Difference between revisions of "Knowledge Management and Transfer for Microenergy Systems – Crossing Borders Worldwide"
***** (***** | *****) m (→Overview) |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | = Overview = | |
− | Overview | ||
During the management and transfer of knowledge between diverse groups, such as academics and practicitioners, the North and South, enterprises and investors, companies and clients, and even between diverse academic disciplines, one must find a means to understanding. | During the management and transfer of knowledge between diverse groups, such as academics and practicitioners, the North and South, enterprises and investors, companies and clients, and even between diverse academic disciplines, one must find a means to understanding. | ||
Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
Multi-stakeholder interaction requires bridging communication borders with diverse methods and tools that either translate or determine common languages, and eventually turn theory into practice. | Multi-stakeholder interaction requires bridging communication borders with diverse methods and tools that either translate or determine common languages, and eventually turn theory into practice. | ||
− | Challenges | + | == Challenges == |
Like many other processes, knowledge management and transfer is plagued with a myriad of challenges. The most basic that will be touched on in this workshop include the lack of incentives, even knowledge and communication that are foundational to communication capacities. Other challenges ranges from competition for, and confidentiality of information shared. Lastly, there is always the challenge in discerning what information is most pertinent to whom. | Like many other processes, knowledge management and transfer is plagued with a myriad of challenges. The most basic that will be touched on in this workshop include the lack of incentives, even knowledge and communication that are foundational to communication capacities. Other challenges ranges from competition for, and confidentiality of information shared. Lastly, there is always the challenge in discerning what information is most pertinent to whom. | ||
− | Strategies | + | == Strategies == |
In developing communication channels and tools, is the need for strategies. Understanding what and where the right forums are for knowledge management transfer can help agents differentiate between explicit and implicit knowledge. Strategies may also help motivate practitioners and academics to contribute to knowledge sharing. | In developing communication channels and tools, is the need for strategies. Understanding what and where the right forums are for knowledge management transfer can help agents differentiate between explicit and implicit knowledge. Strategies may also help motivate practitioners and academics to contribute to knowledge sharing. | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
= Off-grid Access System in South Asia (OASYS)<ref name="Debajit Palit, The Energy & Resources Institute, New Delhi, India">Debajit Palit, The Energy & Resources Institute, New Delhi, India</ref> = | = Off-grid Access System in South Asia (OASYS)<ref name="Debajit Palit, The Energy & Resources Institute, New Delhi, India">Debajit Palit, The Energy & Resources Institute, New Delhi, India</ref> = | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Two multi-stakeholder projects are most relevant to this session. They demonstrate micro energy systems that are closer linked to communities at a local level. | Two multi-stakeholder projects are most relevant to this session. They demonstrate micro energy systems that are closer linked to communities at a local level. | ||
− | OASYS introduced business models for decentralized off-grid electricity generation in developing countries. OASYS started in 2009, with the motivation of researching technical aspects and general cost-effectiveness. The research firstly discovered to main knowledge gaps: <br/> | + | OASYS introduced business models for decentralized off-grid electricity generation in developing countries. OASYS started in 2009, with the motivation of researching technical aspects and general cost-effectiveness. The research firstly discovered to main knowledge gaps:<br/> |
− | *Lack of knowledge regarding Business Models and institutional arrangements for delivery <br/> | + | *Lack of knowledge regarding Business Models and institutional arrangements for delivery<br/> |
*Limited or lack of experience in project scale-up and project sustainability | *Limited or lack of experience in project scale-up and project sustainability | ||
As a result, two questions arose to explore criteria relevant to the aforementioned knowledge gaps: | As a result, two questions arose to explore criteria relevant to the aforementioned knowledge gaps: | ||
− | #Are there cost-effective and reliable off-grid electricity supply solutions that can meet the present & future needs, are socially acceptable, institutionally viable and environmentally desirable?’ <br/> | + | #Are there cost-effective and reliable off-grid electricity supply solutions that can meet the present & future needs, are socially acceptable, institutionally viable and environmentally desirable?’<br/> |
#Do these local solutions have the scaling-up and replication potentials and can these solutions be brought to the mainstream for wider electricity access in the developing world?” | #Do these local solutions have the scaling-up and replication potentials and can these solutions be brought to the mainstream for wider electricity access in the developing world?” | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
The objective of the research and its activities was to transfer successful examples to new places. In addition to the comparative study of grid versus off-grid electrification processes as well as South Asian versus international regional, the research also tried to review existing projects and programs through literature reviews of roughly 100 research papers. The process was time consuming and difficult, but necessary to establish good base knowledge. A technologically independent framework was also developed as part of the research, as context resources determined the existence and feasibility to implement technology. Throughout the process, the cooperation between practitioners as well as academics was also emphasized. | The objective of the research and its activities was to transfer successful examples to new places. In addition to the comparative study of grid versus off-grid electrification processes as well as South Asian versus international regional, the research also tried to review existing projects and programs through literature reviews of roughly 100 research papers. The process was time consuming and difficult, but necessary to establish good base knowledge. A technologically independent framework was also developed as part of the research, as context resources determined the existence and feasibility to implement technology. Throughout the process, the cooperation between practitioners as well as academics was also emphasized. | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
