Difference between revisions of "Income of Actors in the Value Chain of Different Technologies"
***** (***** | *****) |
***** (***** | *****) |
||
| (30 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
= Overview = | = Overview = | ||
| − | Examining and analysing value chains is necessary to be able to strengthen the single links that make it a whole and in consequence develop them further. This evolvement leads to economic advancement and thus to an upturn in the incomes of the players along the chain. This article provides an insight into the income of actors in the value chain of different technologies. | + | Examining and analysing [[Value Chains of Different Technologies|value chains]] is necessary to be able to strengthen the single links that make it a whole and in consequence develop them further. This evolvement leads to economic advancement and thus to an upturn in the incomes of the players along the chain. This article provides an insight into the income of actors in the value chain of different technologies. |
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
= Actors in the Value Chain of Different RE Technologies<br/> = | = Actors in the Value Chain of Different RE Technologies<br/> = | ||
| Line 8: | Line 12: | ||
== <br/>Who are Value Chain Actors? == | == <br/>Who are Value Chain Actors? == | ||
| − | All providers of operational and/or supporting services to produce, market and deliver a product are actors of the value chain. These are individuals, private companies as well as public agencies. If government institutions subordinate to the business environment of the respective value chain play an integral part they can also be value chain actors. | + | All providers of operational and/or supporting services to produce, market and deliver a product are actors of the [[Value Chains of Different Technologies#The Product Value Chain|value chain]]. These are individuals, private companies as well as public agencies. If government institutions subordinate to the business environment of the respective value chain play an integral part they can also be value chain actors.<ref name="GTZ, n.d.. ValueLinks Manual – The Methodology of Value Chain Promotion – First Edition. http://www2.giz.de/wbf/4tDx9kw63gma/ValueLinks_Manual.pdf">GTZ, n.d.. ValueLinks Manual – The Methodology of Value Chain Promotion – First Edition. http://www2.giz.de/wbf/4tDx9kw63gma/ValueLinks_Manual.pdf</ref> |
| − | + | <br/> | |
== Solar Systems == | == Solar Systems == | ||
| − | The Off-Grid Solar sector has evolved continuously in the last years. The market now accommodates a wide spectrum of actors, various stakeholders, a broad range of products as well as innovative business models such as PAYGO. Furthermore, recent developments enabling SHS to power productive use appliances will have a great impact on the market and its players. | + | The [[Portal:Solar|Off-Grid Solar sector]] has evolved continuously in the last years. The [[Market for Solar Home Systems (SHS)|market]] now accommodates a wide spectrum of actors, various stakeholders, a broad range of products as well as innovative business models such as [[Pay-as-you-go Approaches (PAYGO)|PAYGO]]. Furthermore, recent developments enabling SHS to power productive use appliances will have a great impact on the market and its players.<ref name="Lighting Global/GOGLA, 2018. Off-Grid Solar Market Trends Report 2018. https://gallery.mailchimp.com/cb42ca6d63b6f335fac8f0694/files/40b8690a-3325-4c05-89fa-21931059c24f/2018_Off_Grid_Solar_Market_Trends_Report_Full.pdf">Lighting Global/GOGLA, 2018. Off-Grid Solar Market Trends Report 2018. https://gallery.mailchimp.com/cb42ca6d63b6f335fac8f0694/files/40b8690a-3325-4c05-89fa-21931059c24f/2018_Off_Grid_Solar_Market_Trends_Report_Full.pdf</ref> |
| − | |||
| − | Lighting Global/GOGLA, 2018. Off-Grid Solar Market Trends Report 2018. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
=== PicoPV === | === PicoPV === | ||
