National Approaches to Electrification – Review of Options

From energypedia
Revision as of 10:54, 20 June 2018 by ***** (***** | *****) (→‎Introduction)
NAE Overview Page
TechnologyTechnology: Grid ExtensionTechnology: Grid-Connected Mini-Grid/Distribution SystemTechnology: Isolated Mini-GridTechnology: Standalone SystemsDelivery ModelDelivery Model: PublicDelivery Model: Private (Non-Government)Delivery Model: Public-Private PartnershipLegal BasisLegal Basis: ConcessionLegal Basis: LicenseLegal Basis / Price/Tariff Regulation: UnregulatedPrice/Tariff RegulationPrice/Tariff Regulation: UniformPrice/Tariff Regulation: IndividualFinanceFinance: PrivateFinance : UserFinance: Grants & SubsidiesFinance: Cross-SubsidiesFinance: Tax ExemptionsFinance: GuaranteesNon-Financial InterventionsNon-Financial Interventions: Direct Energy Access ProvisionNon-Financial Interventions: Institutional RestructuringNon-Financial Interventions: Regulatory ReformNon-Financial Interventions: Policy & Target SettingNon-Financial Interventions: Quality & Technical StandardsNon-Financial Interventions: Technical AssistanceNon-Financial Interventions: Capacity Building & Awareness RaisingNon-Financial Interventions: Market InformationNon-Financial Interventions: Demand PromotionNon-Financial Interventions: Technology Development & AdoptionNon-Financial Interventions: National Energy PlanningNational Approaches to Electrification – Review of Options.png]]


Content

  1. Introduction
  2. What are National Electrification Approaches?
  3. How to use this Review tool
  4. Categorization of National Electrification Approaches
  5. Category Dashboard and information on categories
  6. Example Table and Country Case Studies
    • Bangladesh, Brazil, Cambodia, Costa Rica, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mali, Nepal, Peru, Philippines, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, Tunisia,Vietnam


Download


Introduction




Key Messages

  • Categorization allows National Electrification Approaches (NEA) to be presented and compared systematically
  • NEAs combine technologies, delivery models, regulation, financial and other interventions – most effective approaches include actions in all these areas
  • There is no one ideal approach to electrification. Successful NEA elements are well alighted with each otehr and national context
  • NEA should change over time as levels of electrification increase
  • Major advances in electrification can be achieved in just a few years given commitment from policy makers.


Further Information


References

Authors

Authors: Mary Willcox, Dean Cooper

Acknowledgements

The Review was prepared by Mary Willcox and Dean Cooper of Practical Action Consulting working with Hadley Taylor, Silvia Cabriolu-Poddu and Christina Stuart of the EU Energy Initiative Partnership Dialogue Facility (EUEIPDF) and Michael Koeberlein and Caspar Priesemann of the Energising Development Programme (EnDev).  It is based on a literature review, stakeholder consultations and development of the NEA categorization system used in the Review Tool.

A wider range of stakeholders were consulted during its preparation and we would particularly like to thank the following for their valuable contributions and insights:

  • Jeff Felten, AfDB
  • Marcus Wiemann and other members, ARE
  • Guilherme Collares Pereira, EdP
  • David Otieno Ochieng, EUEI-PDF
  • Silvia Luisa Escudero Santos Ascarza, EUEI-PDF
  • Nico Peterschmidt, Inensus
  • John Tkacik, REEEP
  • Khorommbi Bongwe, South Africa: Department of Energy 
  • Rashid Ali Abdallah, African Union Commission
  • Nicola Bugatti, ECREEE
  • Getahun Moges Kifle, Ethiopian Energy Authority
  • Marion Merchan Andres, EUEI-PDF
  • Tatjana Walter-Breidenstein, EUEI-PDF
  • Rebecca Symington, Miland Foundation
  • Marcel Reets, RVO NL
  • Nico Tyabji, Sunfunder


Any feedback would be very welcome. If you have any comments or enquires please contact: Mary.Willcox@practicalaction.org.ukhadley.taylor@euei-pdf.org, or michael.koeberlein@giz.de.


NAE Overview Page