Difference between revisions of "Impact Monitoring Guidelines"
From energypedia
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
| | | | ||
+ | *[[Examples Questionnaires|Examples Questionnaires]] | ||
+ | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | |
Revision as of 12:12, 12 October 2009
The focus of the EnDev 2 M&E Sytem has shifted from Outocome Monitoring (EnDev 1) to Outcome and Impact Monitoring (EnDev 2). Therefore the Monitoring Group are developing recommendations for a "proper" impact M&E System.
We recommend to:
- conduct baseline studies before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy
- use a mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions)
- a theory based approach by applying the result chain for developing the study design
- to include control groups if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study
The following table shows typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we would recommend and support.
Steps | Tasks | EnDev MG Offer | Library |
Step 1: Preperation | Terms for Consultants/ Enumerators |
|
|
Selection Consultant/ Enumerators |
|
||
Study of available documents and statistics on national development goals and policies, national sector goals and policies, BMZ goals and concept for the partner country |
|
||
Developing of Results Chains/ Indicators |
|
||
Developing of Questionnaires, interview guidelines, PRA tools (MAPP), observation criteria and other tools |
|
||
Training of Supervisors and Enumerators/ Pretesting |
|
||
Sampling/ Selection target Group |
|
||
Step 2: Implementation | Logistics | ||
Conducting Interviews | |||
Step 3: Data Analysis/ Reporting | Data entry | ||
Data analysis |
|
||
Data interpretation – in exchange with the project team (in a workshop) |
|
||
Report writing |
|