Difference between revisions of "Impact Monitoring Guidelines"

From energypedia
***** (***** | *****)
***** (***** | *****)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
*conduct baseline studies before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy  
 
*conduct baseline studies before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy  
*use a mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions)  
+
*use a [[Mixed Methods|mix]] of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions)  
 
*a [[Theory Based Approach|theory based approach]] by applying the result chain for developing the study design  
 
*a [[Theory Based Approach|theory based approach]] by applying the result chain for developing the study design  
 
*to include [[Control Groups|control groups]] if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study 
 
*to include [[Control Groups|control groups]] if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study 

Revision as of 10:35, 14 October 2009

The focus of the EnDev 2 M&E Sytem has shifted from Outcome Monitoring (EnDev 1) to Outcome and Impact Monitoring (EnDev 2). Therefore the Monitoring Group are developing recommendations for a "proper" impact M&E System.

We recommend to:

  • conduct baseline studies before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy
  • use a mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions)
  • a theory based approach by applying the result chain for developing the study design
  • to include control groups if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study 

The following table shows typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we would recommend and support.

Steps Tasks EnDev MG Offer Library
Step 1: Preperation Terms for Consultants/ Enumerators
  • Sample Terms for national / international consultants
  • Sample Terms for enumerators 
Selection Consultant/ Enumerators
  • Consultants
Study of available documents and statistics on national development goals and policies, national sector goals and policies, BMZ goals and concept for the partner country
  • Checklist on relevant development goals
Developing of Results Chains/ Indicators
  • Sample Results Chain
  • Impact Criteria and indicators
Developing of Questionnaires, interview guidelines, PRA tools (MAPP), observation criteria and other tools 
  • Questionnaires for hh (stoves), stove producers, social institutions and restaurants using ICS
  • PRA tools for focus group discussions (MAPP)
  • Interview guidelines for village authorities
  • Observation criteria for stoves in use (example lists of good cooking practices and of stove conditions) 
Training of Supervisors and Enumerators/ Pretesting
  • Training Material
  • Training Agenda
Sampling/ Selection target Group
Step 2: Implementation Logistics
Conducting Interviews
Step 3: Data Analysis/ Reporting Data entry
Data analysis
Data interpretation – in exchange with the project team (in a workshop)
  • Checklist for data interpretation
Report writing
  • Example for report summary
  • Example for ICS description (Annex)