= The Solar Transitions Project = | = The Solar Transitions Project = | ||
Line 54: | Line 55: | ||
<div>A successful aspect of this project was the “human diversity” as represented by the presence of researchers and practitioners, social scientists and technology implementers in a wide range of disciplines; from countries including India, Kenya, Austria, Norway and the USA.</div><div><br/></div> | <div>A successful aspect of this project was the “human diversity” as represented by the presence of researchers and practitioners, social scientists and technology implementers in a wide range of disciplines; from countries including India, Kenya, Austria, Norway and the USA.</div><div><br/></div> | ||
== Sub-Factors == | == Sub-Factors == | ||
− | <div>Four sub-categorial factors investigated in this project included 1) practical details and social organization of village scale power supply, 2) socio-economic impacts and people’s interests and demands, 3) implementation and management strategies, and lastly 4) relevant support mechanisms and barriers at state and national levels. The last two preceding factors were found to me most important in researching how mini grids actually work, and how to effectively transfer a the successful concept of the mini grid from India to Kenya. Mini grids were specifically chosen as capital investments for implementation have already been completed. Additional research objectives included contributions to the improvement of solar systems currently on market, and a socio-technical assessment to determine how to implement the most appropriate micro energy system in Kenyan markets.</div><div><br/></div><div>Knowledge management findings form the project were how to learn new systems, and then effectively adapt the system to new locations selected according to criterion that did not prioritize technology.</div><div><br/></div><div><br/></div><div><br/></div> | + | <div>Four sub-categorial factors investigated in this project included 1) practical details and social organization of village scale power supply, 2) socio-economic impacts and people’s interests and demands, 3) implementation and management strategies, and lastly 4) relevant support mechanisms and barriers at state and national levels. The last two preceding factors were found to me most important in researching how mini grids actually work, and how to effectively transfer a the successful concept of the mini grid from India to Kenya. Mini grids were specifically chosen as capital investments for implementation have already been completed. Additional research objectives included contributions to the improvement of solar systems currently on market, and a socio-technical assessment to determine how to implement the most appropriate micro energy system in Kenyan markets.</div><div><br/></div><div>Knowledge management findings form the project were how to learn new systems, and then effectively adapt the system to new locations selected according to criterion that did not prioritize technology.</div><div><br/></div><div><br/></div><div><br/></div> |
+ | </div></div> | ||
+ | <div> | ||
= Challenges of Knowledge Management<ref name="Gunnar Wegner, GIZ, Energising Development (EnDev)">Gunnar Wegner, GIZ, Energising Development (EnDev)</ref> = | = Challenges of Knowledge Management<ref name="Gunnar Wegner, GIZ, Energising Development (EnDev)">Gunnar Wegner, GIZ, Energising Development (EnDev)</ref> = | ||
<div><span style="font-size: 0.85em;">This second presentation introduces an impact oriented initiative that includes partners from the Netherlands, Germany, Norway, Australia, the United Kingdom and Switzerland. Since 2005, 18 beneficiary countries include 18 countries in Africa, Latin America, and Asia have received funds in annual funding competitions. The project also includes a monitoring system to track the mid- to long-term success of implemented projects.</span></div><div><br/></div> | <div><span style="font-size: 0.85em;">This second presentation introduces an impact oriented initiative that includes partners from the Netherlands, Germany, Norway, Australia, the United Kingdom and Switzerland. Since 2005, 18 beneficiary countries include 18 countries in Africa, Latin America, and Asia have received funds in annual funding competitions. The project also includes a monitoring system to track the mid- to long-term success of implemented projects.</span></div><div><br/></div> | ||
Line 60: | Line 63: | ||
* | * | ||
+ | |||
<u>‘Wait, I have it somewhere in my mailbox’</u> | <u>‘Wait, I have it somewhere in my mailbox’</u> | ||
<div>Three important aspects constitute successful knowledge management and transfer within this initiative. The first of which focuses on connections and networks that have had previous successes. These connections and networks quite often lie close to home ‘somewhere in my mailbox’ and should be passed on or shared. The challenge specific to this aspect is the inbox pile-up that helps us to forget the connections as well as who and how we should share them.</div><div><br/></div> | <div>Three important aspects constitute successful knowledge management and transfer within this initiative. The first of which focuses on connections and networks that have had previous successes. These connections and networks quite often lie close to home ‘somewhere in my mailbox’ and should be passed on or shared. The challenge specific to this aspect is the inbox pile-up that helps us to forget the connections as well as who and how we should share them.</div><div><br/></div> | ||
* | * | ||
+ | |||
<u>‘The lightening-struck inverter’</u> | <u>‘The lightening-struck inverter’</u> | ||
