Difference between revisions of "Carbon Markets for Energy Access Projects"

From energypedia
***** (***** | *****)
***** (***** | *****)
Line 1: Line 1:
= Clean Development Mechanism  =
+
= Carbon Finance through CDM and VCM  =
  
The CDM allows emission-reduction (or emission removal) projects in developing countries to earn certified emission reduction (CER) credits, each equivalent to one tonne of CO2. These CERs can be traded and sold, and used by industrialized countries to a meet a part of their emission reduction targets under the Kyoto Protocol.
 
  
The mechanism stimulates sustainable development and emission reductions, while giving industrialized countries some flexibility in how they meet their emission reduction limitation targets.
 
  
The projects must qualify through a rigorous and public registration and issuance process designed to ensure real, measurable and verifiable emission reductions that are additional to what would have occurred without the project. The mechanism is overseen by the CDM Executive Board, answerable ultimately to the countries that have ratified the Kyoto Protocol.  
+
Financial payments for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can be an additional source of funding for energy projects. This so-called carbon finance can be accessed by implementing a project under the requirements of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol (Kyoto Protocol) or for the Voluntary Carbon Market (VCM). This page focuses on the possibilities and challenges of successful carbon finance for stove projects. The CDM provides a tool for accessing carbon credits for certified emission reductions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in developing countries. The funds must be used to enable these reductions, which would otherwise not be possible. 
  
In order to be considered for registration, a project must first be approved by the Designated National Authorities (DNA).  
+
The CDM is one of the three flexible mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol; the others being Emissions Trading and Joint Implementation. All these mechanisms aim to achieve GHG reduction in a cost effective manner. While Emissions Trading and Joint Implementation are reserved for countries with binding reduction targets, the CDM allows the participation of countries without targets. Emissions reduction credits that have been achieved through the CDM in a renewable energy, or energy efficiency, project in a developing country can be sold to a country with commitments listed in Annex I of the Kyoto Protocol ([http://unfccc.int/national_reports/annex_i_natcom/submitted_natcom/items/3625.php Annex I Countries]). 
  
Operational since the beginning of 2006, the mechanism has already registered more than 1,000 projects and is anticipated to produce CERs amounting to more than 2.7 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent in the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, 2008–2012.  
+
The CDM has two primary goals: to assist Annex I countries in achieving their reduction targets, and to contribute to sustainable development in the host countries. The criteria for sustainable development are defined by the host country’s national authority (the Designated National Authority – DNA).  
  
The mechanism is seen by many as a trailblazer. It is the first global, environmental investment and credit scheme of its kind, providing a standardized emissions offset instrument, CERs.  
+
<br>
 +
 
 +
= The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) =
 +
 
 +
The CDM encompasses renewable energy, energy efficiency, and avoidance of GHG sources. Relevant GHGs are Carbon dioxide (C0<sub>2</sub>), which also serves as reference value, Methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), Nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>0), Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), Perfluorocarbons (PFCs), Sulphur hexafluoride (SF<sub>6</sub>). Tiny particles like soot and sulfate aerosols are not covered by the Kyoto Protocol, although they do cause global warming.&nbsp;The global warming potential of each gas is measured in CO<sub>2 </sub>equivalents, which describe the global warming potential of each gas over a given time period compared to CO<sub>2</sub>. The calculation of the achieved CO<sub>2</sub> reduction has to follow a methodology accepted by the CDM Executive Board (EB).<br>
  
<br>
+
== General CDM framework ==
 +
 
 +
The CDM Executive Board supervises the CDM and reports directly to the Conference of the Parties to the United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Meeting of the Parties of the Kyoto Protocol. The board is responsible for approving new methodologies related to baselines, to approve monitoring plans, to accredit independent verifiers, review project validation and verification reports, and to issue the CERs.
  
Source: [http://cdm.unfccc.int/about/index.html http://cdm.unfccc.int/about/index.html]
+
All countries that wish to participate in the CDM must (a) have ratified the Kyoto Protocol and (b) designate a national CDM authority. The Designated National Authority (DNA) evaluates and approves the projects and serves as a point of contact. It states that the project participants participate voluntarily in the project and confirms that the project activity assists the host country in achieving sustainable development. As each DNA can establish its own working procedures, the project developer should be well informed about the requirements of the national DNA.  
  
