Indoor Air Pollution (IAP) Measurement

From energypedia
Revision as of 12:23, 25 August 2010 by ***** (***** | *****)

Combustion of wood

  • Wood consist mainly of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen (CH2O)x
  • Results of complete combustion: CO2, H2O and heat


BUT: 'Cooking stove never achieve 100% complete combustion'

There are more combustion products in incomplete combustion like:

  • CO, NO2, Small particles
  • Formaldehyde, Acrolein, Benzene, Toluene, Styrene, 1,3-Butadiene etc.
  • Polyaromatic hydrocarbons
  • CO and Particular matter (PM) have the biggest health impacts

Examples:

  1. CO – low concentration: Mild headache, fatigue, nausea, dizziness
  2. CO – high concentration: Death within one hour
  3. PM: strong effects to respiratory system

Annualy X.X mio people die due to being exposed to incomplete combustion every day


IAP and improve stoves

  • Rule of thumb:

       “stoves with less fuel consumption emit less pollutants”

       “chimneys reduce IAP signicant”

  • EnDev relevant stove ( reduced wood consumption) should have reduced emissions, too
  • Evidence of the improvement through CO and PM measurement:    

       --> Improvement against Baseline


IAP – Measurement Devices

So far:

  • seperated devices for PM and CO measurement
  • Data analysis difficult

Now:

  • One device for PM and CO measurement
  • Data analysis simple using MS Excel
  • But interpretation needs to be done

Procedure in the field:

  • Mount devices
  • Switch on, close lid
  • Perform test, take notes in parallel
  • Open lid, switch off
  • In parallel: fill protocol manual

Data analysis

  • read data from SD card and press “Process data” button in MS Excel

See, analyse and interpret results

  • Careful as calibration of device might be expired


Aprovecho IAP meter

  • Demonstration
  • 1st tests
  • results

IAP measuring and IAP meter.png

IAP measuring and IAP meter2.png


IAP measurement

  • Understand results
  • Check for negative values
  • Be critical, don’t trust what you read without crosschecking


IAP measurement - overview on results from projects

Back to "tests and measuring" section

<div style="line-height: 150%" 

 
'Evaluation of Changes in Cooking Practices in the Area of Lliipapuquio, Andahuaylas, Peru
 
The objective of the study was to determine the health effects of chronic exposure to smoke produced by burning biomass in traditional stoves and to see if there are any changes occurring after the installation of the improved Inkawasi stove . The Inkawasi stove is a built-in brick stove equipped with a chimney. It can be built with two different combustion chambers for different geographical regions and uses the principle of sunken pots to minimise emissions.
The study was conducted by the University of Peru at Cayetano Heredia in a village of the vicinity of the town of San Jeronimo in central Peru. In this area wood is the main fuel used by households for cooking purposes. In the past older (non-smoking) women frequently showed signs of chronic damages of the bronchi (cough, respiratory infections etc.). The methods used were interviews and medical investigations. No determination of kitchen levels of PM and CO was done, however, previous laboratory measurements have shown that emissions of both were greatly reduced by the Inkawasi stove.
A total of 64 families comprising 221 people were randomly divided into two groups. One group received an Inkawasi stove, whereas the other group used the traditional stove. One year later the traditional stove group received a Inkawasi stove too. There was no difference between the groups regarding age, sex, and time spent in the kitchen. However, there was a different in smoking with higher incidence in the Inkawasi stove group (3.7 vs. 1.9%). Differences in health status were determined using a questionnaire and by measurement of blood parameters (haematocrit, haemoglobin levels) and by determination of lung function (vital capacity). After 6 months changes in wood consumption assessed by interviews to assure that the Inkawasi stoves were properly used.
Women using the Inkawasi stove stated that it reduced consumption of wood and there was less smoke in the kitchen. This corroborates well with preliminary results obtained from lab tests, which show a reduction of average PM and CO by 75 and 81 % respectively. However comparable data from the project areas are not available yet. Baseline measurements performed in traditional kitchens showed an extreme variation of both PM and CO by the factor of 114 and 244. This suggests that e. g. kitchen management could also be a very important factor.
Regarding their status health the women reported less arousal at night due to coughing as well as less expectoration. In addition, olfaction and colour vision was improved. Laboratory measurements showed increased haematocrit and haemoglobin content of the blood compared to women using traditional stoves which the author relates to improved food preparation using the improved stove. All differences were statistically significant and the effects were directly related to exposure time and pollutant concentration. In contrast, lung capacity did not differ between the groups although there was a tendency for having higher capacities in the Inkawasi-group. Further, only 8 % of the users of improved stoves had to visit a health facility due to respiratory symptoms in contrast the 22 % of the control group. No correlation existed between health problems and poverty level indicating that the respiratory problems are not due to other factor linked to poverty but that they are caused by the use of the traditional stove.
The study shows that use of energy-efficient Inkawasi stoves significantly improves women’s health besides fuel saving. Its approach using a combination of questionnaires as well as medical measurements may serve as al model for future studies. However, the effects of energy-efficient stoves on chronic diseases caused by IAP such as chronic obstructive lung disease remain to be assessed.
 
 Further reading
Evaluacion de Cambio de Cocinas en el Centro Poblado de Lliupapuquio, Andahuaylas
 
Results of Testing And Existing Stove Design Recommendations -- Peru
Uganda': Indoor Air Pollution Measurements during PCIA Conference 2009
 
The report presents the results of preliminary measurements of particulate matter (PM) and carbon monoxide (CO) in four households and two schools in Kampala, Uganda. Three households were equipped with an improved Rocket Lorena Stove, whereas one household used a traditional stove. In addition measurements were performed in two school kitchens with traditional stoves (3-stone fire). No further details on the traditional stove type of schools are given. CO was measured using a GasBadge Plus device and a CO gauge for CO measurement and an UCB PM Monitor to determine particulate matter. Measurements were done by a team from Berkeley University together with a project officer.
 