| − | The number of actors in a PicoPV market depends on the type of the distribution models in place. There are two common schemes which are the integrated supply chain model and the distribution dealer model. In the first one all actions along the value chain down to the retail are taken over by one solar lantern company. The latter describes a scenario where several actors play a role in the value chain. There is the lantern producing company, the importer, commercial retailers as well as FBO’s/CO-OP’s/SACCOs (Figure 1, Figure 2). | + | The number of actors in a [[Market for PicoPV|PicoPV market]] depends on the type of the [[Solar Lantern Dissemination Models and Their Economic Viability|distribution models]] in place. There are two common schemes which are the integrated supply chain model and the distribution dealer model. In the first one all actions along the value chain down to the retail are taken over by one solar lantern company. The latter describes a scenario where several actors play a role in the value chain. There is the lantern producing company, the importer, commercial retailers as well as FBO’s/CO-OP’s/SACCOs (Figure 1, Figure 2).<ref name="EUEI PDF, 2015. Building Energy Access Markets – A Value Chain Analysis of Key Energy Market Systems. http://www.euei-pdf.org/sites/default/files/field_publication_file/150907_euei_value-chain_en_rz_03_web.pdf">EUEI PDF, 2015. Building Energy Access Markets – A Value Chain Analysis of Key Energy Market Systems. http://www.euei-pdf.org/sites/default/files/field_publication_file/150907_euei_value-chain_en_rz_03_web.pdf</ref> |
| − | + | [[File:Figure 1. Integrated supply chain model (EUEI PDF 2015)..png|thumb|center|720px|Figure 1. Integrated supply chain model (EUEI PDF 2015).|link=File:Figure 1. Integrated supply chain model (EUEI PDF 2015)..png]]<br/> | |
| − | Figure | + | [[File:Figure 2. Distribution dealer model (EUEI PDF 2015)..png|thumb|center|720px|Figure 2. Distribution dealer model (EUEI PDF 2015).|link=File:Figure 2. Distribution dealer model (EUEI PDF 2015)..png]]<br/> |
| − | + | <br/> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
=== Solar-Home-Systems === | === Solar-Home-Systems === | ||
| − | The Solar Home | + | The [[Market for Solar Home Systems (SHS)|Solar Home System (SHS) market]] has similar value chain scenarios as described for the [[Market Trends in the PicoPV Sector and the Role of Development Cooperation|PicoPV market]]. Thus, common players can range from one dominating enterprise to several importers, distributors, associations and cooperatives. However, in addition franchises engaged in retail and/or rental and leasing can also be found in the SHS market (Figure 3).<ref name="EUEI PDF, 2015. Building Energy Access Markets – A Value Chain Analysis of Key Energy Market Systems. http://www.euei-pdf.org/sites/default/files/field_publication_file/150907_euei_value-chain_en_rz_03_web.pdf">EUEI PDF, 2015. Building Energy Access Markets – A Value Chain Analysis of Key Energy Market Systems. http://www.euei-pdf.org/sites/default/files/field_publication_file/150907_euei_value-chain_en_rz_03_web.pdf</ref> |
| − | + | [[File:Fee-for-service business model (EUEI PDF 2015)..png|thumb|center|720px|Figure 3. Fee-for-service business model (EUEI PDF 2015)|link=File:Fee-for-service business model (EUEI PDF 2015)..png]]<br/> | |
| − | Figure 3. Fee-for-service business model (EUEI PDF 2015). | + | Figure 3. Fee-for-service business model (EUEI PDF 2015).<br/> |
| − | + | <br/> | |
=== Solar Mini-Grid === | === Solar Mini-Grid === | ||
| − | Different organisational structures determine the number and type of actors in the Mini-Grid Value Chain. Import, manufacture and assembling, retail, supply and installation can be carried out by various actors. Apart from the operational services, supporting services are provided by project developers, electricity companies, financial institutions, companies tasked with maintenance and consultants. | + | Different organisational structures determine the number and type of actors in the Mini-Grid Value Chain. Import, manufacture and assembling, retail, supply and installation can be carried out by various actors. Apart from the operational services, supporting services are provided by project developers, electricity companies, financial institutions, companies tasked with maintenance and consultants.<ref name="Mali, S. et al, 2016. Value Chain Analysis of the Solar PV Market in Pakistan. https://www.solarwirtschaft.de/fileadmin/user_upload/BSW_VCA_Report_Final.pdf">Mali, S. et al, 2016. Value Chain Analysis of the Solar PV Market in Pakistan. https://www.solarwirtschaft.de/fileadmin/user_upload/BSW_VCA_Report_Final.pdf</ref> |
| − | + | <br/> | |
== Improved Cookstoves (ICS) == | == Improved Cookstoves (ICS) == | ||
