Difference between revisions of "National Approaches to Electrification – Review of Options"
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
#What are National Electrification Approaches? | #What are National Electrification Approaches? | ||
#How to use this Review Tool | #How to use this Review Tool | ||
− | #Categorization of National Electrification | + | #Categorization of National Approaches to <span style="font-size: 13.6px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Electrification</span> |
#Category Dashboard and Information on Categories | #Category Dashboard and Information on Categories | ||
#Example Table and Country Case Studies<br/> | #Example Table and Country Case Studies<br/> | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | = What are National Electrification Approches (NAE)? = | + | = What are National Electrification Approches (NAE)?<br/> = |
== Definition<br/> == | == Definition<br/> == | ||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | = | + | = How to Use this Tool = |
− | + | == Downloading the Tool<br/> == | |
+ | <div><br/></div><ul style="list-style-image: url("images/bullet-icon.png"); font-size: 13.6px;"> | ||
+ | <li>The tool is is available to download as a Powerpoint in full screen slide show:https://energypedia.info/images/a/aa/National_Approaches_to_Electrification_-_Review_of_Options.pptx</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | = | + | = Categorization of National Approaches to Electrification = |
− | <br/> | + | Categorization makes it possible to look at NEA on a systematic, country-neutral basis to understand and compare options. |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Up to now, NEA have most frequently been categorized by: | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Technology or form of electrification eg grid, mini-grid or standalone | ||
+ | *Delivery model – generally government vs market or centralized vs decentralized | ||
+ | *Form of policy or intervention | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | These categorization systems address only a single aspect of the NEA. Different systems use inconsistent definitions and generally cover only one form of electrification (eg mini-grids, or pico-solar). | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | A new categorization system which encompasses all forms and aspects of NEA is needed. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Proposed Categorization Framework: == | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:NAE Proposed Categorisation Framework.PNG|center|800pxpx|NAE Proposed Categorisation Framework]]<br/> | ||
− | < | + | {| border="0.5" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" style="width:100%;" |
+ | |+ Definitions for Categorization Framework | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | style="background-color: rgb(0, 101, 0); width: 103px; border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" | <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color:#FFFFFF;">Technology</span></p> | ||
+ | | style="width: 105px; background-color: rgb(52, 102, 152); border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" | <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color:#FFFFFF;">Delivery Model</span></p> | ||
+ | | style="width: 101px; background-color: rgb(153, 103, 0); border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" | <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color:#FFFFFF;">Legual Basis</span></p> | ||
+ | | style="width: 150px; background-color: rgb(204, 49, 0); border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: center;" | | ||
+ | <span style="color:#FFFFFF;">Price/Tariff Regulation</span> | ||
− | < | + | | style="width: 90px; background-color: rgb(32, 56, 99); border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" | <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color:#FFFFFF;">Finance</span></p> |
+ | | style="width: 179px; background-color: rgb(0, 100, 100); border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" | | ||
+ | <span style="color:#FFFFFF;">Non-Financial Interventions</span> | ||
− | = < | + | |- |
+ | | style="width: 103px;" | <p style="text-align: center;">The physical means by which electricity is generated, transmitted and distributed</p> | ||
+ | | style="width: 105px;" | <p style="text-align: center;">The (market) chain of organisations through which electricity is delivered to users</p> | ||
+ | | style="width: 101px;" | <p style="text-align: center;">The basis on which organisations are legally entitled to sell electricity</p> | ||
+ | | style="width: 150px;" | <p style="text-align: center;">The basis on which the price of electricity (or of standalone systems) are regulated </p> | ||
+ | | style="width: 90px;" | <p style="text-align: center;">Forms of funding used to finance electricity access</p> | ||
+ | | style="width: 179px;" | <p style="text-align: center;">Actions taken to support or facilitate electricity access</p> | ||
+ | |} | ||
= Further Information<br/> = | = Further Information<br/> = | ||
Line 131: | Line 170: | ||
<br/>[[File:NAE Overview Page.png|center|800px|NAE Overview Page|alt=NAE Overview Page]]<br/> | <br/>[[File:NAE Overview Page.png|center|800px|NAE Overview Page|alt=NAE Overview Page]]<br/> | ||
+ | [[Category:Rural_Electrification]] | ||
+ | [[Category:NAE]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Electricity]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Tools]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Policies_and_Regulations]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Bangladesh]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Brazil]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Cambodia]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Costa_Rica]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Ethiopia]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Kenya]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Peru]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Vietnam]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Tunisia]] | ||
+ | [[Category:South_Africa]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Tanzania]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Philippines]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Rwanda]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Mali]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Nepal]] | ||
[[Category:SPIS_Toolbox]] | [[Category:SPIS_Toolbox]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 13:22, 20 June 2018
Category Dashboard:
Key Messages
- Categorization allows National Electrification Approaches to be presented and compared systematically
- NEAs combine technologies, delivery models, regulation, financial and other interventions – most effective approaches include actions in all these areas
- There is no one ideal approach to electrification. Successful NEA elements are well alighted with each otehr and national context
- NEA should change over time as levels of electrification increase
- Major advances in electrification can be achieved in just a few years given commitment from policy makers.
