Knowledge fuels change - Support energypedia!
For over 10 years, energypedia has been connecting energy experts around the world — helping them share knowledge, learn from each other, and accelerate the global energy transition.
Today, we ask for your support to keep this platform free and accessible to all.
Even a small contribution makes a big difference! If just 10–20% of our 60,000+ monthly visitors donated the equivalent of a cup of coffee — €5 — Energypedia would be fully funded for a whole year.
Is the knowledge you’ve gained through Energypedia this year worth €5 or more?
Your donation keeps the platform running, helps us create new knowledge products, and contributes directly to achieving SDG 7.
Thank you for your support, your donation, big or small, truly matters!
Difference between revisions of "Monitoring & Evaluation of Landscapes"
***** (***** | *****) (Created page with " <span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Part of the broader context of Landscape approaches, and the rise of such organisations as the Global Landscapes Forum, ha...") |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255) | + | <span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255)">Part of the broader context of Landscape approaches, and the rise of such organisations as the Global Landscapes Forum, has been a new intensity of scientific research, knowledge sharing and standards of oversight, scrutiny and publicly-available information. This revolution has sought to overcome one of the central problems recognised by the landscape approach: a criticial dearth of communication between sectors, particualrly in reference to monitoring and evaluation. In the absence of such practices, it has proven impossible to fully understand the impact of potentially destructive activities and equally difficult to see tehs cope for mutually beneficial policies (</span>[https://news.globallandscapesforum.org/20114/mining-firms-start-worry-long-term-impacts-understand Understanding impacts of mining]<span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255)">). With a new dawn of consultation and transparency, different parts of the landscape have been able to come together to deliver sustainable solutions (</span>[https://news.globallandscapesforum.org/15183/success-factors-for-sustainable-bio-energy Success Factors for sustainable bio energy]<span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255)">). </span><br/> |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Landscape]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:21, 3 May 2018
Part of the broader context of Landscape approaches, and the rise of such organisations as the Global Landscapes Forum, has been a new intensity of scientific research, knowledge sharing and standards of oversight, scrutiny and publicly-available information. This revolution has sought to overcome one of the central problems recognised by the landscape approach: a criticial dearth of communication between sectors, particualrly in reference to monitoring and evaluation. In the absence of such practices, it has proven impossible to fully understand the impact of potentially destructive activities and equally difficult to see tehs cope for mutually beneficial policies (Understanding impacts of mining). With a new dawn of consultation and transparency, different parts of the landscape have been able to come together to deliver sustainable solutions (Success Factors for sustainable bio energy).
