Financial Instruments & Support for Renewable Energy
► Back to Financing & Funding Portal
Overview
Finance is essential for renewable energy technology (RET) projects in two ways[1]:
- Without funds projects would not materialize, and
- With inadequate financing structure and conditions the disadvantage in competitiveness of RET would even increase, as the costs of electric power utilizing renewable energy technologies are highly sensitive to financing terms.
Financial Instruments
There are various types of financing instruments that exist to support the scaling up of renewable energy technologies (RETs). The choice and availability of instruments largely depends on if the project is being undertaken in a developed or developing country, and also on the stage of development of the technologies or projects in question. These can be broadly grouped into those that can be used in addressing financing barriers; those used to address the risks of RET investments; and those that address both simultaneously.[2]
These financial instruments can be distinguished by the level of risk assumed by the the entity funding the instrument concerned, and also by the level of leverage involved. The figure below illustrates this. The financial instruments in the figure are organised on the horizontal axis by their primary focus: whether to address underdeveloped financial markets, the risks and costs of RETs or both. The vertical axis organises the instruments by the level of risk and leverage associated with their use[2].
Most renewable energy (RE) financing instruments fall under three main categories:
- Energy Market Instruments (Feed-in Tariffs, Premium, Renewable obligations, Tenders, Fiscal incentives);
- Equity Finance Mechanisms (Venture Capital, Equity, R&D Grants, Capital/Project Grants, Contingent Grants);
- Debt Finance Mechanisms (Mezzanine Debt, Senior Debt, Guarantees).[3]
On-Grid Renewable Energy Finance
On-grid renewables projects face the key issue of how to create a price support mechanism that provides stability and predictability over the medium and long term. This can reduce the risk premium in the cost of capital, which in turn can increase the amount of investment in renewables and lower the price that consumers have to pay for RE. For on-grid projects the finance sequence is incomplete, and these gaps can often onl be filled with niche financial products. Some of theses products already exist, while some need to be created. The figure below shows which types of finance are often secured by on-grid projects, which types are occassionaly secured, and the current gaps and barriers in the finance sequence [4].
Various forms of capital are involved in the financial sequence/'continuum' of grid-connected RETs as shown in the figure below. The conventional power sector financial sequence includes these sources of capital:
- Equity Finacnce
- Corporate or Project Finance
- Guarantees
- Insurance
- Key parties to the transaction, such as fuel suppliers or power purchasers who have entered into long-term contracts with the project[4].
Equity Finance
Renewable energy equity investments taking an ownership stake in a project, or company, involve investments by a range of financial investors including Private Equity Funds, Infrastructure Funds and Pension Funds, into companies or directly into projects or portfolios of assets.
Depending on the type of business, the stage of development of the technology, and degree of risk associated, different types of equity investors will engage e.g. Venture Capital will be focused on ‘early stage’ or ‘growth stage’ (depending on how far from the laboratory and commercial roll out) technology companies; ‘Private Equity’ Firms, which focus on later stage and more mature technology or projects, and generally expect to ‘exit’ their investment and make their returns in a 3 to 5 year timeframe; Infrastructure Funds, traditionally interested in lower risk infrastructure such as roads, rail, grid, waste facilities etc, which have a longer term investment horizon and so expect lower returns over this period; Institutional Investors such as Pension Funds have an even longer time horizon and larger amounts of money to invest, with lower risk appetite.
Funds use Internal Rate of Return (IRR, or ‘rate of return’) of each potential project as a key tool in reaching investment decisions. It is used to measure and compare the profitability of investments. Funds will generally have an expectation of what IRR they need to achieve, known as a hurdle rate. The IRR can be said to be the earnings from an investment, in the form of an annual rate of interest[5].
Features of Funds Providing Equity | |||
Venture Capital Funds | Private Equity Funds | Infrastructure Funds | Pension Funds |
|
|
|
|
Source: Adapted from [5] |
Off-Grid Renewable Energy Finance
Further Information
References
- ↑ Lindlein, P. & Mostert, W., 2005. Financing Renewable Energies - Instruments, Strategies, Practice Approaches, Frankfurt am Main: KfW.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 The World Bank, 2013. Financing Renewable Energy - Options for Developing Financing Instruments Using Public Funds. Available at: http://bit.ly/UFHIPy
- ↑ de Jager, D. et al., 2011. Financing Renewable Energy in the European Market, Brussels: ECOFYS.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Sonntag-O’Brien, V., Basel Agency for Sustainable Energy, Usher, E. & UN Environment Programme, 2004. Mobilising Finance for Renewable Energies - Thematic Background Paper, International Conference for Renewable Energies. Bonn, Renewables 2004.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Justice, S., Hamilton, K., Sonntag-O’Brien, V., UNEP Sustainable Energy Finance Initiative., Liebreich, M., Greenwood, C., & Bloomberg New Energy Finance. Private Financing of Renewable Energy - A Guide for Policymakers. 2009.