Difference between revisions of "Germany Energy Situation"
***** (***** | *****) |
***** (***** | *****) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {| width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" align="left" class="FCK__ShowTableBorders" | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | = Overview<br> = | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| width="400" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="1" style="float: right;" | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | align="center" colspan="4" | '''Federal Republic of Germany''' | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | <br> | ||
+ | | <br> | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | Capital<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | | | ||
+ | Berlin ([http://toolserver.org/~geohack/geohack.php?pagename=Germany¶ms=52_31_N_13_23_E_type:country 52° 31′ 0″ N, 13° 23′ 0″ E]) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | Official language(s)<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | | | ||
+ | German<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | Government<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | | | ||
+ | Federal Parliamentary Republic<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | President<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | | | ||
+ | Christian Wulff<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | Prime Minister<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | | | ||
+ | Angela Merkel<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | Total area<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | | | ||
+ | 357,021 km<sup>2</sup><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | Population<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | | | ||
+ | 81,757,600 (2010 estimate) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | GDP (nominal)<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | | | ||
+ | $3.305 trillion (2010 estimate)<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | GDP Per capita <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | | | ||
+ | $40,511 (2010 estimate)<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | Currency<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | | | ||
+ | Euro (€-EUR)<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | Time zone<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | | | ||
+ | CET (UTC+1)<br> - Summer (DST): CEST (UTC+2)<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | Calling code<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | | | ||
+ | +49<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| width="350" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" align="left" | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | __TOC__ | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
When looking at the energy/electricity situation of developing countries around the world it is always helpful to have in mind a reference point for a better understanding, analysis and judgement of the respective challenges in the case at hand. The country situation Germany should help to provide this critical positioning. | When looking at the energy/electricity situation of developing countries around the world it is always helpful to have in mind a reference point for a better understanding, analysis and judgement of the respective challenges in the case at hand. The country situation Germany should help to provide this critical positioning. | ||
This article first briefly discusses the present energy situation in Germany in general terms, before adressing in more detail the electricity sector and recent political endeavours that link climate protection and long-term sustainable energy supply. | This article first briefly discusses the present energy situation in Germany in general terms, before adressing in more detail the electricity sector and recent political endeavours that link climate protection and long-term sustainable energy supply. | ||
− | <br> | + | <br> |
= Energy situation = | = Energy situation = | ||
Line 17: | Line 121: | ||
The following diagram offers an overview of the share of different energy carriers in primary energy consumption: | The following diagram offers an overview of the share of different energy carriers in primary energy consumption: | ||
− | <br> | + | <br> |
[[Image:Primary energy consumption.neu.JPG]] | [[Image:Primary energy consumption.neu.JPG]] | ||
Line 23: | Line 127: | ||
<br>The following energy flow diagram offers insight into the shares of different sectors in total primary energy consumption in 2009. Very prominently, it visualizes the high degree of dependence on energy imports (~70%). Furthermore, it shows that approximately 25% of primary energy consumption are lost in conversion processes. Out of the 13398 PJ of primary energy consumption only 8714 PJ are available for final energy consumption. Final energy consumption is quite evenly distributed among the three sectors industry, transport and households. Only trade and services represent a minor share. | <br>The following energy flow diagram offers insight into the shares of different sectors in total primary energy consumption in 2009. Very prominently, it visualizes the high degree of dependence on energy imports (~70%). Furthermore, it shows that approximately 25% of primary energy consumption are lost in conversion processes. Out of the 13398 PJ of primary energy consumption only 8714 PJ are available for final energy consumption. Final energy consumption is quite evenly distributed among the three sectors industry, transport and households. Only trade and services represent a minor share. | ||
− | <br> | + | <br> |
[[Image:Energy Flow.JPG|center|600x573px|Energy Flow.JPG]] | [[Image:Energy Flow.JPG|center|600x573px|Energy Flow.JPG]] | ||
Line 39: | Line 143: | ||