| − | In the ICS market the type of players engaged is based on the manufacturing method of the stoves. For locally and centrally produced stoves most of the value chain is covered by the stove producers themselves. Whereas for local-decentral and artisanal production as well as internationally produced stoves more actors such as importers and assemblers, distributers and national and local retailers are involved in the process. | + | In the [[Portal:Improved Cooking|ICS]] market the type of players engaged is based on the manufacturing method of the stoves. For locally and centrally produced stoves most of the value chain is covered by the stove producers themselves. Whereas for local-decentral and artisanal production as well as internationally produced stoves more actors such as importers and assemblers, distributers and national and local retailers are involved in the process.<ref name="Clough, L., 2012. ‘The Improved Cookstove Sector in East Africa: Experience from the Developing Energy Enterprise Programme (DEEP)’ (GVEP International, 2012). http://www.gvepinternational.org/sites/default/files/deep_cookstoves_report_lq_for_web.pdf.">Clough, L., 2012. ‘The Improved Cookstove Sector in East Africa: Experience from the Developing Energy Enterprise Programme (DEEP)’ (GVEP International, 2012). http://www.gvepinternational.org/sites/default/files/deep_cookstoves_report_lq_for_web.pdf.</ref> |
| − | + | <br/> | |
== Micro-Hydropower == | == Micro-Hydropower == | ||
| Line 71: | Line 61: | ||
| | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
= Income of Actors in the Value Chain of Different Technologies = | = Income of Actors in the Value Chain of Different Technologies = | ||
| | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
== Income generation through SHS == | == Income generation through SHS == | ||
| − | There has been a lot of governmental subsidisation of the | + | There has been a lot of governmental subsidisation of the [[Market for Solar Home Systems (SHS)|SHS market]] especially in countries where the targeted end consumer is not able to afford the high upfront cost of these systems. However, this attempt to facilitate the market can then backfire once subsidies are taken away and lead to severe misallocations. In these scenarios especially the small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) at the end of the chain suffer great losses in revenues.<ref name="Reiche, K. et al, 2010. What difference can a PicoPV system make? Early findings on small Photovoltaic systems - an emerging lowcost energy technology for developing countries. https://energypedia.info/images/3/3b/Gtz_picopv_booklet.pdf">Reiche, K. et al, 2010. What difference can a PicoPV system make? Early findings on small Photovoltaic systems - an emerging lowcost energy technology for developing countries. https://energypedia.info/images/3/3b/Gtz_picopv_booklet.pdf</ref> |
| − | + | However, new business models such as [[Pay-as-you-go Approaches (PAYGO)|PAYGO]] have helped to push the [[Market for Solar Home Systems (SHS)|SHS market]] and increase revenue. Yet, these capital-intensive innovations have mostly benefitted the larger players in the market. In addition, SMEs struggle even more with the number of defaulting customers. | |
| − | + | As can be seen in Figure 4 although the end-user price increases the longer the contract is the average profit margin before overheads of $ 63 for the SHS company remains the same. This results from higher financing and risk costs that need to be taken into account.<ref name="Lepicard, F. et al, 2017. REACHING SCALE IN ACCESS TO ENERGY - Lessons from practitioners. https://www.gogla.org/sites/default/files/recource_docs/hystra_energy_report.pdf">Lepicard, F. et al, 2017. REACHING SCALE IN ACCESS TO ENERGY - Lessons from practitioners. https://www.gogla.org/sites/default/files/recource_docs/hystra_energy_report.pdf</ref> | |
| − | + | [[File:End-user price breakdown in different contract models (Lepicard et al., 2017).PNG|thumb|center|500px|Figure 4. End-user price breakdown in different contract models (Lepicard et al., 2017).|link=File:End-user price breakdown in different contract models (Lepicard et al., 2017).PNG]] | |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| − | + | <br/> | |
| − | + | <br/> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
== Income generation through PicoPV == | == Income generation through PicoPV == | ||
