Difference between revisions of "Agro Industrial Biogas in Kenya - DBFZ Study"

From energypedia
***** (***** | *****)
m
***** (***** | *****)
m
Line 2: Line 2:
 
= Overview =
 
= Overview =
  
The DBFZ study on “Agro industrial Biogas in Kenya” examines the theoretical potential of 13 groups of biomass from agro-industrial businesses in Kenya to municipal waste in Nairobi and comes to the conclusion:
+
The [https://www.dbfz.de/web/en/the-dbfz.html Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (DBFZ)] [http://www.giz.de/fachexpertise/downloads/gtz2010-en-biogas-assessment-kenya.pdf study on “Agro industrial Biogas in Kenya”] examines the theoretical potential of 13 groups of biomass from agro-industrial businesses in [[Kenya_Energy_Situation|Kenya]] to municipal waste in Nairobi.
  
The potential electric capacity of generated biogas is high. Biogas from all examined subsectors could cover up to 16% of the total Kenyan electricity production as of 2007/08.
 
  
Municipal solid waste, sisal and coffee production are the most promising sectors with the biggest potentials. However, specific electricity production costs for small plants (50kWel) range between 0.11 and 0.29 US$/kWh. Hence a basic feed-in tariff for the small plants of about 0.20 US$/kWh was proposed. But the implementation of such a prohibitive high tariff does not seem to be realistic. Probably only bigger plants with a profitability at a lower tariff of about 0,15 US$ are going to get a chance.
+
 
 +
= Conclusion of Study =
 +
 
 +
The potential electric capacity of generated biogas is high. Biogas from all examined subsectors could cover up to 16% of the total Kenyan electricity production as of 2007/08.<ref name="Agro Industrial Biogas in Kenya - DBFZ Study: http://www.giz.de/fachexpertise/downloads/gtz2010-en-biogas-assessment-kenya.pdf">Agro Industrial Biogas in Kenya - DBFZ Study: http://www.giz.de/fachexpertise/downloads/gtz2010-en-biogas-assessment-kenya.pdf</ref>
 +
 
 +
Municipal solid waste, sisal and coffee production are the most promising sectors with the biggest potentials. However, specific electricity production costs for small plants (50kWel) range between 0.11 and 0.29 US$/kWh. Hence a basic [[Feed-in_Tariffs_(FIT)|feed-in tariff]] for the small plants of about 0.20 US$/kWh was proposed. But the implementation of such a prohibitive high tariff does not seem to be realistic. Probably only bigger plants with a profitability at a lower tariff of about 0,15 US$ are going to get a chance.<ref name="Agro Industrial Biogas in Kenya - DBFZ Study: http://www.giz.de/fachexpertise/downloads/gtz2010-en-biogas-assessment-kenya.pdf">Agro Industrial Biogas in Kenya - DBFZ Study: http://www.giz.de/fachexpertise/downloads/gtz2010-en-biogas-assessment-kenya.pdf</ref>
  
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
 +
 +
= Download =
 +
 +
*[https://energypedia.info/Agro-Industrial Biogas in Kenya Agro-Industrial Biogas in Kenya]<br/>
 +
 +
  
 
= Further Information =
 
= Further Information =
  
*[[Agro-Industrial_Biogas_in_Kenya|Agro-Industrial Biogas in Kenya]]
+
*[[Portal:Biogas|Biogas Portal on energypedia]]
 +
*[[Kenya_Energy_Situation|Kenya Energy Situation]]
 +
 
 +
 
  
 
= References =
 
= References =
Line 18: Line 31:
 
<references /><br/>
 
<references /><br/>
  
 +
[[Category:Biogas]]
 
[[Category:Kenya]]
 
[[Category:Kenya]]
[[Category:Biogas]]
 

Revision as of 10:23, 13 October 2014

Overview

The Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (DBFZ) study on “Agro industrial Biogas in Kenya” examines the theoretical potential of 13 groups of biomass from agro-industrial businesses in Kenya to municipal waste in Nairobi.


Conclusion of Study

The potential electric capacity of generated biogas is high. Biogas from all examined subsectors could cover up to 16% of the total Kenyan electricity production as of 2007/08.[1]

Municipal solid waste, sisal and coffee production are the most promising sectors with the biggest potentials. However, specific electricity production costs for small plants (50kWel) range between 0.11 and 0.29 US$/kWh. Hence a basic feed-in tariff for the small plants of about 0.20 US$/kWh was proposed. But the implementation of such a prohibitive high tariff does not seem to be realistic. Probably only bigger plants with a profitability at a lower tariff of about 0,15 US$ are going to get a chance.[1]


Download


Further Information


References