Electricity generation in Germany is still based to a very large extent on coal. The generation mix in 2009 consisted of 28% from nuclear power plants, 26% from lignite, 18% from coal, 11% from gas and about 16% from renewable energies. The following diagram provides a brief overview of the situation. It should be noted that the share of renewable energies in electricity generation is considerably greater than in primary energy consumption. This can largely be attributed to the incentives created by the German Renewable Energy Law of 2000. | Electricity generation in Germany is still based to a very large extent on coal. The generation mix in 2009 consisted of 28% from nuclear power plants, 26% from lignite, 18% from coal, 11% from gas and about 16% from renewable energies. The following diagram provides a brief overview of the situation. It should be noted that the share of renewable energies in electricity generation is considerably greater than in primary energy consumption. This can largely be attributed to the incentives created by the German Renewable Energy Law of 2000. | ||
− | <br> | + | <br> |
[[Image:Electricity generation.neu.JPG]] | [[Image:Electricity generation.neu.JPG]] | ||
Line 71: | Line 175: | ||
The concept covers in detail the following topics: renewable energies (A), energy efficiency (B), nuclear and fossil power plants (C), net infrastructure (D), energetic building remediation (E), mobility (F), energy research (G), energy supply in a wider context (H), acceptance and transparency (I). | The concept covers in detail the following topics: renewable energies (A), energy efficiency (B), nuclear and fossil power plants (C), net infrastructure (D), energetic building remediation (E), mobility (F), energy research (G), energy supply in a wider context (H), acceptance and transparency (I). | ||
− | * | + | *<br> |
− | |||
+ | ==== <u>''Main issues''</u> ==== | ||
Renewable energies (A): | Renewable energies (A): | ||
Line 135: | Line 239: | ||
The concept takes account of the importance to enlarge the future consesus on energy politics through better information of the citizens. | The concept takes account of the importance to enlarge the future consesus on energy politics through better information of the citizens. | ||
− | * | + | *<br> |
− | |||
+ | ==== <u>''Criticism''</u> ==== | ||
Probably the most critical remarks in the current public debate about the energy concept 2050 concern the future use of nuclear power plants in Germany, i. e. the planned average runtime extension of 12 years. Independent research institutions, like the Wuppertal Institute for example, criticize the government’s plans of placing too much emphasis on the question of runtime extensions.<ref>cf. Wuppertal Institut (2010): Thesen des Wuppertal Instituts zum geplanten Energiekonzept der Bundesregierung, pp. 5-8.</ref> This way, the institute argues, possible scenarios for a future sustainable energy supply are narrowed down to a single scenario that postulates CO2 emission reductions of up to 85% until 2050 (to the baseline of 1990) are not achievable without the extension of nuclear power plants‘ runtimes. | Probably the most critical remarks in the current public debate about the energy concept 2050 concern the future use of nuclear power plants in Germany, i. e. the planned average runtime extension of 12 years. Independent research institutions, like the Wuppertal Institute for example, criticize the government’s plans of placing too much emphasis on the question of runtime extensions.<ref>cf. Wuppertal Institut (2010): Thesen des Wuppertal Instituts zum geplanten Energiekonzept der Bundesregierung, pp. 5-8.</ref> This way, the institute argues, possible scenarios for a future sustainable energy supply are narrowed down to a single scenario that postulates CO2 emission reductions of up to 85% until 2050 (to the baseline of 1990) are not achievable without the extension of nuclear power plants‘ runtimes. | ||
Line 149: | Line 253: | ||
Although the German Advisory Council on the Environment, in principle, appreciates the Government’s push for a comprehensive energy concept, the experts claim that the plans of runtime extensions contradict the overall goal of achieving a reliable, economical and ecological future energy supply. Thus, the energy concept 2050 does not represent a coherent concept. Against this background, the harsh criticism found in several newspapers is much more plausible. | Although the German Advisory Council on the Environment, in principle, appreciates the Government’s push for a comprehensive energy concept, the experts claim that the plans of runtime extensions contradict the overall goal of achieving a reliable, economical and ecological future energy supply. Thus, the energy concept 2050 does not represent a coherent concept. Against this background, the harsh criticism found in several newspapers is much more plausible. | ||
− | <br><br> | + | <br><br> |
= Institutional set up in the electricity sector = | = Institutional set up in the electricity sector = | ||
Line 155: | Line 259: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
− | <br>'''<references />''' | + | <br>'''<references />''' |
+ | |||
+ | |} | ||
[[Category:Country_Situation]] [[Category:Germany]] | [[Category:Country_Situation]] [[Category:Germany]] |
Revision as of 15:42, 22 March 2011
Overview
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
When looking at the energy/electricity situation of developing countries around the world it is always helpful to have in mind a reference point for a better understanding, analysis and judgement of the respective challenges in the case at hand. The country situation Germany should help to provide this critical positioning. This article first briefly discusses the present energy situation in Germany in general terms, before adressing in more detail the electricity sector and recent political endeavours that link climate protection and long-term sustainable energy supply.