| − | Research on income generation through PicoPV | + | Research on income generation through [[PicoPV Types|PicoPV]] has mainly been done on the level of the local retailers, the last-mile-entrepreneurs (LMEs). A study carried out by RWI on [[Portal:Improved Cooking|ICS]] and [[PicoPV Types|PicoPV]] in Kenya found that individuals stepping into the [[PicoPV Types|PicoPV]] market as retailers have been able to increase their average monthly net income in comparison to other income generating activities they had pursued before. Furthermore, the study revealed that there is an initial gender gap when individuals take up this business. However, in comparison to the improved stove sector female entrepreneurs in this market are more successful in closing this gap.<ref name="Bensch, G. et al, 2016. Employment and income effects of improved cook stove and pico-solar interventions: An impact evaluation of the EnDev Kenya Programme. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/145965/1/866079807.pdf">Bensch, G. et al, 2016. Employment and income effects of improved cook stove and pico-solar interventions: An impact evaluation of the EnDev Kenya Programme. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/145965/1/866079807.pdf</ref> |
| − | + | Another finding in a study on the [[Market Trends in the PicoPV Sector and the Role of Development Cooperation#Recent Market Trends|PicoPV market development in Tanzania]] was that the interviewed LMEs enjoyed working with solar technologies very much as 35% chose score 9 or above on a satisfaction scale from 1 to 10. Main reasons given for this level of satisfaction were that the solar business is very profitable. Quantitative information on profits or income was difficult to obtain since many businesses refused to talk about the details of their operation.<ref name="Gemio Beltrán, G. 2016. Market Development Assessment of Pico PV Systems in Tanzania’s Lake Zone Rural Areas (internal EnDev document)">Gemio Beltrán, G. 2016. Market Development Assessment of Pico PV Systems in Tanzania’s Lake Zone Rural Areas (internal EnDev document)</ref> | |
| − | + | For more information, see [[Productive End Use of PicoPV|Productive End Use of PicoPV]]. | |
| − | |||
== Income generation through ICS == | == Income generation through ICS == | ||
| − | Also for the ICS several studies can be found on the business development of small-scale and local stove entrepreneurs. A study in Kenya showed that although there are a few stove producers and salesmen for whom the stove business is the main source of income, the majority pursues additional income-generating businesses. Thus, due to the various parallel income sources it is difficult to depict the actual income generated from the stove business. Furthermore, the businesses were informal, hence the entrepreneurs were not obliged to keep sales records and did not do so. Nonetheless, the study displays an estimate given by the stove entrepreneurs on their total monthly income and their stove business revenue in Kenya Shillings. | + | Also for the [[Portal:Improved Cooking|ICS]] several studies can be found on the business development of small-scale and local stove entrepreneurs. A study in [[Kenya Energy Situation|Kenya]] showed that although there are a few stove producers and salesmen for whom the stove business is the main source of income, the majority pursues additional income-generating businesses. Thus, due to the various parallel income sources it is difficult to depict the actual income generated from the stove business. Furthermore, the businesses were informal, hence the entrepreneurs were not obliged to keep sales records and did not do so. Nonetheless, the study displays an estimate given by the stove entrepreneurs on their total monthly income and their stove business revenue in Kenya Shillings. |
| − | Table 1. Monthly income of stove entrepreneurs (Hartmann et al., 2016). | + | [[File:Monthly income of stove entrepreneurs (Hartmann et al., 2016)..png|thumb|center|500px|Table 1. Monthly income of stove entrepreneurs (Hartmann et al., 2016).|link=File:Monthly income of stove entrepreneurs (Hartmann et al., 2016)..png]] |
| − | + | <br/> | |
| − | + | Table 1 above shows that a third of the interviewed entrepreneurs earned EUR 8.00 – EUR 24.00 per month from their stove business and around 48% of them can created a monthly revenue ranging from EUR 24.00 up to EUR 96.00.<ref name="Hartmann, J et. al, 2016. MEASURING MARKET DEVELOPMENT IN KENYA - Testing the Energy Access Market Development model. (internal EnDev document)">Hartmann, J et. al, 2016. MEASURING MARKET DEVELOPMENT IN KENYA - Testing the Energy Access Market Development model. (internal EnDev document)</ref> Thus, several individuals were exceeding the minimum monthly wage of a fulltime cleaner or gardener in the rural area at the time of the study which was approx. EUR 53.00.<ref name="Africapay.org, 2015. Minimum Wages in Kenya with effect from 01-05-2015. https://africapay.org/kenya/home/salary/minimum-wages/archive/1">Africapay.org, 2015. Minimum Wages in Kenya with effect from 01-05-2015. https://africapay.org/kenya/home/salary/minimum-wages/archive/1</ref> | |
