Difference between revisions of "National Approaches to Electrification – Review of Options"
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) m (→Introduction) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
*The tool is a Powerpoint in full screen slide show: [[File:National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx|center|180px|National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx|alt=National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx]] | *The tool is a Powerpoint in full screen slide show: [[File:National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx|center|180px|National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx|alt=National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx]] | ||
| + | |||
= Introduction = | = Introduction = | ||
| − | < | + | <br/> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| + | |||
= Key Messages<br/> = | = Key Messages<br/> = | ||
Revision as of 10:54, 20 June 2018
![National Approaches to Electrification – Review of Options.png]]](/images/thumb/5/52/National_Approaches_to_Electrification_%E2%80%93_Review_of_Options.png/800px-National_Approaches_to_Electrification_%E2%80%93_Review_of_Options.png) |
Content
- Introduction
- What are National Electrification Approaches?
- How to use this Review tool
- Categorization of National Electrification Approaches
- Category Dashboard and information on categories
- Example Table and Country Case Studies
- Bangladesh, Brazil, Cambodia, Costa Rica, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mali, Nepal, Peru, Philippines, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, Tunisia,Vietnam
- Bangladesh, Brazil, Cambodia, Costa Rica, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mali, Nepal, Peru, Philippines, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, Tunisia,Vietnam
Download
- The tool is a Powerpoint in full screen slide show: File:National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx
Introduction
Key Messages
- Categorization allows National Electrification Approaches (NEA) to be presented and compared systematically
- NEAs combine technologies, delivery models, regulation, financial and other interventions – most effective approaches include actions in all these areas
- There is no one ideal approach to electrification. Successful NEA elements are well alighted with each otehr and national context
- NEA should change over time as levels of electrification increase
- Major advances in electrification can be achieved in just a few years given commitment from policy makers.
Further Information
References
Authors
Authors: Mary Willcox, Dean Cooper
Acknowledgements
The Review was prepared by Mary Willcox and Dean Cooper of Practical Action Consulting working with Hadley Taylor, Silvia Cabriolu-Poddu and Christina Stuart of the EU Energy Initiative Partnership Dialogue Facility (EUEIPDF) and Michael Koeberlein and Caspar Priesemann of the Energising Development Programme (EnDev). It is based on a literature review, stakeholder consultations and development of the NEA categorization system used in the Review Tool.
A wider range of stakeholders were consulted during its preparation and we would particularly like to thank the following for their valuable contributions and insights:
- Jeff Felten, AfDB
- Marcus Wiemann and other members, ARE
- Guilherme Collares Pereira, EdP
- David Otieno Ochieng, EUEI-PDF
- Silvia Luisa Escudero Santos Ascarza, EUEI-PDF
- Nico Peterschmidt, Inensus
- John Tkacik, REEEP
- Khorommbi Bongwe, South Africa: Department of Energy
- Rashid Ali Abdallah, African Union Commission
- Nicola Bugatti, ECREEE
- Getahun Moges Kifle, Ethiopian Energy Authority
- Marion Merchan Andres, EUEI-PDF
- Tatjana Walter-Breidenstein, EUEI-PDF
- Rebecca Symington, Miland Foundation
- Marcel Reets, RVO NL
- Nico Tyabji, Sunfunder
Any feedback would be very welcome. If you have any comments or enquires please contact: Mary.Willcox@practicalaction.org.uk, hadley.taylor@euei-pdf.org, or michael.koeberlein@giz.de.
