Difference between revisions of "National Approaches to Electrification – Review of Options"
From energypedia
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:NAE Overview Page.png|center|800px|NAE Overview Page|alt=NAE Overview Page]] | [[File:NAE Overview Page.png|center|800px|NAE Overview Page|alt=NAE Overview Page]] | ||
| − | + | <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color:#003399;">'''<u>Category Dashboard:</u>'''</span></p> | |
{{NAE Banner}} | {{NAE Banner}} | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| − | = Content<br/> = | + | = Key Messages<br/> = |
| + | |||
| + | *<span style="color:#FF8C00;">'''Categorization allows National Electrification Approaches to be presented and compared systematically'''</span><br/> | ||
| + | *<span style="color:#FF8C00;">'''NEAs combine technologies, delivery models, regulation, financial and other interventions – most effective approaches include actions in all these areas'''</span> | ||
| + | *<span style="color:#FF8C00;">'''There is no one ideal approach to electrification. Successful NEA elements are well alighted with each otehr and national context'''</span> | ||
| + | *<span style="color:#FF8C00;">'''NEA should change over time as levels of electrification increase'''</span><br/> | ||
| + | *<span style="color:#FF8C00;">'''Major advances in electrification can be achieved in just a few years given commitment from policy makers.'''</span> | ||
| + | |||
| + | = Content of the NAE Tool<br/> = | ||
#Introduction<br/> | #Introduction<br/> | ||
#What are National Electrification Approaches? | #What are National Electrification Approaches? | ||
| − | #How to use this Review | + | #How to use this Review Tool |
#Categorization of National Electrification Approaches | #Categorization of National Electrification Approaches | ||
| − | #Category Dashboard and | + | #Category Dashboard and Information on Categories |
#Example Table and Country Case Studies<br/> | #Example Table and Country Case Studies<br/> | ||
| − | #*Bangladesh | + | #*Bangladesh<br/> |
| + | #*Brazil<br/> | ||
| + | #*Cambodia<br/> | ||
| + | #*Costa Rica<br/> | ||
| + | #*Ethiopia<br/> | ||
| + | #*Kenya<br/> | ||
| + | #*Mali<br/> | ||
| + | #*Nepal<br/> | ||
| + | #*Peru<br/> | ||
| + | #*Philippines<br/> | ||
| + | #*Rwanda<br/> | ||
| + | #*South Africa<br/> | ||
| + | #*Tanzania<br/> | ||
| + | #*Tunisia,Vietnam<br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | = What are National Electrification Approches (NAE)? = | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Definition<br/> == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <span style="color:#006400;"></span>''"An approach adopted by national authorities to increase electricity access in a country."'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | *NEA are based on and driven by government policies<br/> | ||
| + | *An initiative by a business or NGO alone will not qualify as an NEA<br/> | ||
| + | *Most NEA are based on explicit government policies and interventions, but a policy of non-intervention (eg a decision not to regulate) may also be part of an NEA<br/> | ||
| + | *NEA may consist of a multi-faceted programme combining policies, financing and interventions or just of a single policy or intervention | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
| − | = | + | == Boundaries == |
| − | + | The purpose of this Option Review Tool is to support analysis of NEA and assist in identifying options and so improving NEA design. | |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| − | + | <u>A country may have more than one NEA and a critical first step is to set boundaries around the NEA</u>: | |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | *These need to be wide enough to include policies and interventions which interact | ||
| + | *<u>But</u> they need to be narrow enough to support meaningful analysis (impossible if every category of NEA activity is included) | ||
| + | <div><br/></div> | ||
| + | There are no absolute rules, but some suggestions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Set time boundaries – Approaches change over time | ||
| + | *Consider looking at one technology <u>or</u> one type of delivery model at a time | ||
| + | *Are different approaches most relevant in different areas of the country (eg urban/rural or regions) or for different user groups (households, SMEs etc)? | ||
| + | *Do not split single, coherent, programmes designed to include multiple categories | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Set boundaries iteratively – aim to include 1(at most 2) types of technology, delivery model, legal basis and form of tariff regulation - and revise boundaries to optimise the balance between encompassing relevant aspects and ease of analysis. | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | = Downloading the Tool<br/> = | ||
| + | |||
| + | *The tool is is available to download as a Powerpoint in full screen slide show: [[File:National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx|center|180px|National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx|alt=National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx]] | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| − | = | + | = Introduction = |
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
| − | + | <br/> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | = <br/> = | ||
= Further Information<br/> = | = Further Information<br/> = | ||
| Line 79: | Line 131: | ||
<br/>[[File:NAE Overview Page.png|center|800px|NAE Overview Page|alt=NAE Overview Page]]<br/> | <br/>[[File:NAE Overview Page.png|center|800px|NAE Overview Page|alt=NAE Overview Page]]<br/> | ||
| + | [[Category:SPIS_Toolbox]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Nepal]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Mali]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Rwanda]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Philippines]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Tanzania]] | ||
| + | [[Category:South_Africa]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Tunisia]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Vietnam]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Peru]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Kenya]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Ethiopia]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Costa_Rica]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Cambodia]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Brazil]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Bangladesh]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Policies_and_Regulations]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Tools]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Electricity]] | ||
| + | [[Category:NAE]] | ||
[[Category:Rural_Electrification]] | [[Category:Rural_Electrification]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 11:25, 20 June 2018
Category Dashboard:
![National Approaches to Electrification – Review of Options.png]]](/images/thumb/5/52/National_Approaches_to_Electrification_%E2%80%93_Review_of_Options.png/800px-National_Approaches_to_Electrification_%E2%80%93_Review_of_Options.png) |
Key Messages
- Categorization allows National Electrification Approaches to be presented and compared systematically
- NEAs combine technologies, delivery models, regulation, financial and other interventions – most effective approaches include actions in all these areas
- There is no one ideal approach to electrification. Successful NEA elements are well alighted with each otehr and national context
- NEA should change over time as levels of electrification increase
- Major advances in electrification can be achieved in just a few years given commitment from policy makers.
