Difference between revisions of "Requirements of Test Reporting"

From energypedia
***** (***** | *****)
***** (***** | *****)
m
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
GTZ 3rd EAST AFRICA REGIONAL ENERGY MEETING, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 27th – 30th October
+
= Documentation During Testing<br/> =
  
Presented by [http://energypedia.info/index.php/User:MichelX Andreas Michel], Energising Development, GTZ
+
<u>Note down everything that is:</u>
 
+
*Relevant
<br>
+
*Unusual
 
+
*Usual
= Documentation during testing  =
+
*Better take too many notes
 
 
<u>Note down everything that is:</u>  
 
 
 
*Relevant  
 
*Unusual  
 
*Usual  
 
*Better take too many notes  
 
 
*Take a picture of the stove and test set up
 
*Take a picture of the stove and test set up
  
<br>
+
<br/>
 
 
= Reporting of Results  =
 
 
 
*Process and analyse the data
 
*Use a readable format and an understandable language
 
*Be precise
 
*Consider extreme results
 
  
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; Add comments when possible (eg wet wood, inexperienced cook)
+
= Reporting of Results =
  
*Appropriate baseline as reference  
+
*Process and analyse the data
*Report all results and interim / raw data (Annex)  
+
*Use a readable format and an understandable language
*Summarize the main results (average)  
+
*Be precise
*Ensure you compare each stove with the relevant baseline  
+
*Consider extreme results -Te> Add comments when possible (eg wet wood, inexperienced cook)
 +
*Appropriate baseline as reference
 +
*Report all results and interim / raw data (Annex)
 +
*Summarize the main results (average)
 +
*Ensure you compare each stove with the relevant baseline
 
*Report the reduction in Specific Consumption (wood/food)
 
*Report the reduction in Specific Consumption (wood/food)
  
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; If sensible you can additionally report raw data in case additional conclusions are drawn from that  
+
> If sensible you can additionally report raw data in case additional conclusions are drawn from that
 
 
<br>
 
  
'''Documentation of the test procedures and results''' Generally the methodology of the tests has to be documented including such important information as:
+
<br/>
  
 +
<u>'''Documentation of the test procedures and results''' Generally the methodology of the tests has to be documented including such important information as:</u>
 
*Clear '''description of the tested stoves''', (The designation ”clay stove” or “improved rocket stove” is not very informative for external users) including:
 
*Clear '''description of the tested stoves''', (The designation ”clay stove” or “improved rocket stove” is not very informative for external users) including:
  
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; significant '''photos''' and '''drawings''' of the stove <br>
+
> significant '''photos''' and '''drawings''' of the stove
  
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; some basic '''measures''' of the stove body, firebox, height, width, etc.<br>
+
> some basic '''measures''' of the stove body, firebox, height, width, etc.
  
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; necessary '''technical explanation''', mode of operation <br>
+
> necessary '''technical explanation''', mode of operation
  
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; used '''material, insulation''' <br>
+
> used '''material, insulation'''
  
<br>'''Description of the testing procedure'''. Basic questions are:  
+
<br/><u>'''Description of the testing procedure'''. Basic questions are:</u>
 
+
*'''Who''' carried out the test, '''when, where'''
*'''Who''' carried out the test, '''when, where'''  
 
 
*The '''used testing protocol''' (WBT, CCT, KPT).
 
*The '''used testing protocol''' (WBT, CCT, KPT).
  
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; A short description how they were carried out: How many pots, pot sizes, how is the cooking/baking process carried out etc. Especially for multi pot  
+
> A short description how they were carried out: How many pots, pot sizes, how is the cooking/baking process carried out etc. Especially for multi pot stoves, of stoves with metal baking plates or stoves with a combined cooking/heating function the procedure of cooking has to be described clearly
 
+
*Which type of food cooked . Quantifying mass of food, cooking time etc.
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; stoves,&nbsp; of stoves with metal baking plates or stoves with a combined cooking/heating function the procedure of cooking has to be described clearly  
+
*'''Used fuel''' type, size, its moisture content (if not available, mention this, describe how it was dried).
 
+
*The '''season of the year '''as it might be important in terms of fuel moisture and consumption habits.
*Which type of food cooked . Quantifying mass of food, cooking time etc.  
 
*'''Used fuel''' type, size, its moisture content (if not available, mention this, describe how it was dried).  
 
*The '''season of the year '''as it might be important in terms of fuel moisture and consumption habits.  
 
 
*Ambient temperature, height above sea level
 
*Ambient temperature, height above sea level
  
<br>
+
<br/>
 
 
= HERA Stove Fact Sheet  =
 
 
 
*Summarizes all relevant stove information
 
*Type, name, dimensions, materials, costs
 
*Performance, fuels
 
*Look (photo and drawing) Technology
 
*Dissemination rate
 
*Contact details
 
 
 
<br>
 
 
 
[[Image:Stove Fact sheet Lorena Uganda.jpg|950px|Stove Fact sheet Lorena Uganda.jpg]]
 
 
 
<br>
 
  
[[Stove tests and Measuring|Back to "tests and measuring" section]]
+
[[Stove Testing and Measurement|-> Back to "Tests and Measuring" section]]
 
  
[[Category:Cooking]]
+
[[Category:Research]]
 +
[[Category:Cookstoves]]

Latest revision as of 12:04, 31 October 2014

Documentation During Testing

Note down everything that is:

  • Relevant
  • Unusual
  • Usual
  • Better take too many notes
  • Take a picture of the stove and test set up


Reporting of Results

  • Process and analyse the data
  • Use a readable format and an understandable language
  • Be precise
  • Consider extreme results -Te> Add comments when possible (eg wet wood, inexperienced cook)
  • Appropriate baseline as reference
  • Report all results and interim / raw data (Annex)
  • Summarize the main results (average)
  • Ensure you compare each stove with the relevant baseline
  • Report the reduction in Specific Consumption (wood/food)

> If sensible you can additionally report raw data in case additional conclusions are drawn from that


Documentation of the test procedures and results Generally the methodology of the tests has to be documented including such important information as:

  • Clear description of the tested stoves, (The designation ”clay stove” or “improved rocket stove” is not very informative for external users) including:

> significant photos and drawings of the stove

> some basic measures of the stove body, firebox, height, width, etc.

> necessary technical explanation, mode of operation

> used material, insulation


Description of the testing procedure. Basic questions are:

  • Who carried out the test, when, where
  • The used testing protocol (WBT, CCT, KPT).

> A short description how they were carried out: How many pots, pot sizes, how is the cooking/baking process carried out etc. Especially for multi pot stoves, of stoves with metal baking plates or stoves with a combined cooking/heating function the procedure of cooking has to be described clearly

  • Which type of food cooked . Quantifying mass of food, cooking time etc.
  • Used fuel type, size, its moisture content (if not available, mention this, describe how it was dried).
  • The season of the year as it might be important in terms of fuel moisture and consumption habits.
  • Ambient temperature, height above sea level


-> Back to "Tests and Measuring" section