Difference between revisions of "Publication - Forestry and Macroeconomic Accounts of Nigeria: The Importance of Linking Ecosystem Services to Macroeconomics"
***** (***** | *****) (Created page with "{{Pub Database |Pub Title=Forestry and Macroeconomic Accounts of Nigeria: The Importance of Linking Ecosystem Services to Macroeconomics |Pub Organization=UN-REDD Programme |P...") |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | |||
{{Pub Database | {{Pub Database | ||
|Pub Title=Forestry and Macroeconomic Accounts of Nigeria: The Importance of Linking Ecosystem Services to Macroeconomics | |Pub Title=Forestry and Macroeconomic Accounts of Nigeria: The Importance of Linking Ecosystem Services to Macroeconomics | ||
| Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
Nigeria would be. The three preliminary policy options tested are: (i) | Nigeria would be. The three preliminary policy options tested are: (i) | ||
Carbon trade; (ii) Certified plantation forestry and (iii) Agroforestry. | Carbon trade; (ii) Certified plantation forestry and (iii) Agroforestry. | ||
| − | |||
|Pub Download=https://www.uncclearn.org/sites/default/files/inventory/final_report_summary_for_decision_makers_redd_nigeria_unep.pdf | |Pub Download=https://www.uncclearn.org/sites/default/files/inventory/final_report_summary_for_decision_makers_redd_nigeria_unep.pdf | ||
|Pub Newsletter=No | |Pub Newsletter=No | ||
| + | |Pub Tag Policy=Policies and Regulations | ||
| + | |Pub Topics=Policy and Regulation | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:57, 12 May 2021
►Add a New Publication
►See All Latest Publications
forest resources, where possible, placing added focus on resources found in the CRS, and demonstrate some policy instruments that would alleviate pressure on these natural forest systems. The analysis shows that the contribution of forests to the economy of Nigeria is underestimated in the national accounts
Furthermore, the study demonstrates three economic policy instruments that seek to incentivize landholders to pursue sustainable forest management. These proposed policy options are not intended to be a comprehensive final set of options for Nigeria, but are rather used to demonstrate how these options could work, what they would cost, to what extent they would curb deforestation and what the relative costs and benefits to the economy of Nigeria would be. The three preliminary policy options tested are: (i)
Carbon trade; (ii) Certified plantation forestry and (iii) Agroforestry.
Admin:
No