Energy situationPrimary energy consumptionPrimary energy denotes the state of energy before any conversion or transformation process towards a more valuable energy form has taken place (e. g. solar energy, wind energy, fossil fuels, hydro power, nuclear fuels, biomass etc.). Primary energy consumption relates to the entire amount of primary energy used by an economy in a certain time period (usually a year). In Germany, primary energy consumption in 2009 amounted to 13398 PJ (= 3720 TWh). (As a yard stick: this is about 2-3 times the value of countries like Saudi-Arabia, Mexico, South Africa, Nigeria or Thailand; or about half the amount of primary energy consumption of the entire African continent.)[1] Although there has been a sharp decline in petroleum product consumption since 1995 (-14,4%), it still remains the most important primary energy carrier representing about a third of total primary energy consumption. Similarily, coal consumption has been decreasing during the last 10-15 years, but remains an important primary energy carrier. A substitution process in the direction of an increasing gas consumption has accompanied the decrease in consumption of the beforementioned energy sources. Germany is a net importer of primary energy with an increase of imports from 57% in 1990 to 70% in 2008.[2] This situation underlines the high degree of energy dependence the German state faces. The rising import quotas can largely be attributed to a rising demand of gas and substitution processes of German coal through coal from international markets. The following diagram offers an overview of the share of different energy carriers in primary energy consumption:
Electricity situationNeedless to say, in comparison to developing and even emerging countries the German electricity sector is very proficient and works reliably. Power outage rates rank among the lowest in the world. Power outages affecting German customers totaled only 23 minutes on average in 2004. Therefore, Germany has the most secure power supply system in Europe. SupplyCurrently, the installed capacity of German power plants lies in the range of 143,3 GW electrical power. This means if capacity factors were assumed to be 100% (i. e. all power plants are in use throughout the whole year) the maximum amount of electricity generation would be 1255.3 TWh/year (143,3 GW x 8760h). Clearly, this is unrealistic due to high variable costs of power plants that are specifically designed to serve intermediate and peak loads only. Additionally, power plants depending on renewable energies like wind or solar radiation cannot decide when to generate. In reality, German electricity generation amounted to 597 billions kWh (= 597 TWh) in 2009 which lies in the range of emerging countries like Brazil or India.[3] This shows that the true value of the aggregated average capacity factor lies around 50%. Whereas nuclear, lignite and hydro power plants virtually run all the time to supply the base load, other electricity plants (such as coal and gas) only serve intermediate load. Peak load is mainly provided for by pumped-storage power plants and oil-fired power plants. To produce the abovementioned amount of electricity, fuels with an energy content of 5227 PJ were used in German power plants (~39% of primary energy consumption). Electricity generation in Germany is still based to a very large extent on coal. The generation mix in 2009 consisted of 28% from nuclear power plants, 26% from lignite, 18% from coal, 11% from gas and about 16% from renewable energies. The following diagram provides a brief overview of the situation. It should be noted that the share of renewable energies in electricity generation is considerably greater than in primary energy consumption. This can largely be attributed to the incentives created by the German Renewable Energy Law of 2000.
|