| − | Figure 5. | + | The study also examined the value added per step along the value chain (stove producer – stove installer – customer) of locally produced ICS as seen in Figure 5 below. It showed that producers only have a profit margin of 88%, while installers have higher profit margins (189% of their costs).<ref name="Hartmann, J et. al, 2016. MEASURING MARKET DEVELOPMENT IN KENYA - Testing the Energy Access Market Development model. (internal EnDev document)">Hartmann, J et. al, 2016. MEASURING MARKET DEVELOPMENT IN KENYA - Testing the Energy Access Market Development model. (internal EnDev document)</ref> |
| − | + | [[File:ICS value chain (Hartmann et al., 2016)..jpg|thumb|center|720px|Figure 5. ICS value chain (Hartmann et al., 2016).|link=File:ICS value chain (Hartmann et al., 2016)..jpg]] | |
| − | + | <br/> | |
| − | A study carried out in Cambodia on ICS production in rural settings identified a daily income of EUR 1.08 for a potter in an ICS production centre amounting to EUR 32.4 per month. A few potters were selected to receive an additional training to step up production efficiency and quality. Division of labour was introduced to the production process also resulting into an increase of income for the potters. Depending on the tasks carried out during the day, the daily income ranged from EUR 1.75 to EUR 2.62. This amounts to a monthly income of EUR 52.5 to EUR 78.6 meaning that individuals were achieving up to twice the minimum wage of EUR 42.6 in 2010 when the study was carried out | + | A study carried out in [[Cambodia Energy Situation|Cambodia]] on ICS production in rural settings identified a daily income of EUR 1.08 for a potter in an ICS production centre amounting to EUR 32.4 per month. A few potters were selected to receive an additional training to step up production efficiency and quality. Division of labour was introduced to the production process also resulting into an increase of income for the potters. Depending on the tasks carried out during the day, the daily income ranged from EUR 1.75 to EUR 2.62.<ref name="The World Bank, 2010. Cambodia: Supporting Self-Sustaining Commercial Markets for Improved Cookstoves and Household Biodigesters. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/495411468046793044/pdf/611560WP0P12021usehold0Biodigesters.pdf">The World Bank, 2010. Cambodia: Supporting Self-Sustaining Commercial Markets for Improved Cookstoves and Household Biodigesters. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/495411468046793044/pdf/611560WP0P12021usehold0Biodigesters.pdf</ref> This amounts to a monthly income of EUR 52.5 to EUR 78.6 meaning that individuals were achieving up to twice the minimum wage of EUR 42.6 in 2010 when the study was carried out.<ref name="ILO, 2016. Cambodian Garment and Footwear Sector Bulletin. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/documents/publication/wcms_463849.pdf">ILO, 2016. Cambodian Garment and Footwear Sector Bulletin. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/documents/publication/wcms_463849.pdf</ref><span style="font-size: 0.85em;"> </span> |
| − | + | Another study was able to identify a gender gap in the income generated from stoves. Female stove entrepreneurs earned less money from their businesses than their male colleagues.<ref name="Bensch, G. et al, 2016. Employment and income effects of improved cook stove and pico-solar interventions: An impact evaluation of the EnDev Kenya Programme. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/145965/1/866079807.pdf">Bensch, G. et al, 2016. Employment and income effects of improved cook stove and pico-solar interventions: An impact evaluation of the EnDev Kenya Programme. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/145965/1/866079807.pdf</ref> | |
| − | + | <br/> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
= Conclusion<br/> = | = Conclusion<br/> = | ||
| Line 144: | Line 135: | ||
No valuable information on income of the actors along the value chain of Micro-Hydropower could be found. | No valuable information on income of the actors along the value chain of Micro-Hydropower could be found. | ||
