Difference between revisions of "Impact Monitoring Guidelines"
From energypedia
***** (***** | *****) |
***** (***** | *****) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*conduct baseline studies before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy | *conduct baseline studies before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy | ||
− | *use a [[Mixed Methods| | + | *use a [[Mixed Methods|mixed methods approach]]: the logic of the comparative advantages of methods: that means the mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions) |
*a [[Theory Based Approach|theory based approach]] by applying the result chain for developing the study design | *a [[Theory Based Approach|theory based approach]] by applying the result chain for developing the study design | ||
*to include [[Control Groups|control groups]] if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study | *to include [[Control Groups|control groups]] if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study |
Revision as of 15:44, 26 October 2009
The focus of the EnDev 2 M&E Sytem has shifted from Outcome Monitoring (EnDev 1) to Outcome and Impact Monitoring (EnDev 2). Therefore the Monitoring Group are developing recommendations for a "proper" impact M&E System.
We recommend to:
- conduct baseline studies before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy
- use a mixed methods approach: the logic of the comparative advantages of methods: that means the mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions)
- a theory based approach by applying the result chain for developing the study design
- to include control groups if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study
The following table shows typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we would recommend and support.
Steps | Tasks | Materials/ Support | Library | |
Step 1: Preperation | Terms for Consultants/ Enumerators |
|
||
Selection Consultant/ Enumerators |
|
|||
Study of available documents and statistics on national development goals and policies, national sector goals and policies, BMZ goals and concept for the partner country |
|
|||
Developing of Results Chains/ Indicators |
|
|||
Developing of Questionnaires, interview guidelines, PRA tools (MAPP), observation criteria and other tools |
|
|
||
Sampling/ Selection target Group |
|
|||
Training of Supervisors and Enumerators/ Pretesting |
|
|
||
Step 2: Implementation | Logistics |
|
||
Conducting Interviews |
|
|||
Data entry | ||||
Step 3: Data Analysis/ Reporting | Data analysis |
|
|
|
Data interpretation – in exchange with the project team (in a workshop) |
|
|||
Report writing |
|