Content of the NAE Tool
- Introduction
- What are National Electrification Approaches?
- How to use this Review Tool
- Categorization of National Approaches to Electrification
- Category Dashboard and Information on Categories
- Example Table and Country Case Studies
- Bangladesh
- Brazil
- Cambodia
- Costa Rica
- Ethiopia
- Kenya
- Mali
- Nepal
- Peru
- Philippines
- Rwanda
- South Africa
- Tanzania
- Tunisia,Vietnam
- Bangladesh
What are National Electrification Approches (NAE)?
Definition
"An approach adopted by national authorities to increase electricity access in a country."
- NEA are based on and driven by government policies
- An initiative by a business or NGO alone will not qualify as an NEA
- Most NEA are based on explicit government policies and interventions, but a policy of non-intervention (eg a decision not to regulate) may also be part of an NEA
- NEA may consist of a multi-faceted programme combining policies, financing and interventions or just of a single policy or intervention
Boundaries
The purpose of this Option Review Tool is to support analysis of NEA and assist in identifying options and so improving NEA design.
A country may have more than one NEA and a critical first step is to set boundaries around the NEA:
- These need to be wide enough to include policies and interventions which interact
- But they need to be narrow enough to support meaningful analysis (impossible if every category of NEA activity is included)
There are no absolute rules, but some suggestions:
- Set time boundaries – Approaches change over time
- Consider looking at one technology or one type of delivery model at a time
- Are different approaches most relevant in different areas of the country (eg urban/rural or regions) or for different user groups (households, SMEs etc)?
- Do not split single, coherent, programmes designed to include multiple categories
- Set boundaries iteratively – aim to include 1(at most 2) types of technology, delivery model, legal basis and form of tariff regulation - and revise boundaries to optimise the balance between encompassing relevant aspects and ease of analysis.
How to Use this Tool
Downloading the Tool
- The tool is is available to download as a Powerpoint in full screen slide show:https://energypedia.info/images/a/aa/National_Approaches_to_Electrification_-_Review_of_Options.pptx
Categorization of National Approaches to Electrification
Categorization makes it possible to look at NEA on a systematic, country-neutral basis to understand and compare options.
Up to now, NEA have most frequently been categorized by:
- Technology or form of electrification eg grid, mini-grid or standalone
- Delivery model – generally government vs market or centralized vs decentralized
- Form of policy or intervention
These categorization systems address only a single aspect of the NEA. Different systems use inconsistent definitions and generally cover only one form of electrification (eg mini-grids, or pico-solar).
A new categorization system which encompasses all forms and aspects of NEA is needed.
Proposed Categorization Framework:
Technology |
Delivery Model |
Legual Basis |
Price/Tariff Regulation |
Finance |
Non-Financial Interventions |
The physical means by which electricity is generated, transmitted and distributed |
The (market) chain of organisations through which electricity is delivered to users |
The basis on which organisations are legally entitled to sell electricity |
The basis on which the price of electricity (or of standalone systems) are regulated |
Forms of funding used to finance electricity access |
Actions taken to support or facilitate electricity access |
Further Information
References
Authors
Authors: Mary Willcox, Dean Cooper
Acknowledgements
The Review was prepared by Mary Willcox and Dean Cooper of Practical Action Consulting working with Hadley Taylor, Silvia Cabriolu-Poddu and Christina Stuart of the EU Energy Initiative Partnership Dialogue Facility (EUEIPDF) and Michael Koeberlein and Caspar Priesemann of the Energising Development Programme (EnDev). It is based on a literature review, stakeholder consultations and development of the NEA categorization system used in the Review Tool.
A wider range of stakeholders were consulted during its preparation and we would particularly like to thank the following for their valuable contributions and insights:
- Jeff Felten, AfDB
- Marcus Wiemann and other members, ARE
- Guilherme Collares Pereira, EdP
- David Otieno Ochieng, EUEI-PDF
- Silvia Luisa Escudero Santos Ascarza, EUEI-PDF
- Nico Peterschmidt, Inensus
- John Tkacik, REEEP
- Khorommbi Bongwe, South Africa: Department of Energy
- Rashid Ali Abdallah, African Union Commission
- Nicola Bugatti, ECREEE
- Getahun Moges Kifle, Ethiopian Energy Authority
- Marion Merchan Andres, EUEI-PDF
- Tatjana Walter-Breidenstein, EUEI-PDF
- Rebecca Symington, Miland Foundation
- Marcel Reets, RVO NL
- Nico Tyabji, Sunfunder
Any feedback would be very welcome. If you have any comments or enquires please contact: Mary.Willcox@practicalaction.org.uk, hadley.taylor@euei-pdf.org, or michael.koeberlein@giz.de.