Difference between revisions of "SPIS Toolbox - Credit Policy: Analyze Potential"
From energypedia
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | === '''<span style="color:#879637;"> | + | === '''<span style="color:#879637;">2. Credit Policy: Analyze Potential</span>''' === |
Today, solar-powered irrigation is a technically mature and reliable option and an alternative to conventional irrigation approaches. When analyzing options for the development of credit policies for SPIS, the following aspects should be considered: <br/> | Today, solar-powered irrigation is a technically mature and reliable option and an alternative to conventional irrigation approaches. When analyzing options for the development of credit policies for SPIS, the following aspects should be considered: <br/> | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
*Donors refinancing solar-powered initiatives; | *Donors refinancing solar-powered initiatives; | ||
*Associations of producers / potential borrowers; | *Associations of producers / potential borrowers; | ||
− | *Technology | + | *Technology and service providers. |
− | |||
==== '''<span style="color:#879637;">Important Issues</span>''' ==== | ==== '''<span style="color:#879637;">Important Issues</span>''' ==== |
Revision as of 13:39, 22 March 2018
►Back to the Start Page | ►Back to the Module Page | ►Go to the Next Chapter |
2. Credit Policy: Analyze Potential
Today, solar-powered irrigation is a technically mature and reliable option and an alternative to conventional irrigation approaches. When analyzing options for the development of credit policies for SPIS, the following aspects should be considered:
SPIS is likely to be a feasible option in a region if:
- energy provision for farming is a constraint (availability or cost of fuel, reliability of grid connection);
- an intensification of agricultural production is envisaged;
- producers are market-oriented and not working on subsistence level;
- producers are at least medium sized or organized in small holder groups;
- subsidized refinancing options for financial operators are available;
- grant schemes or subsidies are available to borrowers (producer);
- producers aim at specialized markets using environmental friendly technology (focusing on ecological production, which could give scope for premium pricing);
- technology distributors and system integrators available in the region;
- water is available and managed adequately so as to prevent groundwater depletion in the long run.
However, compared to conventional pumping and irrigation methods, PV-based pumping solutions have:
- a comparatively high initial capital investment requirement;
- longer repayment periods or/and significantly higher repayment rates;
- higher credit risk.
Outcome/Product
- Study on potential of financing SPIS and recommendations for financial service provider.
Data Requirements
- Profile end customers (cropping patterns, irrigation techniques, pumping systems, market);
- Current offer of loan products available for potential SPIS customer;
- Water and energy provision regime in region;
- Support/advice structures and subsidy schemes (refinancing) available for the region;
- Environmental impact assessment (long term perspective).
People/Stakeholders
- Management of financial service providers;
- Market analysts/consultants;
- Research and training institutions;
- Public entities promoting or/and subsidizing SPIS initiatives;
- Donors refinancing solar-powered initiatives;
- Associations of producers / potential borrowers;
- Technology and service providers.
Important Issues
- Solar-powered irrigation technology is mature, reliable and systems costs have decreased.
- SPIS generally require higher investment cost than other irrigation system, but operation costs are lower.