Make sure you register to our monthly newsletter, it's going out soon! Stay up do date about the latest energy news and our current activities.
Click here to register!

Difference between revisions of "Impact Monitoring Guidelines"

From energypedia
***** (***** | *****)
m
***** (***** | *****)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
  
 
= Overview =
 
= Overview =
  
The Impacts Monitoring Group of [[Energising Development (EnDev)|Energising Development has]] developed recommendations for a "proper" impact assessments.
+
The Impact Monitoring Group of [[Energising_Development_(EnDev)|Energising Development]] has developed recommendations for sound impact assessments.
  
 
<u>We recommend to:</u>
 
<u>We recommend to:</u>
 
*use the recommended [[Indicator rural electrification and stoves|list of indicators]]
 
*use the recommended [[Indicator rural electrification and stoves|list of indicators]]
*conduct '''baseline studies '''before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy
+
*conduct '''baseline studies '''before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs received access to a form of modern energy
 
*use a [[Theory Based Approach|theory based approach]] by applying the result chain for developing the study design
 
*use a [[Theory Based Approach|theory based approach]] by applying the result chain for developing the study design
*use a [[Mixed Methods|mixed methods approach]]: the logic of the comparative advantages of [[Methoden|methods]]: that means the mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions)
+
*use a [[Mixed Methods|mixed methods approach]]: the logic of the comparative advantages of [[Methoden|methods]]: i.e. the mix of quantitative (standardised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open / semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions)
*include [[Control Groups|control groups]] if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study
+
*include, whereever possible, [[Control Groups|control groups]] (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study
 
*consider [[Research Ethics|research ethics]]
 
*consider [[Research Ethics|research ethics]]
  
The following tables show typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we would recommend and support.
+
The following tables show typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we furthermore recommend and support.
  
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
 +
  
 
= Preparation =
 
= Preparation =

Revision as of 08:29, 7 August 2013


Overview

The Impact Monitoring Group of Energising Development has developed recommendations for sound impact assessments.

We recommend to:

  • use the recommended list of indicators
  • conduct baseline studies before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs received access to a form of modern energy
  • use a theory based approach by applying the result chain for developing the study design
  • use a mixed methods approach: the logic of the comparative advantages of methods: i.e. the mix of quantitative (standardised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open / semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions)
  • include, whereever possible, control groups (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study
  • consider research ethics

The following tables show typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we furthermore recommend and support.



Preparation

Tasks Materials/ Support Library
Terms for Consultants/ Enumerators
  • Sample Terms for national / international consultants
  • Sample Terms for enumerators
ToR Consultants:
Selection Consultant/ Enumerators
  • Consultants
Study of available documents and statistics on national development goals and policies, national sector goals and policies, BMZ goals and concept for the partner country
  • Checklist on relevant development goals
Developing of Results Chains/ Indicators (consider

undesired side effects being positive or negative)

Cooking:

Developing of Questionnaires, interview guidelines, PRA tools (MAPP), observation criteria and other tools (catalogue of methods)

Example Questionnaires

(Impact Studies Material)

Sampling/ Selection target Group
Training of Supervisors and Enumerators/ Pretesting
  • Training Material
  • Training Agenda


Implementation

Task Materials/ Support Library
Logistics Checklist on how to implement HH Interviews


Conducting Interviews
Data entry



Data Analysis/ Reporting

Task Materials/ Support Library
Data analysis
Data interpretation – in exchange with the project team (in a workshop)
  • Checklist for data interpretation
Report writing (+ summary writing)
  • Example for report summary
  • Example for ICS description (Annex)

Handover of raw data




Further Information

References