sunlight will be reflected and more will be absorbed, resulting in the warming of the earth.[7]

Snow/albedo Effect

White surface result more light as compared to darker surfaces. Therefore, snow and ice effectively reflect sunlight and are vital in balancing the atmospheric temperature. Black carbon deposited on snow and ice darkens the surface and decrease the reflectivity of the surface (albedo effect). Black carbon can also absorb solar radiation in all wavelength and thus, the BC deposited on the snow accelerates the melting of the snow,exposing the dark soil and the dark seas underneath. Since these surfaces are dark, they contribute to further warming.[7]


Net Effect of Black Carbon

To understand the net effect of black carbon on atmospheric warming, it is important to take into account the following points:

  • Black carbon is not emitted alone but rather with other particles such as sulfur dioxide (SO2) , nitrogen oxides (NOx) and organic carbon. Some of these particles have a cooling effect on the climate. Therefore to calculate the net effect of black carbon, the cooling effect of co-emitted pollutants has to be offset.[5]
  • The atmospheric processes such as  mixing, aging, and coating occur after the BC is emitted and can influence its effect on climate[5]


►Go to Top

Carbon Debt

The extraction, transportation and combustion of biomass releases a significant amount of carbon into the atmosphere. This carbon is added to the atmosphere and it takes time before it is balanced by the ecosystem. According to a report by IPCC on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation (2011), it can take decades, even centuries, before ecosystems; in particular forests can recapture the carbon that has been released during biomass combustion . This creates a "carbon debt" in the atmosphere. Therefore, burning of solid biomas might not be "carbon neutral".[8][9]


Potential Measures

To combat this situation, following potential measures/solutions could be applied:

  • Promotion of clean cookstoves - it is estimated that some modern biomass stove models can reduce CO₂ emissions by 25-50%.
  • Transitioning to agricultural waste briquettes - such as those made from sawdust, and crop residues and pellets (from compressed woodwaste, invasive plants, etc.) that can be burned in highly efficient residential gasifier stoves.
  • More efficient production of charcoal or reducing overall production of charcoal.
  • Switching to alternative fuels such as LPG, biogas, and bioethanol.

►Go to Top



Further Information

►Go to Top



References

  1. ↑ Worldbank, SE4All 2015
  2. ↑ WHO: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs292/en/
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 T. Bond, et al., Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2013 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "T. Bond, et al., Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2013" defined multiple times with different content
  4. ↑ https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216 https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 http://www3.epa.gov/blackcarbon/2012report/Chapter2.pdf
  6. ↑ http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs292/en/
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 https://engineering.stanford.edu/print/node/38216
  8. ↑ http://www.birdlife.org/sites/default/files/attachments/EU-Joint-NGO-briefing-biomass-sustainability-energy-March2012.pdf
  9. ↑ https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/cooking.pdf



Retrieved from "https://energypedia.info/index.php?title=Energy_Access_and_Climate_Mitigation_and_Adaptation&oldid=174328"