Knowledge fuels change - Support energypedia!
For over 10 years, energypedia has been connecting energy experts around the world — helping them share knowledge, learn from each other, and accelerate the global energy transition.
Today, we ask for your support to keep this platform free and accessible to all.
Even a small contribution makes a big difference! If just 10–20% of our 60,000+ monthly visitors donated the equivalent of a cup of coffee — €5 — Energypedia would be fully funded for a whole year.
Is the knowledge you’ve gained through Energypedia this year worth €5 or more?
Your donation keeps the platform running, helps us create new knowledge products, and contributes directly to achieving SDG 7.
Thank you for your support, your donation, big or small, truly matters!
Difference between revisions of "Delivery Models for Decentralised Rural Electrification"
From energypedia
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{HPNET Project Database | {{HPNET Project Database | ||
|HPNET name=Delivery Models for Decentralised Rural Electrification | |HPNET name=Delivery Models for Decentralised Rural Electrification | ||
| − | |HPNET description=The purpose of this report is to analyse the impact of delivery models on the creation of sustainable welfare benefits. Three case studies are selected, one renewable energy mini-grid project or programme from each of Nepal, Peru and Kenya. Although rural electrification poses a great challenge to all three countries (only 32 per cent of rural Nepalese, 23 per cent of rural Peruvians and 10 per cent of rural Kenyans have access to electricity in their homes), their different physical, institutional, economic and socio-cultural contexts have led to different approaches to rural electrification. These | + | |HPNET description=The purpose of this report is to analyse the impact of delivery models on the creation of sustainable welfare benefits. Three case studies are selected, one renewable energy mini-grid project or programme from each of Nepal, Peru and Kenya. Although rural electrification poses a great challenge to all three countries (only 32 per cent of rural Nepalese, 23 per cent of rural Peruvians and 10 per cent of rural Kenyans have access to electricity in their homes), their different physical, institutional, economic and socio-cultural contexts have led to different approaches to rural electrification. These approaches, alongside some of the countries’ major electrification challenges, are described in Chapter 2. The case studies are compared and analysed in terms of their ability to generate sustainable welfare benefits for their intended |
| − | approaches, alongside some of the countries’ major electrification challenges, are described in Chapter 2. The case studies are compared and analysed in terms of their ability to generate sustainable welfare benefits for their intended | ||
beneficiaries (Chapter 3). A series of 43 Sustainability Indicators (based on five dimensions of Sustainability – Economic, | beneficiaries (Chapter 3). A series of 43 Sustainability Indicators (based on five dimensions of Sustainability – Economic, | ||
Technical, Social, Environmental and Institutional Sustainability) – are designed and used to assess the projects’ impact and their likely sustainability. | Technical, Social, Environmental and Institutional Sustainability) – are designed and used to assess the projects’ impact and their likely sustainability. | ||
Revision as of 13:22, 5 August 2016
KNOWLEDGE PRODUCT SUMMARY
Title
Delivery Models for Decentralised Rural Electrification
Type
Case Studies
Organization
No organization entered yet.
Region/Country
Global/Multiple
Nepal
Nepal
Website
no website
Contact
no contact
E-mail
no email
Year of publication
2012
Description
The purpose of this report is to analyse the impact of delivery models on the creation of sustainable welfare benefits. Three case studies are selected, one renewable energy mini-grid project or programme from each of Nepal, Peru and Kenya. Although rural electrification poses a great challenge to all three countries (only 32 per cent of rural Nepalese, 23 per cent of rural Peruvians and 10 per cent of rural Kenyans have access to electricity in their homes), their different physical, institutional, economic and socio-cultural contexts have led to different approaches to rural electrification. These approaches, alongside some of the countries’ major electrification challenges, are described in Chapter 2. The case studies are compared and analysed in terms of their ability to generate sustainable welfare benefits for their intended
beneficiaries (Chapter 3). A series of 43 Sustainability Indicators (based on five dimensions of Sustainability – Economic,
Technical, Social, Environmental and Institutional Sustainability) – are designed and used to assess the projects’ impact and their likely sustainability.Author / Producer
Dr Annabel Yadoo
View / Download
FILTERING
Filter 1:
Region / Country
Region / Country
Global/Multiple
- Nepal
Filter 2:
Knowledge Product Type
Knowledge Product Type
Document
- Case Studies
Filter 3:
Theme / Topic
Theme / Topic
Policy
People and Environment
- Community Participation