| − | + | <br/> | |
| − | |||
| − | + | = Further Information = | |
| − | Value chain analysis of solar energy technologies in Tunisia. | + | *[[Value_Chains_of_Different_Technologies|Value chains of different technologies]]<br/> |
| + | *[http://www2.giz.de/wbf/4tDx9kw63gma/ValueLinks_Manual.pdf Value chain promotion: economic development from a value chain perspective] | ||
| + | *[[Value Chain Analysis of Solar Energy Technologies in Tunisia|Value chain analysis of solar energy technologies in Tunisia]] | ||
| + | *[http://www.minigridpolicytoolkit.euei-pdf.org/casestudies Several Mini-Grid Case studies showing different business and operation models] | ||
| − | + | <br/> | |
| − | |||
| − | + | = References = | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | <references /> | |
| − | + | [[Category:Energy_Access]] | |
| + | [[Category:Solar_Lighting]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Solar]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Solar_Home_Systems_(SHS)]] | ||
| + | [[Category:PicoPV]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Improved_Cooking]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Cooking_Energy]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:18, 9 October 2018
Overview
Examining and analysing value chains is necessary to be able to strengthen the single links that make it a whole and in consequence develop them further. This evolvement leads to economic advancement and thus to an upturn in the incomes of the players along the chain. This article provides an insight into the income of actors in the value chain of different technologies.
Actors in the Value Chain of Different RE Technologies
Who are Value Chain Actors?
All providers of operational and/or supporting services to produce, market and deliver a product are actors of the value chain. These are individuals, private companies as well as public agencies. If government institutions subordinate to the business environment of the respective value chain play an integral part they can also be value chain actors.[1]
Solar Systems
The Off-Grid Solar sector has evolved continuously in the last years. The market now accommodates a wide spectrum of actors, various stakeholders, a broad range of products as well as innovative business models such as PAYGO. Furthermore, recent developments enabling SHS to power productive use appliances will have a great impact on the market and its players.[2]
PicoPV
The number of actors in a PicoPV market depends on the type of the distribution models in place. There are two common schemes which are the integrated supply chain model and the distribution dealer model. In the first one all actions along the value chain down to the retail are taken over by one solar lantern company. The latter describes a scenario where several actors play a role in the value chain. There is the lantern producing company, the importer, commercial retailers as well as FBO’s/CO-OP’s/SACCOs (Figure 1, Figure 2).[3]
..png)
..png)
Solar-Home-Systems
The Solar Home System (SHS) market has similar value chain scenarios as described for the PicoPV market. Thus, common players can range from one dominating enterprise to several importers, distributors, associations and cooperatives. However, in addition franchises engaged in retail and/or rental and leasing can also be found in the SHS market (Figure 3).[3]
..png)
Figure 3. Fee-for-service business model (EUEI PDF 2015).
Solar Mini-Grid
Different organisational structures determine the number and type of actors in the Mini-Grid Value Chain. Import, manufacture and assembling, retail, supply and installation can be carried out by various actors. Apart from the operational services, supporting services are provided by project developers, electricity companies, financial institutions, companies tasked with maintenance and consultants.[4]
Improved Cookstoves (ICS)
In the ICS market the type of players engaged is based on the manufacturing method of the stoves. For locally and centrally produced stoves most of the value chain is covered by the stove producers themselves. Whereas for local-decentral and artisanal production as well as internationally produced stoves more actors such as importers and assemblers, distributers and national and local retailers are involved in the process.[5]
Micro-Hydropower
Please feel free to add further information here.