<br>
+
The CDM requires special documents of which the '''Project Design Document (PDD)''' is the central one. The PDD describes the technology used in the project activity, the relevant project participants and project location(s). It defines the methodology used to calculate emission reductions, including the baseline, project boundary and leakages. The life time of the CDM-project is set, which can be ten years or seven years and can, if desired, be renewed twice. The PDD defines the anticipated emission reductions and the monitoring plan. It has to be validated by an independent operational entity (Designated Operational Entity, DOE) and is then submitted to the CDM-Executive Board for registration.
  
= Bundling CDM Projects  =
+
The preparation of the PDD is a complex task and has to follow the UNFCCC requirements. It is the key document that the host country, investors, stakeholders and DOEs will use to evaluate the project’s potential, and to judge its achievements. All aspects are important; the most challenging aspects are dealing with establishing the baseline and assessing the project’s ‘'''additionality'''’. A project activity is ‘additional’ if GHG emissions are reduced below those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered CDM project activity. This is the central point of the CDM. It means that a CDM project activity is additional if GHG emissions are reduced below those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered CDM project activity. A CDM project must not be a project that would have been implemented under the business as usual scenario. The fulfilment of the additionality criteria is vital for the successful registration of a CDM project. The difference between the GHG baseline emissions and GHG emissions after implementing the CDM project activity (project emission) is the emissions reduction.<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>
  
Bundle is defined as: “Bringing together of several small-scale CDM project activities, to form a single CDM project activity or portfolio without the loss of distinctive characteristics of each project activity. Project activities within a bundle can be arranged in one or more sub-bundles, with each project activities retaining it distinctive characteristics. Such characteristics include its: technology/measure; location; application of simplified baseline methodology. Project activities within a sub-bundle belong to the same type. The sum of the output capacity of project actvities within a sub-bundle shall not exceed the maximum output capacity limit for its type.”
+
Baseline emissions under the selected baseline scenario are calculated according to an approved '''methodology''', (or maybe using a new methodology that is being introduced).
  
Sub-bundle is defined as: “An aggregation of project activities within a bundle having the characteristics that all project activities within a sub-bundle belong to the same type.
+
The process from project idea until registration as CDM project and final issuance of credits takes 6 month at a minimum; the procedures can easily take longer, possibly up to two years.  
  
General principles for bundling:
+
== The CDM project cycle ==
  
*Project activities wishing to be bundled shall indicate this when making the request for registration;
+
All projects that aim to generate CERs under the CDM rules must meet the same criteria and complete the same steps. This process is commonly known as the CDM project cycle. Some of the activities in the CDM project cycle are the same as those for any other investment projects. However, the steps to generate CERs are both unique and mandatory, as shown in Table 1 below. The development of a CDM project documentation and the involvement of different institutions throughout the project cycle generate substantial costs. Some rough estimates for current levels are given in the table.  
*Once a project activity becomes part of a bundle for a project cycle stage, it shall not be de-bundled for this stage. The Board may consider debundling in exceptional situations;
 
*The composition of bundles shall not change over time (i.e. the submission of project activities to be used in a bundle shall be made at the same time. A project activity shall not be taken out of a bundle nor shall a project activity be added to the bundle after registration).
 
*All project activities in the bundle shall have the same crediting period (i.e. the same length and same starting date of the crediting period);
 
*A form with information related to the bundle must be included in the submission;
 
*The form should cover issues such as title of the bundle, general description, project participants, locations, types and categories, estimated amount of emission reduction, crediting period and monitoring plans.
 
  
The advantage of bundling is that bundled projects can obtain a single validation report and a single certification report for the entire bundle, which streamlines these processes for project participants.  
+
Transaction costs are particularly problematic when the volume of CERs being offered is relatively low. As a rule of thumb, it can be said that a project activity should generate at least 10&nbsp;000 CERs to cover the costs for CDM preparation safely. If the emission reduction of a project activity is below that threshold, projects can be implemented as projects for the Voluntary Carbon Market.  
  
Further information on ''bundling'':
+
Small Scale CDM Projects often contribute clearly to the sustainable development aspect of the CDM. But transaction costs associated with developing small-scale projects are high relative to the emissions benefits that may be available. Due to the combination of perceived risk factors and lack of economies of scale, small-scale projects are challenging to transact in the market.
  
