Difference between revisions of "Impact Monitoring Guidelines"

From energypedia
***** (***** | *****)
m
***** (***** | *****)
Line 1: Line 1:
  
 
{{Revision|(Red highlighted links don't have an existance web page. Please provide the link address).}}  
 
{{Revision|(Red highlighted links don't have an existance web page. Please provide the link address).}}  
 +
  
 
= Introduction =
 
= Introduction =
  
−
The Impacts Monitoring Group of [[Energising Development (EnDev)|Energising Development has]] developed recommendations for a "proper" impact assessments.
+
The Impacts Monitoring Group of [[Energising Development (EnDev)|Energising Development has]] developed recommendations for a "proper" impact assessments.
  
 
We recommend to:
 
We recommend to:
−
page
+
 
−
*use the recommended [[Indicator rural electrification and stoves|'''list of indicators''']]
+
<br/>
−
*conduct '''baseline studies '''before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs&nbsp;got access to a form of modern energy
+
*use the recommended [[Indicator rural electrification and stoves|list of indicators]]
−
*use a [[Theory Based Approach|'''theory based approach''']] by applying the result chain for developing the study design
+
*conduct '''baseline studies '''before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy
−
*use&nbsp;a [[Mixed Methods|'''mixed methods approach''']]:&nbsp;the logic of the comparative advantages of [[Methoden|methods]]: that means&nbsp;the mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured&nbsp;interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions)
+
*use a [[Theory Based Approach|theory based approach]] by applying the result chain for developing the study design
−
*include [[Control Groups|'''control groups''']] if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study&nbsp;
+
*use a [[Mixed Methods|mixed methods approach]]: the logic of the comparative advantages of [[Methoden|methods]]: that means the mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions)
−
*consider [[Research Ethics|'''research ethics''']]
+
*include [[Control Groups|control groups]] if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study
 +
*consider [[Research Ethics|research ethics]]
  
 
The following tables show typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we would recommend and support.
 
The following tables show typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we would recommend and support.

Revision as of 12:03, 17 April 2013

Maintenance: Revision needed
 This article needs to be revised. Please rewrite the article according to the specifications below. Only remove this maintenance box after a thorough revision of this article. See the discussion page for more details or start a discussion there.

In particular the following aspects and passages have been specified to be in need for a revision:
(Red highlighted links don't have an existance web page. Please provide the link address).


Introduction

The Impacts Monitoring Group of Energising Development has developed recommendations for a "proper" impact assessments.

We recommend to:


  • use the recommended list of indicators
  • conduct baseline studies before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy
  • use a theory based approach by applying the result chain for developing the study design
  • use a mixed methods approach: the logic of the comparative advantages of methods: that means the mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions)
  • include control groups if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study
  • consider research ethics

The following tables show typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we would recommend and support.


Preparation

Tasks Materials/ Support Library
Terms for Consultants/ Enumerators
  • Sample Terms for national / international consultants
  • Sample Terms for enumerators 
 ToR Consultants:
Selection Consultant/ Enumerators
  • Consultants
  
Study of available documents and statistics on national development goals and policies, national sector goals and policies, BMZ goals and concept for the partner country
  • Checklist on relevant development goals
Developing of Results Chains/ Indicators (consider

undesired side effects being positive or negative)  

Rural Electrifciation:

Cooking:

Developing of Questionnaires, interview guidelines, PRA tools (MAPP), observation criteria and other tools (catalogue of methods)

Example Questionnaires

PRA tools, Interview Guidelines, Observation criteria etc.

(Impact Studies Material)

Sampling/ Selection target Group
Training of Supervisors and Enumerators/ Pretesting
  • Training Material
  • Training Agenda

 


Implementation

Task Materials/ Support Library
Logistics Checklist on how to implement HH Interviews


 

Conducting Interviews  
Data entry    

 


Data Analysis/ Reporting

Task Materials/ Support Library
Data analysis
Data interpretation – in exchange with the project team (in a workshop)
  • Checklist for data interpretation
  
Report writing (+ summary writing)
  • Example for report summary
  • Example for ICS description (Annex)

Handover of raw data




 

Retrieved from "https://energypedia.info/index.php?title=Impact_Monitoring_Guidelines&oldid=57961"