<div>The second aspect illustrates the value in communicating all information. A case example based on the decision of field technicians in Senegal who chose not to communicate how a mini grid inverter was struck by lightening and as a result was out of commission for two weeks. Since the technicians did not consider the information pertinent, and were also not excited to deliver the bad news, they decided it was better to delay transferring informationThe result was a directive and communication workshops that focused on discussing both good and bad information with the aim to increase efficiency and effectiveness in delivering results.</div><div><br/></div> | <div>The second aspect illustrates the value in communicating all information. A case example based on the decision of field technicians in Senegal who chose not to communicate how a mini grid inverter was struck by lightening and as a result was out of commission for two weeks. Since the technicians did not consider the information pertinent, and were also not excited to deliver the bad news, they decided it was better to delay transferring informationThe result was a directive and communication workshops that focused on discussing both good and bad information with the aim to increase efficiency and effectiveness in delivering results.</div><div><br/></div> | ||
* | * | ||
+ | |||
<u>‘EnDev’s next super failure’</u> | <u>‘EnDev’s next super failure’</u> | ||
<div>In this last example from Peru, the ineffective implementation of solar panels in overgrown fields served as the information that was not managed or transfer. Again, a refocusing on a positive setting to discuss all aspects of projects including worst mistakes was made to provide incentives for a team to talk through problems as oppose to punishment. There is also additional emphasis on the shared benefits gained by the entire organization in discussing and problem solving internal failures.</div><div><br/></div> | <div>In this last example from Peru, the ineffective implementation of solar panels in overgrown fields served as the information that was not managed or transfer. Again, a refocusing on a positive setting to discuss all aspects of projects including worst mistakes was made to provide incentives for a team to talk through problems as oppose to punishment. There is also additional emphasis on the shared benefits gained by the entire organization in discussing and problem solving internal failures.</div><div><br/></div> |
Revision as of 15:09, 13 March 2013
Overview
During the management and transfer of knowledge between diverse groups, such as academics and practicitioners, the North and South, enterprises and investors, companies and clients, and even between diverse academic disciplines, one must find a means to understanding.
Multi-stakeholder interaction requires bridging communication borders with diverse methods and tools that either translate or determine common languages, and eventually turn theory into practice.
Challenges
Like many other processes, knowledge management and transfer is plagued with a myriad of challenges. The most basic that will be touched on in this workshop include the lack of incentives, even knowledge and communication that are foundational to communication capacities. Other challenges ranges from competition for, and confidentiality of information shared. Lastly, there is always the challenge in discerning what information is most pertinent to whom.
Strategies
In developing communication channels and tools, is the need for strategies. Understanding what and where the right forums are for knowledge management transfer can help agents differentiate between explicit and implicit knowledge. Strategies may also help motivate practitioners and academics to contribute to knowledge sharing.
Off-grid Access System in South Asia (OASYS)[1]
Two multi-stakeholder projects are most relevant to this session. They demonstrate micro energy systems that are closer linked to communities at a local level.
OASYS introduced business models for decentralized off-grid electricity generation in developing countries. OASYS started in 2009, with the motivation of researching technical aspects and general cost-effectiveness. The research firstly discovered to main knowledge gaps:
- Lack of knowledge regarding Business Models and institutional arrangements for delivery
- Limited or lack of experience in project scale-up and project sustainability
As a result, two questions arose to explore criteria relevant to the aforementioned knowledge gaps:
- Are there cost-effective and reliable off-grid electricity supply solutions that can meet the present & future needs, are socially acceptable, institutionally viable and environmentally desirable?’
- Do these local solutions have the scaling-up and replication potentials and can these solutions be brought to the mainstream for wider electricity access in the developing world?”
Geographical Scope & Analysis Dimensions
To help guide and direct the research, the geographical area of South Asia was decided as the region to apply a multi-dimensional analysis strategy. Since roughly half of all people without access to electricity are found in South Asia, in addition to the region housing some of the best examples of decentralized energy, it was determined as the most suitable geographical scope of the project. Elements in the multi-dimensional analysis include four angles of focus: techno-economic analysis, governance mechanisms, socio-political dimension, as well as environmental aspects. Also, four cross-cutting themes were defined through the research: capacity building, cross-referencing, cross-learning, dissemination for policy translation.
Research Team & Partners
- University of Dundee/De Montfort University
- School of Environment & Development, Manchester University
- Edinburgh Napier University
- The Energy and Resources Institute
- TERI University
- UK Research Council
- DFID
Research Objectives
The objective of the research and its activities was to transfer successful examples to new places. In addition to the comparative study of grid versus off-grid electrification processes as well as South Asian versus international regional, the research also tried to review existing projects and programs through literature reviews of roughly 100 research papers. The process was time consuming and difficult, but necessary to establish good base knowledge. A technologically independent framework was also developed as part of the research, as context resources determined the existence and feasibility to implement technology. Throughout the process, the cooperation between practitioners as well as academics was also emphasized.
The Solar Transitions Project
Human Diversity as a Success Factor
Sub-Factors
</div></div>
Challenges of Knowledge Management[2]
Successes and Barriers to Knowledge Management & Transfer
‘Wait, I have it somewhere in my mailbox’
‘The lightening-struck inverter’
‘EnDev’s next super failure’
Challenges
Connecting Knowldege for a Sustainable Future[3]
Visions & Missions
Challenges & Opportunities
Discussion
Further Information
- Minutes:
References