Difference between revisions of "PicoPV Test"
***** (***** | *****) |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
| (33 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | = | + | [[Portal:Solar|►Back to Solar Portal]] |
| + | = Overview = | ||
| − | + | Pico PV Systems have emerged as a strong contender in the solar market of developing countries. Thus,[[Energising_Development_(EnDev)|EnDev]] has developed a test series to test their effectiveness.<br/> | |
| − | <br> | + | == Technical Test I<br/> == |
| − | + | The technical tests are performed by '''Fraunhofer Gesellschaft ([http://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en?set_language=en FhG/ISE])''' in Freiburg, Germany. In the first test phase (2007/ 10 - 2008/ 01) twelve systems were tested on road capability with special focus on mechanical stability, lighting characteristics and operability. | |
| − | + | <u>These systems were in detail:</u> | |
| − | + | *GL9000SW, Global Marketing Technologies Inc. (US) --> overall picture bad | |
| + | *MS01, Macro-Solar Technology Co,. Ltd (China) --> overall picture very bad | ||
| + | *Solar 2007-1, Solarprojekt-Freilassing e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture good | ||
| + | *Mightylight, Cosmos Ignite Innovations (India) --> overall picture good | ||
| + | *AISHWARYA, Noble energy Solar Technologies Ltd. (?) --> overall picture middle | ||
| + | *Solar Home System, "Afghanistan" --> overall picture very bad | ||
| + | *2212SL Wuara, SolEnergy Africa (PTY) Ltd (South Africa) --> overall picture very bad | ||
| + | *SOLUX-LED-100, SOLUX e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture middle | ||
| + | *Sun x-set mobile, Würth Solergy (Germany) --> overall picture middle - bad | ||
| + | *Glowstar GS7, Sollatek Ltd. (UK) --> overall picture middle | ||
| + | *AS018, Astral Solar technology Co. (China) --> overall picture bad | ||
| + | *SOLUX-LED-50, SOLUX e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture middle | ||
| − | <br> | + | <br/> |
| − | + | == Technical Test II<br/> == | |
| − | + | Seven solar lanterns reached the second testing stage, of which four are German-made: the Solux LED 100 and Solux LED 50 of the Solux e.V. development assistance project, the Solar 2007-1 by the Freilassing solar promotion project, and the sun x-set mobile produced by Würth. Other lamps of the main test were the Glowstar GS7 of the British company Sollatek, the Aishwarya NEST-6543 of the Indian manufacturer Noble Energy and the Mightylight 3040, also Indian made. | |
| − | + | <u>In the following table you find a selection of the most important criteria:</u> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | '''Testcriteria Level 2''' | |
| − | === | + | {| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" border="1" style="width: 70%; width: 100%" |
| + | |- | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | Solar module | ||
| − | + | | | |
| + | Does the system deliver the nominal rated values of power output, open- circuit voltage and shortcircuit current? | ||
| − | == | + | |- |
| + | | <div class="draft"></div>Battery<br/> | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | Measure of capacity (NiMH+ Pb), persistence against overcharging (NiMH), simple durability test (NiMH)<span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: arial"></span> | ||
| − | + | |- | |
| + | | | ||
| + | Luminous fux<span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: arial"></span> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | | ||
| + | average of 210 minutes | ||
| + | |||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | Brennzeit/autonome Zeit | ||
| + | |||
| + | | | ||
| + | The duration is measured until luminous flux falls to 70 % of the initial value. (beginning from a fully-charged battery) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Luminous efficacy<br/> | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | average is obtained from a period of 210 minutes, beginning from a fully-charged battery. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Charge Controller<br/> | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | Spannungslevel Ladeschluss-/ Lastabwurfspannung, Eigenverbrauch, Signalisierungen, Schutz vor Entladung durch Modul, Wirkungsgrad | ||
| + | |||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Ballast device<br/> | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | How good is the efficiency of the ballast? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | Cycle test / degradation of CFL-lamps | ||
| + | |||
| + | | | ||
| + | How long do CFL lamps last when subjected to a switching cycle of ‘on’ for 60 seconds, ‘off’ for 150 seconds? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | Simulation | ||
| + | |||
| + | | | ||
| + | Ermittlung der solaren Deckungsrate für 5 Standorte bei einer Brenndauer von täglich 3,5 Stunden | ||
| + | |||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Field Test<br/> == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <u><span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">The publication is available in English and German:</span></span></u> | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[:File:Solar Lanterns Test - Shades of Light.pdf|English version]] | ||
| + | *[[:File:Solarleuchtentest - Licht und Schatten.pdf|German version]]<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'"></span></span> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | = Further Information = | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[PicoPV Field Tests|PicoPV Field Tests (of GTZ EnDev)]] | ||
| + | *The SOLAR 2007-1 Lantern (Solarprojekt Freilassing e.V.)has been upgraded with new LEDs of 80 lm/W. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:PicoPV]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Solar]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:38, 1 August 2018
Overview
Pico PV Systems have emerged as a strong contender in the solar market of developing countries. Thus,EnDev has developed a test series to test their effectiveness.
