Difference between revisions of "SPIS Toolbox - Select SPIS Configuration"
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{SPIS Design}} {{Back to SPIS Toolbox}} | + | {{SPIS Design}} |
| + | {| cellpadding="1" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | {{Back to SPIS Toolbox 2}} | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | {{Back to Design}} | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | {{Next Chapter}}[[SPIS_Toolbox_-_Estimate_System_Size_and_Costs|►Go to the Next Chapter]]</span></span> | ||
| + | |} | ||
| − | === '''<span style="color:#879637;">Select SPIS Configuration</span>''' === | + | === '''<span style="color:#879637;">4. Select SPIS Configuration</span>''' === |
[[File:Configuration-solar.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 1: SPIS configuration with a solar tracking system, surface pump and drip irrigation (Source: GFA)]] [[File:Solar-panels-fixed.jpg|thumb|right|300pxpx|Figure 2: SPIS configuration with the solar panels fixed, submersible pump, a reservoir and surface irrigation (Source: GFA)]] | [[File:Configuration-solar.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 1: SPIS configuration with a solar tracking system, surface pump and drip irrigation (Source: GFA)]] [[File:Solar-panels-fixed.jpg|thumb|right|300pxpx|Figure 2: SPIS configuration with the solar panels fixed, submersible pump, a reservoir and surface irrigation (Source: GFA)]] | ||
| Line 35: | Line 43: | ||
*PV water pumping works best with low pressure drip irrigation systems. | *PV water pumping works best with low pressure drip irrigation systems. | ||
*The direct connection of the solar pump to the irrigation system leads to a dynamic and varying hydraulic load, which makes planning more complex. | *The direct connection of the solar pump to the irrigation system leads to a dynamic and varying hydraulic load, which makes planning more complex. | ||
| − | *Varying hydraulic loads can be mitigated by | + | *Varying hydraulic loads can be mitigated by (a) using automatic valves, (b) adapting irrigation field size (c) and solar tracking. |
*Combining PV-based water pumping with traditional surface irrigation methods tends to be non-viable in financial terms. | *Combining PV-based water pumping with traditional surface irrigation methods tends to be non-viable in financial terms. | ||
{{SPIS Reference}} | {{SPIS Reference}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| cellpadding="1" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | {{Back to SPIS Toolbox 2}} | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | {{Back to Design}} | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | {{Next Chapter}}[[SPIS_Toolbox_-_Estimate_System_Size_and_Costs|►Go to the Next Chapter]]</span></span> | ||
| + | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:35, 21 July 2020
| ►Back to the Start Page | ►Back to the Module Page | ►Go to the Next Chapter |
4. Select SPIS Configuration
A SPIS can be designed in many ways; major variations will lie in the combination of key components:
- solar mounting system (fixed or tracking);
- motor pump installation (submersible or surface);
- integration of a reservoir or not;
- irrigation method – mainly drip or surface irrigation.
An overview and description of different configurations of the individual components is provided in the GET INFORMED module.
Technically, any irrigation method can be combined with a solar water pump. However, it becomes a matter of cost. Pressure and high discharge require more energy and therefore higher costs. Drip irrigation, working at comparably low operating pressures and water efficient, suits solar pumping systems best. Yet, it requires that the producer learns new irrigation management skills. The suitability of a particular system configuration for a given farm depends on the water availability, the farm’s specific water requirements, its agricultural production and the producer’s skills and budget.
The human and financial resources required for maintenance should already be considered in the design of the system. As a rule, higher investments in good quality equipment outweigh the time and effort put into maintaining and repairing poor quality equipment.
Figure 1 shows an SPIS configuration where one saves on the costs for the reservoir but spends on the tracking systems. The tracking system enables a relatively stable pump dis-charge which is important, because there is no reservoir to buffer the amount of water going to the field. The water can further be controlled by the valves and by splitting up of the drip irrigation system in sections.
Figure 2 shows another, more common, configuration where water is pumped from the ground and stored in an elevated reservoir. The water goes through the irrigation head, which can be equipped with volumetric valves, and/or a fertigation system. Nevertheless the producer is forced to divide the field into small sections to allow a relatively controlled distribution of water across the field. This SPIS configuration requires relatively little maintenance as the panels and the pump are fixed.
Data Requirements
- Results of on-site data collection;
- Results of comparative financial analysis.
People/Stakeholders
- Producers;
- Agricultural service providers;
- Technology providers/system integrators.
Important Issues
- PV water pumping works best with low pressure drip irrigation systems.
- The direct connection of the solar pump to the irrigation system leads to a dynamic and varying hydraulic load, which makes planning more complex.
- Varying hydraulic loads can be mitigated by (a) using automatic valves, (b) adapting irrigation field size (c) and solar tracking.
- Combining PV-based water pumping with traditional surface irrigation methods tends to be non-viable in financial terms.
| ►Back to the Start Page | ►Back to the Module Page | ►Go to the Next Chapter |