Biogas
Please feel free to add further information here.
Income of Actors in the Value Chain of Different Technologies
Income generation through SHS
There has been a lot of governmental subsidisation of the SHS market especially in countries where the targeted end consumer is not able to afford the high upfront cost of these systems. However, this attempt to facilitate the market can then backfire once subsidies are taken away and lead to severe misallocations. In these scenarios especially the small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) at the end of the chain suffer great losses in revenues.[6]
However, new business models such as PAYGO have helped to push the SHS market and increase revenue. Yet, these capital-intensive innovations have mostly benefitted the larger players in the market. In addition, SMEs struggle even more with the number of defaulting customers.
As can be seen in Figure 4 although the end-user price increases the longer the contract is the average profit margin before overheads of $ 63 for the SHS company remains the same. This results from higher financing and risk costs that need to be taken into account.[7]
.PNG)
Income generation through PicoPV
Research on income generation through PicoPV has mainly been done on the level of the local retailers, the last-mile-entrepreneurs (LMEs). A study carried out by RWI on ICS and PicoPV in Kenya found that individuals stepping into the PicoPV market as retailers have been able to increase their average monthly net income in comparison to other income generating activities they had pursued before. Furthermore, the study revealed that there is an initial gender gap when individuals take up this business. However, in comparison to the improved stove sector female entrepreneurs in this market are more successful in closing this gap.[8]
Another finding in a study on the PicoPV market development in Tanzania was that the interviewed LMEs enjoyed working with solar technologies very much as 35% chose score 9 or above on a satisfaction scale from 1 to 10. Main reasons given for this level of satisfaction were that the solar business is very profitable. Quantitative information on profits or income was difficult to obtain since many businesses refused to talk about the details of their operation.[9]
For more information, see Productive End Use of PicoPV.
Income generation through ICS
Also for the ICS several studies can be found on the business development of small-scale and local stove entrepreneurs. A study in Kenya showed that although there are a few stove producers and salesmen for whom the stove business is the main source of income, the majority pursues additional income-generating businesses. Thus, due to the various parallel income sources it is difficult to depict the actual income generated from the stove business. Furthermore, the businesses were informal, hence the entrepreneurs were not obliged to keep sales records and did not do so. Nonetheless, the study displays an estimate given by the stove entrepreneurs on their total monthly income and their stove business revenue in Kenya Shillings.
..png)
Table 1 above shows that a third of the interviewed entrepreneurs earned EUR 8.00 – EUR 24.00 per month from their stove business and around 48% of them can created a monthly revenue ranging from EUR 24.00 up to EUR 96.00.[10] Thus, several individuals were exceeding the minimum monthly wage of a fulltime cleaner or gardener in the rural area at the time of the study which was approx. EUR 53.00.[11]
The study also examined the value added per step along the value chain (stove producer – stove installer – customer) of locally produced ICS as seen in Figure 5 below. It showed that producers only have a profit margin of 88%, while installers have higher profit margins (189% of their costs).[10]
..jpg)
A study carried out in Cambodia on ICS production in rural settings identified a daily income of EUR 1.08 for a potter in an ICS production centre amounting to EUR 32.4 per month. A few potters were selected to receive an additional training to step up production efficiency and quality. Division of labour was introduced to the production process also resulting into an increase of income for the potters. Depending on the tasks carried out during the day, the daily income ranged from EUR 1.75 to EUR 2.62.[12] This amounts to a monthly income of EUR 52.5 to EUR 78.6 meaning that individuals were achieving up to twice the minimum wage of EUR 42.6 in 2010 when the study was carried out.[13]
Another study was able to identify a gender gap in the income generated from stoves. Female stove entrepreneurs earned less money from their businesses than their male colleagues.[8]
Conclusion
In RE technology markets a wide range of business and distribution models can be found accommodating various actors. However, quantitative information on the different income levels is hardly available. Various studies on business models and market analyses exist, yet barely any of these examine income, profit margins or even revenue of the market players in detail. As mentioned above concerning retailers and entrepreneurs at the end of the chains the difficulties of obtaining this particular information are the various income generating activities carried out in parallel as well as the informality of the businesses. Regarding the actors further up the chain which are generally formal larger enterprises the issue here is probably reluctance to share internal information on revenue or profit of the company.