Technical Test I
The technical tests are performed by Fraunhofer Gesellschaft (FhG/ISE) in Freiburg, Germany. In the first test phase (2007/ 10 - 2008/ 01) twelve systems were tested on road capability with special focus on mechanical stability, lighting characteristics and operability.
These systems were in detail:
- GL9000SW, Global Marketing Technologies Inc. (US) --> overall picture bad
- MS01, Macro-Solar Technology Co,. Ltd (China) --> overall picture very bad
- Solar 2007-1, Solarprojekt-Freilassing e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture good
- Mightylight, Cosmos Ignite Innovations (India) --> overall picture good
- AISHWARYA, Noble energy Solar Technologies Ltd. (?) --> overall picture middle
- Solar Home System, "Afghanistan" --> overall picture very bad
- 2212SL Wuara, SolEnergy Africa (PTY) Ltd (South Africa) --> overall picture very bad
- SOLUX-LED-100, SOLUX e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture middle
- Sun x-set mobile, Würth Solergy (Germany) --> overall picture middle - bad
- Glowstar GS7, Sollatek Ltd. (UK) --> overall picture middle
- AS018, Astral Solar technology Co. (China) --> overall picture bad
- SOLUX-LED-50, SOLUX e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture middle
Technical Test II
Seven solar lanterns reached the second testing stage, of which four are German-made: the Solux LED 100 and Solux LED 50 of the Solux e.V. development assistance project, the Solar 2007-1 by the Freilassing solar promotion project, and the sun x-set mobile produced by Würth. Other lamps of the main test were the Glowstar GS7 of the British company Sollatek, the Aishwarya NEST-6543 of the Indian manufacturer Noble Energy and the Mightylight 3040, also Indian made.
In the following table you find a selection of the most important criteria:
Testcriteria Level 2
|
Solar module |
Does the system deliver the nominal rated values of power output, open- circuit voltage and shortcircuit current? |
| Battery |
Measure of capacity (NiMH+ Pb), persistence against overcharging (NiMH), simple durability test (NiMH) |
|
Luminous fux |
average of 210 minutes |
|
Brennzeit/autonome Zeit |
The duration is measured until luminous flux falls to 70 % of the initial value. (beginning from a fully-charged battery) |
| Luminous efficacy |
average is obtained from a period of 210 minutes, beginning from a fully-charged battery. |
| Charge Controller |
Spannungslevel Ladeschluss-/ Lastabwurfspannung, Eigenverbrauch, Signalisierungen, Schutz vor Entladung durch Modul, Wirkungsgrad |
| Ballast device |
How good is the efficiency of the ballast? |
|
Cycle test / degradation of CFL-lamps |
How long do CFL lamps last when subjected to a switching cycle of ‘on’ for 60 seconds, ‘off’ for 150 seconds? |
|
Simulation |
Ermittlung der solaren Deckungsrate für 5 Standorte bei einer Brenndauer von täglich 3,5 Stunden |
Field Test
The publication is available in English and German:
Further Information
- PicoPV Field Tests (of GTZ EnDev)
- The SOLAR 2007-1 Lantern (Solarprojekt Freilassing e.V.)has been upgraded with new LEDs of 80 lm/W.
