Make sure you register to our monthly newsletter, it's going out soon! Stay up do date about the latest energy news and our current activities.
Click here to register!

Experience with Polyethylene Biogas Digester (PBD)

From energypedia
Revision as of 08:20, 25 February 2010 by ***** (***** | *****) (New page: '''<span style="font-size: 14pt;">Experience Polyethylene Biogas Digester (PBD) from</span>''' some countries.   '''Overview''' <span>Polyethylene Biogas Digesters have been use...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Experience Polyethylene Biogas Digester (PBD) from some countries.

 

Overview

Polyethylene Biogas Digesters have been used repeatedly over the last 15 years. In some areas they have been abandoned after unsuccessful introduction but usage has never stopped completely. Although data about the lifespan and reliability of plastic digesters are rare, reports show that the lifespan of the plastic tubes is always a main issue.

They can just be operated properly if the farmers take care about the digesters. This needs intensive training and raised responsibility amongst the farmers.

If they do, experiences showed that most problems are easily to handle and can be fixed by farmers.

 

Below are some extracts of information collected from the Internet from experiences with plastic tube digesters in other countries

 

 

Vietnam:

Over 30,000 Units have been installed over the past ten years in Vietnam and was widely accepted by the farmers

(Presentation by Vo Lam, Takeshi Watanabe, College of Agriculture, Cantho University. Vietnam)

                                   

 

Tanzania'

It is concluded that the main reasons for failure was insufficient training of farmers and insufficient follow up by Surude.

(Evaluation of small scale biogas digesters in Turiani, Nronga and Amani, Tanzania

by University of Aarhus, Denmark)

 

 

Honduras:

Polyethylene Plastic tubes must be purchased in large quantities. Need of a third party to act as a distributor to farmers.

Flooding for digesters laid in trench

(Emerging Biodigester Technology in Honduras: Biophysical Process and Operation

By N. Stuart Green; Montana Tech of the Universityof Montana, 1999)

 

 

Kenya:

After a false start in promoting this energy source in Kenya in the mid 1990s, it was successfully reintroduced by KARI-Embu in 2005. According to Erastus Kiruiro from KARI-Embu there are around 300 tubular digesters in use, mostly in Central Kenya but also around Nairobi

(The Organic Farmer, The Magazine for sustainable agriculture in Kenya, Nr. 45 February 2009)

 

Based on Promoting Biogas Systems in Kenya, a</span

“Pioneer Technologies” (a Kenyan plastic company) has built 200 plants since 2006.

They improved the plastic tubes to be better sun and pressure resistant.

It has not been a successful story yet due to:

-       there is no reliable back-up support

-       “The digester seems to suffer from effects of variable temperature, and there is a possibility that the heat catalyses some reactions that produce other volatile gases as well as methane”

 

It is still a promising approach which is strongly driven by KARI. Currently there are many problems and referring to the feasibility study mentioned above 4 of 5 visited plants had some technical problems but most of them could have been solved easily. 

 

“Development of the plastic tubular technology was initiated in August 2006.

The Plastic Tubular bio-digesters are designed for households with two to three animals although bigger ones have been installed. Capacity of the former is about 8-9 m3, with a gas holding chamber of 1-3 m3. A larger one that doubles this size has already been installed. The smaller Plastic Tubular Bio-digesters can give gas for six hours using one burner. Methane production is initially dependent on temperatures.

Currently, Pioneer Technologies Ltd receives support from Land O’lakes and has entered into research collaboration with Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT). Land O’Lakes gives financial support to the company in the production of biogas digesters. JKUAT is supposed to carry out investigations into issues arising from the use of the technology, with focus on how the technology can be improved, made more efficient etc. However, Pioneer Technologies Ltd gave the JKUAT one digester only, and so the university should acquire more digesters for any meaningful research to be done.

 

Pioneer Technologies Ltd has installed its bio-digester in various parts of the country including Nakuru, Meru, Kisumu, Kiambu, the coastal regions and the environs of Nairobi. The company has capacity to install up to 3,000 units a year, but there are several challenges including:

-       Most households need some financial support to acquire the technology. At cost, a Plastic Tubular Bio-digester goes for €322 only. However, this excludes the cost of transport – and so areas further away from Nairobi pay more money. In Meru, users paid up to €399. The cost of the technology, though coming down is prohibitive to most farmers, although when financial and economic analyses are made, especially taking into account opportunity costs vis a vis other energy technologies, it is very likely that bio-digesters will be economical and profitable.

-       Training of technicians to support the technology is costly. Not all technicians trained will work on the digesters forever, some move on. There is need for the technology to be supported by some form of extension. Regular visits to households that have installed it are critical for longevity, good use and success of the technology.

-       Many people are not aware of the existence of the technology, or if aware, do not have adequate information on how the technology actually works. This is a hindrance to large-scale adoption.

-       At times, the technology fails because of unmet expectations. Even the Plastic Tubular Bio-digester has some technical problems – and these need to be sorted out. Without a reliable back-up support, small problems can lead potential users to shun away from it. But companies like Pioneer Technology Ltd cannot afford to have an extension/back-up support team because it already charges very low figures to install a unit.

-       Users need to be trained, and this is quite costly. This is where organisations like Land O’Lakes come in.

-       There are many research needs on the technology

 

Pioneer Technologies Ltd has trained 7 technicians to support the technology and at least 300 or so units have been installed country wide and despite small problems, all are now working.”