Nevertheless, it was noticed that LMEs can increase their monthly income by engaging entrepreneurially with RE technologies. In the improved stove market, installers have a significant higher profit margin than producers. Further, on the LME level of the chain gender inequality in earnings remains an issue in all markets.
Further Research
Very little information on the income generation of the actors along the value chain of renewable energy technologies exists. Further research is necessary along the whole value chain to display the different profit margins, added value and incomes and thus, getting closer to uncovering inequalities along the chain. This would in turn create possibilities to enable win-win situations and strengthen the chain performance.
No valuable information on income of the actors along the value chain of Micro-Hydropower could be found.
Further Information
- Value chains of different technologies
- Value chain promotion: economic development from a value chain perspective
- Value chain analysis of solar energy technologies in Tunisia
- Several Mini-Grid Case studies showing different business and operation models
References
- ↑ GTZ, n.d.. ValueLinks Manual – The Methodology of Value Chain Promotion – First Edition. http://www2.giz.de/wbf/4tDx9kw63gma/ValueLinks_Manual.pdf
- ↑ Lighting Global/GOGLA, 2018. Off-Grid Solar Market Trends Report 2018. https://gallery.mailchimp.com/cb42ca6d63b6f335fac8f0694/files/40b8690a-3325-4c05-89fa-21931059c24f/2018_Off_Grid_Solar_Market_Trends_Report_Full.pdf
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 EUEI PDF, 2015. Building Energy Access Markets – A Value Chain Analysis of Key Energy Market Systems. http://www.euei-pdf.org/sites/default/files/field_publication_file/150907_euei_value-chain_en_rz_03_web.pdf
- ↑ Mali, S. et al, 2016. Value Chain Analysis of the Solar PV Market in Pakistan. https://www.solarwirtschaft.de/fileadmin/user_upload/BSW_VCA_Report_Final.pdf
- ↑ Clough, L., 2012. ‘The Improved Cookstove Sector in East Africa: Experience from the Developing Energy Enterprise Programme (DEEP)’ (GVEP International, 2012). http://www.gvepinternational.org/sites/default/files/deep_cookstoves_report_lq_for_web.pdf.
- ↑ Reiche, K. et al, 2010. What difference can a PicoPV system make? Early findings on small Photovoltaic systems - an emerging lowcost energy technology for developing countries. https://energypedia.info/images/3/3b/Gtz_picopv_booklet.pdf
- ↑ Lepicard, F. et al, 2017. REACHING SCALE IN ACCESS TO ENERGY - Lessons from practitioners. https://www.gogla.org/sites/default/files/recource_docs/hystra_energy_report.pdf
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Bensch, G. et al, 2016. Employment and income effects of improved cook stove and pico-solar interventions: An impact evaluation of the EnDev Kenya Programme. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/145965/1/866079807.pdf
- ↑ Gemio Beltrán, G. 2016. Market Development Assessment of Pico PV Systems in Tanzania’s Lake Zone Rural Areas (internal EnDev document)
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Hartmann, J et. al, 2016. MEASURING MARKET DEVELOPMENT IN KENYA - Testing the Energy Access Market Development model. (internal EnDev document)
- ↑ Africapay.org, 2015. Minimum Wages in Kenya with effect from 01-05-2015. https://africapay.org/kenya/home/salary/minimum-wages/archive/1
- ↑ The World Bank, 2010. Cambodia: Supporting Self-Sustaining Commercial Markets for Improved Cookstoves and Household Biodigesters. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/495411468046793044/pdf/611560WP0P12021usehold0Biodigesters.pdf
- ↑ ILO, 2016. Cambodian Garment and Footwear Sector Bulletin. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/documents/publication/wcms_463849.pdf
