Frame Conditions for Planning Cooking Energy Interventions

Basics | Policy Advice | Planning | Designing and Implementing (ICS Supply)| Technologies and Practices | Designing and Implementing (Woodfuel Supply)| Climate Change

The Cooking Energy System

Cooking Energy is a complex system which comprises issues related to the energy supply, the end user devices (e.g. cook stoves), and the user behaviour. While fuel supply and improved cook stoves have been given a lot of attention, the users’ capacity to manage the fuel, to handle the stove in the right way, and to manage the cooking process in an energy efficient way are the most difficult and neglected aspects of the cooking energy system. It is only through the way people use their resources, that the actual quality of the (energy) service is realized.

Fig: Overview of cooking energy systems (GIZ 2011)

Key intervention areas for cooking energy:
80% of the cooking energy in developing countries is based on the use of biomass fuels, in particular firewood and charcoal. The key interventions of cooking energy are therefore focused on the supply and demand side of these wood fuels.

These interventions are:

• Introduction and scaling up of the efficient use of improved wood fuel stoves;
  This includes both firewood and charcoal as well as the stoves and the stove management practices.
• Increase (sustainable) wood fuel supply and efficient wood fuel management;
  This includes afforestation, sustainable forest management, efficient charcoal production, and the fuel management at household level.

However, improved efficiency of wood fuel consumption and increased wood fuel supply may not be sufficient to achieve a sustainable wood fuel supply-demand system, due to other competing demands of wood and land resources.

As a result, a complementary third key intervention is required:

• Promotion of alternative cooking energy options (fuels, stoves and practices);
  This includes other biomass fuels, non-biomass fuels, and energy-efficient cooking practices.

The National Political Framework Conditions for Cooking Energy

Cooking energy is not always the key priority in national ministries dealing with energy matters. However, there still might be political ambitions, agendas, visions, prejudices against, and preferences for specific technical solutions which will impact on the perception of a planning process.

In the preparation of the inception workshop, it is therefore important to assess the national political frame conditions for the planning of ICS interventions.

Here are some examples of questions which have been useful for GIZ:

• What has happened nationally in the household energy sector in the past?
• How much knowledge (and which) is still available on stoves, small business development, and marketing?
• How much of this knowledge is available at the level of the ministry that is responsible for energy?
• What is the guiding vision in the ministry concerning the future of cooking energy in the country?
• What is the governments/ministries perception(s) and position(s) with regard to the use of wood fuels for cooking in rural and urban environments?
• Are there strategies or policies regarding the use of specific fuels (e.g. a ban of charcoal?)
• How do national ministriesperceive alternative fuel options for cooking energy?
• How realistic and serious are these positions (relevance for practical actions)?
• Who is either involved in, or supposed to support, the household energy sector?
• Are there other ministries (e.g. forestry, environment, agriculture) who have a mandate and policy/strategy in the field of household energy? (if Yes: What are their positions to the above?)

The Planning of Cooking Energy Interventions for Programs in other Sectors

Access to (cooking) energy has not been considered in the definition of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

Nonetheless, it has become clear that it is a key requisite to achieve many of the MDGs. (See Cooking Energy and the MDGs.)

Accordingly, key interventions to improve cooking energy systems are not always implemented in designated energy programs. In fact, quite often they are components in larger programs which are following other development goals.

Hence the planning of cooking energy interventions is directed towards achieving maximum synergies with the main development goals of the “hosting” program.

Fig: Overview of cooking energy systems (GIZ 2011)

If this is the case, there are conditions or preferences towards the design of the implementation concept. As a result, many of such cooking energy components address only a section of the cooking energy system (e.g. fuel supply or supply and use of improved cook stoves respectively). Even the selection of the target group, the intervention area, the technologies, and the production systems will be tailored towards supporting the requirements of the “hosting sector”.

(How) Do we reach the Poor?

Poverty reduction is the overarching goal of many development interventions. However, there can be a huge difference between ‘directly addressing the needs of the poor’ and engaging in actions where poverty reduction is an effect at the outer end of the result chain.

The first step in this process is to agree who should be considered poor in the given environment. Usually there is a strata within “the poor” which can be instrumental in the process of identifying the right target group.

Generally, there are four concepts of how to specifically address very poor target groups:

1. Promotion of “non-cash” solutions
2. Making “special products” for the poor available
3. Making “special prices” for the poor available
4. Reaching the poor by improving social services

Each of these concepts has its specific rational and approaches. See the chart below.

Fig: Reaching the Poor Publication (GIZ HERA)

“Non-cash” self-help stoves and highly subsidized stoves are effective in that they may facilitate quickly reaching many very poor people. However, it is not uncommon that the duration of impact for both of these approaches is rather short.

This can be due to several reasons, including:

• If households produce their own stove themselves, they might not have much practice and the quality and life-span of such stoves could be low. This may lead to frustration and to a return to the baseline stove after some years.
• The approach of giving stoves out for free or with a very high subsidy can work until the resources to finance such an approach are exhausted. However, as people deem the stoves as cheap or for free, it will be difficult to create a transition to a market-based approach later on.

In contrast, the development of special products sold at commercial rates or supporting access through improved social services can take a much slower development path as compared to the free hand out approach. However, the results of this approach have often been much more sustainable.

Commercialization of efficient stoves entails design standards, which enable professional stove producers to gain more routine in building stoves and create higher quality stoves. And because stove producers earn money, they have a strong interest in selling high quality products. This means stoves last longer, making them and the system more sustainable.

References

This article was originally published by GIZ HERA. It is basically based on experiences, lessons learned and information gathered by GIZ cook stove projects. You can find more information about the authors and experts of the original “Cooking Energy Compendium” in the Imprint.

►Top of the page
--> Back to Overview GIZ HERA Cooking Energy Compendium