Difference between revisions of "Tariffs and Billings Systems - Experience Matrix - MATA 2009"
From energypedia
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | planned in Ethiopia / EnDev / Micro Hydro Schemes | + | | planned in Ethiopia / EnDev / Micro Hydro Schemes |
| | | | ||
*flat rate (no productive use) + mech.load limiter; only CLF, no social tariff | *flat rate (no productive use) + mech.load limiter; only CLF, no social tariff | ||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Subsidies and Financing]] |
Revision as of 11:56, 10 July 2009
Results of the discussions during Mata 2009 about:
Which tariffs and billing systems have been successful? Which challenges have been identified?
Country/Project/System | system applied successful | Challenge |
Indonesia / MHP /Micro Hydro Schemes |
Communal-set tariffs
2. |
|
Pakistan | Item based (eg #of bulbs) | |
planned in Ethiopia / EnDev / Micro Hydro Schemes |
|
|