*[http://cdm.unfccc.int/EB/021/eb21repan21.pdf UNFCCC-CDM]
+
Small projects qualify as small-scale if they comprise the following:  
*[http://cdmrulebook.org/pageid/158 CDM Rulebook]
 
  
<br>
+
*Renewable energy project activities with a maximum output capacity equivalent of up to 15 megawatts (or an appropriate equivalent)
 +
*Energy efficiency improvement project activities which reduce energy consumption by up to the equivalent of 60 gigawatt hours per year; and
 +
*Other project activities limited to those that result in emission reduction of less than or equal to 60 kilotonnes of CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent per year
  
 
= Links to General Information  =
 
= Links to General Information  =
Line 53: Line 53:
 
[http://www.cdmgoldstandard.org/ Gold Standard]  
 
[http://www.cdmgoldstandard.org/ Gold Standard]  
  
[http://wbcarbonfinance.org/docs/State___Trends_of_the_Carbon_Market_2009-FINAL_26_May09.pdf The World Bank: State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2009]&nbsp;(pdf, 656 kB)
+
[http://wbcarbonfinance.org/docs/State___Trends_of_the_Carbon_Market_2009-FINAL_26_May09.pdf The World Bank: State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2009]&nbsp;(pdf, 656 kB)  
  
 
<br>
 
<br>

Revision as of 09:55, 13 November 2009

Carbon Finance through CDM and VCM 

Financial payments for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can be an additional source of funding for energy projects. This so-called carbon finance can be accessed by implementing a project under the requirements of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol (Kyoto Protocol) or for the Voluntary Carbon Market (VCM). This page focuses on the possibilities and challenges of successful carbon finance for stove projects. The CDM provides a tool for accessing carbon credits for certified emission reductions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in developing countries. The funds must be used to enable these reductions, which would otherwise not be possible. 

The CDM is one of the three flexible mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol; the others being Emissions Trading and Joint Implementation. All these mechanisms aim to achieve GHG reduction in a cost effective manner. While Emissions Trading and Joint Implementation are reserved for countries with binding reduction targets, the CDM allows the participation of countries without targets. Emissions reduction credits that have been achieved through the CDM in a renewable energy, or energy efficiency, project in a developing country can be sold to a country with commitments listed in Annex I of the Kyoto Protocol (Annex I Countries). 

The CDM has two primary goals: to assist Annex I countries in achieving their reduction targets, and to contribute to sustainable development in the host countries. The criteria for sustainable development are defined by the host country’s national authority (the Designated National Authority – DNA).


The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)

The CDM encompasses renewable energy, energy efficiency, and avoidance of GHG sources. Relevant GHGs are Carbon dioxide (C02), which also serves as reference value, Methane (CH4), Nitrous oxide (N20), Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), Perfluorocarbons (PFCs), Sulphur hexafluoride (SF6). Tiny particles like soot and sulfate aerosols are not covered by the Kyoto Protocol, although they do cause global warming. The global warming potential of each gas is measured in CO2 equivalents, which describe the global warming potential of each gas over a given time period compared to CO2. The calculation of the achieved CO2 reduction has to follow a methodology accepted by the CDM Executive Board (EB).

General CDM framework

The CDM Executive Board supervises the CDM and reports directly to the Conference of the Parties to the United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Meeting of the Parties of the Kyoto Protocol. The board is responsible for approving new methodologies related to baselines, to approve monitoring plans, to accredit independent verifiers, review project validation and verification reports, and to issue the CERs.

All countries that wish to participate in the CDM must (a) have ratified the Kyoto Protocol and (b) designate a national CDM authority. The Designated National Authority (DNA) evaluates and approves the projects and serves as a point of contact. It states that the project participants participate voluntarily in the project and confirms that the project activity assists the host country in achieving sustainable development. As each DNA can establish its own working procedures, the project developer should be well informed about the requirements of the national DNA.

The CDM requires special documents of which the Project Design Document (PDD) is the central one. The PDD describes the technology used in the project activity, the relevant project participants and project location(s). It defines the methodology used to calculate emission reductions, including the baseline, project boundary and leakages. The life time of the CDM-project is set, which can be ten years or seven years and can, if desired, be renewed twice. The PDD defines the anticipated emission reductions and the monitoring plan. It has to be validated by an independent operational entity (Designated Operational Entity, DOE) and is then submitted to the CDM-Executive Board for registration.