Content of the NAE Tool
- Introduction
- What are National Electrification Approaches?
- How to use this Review Tool
- Categorization of National Electrification Approaches
- Category Dashboard and Information on Categories
- Example Table and Country Case Studies
- Bangladesh
- Brazil
- Cambodia
- Costa Rica
- Ethiopia
- Kenya
- Mali
- Nepal
- Peru
- Philippines
- Rwanda
- South Africa
- Tanzania
- Tunisia,Vietnam
- Bangladesh
What are National Electrification Approches (NAE)?
Definition
"An approach adopted by national authorities to increase electricity access in a country."
- NEA are based on and driven by government policies
- An initiative by a business or NGO alone will not qualify as an NEA
- Most NEA are based on explicit government policies and interventions, but a policy of non-intervention (eg a decision not to regulate) may also be part of an NEA
- NEA may consist of a multi-faceted programme combining policies, financing and interventions or just of a single policy or intervention
Boundaries
The purpose of this Option Review Tool is to support analysis of NEA and assist in identifying options and so improving NEA design.
A country may have more than one NEA and a critical first step is to set boundaries around the NEA:
- These need to be wide enough to include policies and interventions which interact
- But they need to be narrow enough to support meaningful analysis (impossible if every category of NEA activity is included)
There are no absolute rules, but some suggestions:
- Set time boundaries – Approaches change over time
- Consider looking at one technology or one type of delivery model at a time
- Are different approaches most relevant in different areas of the country (eg urban/rural or regions) or for different user groups (households, SMEs etc)?
- Do not split single, coherent, programmes designed to include multiple categories
- Set boundaries iteratively – aim to include 1(at most 2) types of technology, delivery model, legal basis and form of tariff regulation - and revise boundaries to optimise the balance between encompassing relevant aspects and ease of analysis.
Downloading the Tool
- The tool is is available to download as a Powerpoint in full screen slide show: File:National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx
Introduction
Further Information
References
Authors
Authors: Mary Willcox, Dean Cooper
Acknowledgements
The Review was prepared by Mary Willcox and Dean Cooper of Practical Action Consulting working with Hadley Taylor, Silvia Cabriolu-Poddu and Christina Stuart of the EU Energy Initiative Partnership Dialogue Facility (EUEIPDF) and Michael Koeberlein and Caspar Priesemann of the Energising Development Programme (EnDev). It is based on a literature review, stakeholder consultations and development of the NEA categorization system used in the Review Tool.
A wider range of stakeholders were consulted during its preparation and we would particularly like to thank the following for their valuable contributions and insights:
- Jeff Felten, AfDB
- Marcus Wiemann and other members, ARE
- Guilherme Collares Pereira, EdP
- David Otieno Ochieng, EUEI-PDF
- Silvia Luisa Escudero Santos Ascarza, EUEI-PDF
- Nico Peterschmidt, Inensus
- John Tkacik, REEEP
- Khorommbi Bongwe, South Africa: Department of Energy
- Rashid Ali Abdallah, African Union Commission
- Nicola Bugatti, ECREEE
- Getahun Moges Kifle, Ethiopian Energy Authority
- Marion Merchan Andres, EUEI-PDF
- Tatjana Walter-Breidenstein, EUEI-PDF
- Rebecca Symington, Miland Foundation
- Marcel Reets, RVO NL
- Nico Tyabji, Sunfunder
Any feedback would be very welcome. If you have any comments or enquires please contact: Mary.Willcox@practicalaction.org.uk, hadley.taylor@euei-pdf.org, or michael.koeberlein@giz.de.