 
 
 Table 1: Results of Emission Monitoring in Households and Schools in Kampala
 <v:shapetype id="_x0000_t75" stroked="f" filled="f" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" o:preferrelative="t" o:spt="75" coordsize="21600,21600"> </v:shapetype>
Stove Type
 
PM
CO
Improved
House 1
0.237
5.3
Improved
House 2
0.357
2.1
Improved
House 3
 
9.4
Traditional
House 4
1.746
38.2
Institutional
School 1
0.251
7.2
Institutional
School 2
1.213
47.7
 
 
The measurements show a reduction of both CO- and PM-levels in households with a Rocket-Lorena-Stove by 69 and 83 %, respectively. However, the results obtained in schools are less clear. In one school kitchen the level are high whereas in the other they are as low as in households using the Rocket-Lorena Stove. Unfortunately, no reason for these discrepancies is given.
 
From the study the following recommendations emerge:
 
  • Detailed IAP monitoring should be performed for the stoves promoted by the project as well as for the 3-stone-fire.
 
  • Institutional stoves should be monitored more urgently because they consume more firewood than stoves in households.
 
  • Based on the results emissions should be used as one criterion for stove selection.
 
A detailed IAP study is in progress.
<v:stroke joinstyle="miter"></v:stroke><v:formulas><v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0"></v:f></v:formulas><v:path o:connecttype="rect" gradientshapeok="t" o:extrusionok="f"></v:path><o:lock aspectratio="t" v:ext="edit"></o:lock>
Summary of Stove-Testing Report from GTZ-SUN:E
 
The goal of the study was to obtain data on fuel consumption and IAP-Pollutants particulate matter (PM) and carbon monoxide (CO) from traditional and energy-efficient stove models (open fire, Mirt stove, Approvecho stove). It was performed at the EREDPC und applied the controlled cooking test (CCT), an established testing protocol. Measurements were performed in a kitchen and care was taken that stoves and measurement devices were always installed at the same place. In addition fuel consumption was determined and was found to be about 50 to 60 % in the Mirt stove and the Approvecho stove as compared to the open fire.
 
CO levels were measured using a HOBO CO logger.
 
Table 1: CO-Emissions in ppm (mean + standard deviation of 8 measurements)
 
Open Stone Fire
Mirt Stove
Approvecho Stove
 
C1
C2
C3
C1
C2
C3
C1
C2
C3
Average
78.90
+10.55
90.71
+17.81
88.97
+17.64
6.09
+7,50
6.97
+7.56
7.97
+6,78
8.37
+4.60
9.14
+3.57
7.89
+2.43
Average of baking session
88.84
+13.61
101.06
+21.61
99.11
+21.51
6.11
+9,35
7.02
+9.43
8.08
+8.8
8.70
+4.55
8.82
+4.49
7.58
+3.05
Maximum
124.30
+0
241.93
+43.73
239.5
+64.0
42.80+
29.26
44.44
+29.53
42.00
+29.6
43.28*
+17.16
43.21*
+16.99
40.00*
+17.14
* The means given in the study are 79.3, 79.1 and 74, respectively. However, from the table it is clear that these values represent individual measurements. Therefore means were recalculated.
 
HOBO loggers were used to monitor CO Measurement of CO emissions was performed eight times presumably to improve accuracy of the mean levels. The results of three different channels given as C1 - 3 represent CO-levels below 125, up to 500 and above 500 ppm. In addition, for each test the average, the average of the baking session and the maximum values are given. In the open fire the maximum CO-levels for C1 are eight times the same, which is in marked contrast to the variation in other groups, which is sometime quite large. Further, no explanation is given, why the C2 mean was used for comparison. Generally, the description of the testing procedure is not sufficient.
Nevertheless, the results indicate higher emissions of both CO and PM in the open fire compared to the Mirt stove and the Approvecho stove.
 
Particulate Matter
PM concentrations were also measured eight times and means were calculated.
However, from the individual values it becomes clear that that some means contain outliers which obscure the results. Therefore the means were recalculated after removing these data. However, no information is given whether these data could be due to problems with the measurement or with the test procedure (high concentrations during the lightning of the stove).
 
Table 2: Particulate Matter Emission (mg/m³) (mean + standard deviation)
 
Average
Average of Baking Session
Maximum Values
 
n = 8
n = 7
n = 8
n = 7
n = 8
n = 7
Open fire Injera
0.98 + 0.45
0.83 + 0.17
1.04 + 0.50
0.87 + 0.21
8.91 + 7.69
6.23 + 1.49
Mirt stove
0.68 + 0.65
0.47 + 0.26
0.77 + 0.75
 
6.55 + 5.01
 
Approvecho Stove
0.51 + 0.7
0.27 + 0.09
0.73 + 1.24
0.29 + 0.09
3.60 + 2.33
 
 
According to the study average reduction is 27 % for the Mirt stoves and 46 % for the Approvecho stove compared the traditional fire. However, if the means are recalculated without outliers (figures in italics) PM reduction was higher being 44 % for the Mirt stove and 68 % for the Aprovecho stove. In contrast to CO-Concentration, PM-Levels are much stronger affected by the apparent problems of data collection or test procedure.
Although the study contains important data it lacks essential information how the tests were performed and the problem of the numerous outliers is not discussed.