The preparation of the PDD is a complex task and has to follow the UNFCCC requirements. It is the key document that the host country, investors, stakeholders and DOEs will use to evaluate the project’s potential, and to judge its achievements. All aspects are important; the most challenging aspects are dealing with establishing the baseline and assessing the project’s ‘additionality’. A project activity is ‘additional’ if GHG emissions are reduced below those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered CDM project activity. This is the central point of the CDM. It means that a CDM project activity is additional if GHG emissions are reduced below those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered CDM project activity. A CDM project must not be a project that would have been implemented under the business as usual scenario. The fulfilment of the additionality criteria is vital for the successful registration of a CDM project. The difference between the GHG baseline emissions and GHG emissions after implementing the CDM project activity (project emission) is the emissions reduction.                      

Baseline emissions under the selected baseline scenario are calculated according to an approved methodology, (or maybe using a new methodology that is being introduced).

The process from project idea until registration as CDM project and final issuance of credits takes 6 month at a minimum; the procedures can easily take longer, possibly up to two years.

The CDM project cycle

All projects that aim to generate CERs under the CDM rules must meet the same criteria and complete the same steps. This process is commonly known as the CDM project cycle. Some of the activities in the CDM project cycle are the same as those for any other investment projects. However, the steps to generate CERs are both unique and mandatory, as shown in Table 1 below. The development of a CDM project documentation and the involvement of different institutions throughout the project cycle generate substantial costs. Some rough estimates for current levels are given in the table.

Transaction costs are particularly problematic when the volume of CERs being offered is relatively low. As a rule of thumb, it can be said that a project activity should generate at least 10 000 CERs to cover the costs for CDM preparation safely. If the emission reduction of a project activity is below that threshold, projects can be implemented as projects for the Voluntary Carbon Market.

Small Scale CDM Projects often contribute clearly to the sustainable development aspect of the CDM. But transaction costs associated with developing small-scale projects are high relative to the emissions benefits that may be available. Due to the combination of perceived risk factors and lack of economies of scale, small-scale projects are challenging to transact in the market.

Small projects qualify as small-scale if they comprise the following:

  • Renewable energy project activities with a maximum output capacity equivalent of up to 15 megawatts (or an appropriate equivalent)
  • Energy efficiency improvement project activities which reduce energy consumption by up to the equivalent of 60 gigawatt hours per year; and
  • Other project activities limited to those that result in emission reduction of less than or equal to 60 kilotonnes of CO2 equivalent per year

Links to General Information

CDM Project Activity Cycle

Small Scale CDM Project Activities

Small Scale CDM Methodologies

Gold Standard

The World Bank: State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2009 (pdf, 656 kB)


Small Hydro Power and the CDM

A Guide to CDM and Family Hydro Power

Selected Small Hydro Power CDM Projects

Phu Mau hydropower project (Vietnam): small scale run-of-river hydropower plant; three cascades with a total installed capacity of 5.6 MW. Crediting period 05 Jun 09 - 04 Jun 16.

Sichuan provincial Longchi & Caoyuan Small-scale Hydro Power Bundle Project (China): two small-scale hydro projects - Longchi 5 MW + Caoyuan 4MW. Crediting period 28 Apr 09 - 27 Apr 16.

Iruttukanam Small Hydro Electric Project (India): small scale run-of-river, 3 MW. Crediting period 01 Jun 09 - 31 May 19.

e7 Bhutan Micro Hydro Power CDM Project (Bhutan): power generation capacity 70 kW. Crediting period 19 Aug 05 - 18 Aug 12.

Sanquhar and Delta Small Hydro Power Projects (Sri Lanka): two small-scale, run of river hydropower plants, each with an installed capacity of 1.6 MW. Crediting period 01 Jan 04 - 31 Dec 10.

Santa Lúcia II Small Hydropower Plant (Brazil): run-of-river small hydro plant with installed capacity of 7.6 MW. Crediting period 01 Oct 03 - 30 Sep 10.

Feasibility of CDM as a financing model (Case studies from Ethiopia)


PV Solar Home Systems and the CDM

PV Solar home system (SHS) could be an excellent fit for the CDM because of both its CO2 abatement and its sustainable development potential. However, this will only be possible if transaction costs of the Certified Emission Reduction (CER) are limited by a system of streamlined baseline setting, validation, and monitoring procedures.

For further information and studies see the website of the Energy research Centre of the Netherlands.

Photovoltaic kits to light up rural households in Marocco: Up to now this is the only registered SHS CDM project. Crediting period: 01 Jan 07 - 31 Dec 16.

Study: PCFplus: Robert F. Lee et al.: Could carbon financing appreciably accelerate the diffusion of Solar Home Systems?, 2001

Annexes to the Study



⇒ Back to Solar Section
⇒ Back to Hydro Section